Sultan of Sultans
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (November 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
As with various other laudatory titles of Semitic origin, such as "King of Kings", Sultan of Sultans can express a claim of imperial rank up to and including universal legitimate sovereignty. Although the notion and title of an emperor is largely alien to Islamic tradition, the Ottoman dynasty, which employed the title of "Sultan of Sultans" in its official full style, had perhaps the best claim to usage due to its territorial extent and great length. The Ottomans also adopted the traditional Byzantine imperial title Caesar for their own ruler (the Padishah).
The Sultans of Delhi Sultanate used this title to signify their rule over entire Indian subcontinent as hundred of Indian Rajas (Prince) ruled under their suzerainty. But they also considered themselves beneath the Caliph however they were independent.
The title has also been appropriated for local use by various regional Muslim rulers, especially in Bengal Sultanate.
The Shahanshah (Persian for "King of Kings") of Iran also claimed, with slightly less legitimacy, to be the "Sultan of Sultans". These assertions were tied to the conflict between the Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam.
- G. W. Prothero, Stanley Leathes, Sir Adolphus William Ward, John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton Acton (Baron.). The Cambridge Modern History. CUP Archive. p. 95. Retrieved 20 November 2014.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
|This Islam-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|