 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Infobox problem
The infobox(or whatever that is) in Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is looking ugly in a book. See this book for example. I want to use the {{Hide in print}} template. First of all, can the template be used on other templates?? I'm also worried that it might affect books of other people(who may not have the same opinion). What should I do?? Roshan220195 (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- This edit shows how to use the {{Hide in print}} template to hide the infobox in one article only; this edit shows how to edit the infobox definition to hide it in all articles. But yes, both methods will affect all users and all books. I suggest you boldly edit the article with a clear edit summary, and begin a discussion if anyone undoes your edit. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- thanks
Roshan220195 (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- thanks
Different levels
An article on a science-related topic would contain all beginner, intermediate and advanced concepts related to the topic. However, if I were to create a book like "Introduction to ...." I would be needing only beginner concepts in it. There is no point in feeding advanced concepts to people who don't have a clue about what the topic actually is. So, I would suggest the usage of templates to mark portions of the article appropriately and an option in the Book creator to choose which portion to include. Roshan (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Animations
What can be the alternative for animations in a book? Roshan (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Can my Wiki book get an ISBN?
G'day there, I am interested to know if it is possible to obtain an ISBN for my Wikibook? If so, what is the procedure? Thanks, Ben Benwebboz (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Some images missing
When rendering the page Shoelace formula using "Download as PDF" the last image (File:ShoelaceMatrix3.GIF) in the article was not included, nor was it listed under Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors. This was brought up before in March of 2009 (section 47), but it was supposed to be fixed in the next update. Nat2 (talk) 22:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
