Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma

In axiomatic set theory, the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma named after Helena Rasiowa and Roman Sikorski is one of the most fundamental facts used in the technique of forcing. In the area of forcing, a subset E of a poset (P, ≤) is called dense in P if for any p ∈ P there is e ∈ E with e ≤ p. If D is a set of dense subsets of P, then a filter F in P is called D-generic if

F ∩ E ≠ ∅ for all E ∈ D.

Now we can state the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma:

Let (P, ≤) be a poset and p ∈ P. If D is a countable set of dense subsets of P then there exists a D-generic filter F in P such that p ∈ F.

Proof of the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma

Let p ∈ P be given. Since D is countable, D = { D_i | i ∈ N }, i.e., one can enumerate the dense subsets of P as D₁, D₂, ... and, by density, there exists p₁ ≤ p with p₁ ∈ D₁. Iterating that, one gets ... ≤ p₂ ≤ p₁ ≤ p with p_i ∈ D_i. Then G = { q ∈ P | ∃i. q ≥ p_i } is a D-generic filter.

The Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma can be viewed as an equivalent to a weaker form of Martin's axiom. More specifically, it is equivalent to MA(ℵ₀).

Examples

• For (P, ≤) = (Func(X, Y), ⊇), the poset of partial functions from X to Y, reverse-ordered by inclusion, define D_x = { s ∈ P | x ∈ dom(s) }. Let D = { D_x | x ∈ X }. If X is countable, the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma yields a D-generic filter F and thus a function F: X → Y.
• If we adhere to the notation used in dealing with D-generic filters, { H ∪ G₀ | P_ijP_t } forms an H-generic filter.
• If D is uncountable, but of cardinality strictly smaller than 2^ℵ₀ and the poset has the countable chain condition, we can instead use Martin's axiom.

See also

• Generic filter – in set theory, given a collection of dense open subsets of a poset, a filter that meets all sets in that collectionPages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
• Martin's axiom – axiom in mathematical logic that all cardinals less than the cardinality of the continuum behave like ℵ₀ in a specific sensePages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback

References

• Ciesielski, Krzysztof (1997). Set theory for the working mathematician. London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Vol. 39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-59441-3. Zbl 0938.03067.
• Kunen, Kenneth (1980). Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 102. North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-85401-0. Zbl 0443.03021.

External links

• Timothy Chow's paper A beginner's guide to forcing is a good introduction to the concepts and ideas behind forcing.