Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Muda (無駄) is a Japanese word meaning "futility; uselessness; wastefulness",[1] and is a key concept in lean process thinking, like the Toyota Production System (TPS) as one of the three types of deviation from optimal allocation of resources (the others being mura and muri).[2] Waste reduction is an effective way to increase profitability.

From an end-customer's point of view, value-added work is any activity that produces goods or provides a service for which a customer is willing to pay; muda is any constraint or impediment that causes waste to occur.[3]

There are two types of muda:[4]

  • Muda Type I: non value-adding, but necessary for end-customers. These are usually harder to eliminate because while classified as non-value adding, they may still be necessary. For example, while an end-customer might not view quality inspection in car assembly as value-adding, it is necessary to ensure the car meets safety standards.
  • Muda Type II: non value-adding and unnecessary for end-customers. These contribute to waste, incur hidden costs, and should be eliminated.[5]

Contents

The seven forms of wasteEdit

One of the key steps in lean process and TPS is to identify which activities add value and which do not, then to progressively work to improve or eliminate them.

Taiichi Ohno, "father" of the Toyota Production System, originally identified seven forms of muda or waste:[6]  

Later, an eighth waste, unused skills, was added.[citation needed]

A mnemonic may be useful for remembering the categories of waste, such as TIM WOOD or TIM WOODS:[7]

TransportationEdit

Every time a product is touched or moved unnecessarily there is a risk that it could be damaged, lost, delayed, etc. as well as being a cost for no added value. Transportation does not add value to the product, i.e. is not a transformation for which the consumer is willing to pay.

InventoryEdit

Whether in the form of raw materials, work-in-progress (WIP), or finished goods, represents a capital outlay that cannot yet produce an income. The longer a product sits in one of these states, the more it contributes to waste. The smooth, continuous flow of work through each process ensures excess amounts of inventory are minimized.

MotionEdit

In contrast to transportation, which refers to damage and transaction costs associated with moving the product, motion refers to the damage and costs inflicted on what creates the product. This can include wear and tear for equipment, repetitive strain injuries for workers, or unnecessary downtime.

WaitingEdit

Whenever the product is not in transportation or being processed, it is waiting (typically in a queue). In traditional processes, a large part of an individual product's life is spent waiting to be worked on.

Over-productionEdit

Making more of a product than is required results in several forms of waste, typically caused by production in large batches. The customer's needs often change over the time it takes to produce a larger batches. Over-production has been described as the worst kind of waste.[8]

Over-processingEdit

Doing more to a product than is required by the end-customer results in it taking longer and costing more to produce. This also includes using components that are more precise, complex, expensive or higher quality than absolutely required.[citation needed]

DefectsEdit

Having to discard or rework a product due to earlier defective work or components results in additional cost and delays.

Unused skillsEdit

Organizations often under-utilize the skills their workers have or permit workers to operate in silos so that knowledge is not shared. This was added to the original seven forms of waste, as resolving this waste is a key enabler to resolving the others.[9]

Alternative Forms of WasteEdit

The eight forms of waste were developed for Toyota specific processes. Companies have further identified such other forms of waste as:[citation needed]

UnsafeEdit

Any unsafe work conditions leading to future value reducing incidents

ConfusionEdit

General uncertainty about the right thing to do, or absence of documented procedures and operating statements.

Self-doubtEdit

Writer Jim Womack[disambiguation needed] described "thinking you can't" as the worst form of waste, quoting Henry Ford's aphorism:

Henry Ford probably said it best when he noted, "You can think you can achieve something or you can think you can't and you will be right.[10]

ImplementationEdit

Shigeo Shingo divides process related activity into Process and Operation.[11] He distinguishes "Process", the course of material that is transformed into product, from "Operation" which are the actions performed on the material by workers and machines. This distinction is not generally recognized because most people would view the "Operations" performed on the raw materials of a product by workers and machines as the "Process" by which those raw materials are transformed into the final product. He makes this distinction because value is added to the product by the process but not by most of the operations. He states that whereas many see Process and Operations in parallel he sees them at right angles (orthogonal) (see Value Stream Mapping). This starkly throws most of the operations into the waste category.

Many of the TPS/Lean techniques work in a similar way. By planning to reduce manpower, or reduce change-over times, or reduce campaign lengths, or reduce lot sizes the question of waste comes immediately into focus upon those elements that prevent the plan being implemented. Often it is in the operations' area rather than the process area that muda can be eliminated and remove the blockage to the plan. Tools of many types and methodologies can then be employed on these wastes to reduce or eliminate them.

The plan is therefore to build a fast, flexible process where the immediate impact is to reduce waste and therefore costs. By ratcheting the process towards this aim with focused muda reduction to achieve each step, the improvements are 'locked in' and become required for the process to function. Without this intent to build a fast, flexible process there is a significant danger that any improvements achieved will not be sustained because they are just desirable and can slip back towards old behaviours without the process stopping.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary, 5th edition, 2003, Tokyo: Kenkyusha, p. 2530.
  2. ^ Emiliani, Bob; Stec, David; Grasso, Lawrence; Stodder, James (2007). Better thinking, better results: case study and analysis of an enterprise-wide lean transformation (2nd ed.). Kensington, Conn: Center for Lean Business Management. ISBN 978-0-9722591-2-5. 
  3. ^ Kato, Isao; Smalley, Art (2011). Toyota Kaizen Methods: Six Steps to Improvement. 
  4. ^ Lean Enterprise Institute, Waste, accessed 3 February 2018
  5. ^ Sayer, Natalie; Williams, Bruce (2012). Lean For Dummies 2nd Edition. 
  6. ^ Ohno, T. (1988), Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production, Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon
  7. ^ Phillips Healthcare Ultrasound Division. "Gemba Tour: Come and see for yourself." 2016. Pamphlet distributed by Philips Ultrasound Factory in Bothell, WA.
  8. ^ "Why is Overproduction the Worst Muda?". Le BLOG. XP Consulting. 4 January 2015. Retrieved 2016-03-29. 
  9. ^ Liker (2004) - The Toyota Way (p.28)
  10. ^ Womack, J., The Worst Form of Muda, published 14 August 2008, accessed 3 February 2018
  11. ^ A study of the Toyota Production System, Shigeo Shingo, Productivity Press, 1989, p xxxi

External linksEdit