Open main menu

Pan Am Flight 214 was a scheduled flight of Pan American World Airways from San Juan, Puerto Rico, to Baltimore, Maryland, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On December 8, 1963, the Boeing 707 serving the flight crashed near Elkton, Maryland, while on route from Baltimore to Philadelphia, after being hit by lightning, killing all 81 on board.[1] It was the first fatal accident on a Pan Am jet plane since the airline had started flying jets five years earlier.[2]

Pan Am Flight 214
Boeing 707 "Stratoliner", 3rd 707-121 production airplane, N709PA, later delivered to Pan Am.jpg
The aircraft involved in the crash, N709PA, before being delivered to Pan Am
Accident
DateDecember 8, 1963
SummaryIn-flight explosion caused by lightning strike
SiteElkton, Maryland, United States
39°36′47.8″N 75°47′29.7″W / 39.613278°N 75.791583°W / 39.613278; -75.791583Coordinates: 39°36′47.8″N 75°47′29.7″W / 39.613278°N 75.791583°W / 39.613278; -75.791583
Aircraft
Aircraft typeBoeing 707-121
Aircraft nameClipper Tradewind
OperatorPan American World Airways
RegistrationN709PA
Flight originIsla Verde International Airport
StopoverFriendship Airport
DestinationPhiladelphia Int'l Airport
Passengers73
Crew8
Fatalities81
Survivors0

An investigation by the Civil Aeronautics Board concluded that the cause of the crash was a lightning strike that had ignited fuel vapors in one of the aircraft's fuel tanks, causing an explosion that destroyed one of the wings. The exact way that the lightning had ignited the fumes was never determined. The accident led to improvements in aircraft safety by identifying ways that lightning can adversely affect planes in flight, leading to new safety regulations. It also led to research into the safety of aviation fuel in use at the time, and ways of reducing the level of dangerous fuel vapors in the fuel tanks of aircraft.

Contents

AccidentEdit

Pan American Flight 214 was a regularly scheduled flight from Isla Verde International Airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico to Philadelphia International Airport with a scheduled stopover at Baltimore's Friendship Airport.[1](p2)  It operated three times a week as the counterpart to Flight 213, which flew from Philadelphia and Baltimore to San Juan earlier the same day.[3] The flight left San Juan at 4:10pm Eastern time with 140 passengers and 8 crew members, and arrived in Baltimore at 7:10pm.[1](p2)[4]  The crew did not report any maintenance issues or problems during the flight.[1](p2)  Upon arrival, 67 of the passengers got off the plane in Baltimore.[4] After refueling, the flight left Baltimore at 8:24pm with the remaining 73 passengers for the final leg to Philadelphia International Airport.[1](p2)[4]

As the flight approached Philadelphia, the pilots established contact with air traffic control near Philadelphia at 8:42pm, who told the pilots that the airport was experiencing a line of thunderstorms in the vicinity of the airport, accompanied by strong winds and turbulence.[1](p3)  The controller asked if the pilots wanted to proceed directly to the airport, or to enter a holding pattern to wait for the storm to pass.[1](p3)  The pilots elected to hold, at 5000 feet, in a holding pattern with five other aircraft.[5] The air traffic controller told them that the delay would be approximately 30 minutes.[1](p3)   There was heavy rain in the holding area, with frequent lightning and gusts of wind up to 50 miles per hour.[2]

At 8:58pm, the aircraft exploded.[6] The pilots were able to transmit a final message, "MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY. Clipper 214 out of control.  Here we go."[7]   Seconds later, the first officer of National Airlines Flight 16, holding 1000 feet higher in the same holding pattern, radioed in, "Clipper 214 is going down in flames".[7]    The aircraft crashed at 8:59pm in a corn field east of Elkton, Maryland, near the Delaware Turnpike, setting the rain-soaked field on fire.[2][1](pp1,3) The aircraft was completely destroyed, and all of the occupants were killed.[1](p1)

The crash was the first Pan American jet plane to crash in the five years they had been flown by the airline.[2] It was the 10th fatal accident involving the Boeing 707, and at the time it was the fourth highest number of fatalities in an aviation accident in U.S. history.[6]

AftermathEdit

 
Wreckage from the flight after the crash

After the crash, witnesses and residents rushed to the scene of the crash, but there was little that could be done other than begin the collection of bodies.[2] First responders and police from across the county, along with men from the Bainbridge Naval Training Center assisted with the recovery.[8] One firefighter, Steward Godwin, collapsed at the scene at about 1:30 am of a heart attack.[8] On the seventh day, a memorial service was held at the crash site.[8] It took the state medical examiner nine days to identify all of the bodies, using fingerprints, dental records, and nearby personal effects.[8] In some cases, the team reconstructed the victims' faces as much as possible using mannequins.[8]

The main impact crater contained most of the aircraft's fuselage, the left inner wing, the left main gear, and the nose gear.[1](p5). Portions of the plane's right wing and fuselage, right main landing gear, horizontal and vertical tail surfaces, and two of the engines were found within 360 feet of the crater.[1](p4) A trail of debris from the plane extended as far as four miles from the point of impact.[1](p4) The complete left wing tip was found a little under two miles from the crash site.[1](pp5-6) Parts of the wreckage ripped a 40-foot-wide hole in a country road, shattered windows in a home in the area, and spread burning jet fuel across a wide area.[2][4]

The Civil Aeronautics Board was notified of the accident and was dispatched from Washington, DC to conduct an investigation.[1](p14)[2] Witnesses of the crash described hearing the explosion and seeing the plane in flames as it went down.[2] Of the 140 witnesses interviewed, 99 reported seeing an aircraft or a flaming object in the sky.[1](p4) Seven witnesses stated that they saw lightning strike the aircraft.[1](p4) Seventy-two witnesses said the ball of fire occurred at the same time or immediately after the lightning strike.[1](p4) Twenty three witnesses reported that the aircraft exploded after they saw the plane on fire.[1](p4)

AircraftEdit

The aircraft involved was a Boeing 707-121 registered with tail number N709PA.[6] Named the "Clipper Tradewind", it was the oldest jet aircraft in the U.S. commercial jet fleet at the time of the crash.[6][4] It had been delivered to Pan American on 27 October 1958 and had flown a total of 14,609 hours.[1](p14) It was powered by four Pratt & Whitney JT3C-6 turbojet engines. At the time of the accident, the aircraft was estimated to have a book value of $3,400,000 (equivalent to $27,800,000 in 2018).[9]

Nearly five years earlier, in 1959, the same aircraft had been involved in an incident when the right outboard engine had been torn from the wing during a training flight in France. The plane entered a sudden spin during a demonstration of the aircraft's minimum control speed, and the aerodynamic forces caused the engine to break away.[10] The pilot regained control of the aircraft and landed safely in London using the remaining three engines.[10] The detached engine fell into a field on a farm southwest of Paris, where the flight had originated, with no injuries.[10]

Passengers and CrewEdit

The plane carried 73 passengers, who all died in the crash.[1](p1) All but four of the passengers were residents of the United States, the remaining four were from Puerto Rico.[11]

The pilot of the plane was George F. Knuth, 45, of Long Island.[11] He had flown for Pan Am for 22 years and had accumulated 17,049 hours of flying experience, including 2890 in the Boeing 707.[8] He had been involved in another incident in 1949, when as pilot of Pan Am Flight 100, a Lockheed Constellation in flight over Port Washington, New York, a Cessna 140 single-engine airplane crashed into his plane. The two occupants of the Cessna were killed in the accident, but Captain Knuth was able to land safely with no injuries to the Pan Am flight.[12][13]

The first officer of the flight was John R. Dale, 48, of Long Island.[11] He had a total of 13,963 hours of flying time, of which 2,681 were in the Boeing 707.[1](p14) The second officer was Paul L. Orringer, age 42, of New Rochelle, New York.[11] He had 10,008 hours of flying experience, including 2,808 in Boeing 707 aircraft.[1](p14) The flight engineer was John R. Kantlehner, of Long Island.[11] He had a total flying time of 6,066 hours, including 76 hours in the Boeing 707.[1](p14)

InvestigationEdit

 
A CAB engineer examines the badly damaged flight recorder of Pan Am Flight 214
 
Diagram showing Flight 214's fuel tank layout.

The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) assigned more than a dozen investigators within an hour of the crash.[4] They were assisted by investigators from the Boeing Company, Pan American World Airways, the Air Line Pilots Association, Pratt & Whitney Co., the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Federal Aviation Agency.[4] The costs of investigations by the CAB at the time rarely exceeded $10,000, but the agency would spend about $125,000 investigating this crash (equivalent to $1,020,000 in 2018), in addition to the costs Boeing Company, the Federal Aviation Administration, the engine manufacturer, and other aircraft parts suppliers spent conducting additional investigations.[14](p31)

Initial theories of the cause of the crash focused on the possibility that the plane had experienced severe turbulence in flight that had caused a fuel tank or fuel line to rupture, leading to an in-flight fire from leaking fuel.[4][15] Rep. Samuel S. Stratton of Schenectady, New York, sent a telegram to the Federal Aviation Administration urging them to restrict jet operations in turbulent weather, but the FAA responded that it saw no pattern that suggested the need for such restrictions, and the Boeing Company concurred.[15] Other possibilities of the cause of the crash included sabotage or that the aircraft had been hit by lightning, but by nightfall after the first day, investigators had not found evidence or either.[4] There was also some speculation that metal fatigue as a result of the aircraft's 1959 incident could be involved in the crash, but the aircraft had gone through four separate maintenance overhauls since the accident without any detection of issues.[4]

Investigators rapidly located the flight data recorder, but it was badly damaged in the crash.[4][16] Built to withstand an impact 100 times as strong as the force of gravity, it had been subjected to a force of 200 times the force of gravity, and its tape appeared to be hopelessly damaged.[14](p32) Alan S. Boyd, chairman of the CAB, told reporters shortly after the accident, "It was so compacted there is no way to tell at this time whether we can derive any useful information from it."[16] Eventually, investigators were able to extract data from 95 percent of the tape that had been in the recorder.[1](p8)

The recovery of the wreckage took place over a period of 12 days, and 16 truckloads of the debris was taken to Bolling Air Force Base in Washington, DC for investigators to examine and reassemble.[8] Investigators revealed that there was evidence of a fire that occurred in flight, and one commented that it was nearly certain that there had been an explosion of some kind before it crashed.[16] Eyewitness testimony later confirmed that the plane had been burning on its way down to the crash site.[17]

Within days, investigators reported that it was apparent that the crash had been caused by an explosion that had blown off one of the wing tips of the airplane.[18] The wing tip had been found about 3 miles from the crash site bearing burn marks and bulging from an apparent internal explosive force.[18] Remnants of nine feet of the wing tip had been found at various points along the flight path short of the impact crater.[18] Investigators revealed that it was unlikely that rough turbulence had caused the crash because the crews of other aircraft that had been circling in the area reported that the air was relatively smooth at the time of the crash.[18] They also said that the plane would have had to dive a considerable distance before aerodynamic forces would cause it to break up and explode, but all evidence pointed to the fact that it had caught fire at around its cruising altitude of 5,000 feet.[18]

Before this flight, there had been no other known case of lightning causing a plane to crash despite many instances of planes being stuck.[18] Investigators found that on average, every airplane is struck by lightning once or twice a year.[19] Scientists and airline industry representatives vigorously disputed the theory that lightning could caused the aircraft to explode, calling it improbable.[8] The closest example of such an instance occurred near Milan, Italy in June 1959 where a Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation had crashed as a result of static electricity igniting fuel vapor coming from the fuel vents.[18] Despite the opposition, investigators found multiple lightning strike marks on the left wing tip, and a large area of damage that extended along the rear edge of the wing, leading investigators to believe that lightning was the cause.[14](p34) The CAB launched an urgent research program in an attempt to identify conditions in which fuel vapors in the wings could have been ignited by lightning.[18] Within a week of the crash, the FAA issued an order requiring the installation of static electricity dischargers on the approximately 100 Boeing jet airliners that had not already been equipped with them.[20][14](p22) Aviation industry representatives criticized the order, saying there was no evidence that the dischargers would have any beneficial effect since they were never designed for lightning, and the order would create a false impression that the risk of lightning strikes had been resolved.[20]

The Civil Aeronautics Board conducted a public hearing in Philadelphia in February 1964 as part of their investigation.[1](p14). Experts had still not concluded that lightning had caused the accident, but they were investigating different ways lightning could have triggered the explosion.[21] The FAA said that it was going to conduct research to determine the relative safety of the two types of jet fuel used in the United States.[22] Criticism of the JP-4 jet fuel that had been present in a mixture in Pan Am 214's fuel tanks centered around the fact that its vapors can be easily ignited at the low temperatures encountered in flight.[22] JP-4 advocates countered that the fuel was as safe or safer than kerosene, the other fuel used in jets at the time.[22]

Pan American World Airways conducted a flight test in a Boeing 707 to investigate whether fuel could leak from the tank venting system during a test flight that attempted to simulate moderate to rough turbulence in flight. The test did not reveal any fuel discharge, but there was evidence that fuel had entered the vent system, collected in the surge tanks, and returned to the fuel tanks.[1](p9) Pan American said that it would be testing a new system to inject inert gas into the air spaces above the fuel tanks in aircraft in an attempt to reduce the risk of hazardous fuel-air mixtures.[21]

On 3 March 1965, the Civil Aeronautics Board released the final accident report.[23] The investigators concluded that a lightning strike had ignited the fuel-air mixture in the number 1 reserve fuel tank, which had caused an explosive disintegration of the left outer wing, leading to a loss of control.[1](p1) Despite one of the most intensive research efforts in its history, the agency could not identify the exact mechanics of how the fuel had ignited, concluding that the lightning had ignited vapors through an as-yet unknown pathway.[23] The board said, "It is felt that the current state of the art does not permit an extension of test results to unqualified conclusions of all aspects of natural lightning effects. The need for additional research is recognized and additional programming is planned."[23]

LegacyEdit

The crash of Pan Am Flight 214 called attention to the fact that there were previously unknown risks to aircraft in flight from lightning strikes. One month after the crash, the Federal Aviation Administration formed a technical committee on lightning protection for fuel systems, with experts from the FAA, CAB, other government agencies, and lightning experts[24] The committee made commitments to conduct both long-range and short-range studies of the hazards of lightning on the fuel systems of aircraft, and how to defeat those hazards.[25] In 1967, the FAA updated airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes with requirements that the fuel systems of aircraft must be designed to prevent the ignition of fuel vapor within the system by lightning strikes, and published guidance related to that requirement.[24] Additional requirements to protect the aircraft from lightning were enacted in 1970.[24]

Many aircraft design improvements emerged as a result of the new guidelines and regulations. There was increased attention to the electrical bonding of the components installed in the outer surfaces of the fuel tanks located in the wings, such as fuel filler caps, drain valves, and access panels, to the surrounding structures.[24][23] Fuel vent flame arrestors were added to aircraft to detect and extinguish ignition of fuel vapors at fuel vent outlets.[24][14](p36) The thickness of the aluminum surfaces of the wings was thickened in order to reduce the chances that a lightning strike would cause a complete melt-through of the wing surface into the internal components of the wings.[24][14](p36)

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab "Aircraft Accident Report: Pan American World Airways Inc Boeing 707-121, N709PA Near Elkton, Maryland December 8, 1963" (PDF). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 3, 1965. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h "81 on Jet Killed in Flaming Crash Near Elkton, MD". The New York Times. December 9, 1963. p. 1. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  3. ^ "Pan Am system time table, December 1-31, 1963". University of Miami Digital Collections, Pan American World Airways Records. Pan American World Airways. 1963. p. 15. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Witkin, Richard (December 10, 1963). "Turbulence Cited in Jetliner Crash". The New York Times. p. 48. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  5. ^ "Last Words: '...Going Down in Flames'". Pasadena, California: The Independent. Associated Press. December 10, 1963. p. 1. Retrieved May 16, 2019 – via NewspaperArchive.
  6. ^ a b c d Accident description at the Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved on June 12, 2006.
  7. ^ a b "Plane Crew Witnessed, Told About Crash of Jet Airliner". Ironwood, Michigan: Ironwood Daily Globe. Associated Press. December 11, 1963. p. 1. Retrieved May 16, 2019 – via NewspaperArchive.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h McBride, Dara (December 8, 2013). "50 years later, witnesses, families recall Flight 214 crash". Newark Post. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  9. ^ "London May Cover Insurance on Jet". The New York Times. Associated Press. December 10, 1963. p. 48. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  10. ^ a b c "Jet Airliner Drops Engine in France". The New York Times. UPI. February 26, 1959. p. 62. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  11. ^ a b c d e "List of Victims in Crash". The New York Times. Associated Press. December 10, 1963. p. 48. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  12. ^ "Pilot in Earlier Accident". The New York Times. Associated Press. December 10, 1963. p. 48. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  13. ^ "2 in Tiny Plane Are Killed As It Rips Clipper in Flight". The New York Times. January 31, 1949. p. 1. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  14. ^ a b c d e f McClement, Fred (1969). It Doesn't Matter Where You Sit. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. ISBN 0030765102. LCCN 69016187. Retrieved May 8, 2019 – via archive.org.
  15. ^ a b Witkin, Richard (December 11, 1963). "U.S. Sees No Need to Restrict Jets". The New York Times. p. 94. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  16. ^ a b c "CAB Probes Wreckage of Crashed Jet". Pasadena, California: The Independent. Associated Press. December 10, 1963. p. 1. Retrieved May 16, 2019 – via NewspaperArchive.
  17. ^ "Eyewitnesses Bear Out Supposition That Airliner Was Hit By Lightning". New Castle, Pennsylvania: New Castle News. UPI. February 25, 1964. p. 1. Retrieved May 16, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h Witkin, Richard (December 13, 1963). "Bolt of Lightning May Have Hit Jet". The New York Times. p. 51. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
  19. ^ "Lessons Learned from Civil Aviation Accidents: Pan Am Flight 214 at Elkton, Maryland - Accident overview". Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved May 15, 2019.
  20. ^ a b Witkin, Richard (December 18, 1963). "Lightning Danger Stirs Air Experts". The New York Times. p. 59. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  21. ^ a b Hudson, Edward (February 27, 1964). "Pan Am To Test Fuel Safeguard". The New York Times. p. 63. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  22. ^ a b c Hudson, Edward (February 26, 1964). "F.A.A. Will Study Jet Fuel Safety". The New York Times. p. 21. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  23. ^ a b c d "C.A.B. Fails to Fix Cause of a Crash". The New York Times. UPI. March 4, 1965. p. 63. Retrieved May 16, 2019.
  24. ^ a b c d e f "Lessons Learned from Civil Aviation Accidents: Pan Am Flight 214 at Elkton, Maryland - Resulting Safety Initiatives". Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved May 19, 2019.
  25. ^ "Program for Investigation of Aircraft Lightning Protection Measures" (PDF). Federal Aviation Agency. January 6, 1964. Retrieved May 15, 2019.

External linksEdit