Open main menu
Incised stream in the Ecuadorian Andes in Cayambe Canton.

River incision is the narrow erosion caused by a river or stream that is far from its base level. River incision is common after tectonic uplift of the landscape. Incision by multiple rivers result in a dissected landscape, for example a dissected plateau. River Incision is the natural process by which a river cuts downward into its bed, deepening the active channel. Though it is a natural process, it can be accelerated rapidly by human factors including land use changes such as timber harvest, mining, agriculture, and road and dam construction. The rate of incision is a function of basal shear-stress. Shear stress is increased by factors such as sediment in the water, which increase its density (Lague, et. al. 2005). Shear stress is proportional to water mass, gravity, and Sw, where t= Shear Stress (N/m2), g= Weight Density of Water (N/m3, lb/ft ), D = Average water depth (m, ft), and Sw = Water Surface slope (m/m, ft/ft). Increases in slope, depth, or density of water increase the water’s potential to cause erosion (Lague 2014).

Contents

CausesEdit

Traditional logging in the West coast of the United States included many practices which increased river incision. Timber removal and the associated road construction facilitate runoff and thus increased erosion and sediment delivery to streams (Wakabayashi 2001). Increases in sediment increases the water’s stream power, increasing the stream’s ability to do geomorphic work on the bed and banks (Yang et. al.1974). This leads to scouring of the bed material, exposing the bedrock channel bed to erosion and thus faster rates of channel incision (Kondolf, et. al. 2002). The scoured bed material consists of finer sediments such as silts, sands, and gravels. The removal of these removes important aquatic habitats for salmonid species and other aquatic organisms (Kondolf 1997). In many agricultural areas, rivers have been straightened and dyked for flood control and to plant crops in the floodplain (Doyle, et al.). Normally, floods are allowed to spread out across the floodplain, allowing deposition of sediment and slowing water speeds, reducing the erosive potential of the water (Heiler, et. al. 1995). Channelization concentrates flood flows down the active channel, increasing erosion. River incision due to agriculture is well-documented throughout the agricultural regions of the world, such as the Central Valley of California (Florsheim, et. al. 2011).

In-stream gravel mining is also well documented as a cause of river incision. Stable material on the river bed mitigate erosion (Jansen 2006), removing this armoring layer of gravel, boulders, etc. exposes the channel bed to the erosive force of the water. “On the Russian River near Healdsburg, California, instream pit mining in the 1950s and 1960s caused channel incision in excess of 3-6 m over an 11-km length of river” (Kondolf et. al. 2002).

Tectonics play an important role in shaping landscapes and rivers, and tectonic uplift and river incision go hand in hand. Over geologic time, as mountains rise higher, water erodes deep gorges and channels, dissecting the landscape. In some instances, such as the Sierra Nevada mountains of California, up to 1 km of incision has been shown to have occurred over the last 5 million years (Lavé 2001). “River erosion is one of the primary agents of landscape evolution. Outside of glaciated regions, rivers are responsible for sculpting uplifted terrain into arborescent valley networks and creating the relief that drives gravitational transport processes such as landsliding” (Tucker, et. al. 2002). Rivers and streams that cross tectonic boundaries are subject to immense geomorphic change. When an area in the path of a river is uplifted, the river must either divert, or slowly incise into the uplifted area, creating a gorge or canyon (Schumm, et. al. 2002).

EffectsEdit

Groundwater level dropEdit

As a channel bed drops, the water in the surrounding aquifer runs into the stream, lowering the water table. This modifies the flow regime of a stream, and can lead to a large reduction in summer flows (Neal 2009). Prolonged incision can lower the water table to the point where the roots of the riparian vegetation can no longer access it for water, causing the death of the riparian forest and thus a loss of soil stability, contributing to increased sedimentation (Lowrance et. al. 1997). Riparian forests are some of the most productive and diverse ecosystems on the planet and are for this reason the focus of many restoration projects throughout the United States.

Change in hillslope formEdit

At low erosion rates increased stream incision may make gentle slopes to erode creating convex-up forms. Convex slopes around a stream can thus indirectly reflect accelerated crustal uplift. This is because accelerated incision may trigger accelerated erosion on the adjacent slopes creating slopes progressively steeper slopes that are in equilibrium with high erosion rates.[1][2][A]

NotesEdit

  1. ^ Walther Penck is commonly but wrongly attributed the notion that accelerated uplift leads to the formation of convex slopes.[1]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b Simons, Martin (1962), "The morphological analysis of landforms: A new review of the work of Walther Penck (1888-1923)", Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers), 31 (31): 1–14, doi:10.2307/621083, JSTOR 621083
  2. ^ Chorley, Richard J.; Beckinsale, Robert P.; Dunn, Antony J. (2005) [1973]. "Chapter Twenty-Two". The History of the Study of Landforms. Volume Two. Taylor & Francis e-Library. p. 790.

Further readingEdit

  • Doyle, M. Shields Jr. F. 1998. Perturbations of Stage Hydrographs Caused by Channelization and Incision. International Conference on Water Resource Engineering Proceedings, 5/1/1998.
  • Florsheim, J. L.; Nichols, A. L.; Ustin, S.; Lay, M. (2011). "Identifying and Quantifying Ecological Changes in Channel Bank Systems in a Small California Agricultural Watershed". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 31: B31K–06. Bibcode:2011AGUFM.B31K..06F.
  • Fredriksen, R. L. 1970. Research Papers.. Pacific Northwestern Forest and Range Experiment Station. 1970 No.PNW-104 pp. 15.
  • Heiler, Gudrun; Hein, Thomas; Schiemer, Fritz; Bornette, Gudrun (1995). "Hydrological connectivity and flood pulses as the central aspects for the integrity of a river-floodplain system". Regulated Rivers: Research & Management. 11 (3–4): 351. doi:10.1002/rrr.3450110309.
  • Jansen, J. (2006), Flood magnitude-frequency and lithologic control on bedrock river incision in post-orogenic terrain. Geomorphology. V82, Issues 1-2, Pages 39–57.
  • Kondolf, G. (1997). Profile: Hungry water: Effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management, 21(4), 533-551.
  • Kondolf, G.M.; Piégay, H.; Landon, N. (2002). "Channel response to increased and decreased bedload supply from land use change: Contrasts between two catchments". Geomorphology. 45 (1–2): 35–51. Bibcode:2002Geomo..45...35K. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00188-X.
  • Lague, Dimitri (2014). "The stream power river incision model: Evidence, theory and beyond". Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 39 (1): 38–61. Bibcode:2014ESPL...39...38L. doi:10.1002/esp.3462.
  • Lague, Dimitri; Hovius, Niels; Davy, Philippe (2005). "Discharge, discharge variability, and the bedrock channel profile". Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. 110 (F4): n/a. Bibcode:2005JGRF..110.4006L. doi:10.1029/2004JF000259.
  • Lavé, J.; Avouac, J. P. (2001). "Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 106 (B11): 26561–26591. Bibcode:2001JGR...10626561L. doi:10.1029/2001JB000359.
  • Neal, Edward G., 2009, Channel incision and water-table decline along a recently formed proglacial stream, Mendenhall Valley, southeastern Alaska, in Haeussler, P.J., and Galloway, J.P., Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska, 2007: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1760-E, 15
  • Schumm, S., Dumont, J., Holbrook, J. Active Tectonics and Alluvial Rivers. Cambridge University Press, Feb 21, 2002.
  • Tucker, G. E.; Whipple, K. X. (2002). "Topographic outcomes predicted by stream erosion models: Sensitivity analysis and intermodel comparison". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 107 (B9): ETG 1–1. Bibcode:2002JGRB..107.2179T. doi:10.1029/2001JB000162.
  • Wakabayashi, John; Sawyer, Thomas L. (2001). "Stream Incision, Tectonics, Uplift, and Evolution of Topography of the Sierra Nevada, California". The Journal of Geology. 109 (5): 539. Bibcode:2001JG....109..539W. doi:10.1086/321962.
  • Yang, C. T., Stall, J. B. (1974). Unit stream power for sediment transport in natural rivers. Illinois State Water Survey. Urbana, Illinois. UILU-WRC-74-0088.