 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Significa liberdade (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update) |
Real Patterns is a philosophical concept introduced by Daniel Dennett in his 1991 paper of the same name.[1] The idea aims to reconcile realism with eliminative materialism by arguing that patterns in data can be considered real entities if they are useful in making predictions.
Key concepts edit
Predictive utility edit
The core of the idea is that a pattern is real if it has predictive utility. In other words, if recognizing a pattern allows for better predictions, then the pattern is real in a functional sense.[1]
Compression edit
Dennett also discusses the concept of data compression as a measure of the reality of a pattern. A pattern is more real if it allows for a more efficient encoding of information.
Levels of abstraction edit
Real Patterns can exist at multiple levels of abstraction, from quantum mechanics to social sciences. Dennett argues that the reality of a pattern is not confined to its lowest level of explanation.
Criticisms edit
The concept has been subject to various criticisms, including its vagueness and the potential for circular reasoning.
References edit
External links edit
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |