There is an RfC at one of the cleanup templates in this group, Template talk:COI, proposing changes to the conditions whereby the template may be removed for lack of discussion. --RexxS (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't care that much, but I disagree with the status quo ordering, which Debresser reverted the template description back to.
Since understanding the templates is a prerequisite for being able evaluate whether the issue has been resolved, it should be particularly emphasized. Unless the statement is so obvious as to not merit a mention (in which case it should be removed), understanding is the first step in the chronological order of template removal reasons. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 01:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing this to talk! I have no horse in the ordering race; just wanted to express a strong keep on the understanding statement; wiki needs more friendly common-sense instructions like that! Br, CapnZapp (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Whatever. Debresser (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- @E to the Pi times i. Since you said in your revert that I don't care, I have to correct you: I do care, and I disagree with you, but not enough to make an issue out of it. Debresser (talk) 17:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- If you don't care enough to discuss an edit, then don't revert it. I could have more correctly said "have strong feelings" in my edit summary. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 17:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)