Open main menu

Phaeton (or Phaëton) was the hypothetical planet theorized by the Titius–Bode law to have existed between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, the destruction of which supposedly led to the formation of the asteroid belt (including the dwarf planet Ceres). The hypothetical planet was named for Phaethon, the son of the sun god Helios in Greek mythology, who attempted to drive his father's solar chariot for a day with disastrous results and was ultimately destroyed by Zeus.[1]


Phaeton hypothesisEdit

Heinrich Wilhelm Matthäus Olbers, who formulated the planet Phaeton hypothesis
Sturz des Phaeton (Fall of the Phaeton) by Johann Michael Franz

According to the discredited Titius–Bode law, a planet was believed to exist between Mars and Jupiter. After observing the discoveries made by the German astronomer and professor Johann Daniel Titius (1729–1796), Johann Elert Bode himself urged a search for the fifth planet. When Ceres, the largest of the asteroids in the asteroid belt (now considered a dwarf planet), was serendipitously discovered in 1801 by the Italian Giuseppe Piazzi and found to match the predicted position of the fifth planet, many believed it was the missing planet. However, in 1802 astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Matthäus Olbers discovered and named another object in the same general orbit as Ceres, the asteroid Pallas.

Olbers proposed that these new discoveries were the fragments of a disrupted planet that had formerly orbited the Sun. He also predicted that more of these pieces would be found. The discovery of the asteroid Juno by Karl Ludwig Harding and Vesta, by Olbers, buttressed the Olbers hypothesis.

In 1823, German linguist and retired teacher Johann Gottlieb Radlof called Olbers' destroyed planet "Phaëthon," linking it to the Greek myths and legends about Phaethon and others.[2][3] His ideas were similar to those later advocated by Immanuel Velikovsky.[3] Despite Radlof's precedence, Russian authors of the 20th century claimed that, "The hypothetical planet of Olbers' was left nameless for a century and a half. Only in 1949 did the well-known Soviet astronomer Sergej Vladirimovich Orlov give it the name Phaeton... This name has become established."[4]

In 1927, Kugler wrote a short book (56 p.) titled Sibyllinischer Sternkampf und Phaëthon in naturgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung (The Sybilline Battle of the Stars and Phaeton Seen as Natural History)[5] [6]. Making use of ancient sources, Kugler argued that Phaeton had been a very bright celestial object that appeareed around 1500 BC which fell to Earth not long afterwards as a shower of large meteorites, causing catastrophic fires and floods in Africa and elsewhere. The central idea in Kugler’s book is that the myth of Phaethon was based on a real event.

Theories regarding the formation of the asteroid belt from the destruction of a hypothetical fifth planet are today collectively referred to as the "disruption theory". This theory states that there was once a major planetary member of our solar system circulating in the present gap between Mars and Jupiter, which was variously destroyed when:

  • it veered too close to Jupiter and was torn apart by its powerful gravity
  • it was struck by another large celestial body
  • it was destroyed by a hypothetical brown dwarf, the companion star to the Sun, known as Nemesis
  • it was shattered by some internal catastrophe

The exploded planet hypothesis has also been supported by French-Italian mathematician and astronomer Joseph-Louis Lagrange [7]; Canadian geologist Reginald Daly in 1943 [8]; American geochemists Harrison Brown and Clair Patterson [9], who were instrumental in the new estimate for the age of the Earth; Soviet academics Konstantin Savchenko, Alexander Zavaritskiy, Vasily Fesenkov, Ivan Putilin, and Otto Schmidt [10]; British-Canadian astronomer Michael Ovenden [11][12]; American astronomer Donald Menzel [13], who stated, 'Presque toutes ces petites planètes circulent entre les orbites de Mars et Jupiter. On admet qu'elles représentent les fragments dispersés d'une grande planète qui se serait désintégrée'; inter alia.

Today, the Phaeton hypothesis has been superseded by the accretion model.[14] Most astronomers today believe that the asteroids in the main belt are remnants of the protoplanetary disk, and in this region the incorporation of protoplanetary remnants into the planets was prevented by large gravitational perturbations induced by Jupiter during the formative period of the solar system.

Other hypothesesEdit

Some scientists and non-scientists continue to advocate for the existence and destruction of a Phaeton-like planet.

Zecharia Sitchin suggested that the goddess known to the Sumerians as Tiamat in fact relates to a planet that was destroyed by a rogue planet known as Nibiru, creating both Earth and the asteroid belt.[15] His work is widely regarded as pseudoscience.[16]

The astronomer and author Tom Van Flandern held that Phaeton exploded through some internal mechanism. In his "Exploded Planet Hypothesis 2000", he lists possible reasons for its explosion: a runaway nuclear reaction of uranium in its core, a change of state as the planet cooled down creating a density phase change, or through continual absorption of heat in the core from gravitons.[17][18][19]

In 1972, Soyuzmultfilm studies produced an animated short film titled Phaeton: The Son of Sun (Russian: Фаэтон - Сын Солнца), directed by Vasiliy Livanov, in which the asteroid belt is portrayed as the remains of a planet.[citation needed]

Phaeton in literatureEdit

Several works of fiction feature a supposed planet (sometimes named Phaeton) existing in the past between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, which somehow became the Solar System's asteroid belt.

See alsoEdit



  •   "Olbers, Heinrich Wilhelm Matthias" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 20 (11th ed.). 1911. p. 63.
  • Christy-Vitale, Joseph (2004). Watermark: The Disaster That Changed the World and Humanity 12,000 Years Ago. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Cole, Dandridge M.; Cox, Donald William (1964). Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids. Philadelphia: Chilton Books.
  • McSween, Harry Y. (2004). Meteorites and Their Parent Planets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York Academy of Sciences., Records of meetings 1808–1916 in v. 11–27, p. 872.


  1. ^   Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Phaëthon" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 342.
  2. ^ Radlof, Johann Gottlieb (1823). Zertrümmerung der großen Planeten Hesperus und Phaeton, und darauf folgenden Zerstörungen und Ueberflutung auf der Erde. Berlin: G. Reimer. p. 59.
  3. ^ a b van der Sluijs, Marinus Anthony. "Johan Radlof: The Father of Planetary Catastrophism". Retrieved 2017-03-21.
  4. ^ Bronshten, V.A. (May 1972). Origin of the Asteroids. Zemlya i Vselennaya. Retrieved 2017-03-22.
  5. ^ Kugler, Franz Xaver, Sibyllinischer Sternkampf und Phaëthon in naturgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung,
  6. ^ Sybilline Battle of the Stars -
  7. ^ Lagrange, J. L. 1814. Sur l’origine des comètes-Connaissance des temps pour l’an 1814, p. 211
  8. ^ Dodd, Robert. 1986. Thunderstones and Shooting Stars, p. 54. Harvard U. Press
  9. ^ Brown, H., Patterson, C. 1948. The Composition of Meteoritic Matter III. J. Geol. 56: 85-111.
  10. ^ Bronshten, Origin of the Asteroids, 1971 – Archive.Org
  11. ^ Ovenden, M.W. 1972. Bode’s Law and the Missing Planet. Nature 239: 508-9.
  12. ^ Ovenden, M.W. 1973. Planetary Distances and the Missing Planet, pp. 319-32, in Recent Advances in Dynamic Astronomy, Reidel.
  13. ^ Menzel, Donald. 1978. Guide des Etoiles et Planètes (Les Guides du Naturaliste), 2me éd., p. 315, transl. M. & F. Egger from A Field Guide to the Stars and Planets, Houghton-Mifflin. Delachaux et Nestlé, Paris
  14. ^ "Ask an Astrophysicist".
  15. ^ Sitchin, Zecharia (1990). "Chapter 2: It Came From Outer Space". Genesis Revisited. New York: Avon Books. ISBN 978-0380761593.
  16. ^ Carroll, Robert T (1994–2009). "Zecharia Sitchin and The Earth Chronicles". The Skeptic's Dictionary. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 2016-02-05.
  17. ^ Van Flandern, Tom. org/solar% 20system/eph/eph2000. asp "The Exploded Planet Hypothesis 2000".[permanent dead link] Meta Research, (2000).
  18. ^ Flandern, Tom Van (2007). "The challenge of the exploded planet hypothesis". International Journal of Astrobiology. 6 (3): 185. Bibcode:2007IJAsB...6..185V. doi:10.1017/S1473550407003758. ISSN 1473-5504.
  19. ^ Van Flandern, Tom. Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets: Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated. North Atlantic Books, 1999.

External linksEdit