| Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 21 October 2023 by Spinster300 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. | |
| Submission declined on 4 August 2023 by Chetsford (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 3 August 2023 by Josve05a (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. | |
Stefano De Marchi (born 17 December 1962 in Candiana, Padua) is an Italian mathematician who works in numerical analysis and is a professor at the University of Padua.[1].
He received the degree in Mathematics in 1987 from the University of Padova, the master’s degree in Mathematics and Computer Science in 1990 from the University of Padova and the PhD in Computational Mathematics in 1994, “ciclo VI – Consorzio Nord-Orientale” [2]
He habilitated in 2017 and became a Full Professor of Numerical Analysis at the Department of Mathematics “Tullio Levi-Civita”, University of Padua in 2022.
He deals with interpolation and approximation, including methods of approximation of functions (Method of radial basis functions (RBFs)).
He is one of the discoverers of the so called Padua points, which are the only set of quasi-optimal interpolation points explicitly known on the square, for polynomial interpolation of total degree.
References edit
- ^ "Stefano De Marchi :: Dipartimento di Matematica "Tullio Levi-Civita"". www.math.unipd.it. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
- ^ "Stefano De Marchi - The Mathematics Genealogy Project". www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu. Retrieved 2023-11-14.