File talk:Audition-1999-poster.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Film Fan in topic Poster version
WikiProject iconFilm: Japanese File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.
WikiProject iconHorror File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Poster version edit

The other poster appears to make the man's face green and the actress at the bottom is far too blown out in it's white level. I think my poster is more accurate as it doesn't have the green and blown out levels. Thoughts? Let's discuss before reverting. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Seems to me to be a clear case of a not very good copy versus a rubbish copy. As far as I'm concerned, the rubbish copy is the faded one, and while the colors aren't perfect on the other one, it's closer to the original. — Film Fan 21:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
A lot of Japanese film posters like to use special foils and stuff which would only show in certain light. I can't say if this poster does or not but I still think a scan makes things a bit too blown out, and i'd rather have the japanese characters visible and faces clear rather than having the little crab claw looking things showing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand what you're saying, and it's no contest to me - the poster I uploaded is clearly in much better condition. — Film Fan 21:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I still don't agree as you said before. Besides, you say it's closer to the original. Can you show some proof of this? Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
No proof but memory. However, it's undeniable that the poster you uploaded is a significantly faded scan. — Film Fan 22:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply