| Submission declined on 14 February 2023 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 5 February 2023 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CNMall41 16 months ago. | |
Comment: Only sourced to press releases, which are neither independent nor secondary.Awards that are not in themselves notable don't contribute towards an individual's notability, and are usually not mentioned. bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Jonas Nyabor is an award-winning Ghanaian journalist and fact-checker at Dubawa Ghana.[1]
Career
editIn 2012, Jonas Nyabor joined Radio Universe, a student-based radio station of the University of Ghana, as a student journalist, and later became its editor in 2016.
He joined Citi FM/TV as a broadcast journalist but currently works with Dubawa Ghana as a fact-checker and trainer.[1]
Education
editHe studied Psychology and Geography his 1st degree at the University of Ghana.[1]
Awards/Nominations
editHe won the Professional Fact-Checker Award at the 2022 Africa Fact-Checking Awards held in Nigeria.[2]
In 2020, he was awarded the 1st runner-up in the "Best Fact-Checker" category in a Dubawa Fellowship fact-checking awards.[1]
External Link
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c d Univers, Radio (2022-11-08). "Former Radio Univers editor Jonas Nyabor nominated for 2022 Africa fact-checking awards". Radio Univers 105.7fm (Press release). Retrieved 2022-11-19.
- ^ "Former Citi FM/Citi TV staff, Jonas Nyabor wins 2022 African fact-checking award". Citinewsroom - Comprehensive News in Ghana. 2022-11-14. Retrieved 2022-11-19.