In mathematics, specifically the algebraic theory of fields, a normal basis is a special kind of basis for Galois extensions of finite degree, characterised as forming a single orbit for the Galois group. The normal basis theorem states that any finite Galois extension of fields has a normal basis. In algebraic number theory, the study of the more refined question of the existence of a normal integral basis is part of Galois module theory.

Normal basis theorem edit

Let   be a Galois extension with Galois group  . The classical normal basis theorem states that there is an element   such that   forms a basis of K, considered as a vector space over F. That is, any element   can be written uniquely as   for some elements  

A normal basis contrasts with a primitive element basis of the form  , where   is an element whose minimal polynomial has degree  .

Group representation point of view edit

A field extension K / F with Galois group G can be naturally viewed as a representation of the group G over the field F in which each automorphism is represented by itself. Representations of G over the field F can be viewed as left modules for the group algebra F[G]. Every homomorphism of left F[G]-modules   is of form   for some  . Since   is a linear basis of F[G] over F, it follows easily that   is bijective iff   generates a normal basis of K over F. The normal basis theorem therefore amounts to the statement saying that if K / F is finite Galois extension, then   as left  -module. In terms of representations of G over F, this means that K is isomorphic to the regular representation.

Case of finite fields edit

For finite fields this can be stated as follows:[1] Let   denote the field of q elements, where q = pm is a prime power, and let   denote its extension field of degree n ≥ 1. Here the Galois group is   with   a cyclic group generated by the q-power Frobenius automorphism  with   Then there exists an element βK such that

 
is a basis of K over F.

Proof for finite fields edit

In case the Galois group is cyclic as above, generated by   with   the normal basis theorem follows from two basic facts. The first is the linear independence of characters: a multiplicative character is a mapping χ from a group H to a field K satisfying  ; then any distinct characters   are linearly independent in the K-vector space of mappings. We apply this to the Galois group automorphisms   thought of as mappings from the multiplicative group  . Now  as an F-vector space, so we may consider   as an element of the matrix algebra Mn(F); since its powers   are linearly independent (over K and a fortiori over F), its minimal polynomial must have degree at least n, i.e. it must be  .

The second basic fact is the classification of finitely generated modules over a PID such as  . Every such module M can be represented as  , where   may be chosen so that they are monic polynomials or zero and   is a multiple of  .   is the monic polynomial of smallest degree annihilating the module, or zero if no such non-zero polynomial exists. In the first case  , in the second case  . In our case of cyclic G of size n generated by   we have an F-algebra isomorphism   where X corresponds to  , so every  -module may be viewed as an  -module with multiplication by X being multiplication by  . In case of K this means  , so the monic polynomial of smallest degree annihilating K is the minimal polynomial of  . Since K is a finite dimensional F-space, the representation above is possible with  . Since   we can only have  , and   as F[X]-modules. (Note this is an isomorphism of F-linear spaces, but not of rings or F-algebras.) This gives isomorphism of  -modules   that we talked about above, and under it the basis   on the right side corresponds to a normal basis   of K on the left.

Note that this proof would also apply in the case of a cyclic Kummer extension.

Example edit

Consider the field   over  , with Frobenius automorphism  . The proof above clarifies the choice of normal bases in terms of the structure of K as a representation of G (or F[G]-module). The irreducible factorization

 
means we have a direct sum of F[G]-modules (by the Chinese remainder theorem):
 
The first component is just  , while the second is isomorphic as an F[G]-module to   under the action   (Thus   as F[G]-modules, but not as F-algebras.)

The elements   which can be used for a normal basis are precisely those outside either of the submodules, so that   and  . In terms of the G-orbits of K, which correspond to the irreducible factors of:

 
the elements of   are the roots of  , the nonzero elements of the submodule   are the roots of  , while the normal basis, which in this case is unique, is given by the roots of the remaining factor  .

By contrast, for the extension field   in which n = 4 is divisible by p = 2, we have the F[G]-module isomorphism

 
Here the operator   is not diagonalizable, the module L has nested submodules given by generalized eigenspaces of  , and the normal basis elements β are those outside the largest proper generalized eigenspace, the elements with  .

Application to cryptography edit

The normal basis is frequently used in cryptographic applications based on the discrete logarithm problem, such as elliptic curve cryptography, since arithmetic using a normal basis is typically more computationally efficient than using other bases.

For example, in the field   above, we may represent elements as bit-strings:

 
where the coefficients are bits   Now we can square elements by doing a left circular shift,  , since squaring β4 gives β8 = β. This makes the normal basis especially attractive for cryptosystems that utilize frequent squaring.

Proof for the case of infinite fields edit

Suppose   is a finite Galois extension of the infinite field F. Let [K : F] = n,  , where  . By the primitive element theorem there exists   such   and  . Let us write  .  's (monic) minimal polynomial f over K is the irreducible degree n polynomial given by the formula

 
Since f is separable (it has simple roots) we may define
 
In other words,
 
Note that   and   for  . Next, define an   matrix A of polynomials over K and a polynomial D by
 
Observe that  , where k is determined by  ; in particular   iff  . It follows that   is the permutation matrix corresponding to the permutation of G which sends each   to  . (We denote by   the matrix obtained by evaluating   at  .) Therefore,  . We see that D is a non-zero polynomial, and therefore it has only a finite number of roots. Since we assumed F is infinite, we can find   such that  . Define
 
We claim that   is a normal basis. We only have to show that   are linearly independent over F, so suppose   for some  . Applying the automorphism   yields   for all i. In other words,  . Since  , we conclude that  , which completes the proof.

It is tempting to take   because  . But this is impermissible because we used the fact that   to conclude that for any F-automorphism   and polynomial   over   the value of the polynomial   at a equals  .

Primitive normal basis edit

A primitive normal basis of an extension of finite fields E / F is a normal basis for E / F that is generated by a primitive element of E, that is a generator of the multiplicative group K×. (Note that this is a more restrictive definition of primitive element than that mentioned above after the general normal basis theorem: one requires powers of the element to produce every non-zero element of K, not merely a basis.) Lenstra and Schoof (1987) proved that every finite field extension possesses a primitive normal basis, the case when F is a prime field having been settled by Harold Davenport.

Free elements edit

If K / F is a Galois extension and x in K generates a normal basis over F, then x is free in K / F. If x has the property that for every subgroup H of the Galois group G, with fixed field KH, x is free for K / KH, then x is said to be completely free in K / F. Every Galois extension has a completely free element.[2]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Nader H. Bshouty; Gadiel Seroussi (1989), Generalizations of the normal basis theorem of finite fields (PDF), p. 1; SIAM J. Discrete Math. 3 (1990), no. 3, 330–337.
  2. ^ Dirk Hachenberger, Completely free elements, in Cohen & Niederreiter (1996) pp. 97–107 Zbl 0864.11066