Draft talk:Oqimta
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Randykitty in topic Why I think the entry should be published
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Why I think the entry should be published
editDear Wiki Editors, I've been comparing this entry with other entries for academic journals in Jewish Studies. While the level of detail might vary slightly across these entries, I believe the information provided here for Oqimta is sufficient and adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines for referencing scholarly sources. Considering the limited number of academic and open-access journals in Jewish Studies, I believe a concise entry for Oqimta is valuable, especially since it highlights the availability of this resource for a wider audience. Thank you for your consideration, Toraumada (talk) 07:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for taking this to the talk page. Two remarks: &/ That other articles appear to be similar has no bearing on whether this draft should be created or not. Perhaps it's those other articles that need to be deleted... See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (aka WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). 2/ This journal does not appear to meet either WP:NJOURNALS (it is not included in any selective databases) or WP:GNG (there are no sources discussing the journal in depth). Hope this clarifies. --Randykitty (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)