MediaWiki talk:Acct creation throttle hit
 | This interface message or skin may be documented on MediaWiki.org or translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators and interface editors. To request a change to the page, add {{edit fully-protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. Consider announcing discussions you add here at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to bring more people to the discussion. |
Wording
editMay I change the wording to something a little less engineer-ish? Maybe something along the lines of:
You have created $1 accounts, which surpasses the maximum allowable limit, and cannot create any more. If you have a special need to create more accounts, please contact a(n) ______ (admin/bureaucrat/steward/dev?) to request a higher number.
I think it would be helpful for admins to be able to grant more accounts to legitimate schools and such. Any ideas? -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 04:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Well, you must also consider the pitfalls of granting more accounts as this could lead to an abuse of the system as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
My suggestion
editYou have created $1 accounts, which exceeds the maximum allowable limit. As a result, you cannot create any more accounts at the moment. If you have a special need to create more accounts, please make a request on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for the limit to be temporarily raised.
Mark 04:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Admins don't have the ability to change the limit. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- True, they do not have this ability. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
AOL
editThere are frequent complaints sent to info-en@wikimedia.org by AOL users about the inability to create accounts. I have updated the text accordingly. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do you know the reason for this inability? --Siva1979Talk to me 03:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} It doesn't seem necessary or appropriate to link "proxy detection" to a google search. There is already an internal link to Proxy server, and if anything "proxy detection" should point to a how-to article. It is biased to use Google for this purpose. Please remove the link. Thanks129.49.24.222 (talk) 21:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Not done I'm refusing this request because Google is the search engine Wikipedia generally uses. Users have a choice between a number of different programs; Google just provides the list. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
