John Robinson (bishop of Woolwich)

John Arthur Thomas Robinson (16 May 1919 – 5 December 1983) was an English New Testament scholar, author and the Anglican Bishop of Woolwich.[1] He was a lecturer at Trinity College, Cambridge, and later Dean of Trinity College[2] until his death in 1983 from cancer.[3] Robinson was considered a major force in New Testament studies and in shaping liberal Christian theology. Along with the Harvard theologian Harvey Cox, he spearheaded the field of secular theology and, like William Barclay, was a believer in universal salvation.[4]

John Robinson
Bishop of Woolwich
Robinson in 1963
ChurchChurch of England
In office1959 to 1969
PredecessorRobert Stannard
SuccessorDavid Sheppard
Other post(s)Dean of Chapel of Trinity College, Cambridge (1969–1983)
  • 1945 (deacon)
  • 1946 (priest)
by Geoffrey Fisher
Personal details
John Arthur Thomas Robinson

(1919-05-16)16 May 1919
Canterbury, Kent, England
Died5 December 1983(1983-12-05) (aged 64)
Arncliffe, North Yorkshire, England
ProfessionClergyman and scholar
Alma materWestcott House, Cambridge

Early life and education edit

Robinson was born on 16 May 1919 in the precincts of Canterbury Cathedral, England, where his late father had been a canon. He was educated at Marlborough College, then an all-boys' private school in Marlborough, Wiltshire. He studied at Jesus College, Cambridge and Trinity College, Cambridge, and then trained for ordination at Westcott House, Cambridge.[5]

Ordained ministry edit

Robinson was ordained in the Church of England as a deacon in 1945 and as a priest in 1946.[6] From 1945 to 1948, he served his curacy at St Matthew's Church, Moorfields in the Diocese of Bristol.[5] The vicar at the time was Mervyn Stockwood.

In 1948, Robinson became chaplain of Wells Theological College, where he wrote his first book, In the End, God. In 1951, he was appointed Fellow and Dean of Clare College, Cambridge and a lecturer in divinity at Cambridge University.[7]

Following an invitation from Stockwood, by then the Bishop of Southwark, Robinson became the Bishop of Woolwich in 1959.[8] The appointment of Robinson as a suffragan bishop was in Stockwood's gift, and whilst the Archbishop of Canterbury (at that point Geoffrey Fisher) questioned the appointment on the grounds that he believed Robinson at that point would be doing more valuable work as a theologian, he accepted that once he had given advice he had "done all that it was proper for him to do" and proceeded to consecrate Robinson to the episcopate. In 1960 Robinson served as a witness for the defence in the obscenity trial of Penguin Books for the publication of D. H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover. Following a ten-year period at Woolwich, Robinson returned to Cambridge in 1969 as Fellow and Dean of Chapel at Trinity College, where he lectured and continued to write.

Death edit

Robinson was diagnosed with terminal cancer in 1983[9] and died on 5 December of that year in Arncliffe, North Yorkshire.[10]

Selected writings edit

In the End, God (1950) edit

Modern Universalist writer Brian Hebblethwaite[11] cites Robinson's In the End, God: A Study of the Christian Doctrine of the Last Things[12] as arguing for the universal reconciliation of all immortal souls. Ken R. Vincent, in The Golden Thread[13] states: "Robinson notes that Christ, in Origen's old words, remains on the Cross so long as one sinner remains in [H]ell. This is not speculation: it is a statement grounded in the very necessity of God's nature." George Hunsinger, author of Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth[14] writes that "[i]f one is looking for an uninhibited proponent of universal salvation, Robinson leaves nothing to be desired."

Jesus and His Coming (1957) edit

In this book, an analysis of the early history of the doctrine of the parousia, Robinson states: "That the heart of the Christian hope was now, once more to 'wait for God's son from heaven', for a second and final coming which would complete and crown the first, is a belief for which we have found no firm foundation in the words of Jesus himself."[15] Robinson further argued that there was a tendency in the early church to alter the meaning of sayings of Jesus that originally referred to his death and ascension into heaven, to refer to an event in the future that had not yet happened.[a]

Honest to God (1963) edit

Robinson wrote several well-received books. The most popular was Honest to God published in 1963.[16][17] According to Exploration into God in (1967), he felt its chief contribution was its attempt to synthesize the work of theologians Paul Tillich and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, both of them well known in theological circles, but whose views were largely unknown to the people in the pews. The book proved contentious because it called on Christians to view God as the "Ground of Being" rather than as a supernatural being "out there". The modifications of the Divine image posited by Robinson have some aspects in common with the psychological deconstruction of God-ideas put forward by his fellow Cambridge theologian Harry Williams in his contribution to the symposium "Soundings" edited by Alec Vidler and published in 1962.[18] When that book was being produced, Robinson was not asked to contribute, because he was then thought to be too conservative a New Testament scholar.[19] This view has never quite dissipated, for in his later books, Robinson would champion early dates and apostolic authorship for the gospels, largely without success.

The media furore concerning Honest to God – one which was to portray him as anything but conservative in the public mind[20] – led to a criticism of Robinson in the Church Assembly (the precursor of the General Synod of the Church of England) by the Archbishop of Canterbury Michael Ramsey, and there were calls from many quarters for Robinson to resign or be deposed. Whilst Ramsey took Robinson to task for his views, Ramsey's pamphlet "Image Old and New" rushed out as a response, did not entirely dismiss what had been said.[21] Indeed, Ramsey would later admit in a letter to Mervyn Stockwood that he regretted the way in which he had handled the matter.[22] The book, which has remained almost consistently in print, proposes abandoning the notion of God "out there", existing somewhere as a "cosmic supremo", just as we have abandoned already the idea of God "up there", the notion of "the old man up in the sky". In its place, he offered a reinterpretation of God as "Love".[23] After endorsing Paul Tillich's assertion that God is the "ground of all being", Robinson wrote: "For it is in [Jesus] making himself nothing, in his utter self-surrender to others in love, that he discloses and lays bare the ground of man's being as Love[24] ... For assertions about God are in the last analysis assertions about Love".[25] While some of its ideas have been taken up by more liberal circles of Christian thought, proponents of the traditional interpretation of Christianity, both Catholic and Protestant, reject Robinson's thesis as an unnecessary capitulation to Modernism.[26]

To what extent this is in fact the case depends very much on the frame of reference of the reader. However, the work of Robinson in Honest to God provided a departure point which would be followed up in the writings of the radical theologians Don Cupitt and John Shelby Spong and in the 1977 symposium The Myth of God Incarnate, edited by John Hick. Whether Robinson would have gone as far as Cupitt did in declaring the idea of God to be an entirely human creation is something which can only be conjectured. However, he said as he was dying that he "never doubted the essential truth of Christianity".[27] Robinson seemed to rapidly become a person upon whom religious people projected their own ideas of what he was like, and the book The Honest to God Debate, edited by Robinson and by David L Edwards, also published in 1963, contains a mixture of articles which either praise Robinson for his approach or accuse him of atheism.[28]

Redating the New Testament (1976) edit

Although Robinson was considered a liberal theologian, he challenged the work of like-minded colleagues in the field of exegetical criticism. Specifically, Robinson examined the reliability of the New Testament as he believed that it had been the subject of very little original research during the 20th century. He also wrote that past scholarship was based on a "tyranny of unexamined assumptions" and an "almost wilful blindness".[29]

Robinson concluded that much of the New Testament was written before AD 64, partly basing his judgement on the sparse textual evidence that the New Testament reflects knowledge of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in AD 70. In relation to the four gospels' dates of authorship, Robinson placed Matthew as being written sometime between AD 40 and the AD 60s, Mark sometime between AD 45 and AD 60, Luke sometime during the AD 50s and the 60s and John sometime between AD 40 and AD 65 or later.[30][31] Robinson also argued that the letter of James was penned by a brother of Jesus Christ within twenty years of Jesus' death, that Paul authored all the books attributed to him, and that the "John" who wrote the fourth Gospel was the apostle John. Robinson also suggested that the results of his investigations implied a need to rewrite many theologies of the New Testament.[32][33][34]

In a letter to Robinson, the New Testament scholar C. H. Dodd wrote, "I should agree with you that much of the late dating is quite arbitrary, even wanton[;] the offspring not of any argument that can be presented, but rather of the critic's prejudice that, if he appears to assent to the traditional position of the early church, he will be thought no better than a stick-in-the-mud."[35][36] Robinson's call for redating the New Testament – or, at least, the four gospels – was echoed in subsequent scholarship such as John Wenham's work Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke: A Fresh Assault on the Synoptic Problem and work by Claude Tresmontant, Günther Zuntz, Carsten Peter Thiede, Eta Linnemann, Harold Riley, Jean Carmignac, and Bernard Orchard.[citation needed]

Bart Ehrman maintains that Robinson's early dates for the gospels, especially those for John, have not been taken up among most liberal scholars of Biblical historicity.[37] Some conservative and traditionalist scholars, however, concur with his dating of the synoptic gospels.[38]

The Priority of John (1984) edit

In The Priority of John,[39] Robinson furthered the argument put forward in Redating the New Testament that all the books were written before 70 AD, by focusing on the book that is placed early least often. He also wanted to prove that John is independent of the Synoptics and better than them at describing the length and time period of Jesus' ministry, Palestinian geography, and the cultural milieu of the early first century there.

This work was put together posthumously by J. F. Coakley according to Robinson's basically complete but unfinished notes for his Bampton Lectures.

Other edit

Robinson was also noted for his 1960 court testimony against the censorship of Lady Chatterley's Lover, claiming that it was a book which "every Christian should read."[40]

Robinson's legacy includes the work of the now late Episcopal bishop John Shelby Spong in best-selling books that include salutes by Spong to Robinson as a lifelong mentor. In a 2013 interview, Spong recalls reading Robinson's 1963 book: "I can remember reading his first book as if was yesterday. I was rather snobbish when the book came out. I actually refused to read it at first. Then, when I read it – I couldn’t stop. I read it three times! My theology was never the same. I had to wrestle with how I could take the literalism I had picked up in Sunday school and put it into these new categories."[41]

The Bishop John Robinson School in Thamesmead, south-east London, which is within the area for which he was responsible as Bishop of Woolwich, is named after him.[42]

Works edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ "It is this shift of emphasis which, I believe, may be seen at work upon the sayings of Jesus and was to prove one of the most potent factors in attributing to him a concern with a second event lying beyond his on ministry. In the course of transmission his teaching became focused not upon the present event whose urgency he was proclaiming but upon another event whose imminence he was predicting. [...] His concern was with the present moment, with the crisis introduced into history by the advent of the Kingdom of God, at work proleptically in his ministry and shortly to be 'fulfilled' in his death and vindication."[15]

References edit

  1. ^ "New Bishop Suffragan of Woolwich". Official Appointments and Notices. The Times. No. 54477. London. 3 June 1959. p. 12, col G..
  2. ^ Who was Who 1897–1990, London: A&C Black, 1991, ISBN 0-7136-3457-X.
  3. ^ "Deaths", The Times, no. 61706, London, ENG, UK, p. 30, col A, 7 December 1983.
  4. ^ Dybdahl, Jon, "Is There Hope for the Unevangelized?", Dialogue, Adventist, archived from the original on 7 July 2012, retrieved 29 November 2007.
  5. ^ a b "ROBINSON, Rt Rev. John Arthur Thomas". Who Was Who. Oxford University Press. April 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  6. ^ "John Arthur Thomas Robinson". Crockford's Clerical Directory (online ed.). Church House Publishing. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  7. ^ Crockford's Clerical Directory 1975–76, Lambeth: Church House, 1975, ISBN 0-19-200008-X.
  8. ^ Crockford's Clerical Directory, 1977-79, Oxford University Press
  9. ^ Belcher, Fred (19 October 2008). "Living with cancer". Sermons from Sherborne. Archived from the original on 3 May 2014.
  10. ^ Saxon, Wolfgang (7 December 1983), "New York Times Obituary", The New York Times
  11. ^ Hebblethwaite, Brian (2 September 2010). The Christian Hope. Oxford University Press. p. 190. ISBN 978-0-19-162508-4.
  12. ^ Robinson 2011b.
  13. ^ Vincent, Ken R (5 August 2005). The Golden Thread. iUniverse. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-595-81105-2.
  14. ^ Hunsinger, George (1 January 2001). Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Wm B Eerdmans. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-8028-4940-3.
  15. ^ a b Robinson, J.A.T. (2012). Jesus and His Coming. SCM Press. pp. 83–97. ISBN 978-0-334-00757-9. Retrieved 23 December 2017.
  16. ^ Robinson 2002b.
  17. ^ McLeod 2017.
  18. ^ Vidler, A. R. (1962). Soundings, Essays Concerning Christian Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.
  19. ^ Vidler, A. R. (1977). Scenes From A Clerical Life. London: Collins. ISBN 9780002168090.
  20. ^ Lewis, C. S.; Hooper, Walter (1998). God in the dock : essays on theology. London: Fount. p. 78. ISBN 0-00-628088-9. OCLC 40052234.
  21. ^ Ramsey, Michael (1963). Image, Old and New. London: S.P.C.K.
  22. ^ Stockwood, Mervyn (1982). Chanctonbury Ring: An Autobiography. Hodder and Stoughton. ISBN 978-0-340-27568-9.
  23. ^ Robinson 2002b, pp. 63, 75, 105, 115f., 127, 130.
  24. ^ Robinson 2002b, pp. 22, 75.
  25. ^ Robinson 2002b, p. 105.
  26. ^ Wright, N. T. (5 April 2016). "Doubts about Doubt: Honest to God Forty Years On".
  27. ^ James 1988.
  28. ^ Robinson, J. A. T. & Edwards, D. L. 1963 and 2012. The Honest to God Debate. London. SCM.
  29. ^ Robinson 2000, pp. 310, 307.
  30. ^ Be thinking, 25 November 2007.
  31. ^ Robinson 2000, p. 352.
  32. ^ "The Historicity of Jesus Christ", The Christian Courier.
  33. ^ Grant R. Jeffrey Ministries.
  34. ^ "Robinson's views on the Shroud of Turin", Shroud story (FAQ), archived from the original on 25 November 2005.
  35. ^ JMM, AU: AAA, 11 February 2005.
  36. ^ Robinson 2000, pp. 359–60.
  37. ^ Professor Bart D. Ehrman, The Historical Jesus, Part I, p. 6, The Teaching Company, 2000. Quote: "Scholars are fairly unanimous that they were written some decades after Jesus’ death: Mark, AD 65–70; Matthew and Luke, AD 80–85; and John, AD 90–95."
  38. ^ Cross, F. L., ed. (2005), "Robinson, John Arthur Thomas", The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, New York: Oxford University Press.
  39. ^ Robinson 2011a.
  40. ^ "Attempt To Portray Sex As Something Sacred – Bishop A Witness For Defence",The Times, 28 October 1960; p. 6.
  41. ^ "The retired Bishop John Shelby Spong interview", Read the Spirit, 23 June 2013.
  42. ^ Bishop John Robinson C.E. Primary School
Church of England titles
Preceded by Bishop of Woolwich
Succeeded by