Draft talk:Bowen fluorescence
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Chaotic Enby in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article has some weird issues. On top of some prose being hard to read, the citations aren't consistent. For instance, you cite a 1993 paper when describing a study that only happened in 1999. Did you write the article yourself, or using a tool such as ChatGPT? The latter are known to be prone to adding "fake references" like this, which might be an explanation. If this is the case, you should verify the whole article to check whether the references given actually support the material that is written.
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)