Pore-C is an emerging genomic technique[1][2][3] which utilizes chromatin conformation capture (3C) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies' (ONT) long-read sequencing to characterize three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structure. To characterize concatemers, the originators of Pore-C developed an algorithm to identify alignments that are assigned to a restriction fragment; concatemers with greater than two associated fragments are deemed high order.[2] Pore-C attempts to improve on previous 3C technologies, such as Hi-C and SPRITE, by not requiring DNA amplification prior to sequencing.[2] This technology was developed as a simpler and more easily scalable method of capturing higher-order chromatin structure and mapping regions of chromatin contact. In addition, Pore-C can be used to visualize epigenomic interactions due to the capability of ONT long-read sequencing to detect DNA methylation. Applications of this technology include analysis of combinatorial chromatin interactions, the generation of de novo chromosome scale assemblies, visualization of regions associated with multi-locus histone bodies, and detection and resolution of structural variants.[2]

Background edit

Although the DNA within eukaryotic cells is linear, it is also intricately folded and packaged to fit within each cell’s nucleus.[4][5] Thus, specific parts of the genome may be closer in physical space than would otherwise appear to be based on DNA sequence alone. The 3D genome refers to how DNA is spatially organized within cells.[4][5] The 3D structures found in the genome include active and inactive chromatin, chromatin loops, and topologically associated domains (TADs). These structures function to regulate gene expression. In genomic and epigenomic research, chromatin structure is most often visualized by 3C techniques,[5] which quantify interactions between loci to construct a 3D map. The fundamental 3C technique is used to quantify interactions between pairs of genomic loci. Methods that are derived from this technique, such as 4C, 5C, and Hi-C assays, allow quantification of pairwise interactions between multiple loci.[6] Other variations, such as ChIP-loop[6] and ChIA-PET,[7] combine 3C with immunoprecipitation assays to detect interactions mediated by a protein of interest. These techniques all involve an amplification step, most often using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A limitation of most current 3D chromatin assays is that they are less useful to categorize interactions between more than two loci, and Pore-C was developed to fill this gap in technology.[2] Additionally, not requiring PCR amplification simplifies the workflow, therefore Pore-C is intended to be simpler and more easily scalable than previous techniques. Pore-C can also be used in populations of cells to characterize topology polymorphisms at specific loci.[2]

Methodology edit

 
Pore-C workflow

Many methods to characterize the 3D genome are variations on 3C technology.[5] Like other 3C-based technologies,[5] Pore-C seeks to characterize the architecture of the 3D genome by determining which genomic loci are in close spatial proximity (within ~200 nm).[2] Similar to previous 3C-based methods,[5] Pore-C relies on crosslinking, restriction enzyme digestion, proximity ligation, reverse cross-linking, and protein degradation steps.[2] However, Pore-C is distinct from many previous methods in its subsequent utilization of ONT long-read sequencing, which facilitates the resolution of multi-way chromosome contacts and simultaneous detection of DNA methylation[2][3]

Cross-linking DNA to protein edit

First, in order to preserve the 3D structure of the genome from degradation in subsequent steps, DNA is cross-linked to DNA-associated proteins, such as histones.[2]Formaldehyde is used for cross-linking, as it joins DNA to proteins with covalent bonds, thus temporarily locking the 3D genome in place.[8] Specifically, after a series of washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells are pelletted with centrifugation, and then resuspended in a formaldehyde and PBS solution. Following a short incubation period, glycine is added to stop the cross-linking reaction.[8][2] By quenching the excess formaldehyde, glycine prevents the reaction from going to completion, thereby maximizing the efficiency of later steps and ensuring the cross-linking reaction is reversible.[8]

Restriction enzyme digestion and proximity ligation edit

Cross-linking generates loops of DNA, with each loop arising from a separate locus.[5] To capture long-range interactions between distant loci, potentially from different chromosomes, these loops are first cut and then re-joined back together based on proximity. Although fragments deriving from the same loop may reanneal back together, sometimes fragments from separate loops will ligate together, thus creating chimeric sequences.[5] The cutting and rejoining of DNA is achieved by the in situ restriction enzyme digestion and proximity ligation steps respectively. Specifically, a restriction endonuclease cuts the DNA to create free ends, whereas T4 ligase is used to join fragments together.[5] Ultimately, these steps result in genomic loci close together in physical space being linked together on contiguous DNA segments referred to as concatemers.[2]

Cross-linking reversal, protein degradation, and DNA purification edit

Next, in order to isolate DNA for sequencing, proteins bound to the DNA have to be detached and degraded.[5] First, Proteinase K, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; a detergent), Tween-20, and nuclease-free water are added.[2] Subsequently, the reaction is heated to 56 °C in a thermocycler for optimal reaction kinetics. Proteinase K degrades proteins, and SDS acts a denaturing agent that disrupts protein structure.[9][10] This reaction results in the breakage of covalent bonds between DNA and protein and removes potential protein contamination.[5] DNA is then isolated and purified, typically using phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation.[2]

Size selection, library preparation, and long-read sequencing edit

Pore-C concatemers undergo size selection prior to library preparation and ONT long-read sequencing.[2] Via size selection, Pore-C is able to detect high-order interactions, which are defined as concatemers containing greater than two DNA fragments. Specifically, Pore-C size selection enriches for DNA sequences greater than 1.5 kb, thereby filtering out shorter concatemers unlikely to contain greater than two fragments.[2] Many size selection methods have been developed for ONT long-read sequencing.[11] For example, Solid Phase Reversible Immobilisation (SPRI) size selection has been used in the Pore-C literature.[2][3] Following size selection, library preparation for ONT long-read sequencing is performed, usually with a ligation sequencing kit provided by ONT. Key steps include DNA repair and adaptor ligation.[2][3] Subsequently, DNA is loaded onto flow cells for sequencing, where each concatemer is fed through a pore, aided by a motor protein.[2][11] Nitrogenous DNA bases are read out by their characteristic disruption of an electric current[11]

Bioinformatic analysis edit

Overall, bioinformatic approaches applied to Pore-C data allow for the inference of pairwise and multi-way contacts between loci.[2] Since concatemers in Pore-C contain DNA sequences that come from different regions of the genome, aligning sequencing reads to a reference genome is challenging. One solution to this problem involves a bioinformatic pipeline using a greedy piece-wise algorithm.[2] Further analysis of Pore-C results depends on the study and what other data types are available.[3]

Applications edit

Pore-C is a relatively new method, so its applications have not yet been fully appreciated.[2] A strength of Pore-C over previous methods is its ability to detect interactions between more than two genomic loci. Such high-order interactions enable the study of cellular processes, such as gene expression regulation at a more system-level scale.[2][3] With statistical methods, Pore-C data can be used to identify cooperative interactions, wherein high-order interactions are observed at a frequency greater than the sum of their expected pairwise contacts.[2] In addition, using ONT long reads, Pore-C can detect DNA methylation, thereby providing an additional layer of epigenetic information to analyze.[2] In the future, Pore-C may be applied to study how the 3D genome changes during developmental processes, such as cellular differentiation.[3] Additionally, Pore-C may be applied to the study of cancer, where the 3D genome is often structurally rearranged, which can result in aberrant gene transcription via processes such as enhancer hijacking.[2]

Use edit

Advantages edit

  • Pore-C has a higher efficiency and fidelity compared to previous methods.[1]
  • The absence of an amplification step that is required in other chromatin conformation capture methods simplifies the experimental protocol. Additionally, bisulfite conversion (as is required in Methyl-HiC) is not required when detecting DNA methylation.
  • Pore-C can detect more higher order interactions than Hi-C and other previous methods,[1] because concatemers can span multiple chromosomes and detect distal interactions. Previously, these interactions have been understudied because of the limitations of previous methods.
  • Because ONT long-read sequencing can detect DNA methylation, Pore-C can be extended to characterize epigenetic interactions and their relationship with chromatin topology.

Limitations edit

  • Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology is costly,[12] and therefore Pore-C is more expensive per run when compared to other chromatin conformation capture techniques.
  • Pore-C throughput is relatively low when compared to other techniques, particularly due to DNA-bound proteins clogging sequencing pores. This can cause it to be less efficient, especially when combined with its relatively high cost per run. However, recent work[12] has shown that the throughput can be increased by treating DNA fragments with proteases to reduce clogging.
  • Because it relies on ONT long-read sequencing technology, Pore-C is subject to the same limitations. For example, longer reads can be less accurate when compared to shorter reads.[citation needed]
  • Because Pore-C is a newer technique, it is relatively unproven and has not been tested to the same extent as other chromatin conformation capture techniques.[citation needed]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c Ulahannan, Netha; Pendleton, Matthew; Deshpande, Aditya; Schwenk, Stefan; Behr, Julie M. (2019-11-07). "Nanopore sequencing of DNA concatemers reveals higher-order features of chromatin structure". bioRxiv: 833590. doi:10.1101/833590. S2CID 209606104. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Deshpande, Aditya; Ulahannan, Netha; Pendleton, Matthew; Dai, Xiaoguang; Ly, Lynn (2022-05-30). "Nanopore sequencing of DNA concatemers reveals higher-order features of chromatin structure". Nature Biotechnology. 40 (10): 1488–1499. doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01289-z. PMID 35637420. S2CID 249217259.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Dotson, Gabrielle; Chen, Can; Lindsly, Stephen; Cicalo, Anthony; Dilworth, Sam (2022-09-20). "Deciphering multi-way interactions in the human genome". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 5498. Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.5498D. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32980-z. PMC 9489732. PMID 36127324.
  4. ^ a b Hafner, Antonina; Boettiger, Alistair (2022-09-14). "The spatial organization of transcriptional control". Nature Reviews Genetics. 24 (1): 53–68. doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00526-0. PMID 36104547. S2CID 252282267.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Patton McCord, Rachel; Kaplan, Noam; Giorgetti, Luca (2020-01-27). "Chromosome Conformation Capture and Beyond: Toward an Integrative View of Chromosome Structure and FunctionThe spatial organization of transcriptional control". Molecular Cell. 77 (4): 688–708. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.021. PMC 7134573. PMID 32001106.
  6. ^ a b de Wit, Elzo; de Laat, Wouter (2012-01-01). "A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization". Genes Dev. 26 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-S12-S11. PMC 3258961. PMID 22215806.
  7. ^ Li, Guoliang; Cai, Liuyang; Chang, Huidang; Hong, Ping; Zhou, Qiangwei (2014-12-19). "Chromatin Interaction Analysis with Paired-End Tag (ChIA-PET) sequencing technology and application". BMC Genomics. 15 (12): S11. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-S12-S11. PMC 4303937. PMID 25563301.
  8. ^ a b c Hoffman, Elizabeth A.; Frey, Brian L.; Smith, Lloyd M.; Auble, David T. (2015). "Formaldehyde Crosslinking: A Tool for the Study of Chromatin Complexes". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290 (44): 26404–26411. doi:10.1074/jbc.R115.651679. PMC 4646298. PMID 26354429.
  9. ^ Weber, Klaus; Kuter, David J. (1971). "Reversible denaturation of enzymes by sodium dodecyl sulfate". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 246 (14): 4504–4509. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62040-X. PMID 5106387.
  10. ^ McKinley, M.P.; Bolton, D.C.; Prusiner, S.B. (1983). "A protease-resistant protein is a structural component of the scrapie prion". Cell. 1 (1): 57–62. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90207-6. PMID 6414721. S2CID 34383066.
  11. ^ a b c Wang, Yunhao; Zhao, Yue; Bollas, Audrey; Wang, Yuru; Au, Kin Fai (2021-11-08). "Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications". Nature Biotechnology. 39 (11): 1348–1365. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01108-x. PMC 8988251. PMID 34750572.
  12. ^ a b Zhong, Jia-Yong; Niu, Longjian; Lin, Zhuo-Bin; Bai, Xin; Chen, Ying; Luo, Feng; Hou, Chunhui; Xiao, Chuan-Le (2023). "High-throughput Pore-C reveals the single-allele topology and cell type-specificity of 3D genome folding". Nature Communications. 14 (1): 1250. Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.1250Z. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36899-x. PMC 9988853. PMID 36878904.