This page is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article widely depend on the WP:RAJ sources which are not allowed to use. Sources published before 1947 is considered as the WP:RAJ references and the editor should replace it with other sources before getting reviewed.
Update: Needs modern sources. Most of them falls under WP:AGEMATTERS and WP:RAJ. Imperial[AFCND] 11:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Important Notice for reviewer as well as Administratoredit
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This draft appears to violate WP:NPOV by disproportionately targeting some specific empires which comes under WP:BIAS on the basis of religion without presenting a balanced viewpoint.This draft contains the material which violates WP:SOAP and WP:RAJ Wikipedia refers to the act of using the platform to promote personal opinions or agendas, often in a disruptive or non-constructive manner. This behavior can manifest as excessively advocating for a particular viewpoint , pushing an agenda, or using language that is more characteristic of a persuasive speech or advocacy rather than collaborative editing within the framework of Wikipedia's content policies. In general, Wikipedia aims to provide a neutral and verifiable presentation of information rather than serving as a platform for personal beliefs or ideologies. Therefore, soapboxing is discouraged as it may lead to biased or non-neutral content.As this person is trying to violate Wikipedia guidelines on the basis of WP: VANDALISM please block his IP address by editing Wikipedia. Thanks Kemilliogolgi (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion
This draft appears to violate WP:NPOV by disproportionately targeting some specific empires which comes under WP:BIAS on the basis of religion without presenting a balanced viewpoint.Kindly apply {{db-g13}} ,{{db-a7}} and {{db-g11}}. Thanks!! Kemilliogolgi (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Kemilliogolgi It's up to you to place the notices on the draft if you feel the given speedy deletion criteria apply- though none of them appear to from what I see. I've suppressed them from this page which isn't where they should go. Nothing about Wikipedia requires a "balanced viewpoint" if reliable sources do not provide one. A draft or article does not need to be 100% complete to be included in the encyclopedia or even remain as a draft. BIAS does not refer to a user editing about a particular religion. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I would like to request the speedy deletion of this article, as it primarily focuses on demonstrating the superiority of a specific empire that is linked to a particular religion. This biased portrayal is unfair and should not be allowed to remain on the platform. Thank you!! Kemilliogolgi (talk) 09:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Nearly all sources given by this person comes under WP:RAJ because they were published before 1947 as well this person is trying to claim all the victory of any particular empire which is not possible . There are multiple books that contradicts with it. Kindly remove this draft from Wikipedia. Kemilliogolgi (talk) 09:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Kemilliogolgi There is no speedy deletion criteria related to bias. Wikipedia does not claim to be unbiased, as all sources have biases. Sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves to determine what they believe.
If you feel there are policy based reasons to delete this draft now, the only way you have to do so is to propose it via Miscellany for deletion. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
But nearly all the sources given in this draft comes under WP:RAJ please remove this project/draft from Wikipedia.Thanks!! Kemilliogolgi (talk) 10:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:RAJ is an essay, not a Wikipedia policy. You need to stop flooding this page with messages demanding removal of this draft and either move on to something else, or proceed as I've indicated. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nowadays multiple articles are in running drafts.Those articles related to Infobox campaigns contains false matter and less significance.This is because different books gives different opinions about this type of skirmishes.There is a high suspicion of meatpuppetry going there. Please check if those articles pass WP:GNG. Kemilliogolgi (talk) 10:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
