Talk:Changzhi Li

(Redirected from Draft talk:Changzhi Li, Professor)
Latest comment: 15 days ago by Limanarui33.1982 in topic Li Changzhi or Changzhi Li?

Li Changzhi or Changzhi Li? edit

Hi. I moved the article from Changzhi Li to Li Changzhi because of WP:ZHNAME. However, I've been informed on my talk page that Changzhi Li might be the right name, and, after checking this article's sources, I agree with the idea. @Limanarui33.1982, since you're this article's creator and main contributor, what do you think? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 01:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello!
Thank you for your question. Professor Li is Changzhi Li in westen way. Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for answering. To clarify, do you think the name of the article be Li Changzhi or Changzhi Li? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 08:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Changzhi Li Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've moved and edited the article. Thank you! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 08:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The article stil mention "This article has multiple issues. ". Can you help me identify them, please? Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
It seems that the issues are:
  1. This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification.
  2. This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral.
  3. The neutrality of this article is disputed.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 10:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. There are 19 different sources. How many are reliable?Moreover Wikipedia even question the date of birth!!! Do they need a birth certificate?!! I deleted it and only left the year....Additionaly I found several other biographies of other scientists with 1 (ONE) reference that didn´t even work!
  2. Of course the sources are closely associated of the subject, otherwise they were not references of the subject.
  3. Don´t understand what it can be not neutral speach. Every sentence is proofed in official entitie´s links, is as objective as it could be.
Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The issue is there's almost no reliable independent coverage about him. Most, if not all, of the sources cited are from places he worked at. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I really can not understand. It´s because the references are from places where he work or worked that they are reliable...no?!
moreover we are talking about universities, international organizations and scholar!
what woukd be more reliable? newspapers?! Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 13:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
See WP:RS and WP:SELFPUBLISHED. There are very little third-party sources cited in the article. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
check this profile: Almudena Suarez as an example. This professor only has 2 references exactly from the site as mine, the IEEE.org and 2 ISBN concerning her books. And there is no issues mentioned when one enter this profile... I tried to put several diffrent sources and don´t know what else to do to overcome the comments.... Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply