The Darwin Awards are a rhetorical tongue-in-cheek honor that originated in Usenet newsgroup discussions around 1985. They recognize individuals who have supposedly contributed to human evolution by selecting themselves out of the gene pool by dying or becoming sterilized by their own actions.

Darwin Awards
Type of site
OwnerWendy Northcutt
Launched1993; 31 years ago (1993)

The project became more formalized with the creation of a website in 1993, followed by a series of books starting in 2000 by Wendy Northcutt. The criterion for the awards states: "In the spirit of Charles Darwin, the Darwin Awards commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own lives. Darwin Award winners eliminate themselves in an extraordinarily idiotic manner, thereby improving our species' chances of long-term survival."[1]

Accidental self-sterilization also qualifies, but the site notes: "Of necessity, the award is usually bestowed posthumously." The candidate is disqualified, though, if "innocent bystanders" are killed in the process, as they might have contributed positively to the gene pool. The logical problem presented by award winners who may have already reproduced is not addressed in the selection process owing to the difficulty of ascertaining whether or not a person has children; the Darwin Award rules state that the presence of offspring does not disqualify a nominee.[2]

History edit

Wendy Northcutt, author of the Darwin Awards website and books.

The origin of the Darwin Awards can be traced back to posts on Usenet group discussions as early as 1985. A post on August 7, 1985 describes the awards as being "given posthumously to people who have made the supreme sacrifice to keep their genes out of our pool. Style counts, not everyone who dies from their own stupidity can win."[3] This early post cites an example of a person who tried to break into a vending machine and was crushed to death when he pulled it over himself.[3] Another widely distributed early story mentioning the Darwin Awards is the JATO Rocket Car, which describes a man who strapped a jet-assisted take-off unit to his Chevrolet Impala in the Arizona desert and who died on the side of a cliff as his car achieved speeds of 250 to 300 miles per hour (400 to 480 km/h). This story was later determined to be an urban legend by the Arizona Department of Public Safety.[4] Wendy Northcutt says the official Darwin Awards website run by Northcutt does its best to confirm all stories submitted, listing them as, "confirmed true by Darwin". Many of the viral emails circulating the Internet, however, are hoaxes and urban legends.[5][6][7][8]

The website and collection of books were started in 1993 by Wendy Northcutt, who at the time was a graduate in molecular biology from the University of California, Berkeley.[9] She went on to study neurobiology at Stanford University, doing research on cancer and telomerase. In her spare time, she organised chain letters from family members into the original Darwin Awards website hosted in her personal account space at Stanford. She eventually left the bench in 1998 and devoted herself full-time to her website and books in September 1999.[10] By 2002, the website received 7 million page hits per month.[11]

Northcutt encountered some difficulty in publishing the first book, since most publishers would only offer her a deal if she agreed to remove the stories from the Internet, but she refused: "It was a community! I could not do that. Even though it might have cost me a lot of money, I kept saying no." She eventually found a publisher who agreed to print a book containing only 10% of the material gathered for the website. The first book turned out to be a success, and was listed on The New York Times best-seller list for 6 months.[12]

Not all of the feedback from the stories Northcutt published was positive, and she occasionally received email from people who knew the deceased. One such person advised: "This is horrible. It has shocked our community to the core. You should remove this." Northcutt demurred: "I can't. It's just too stupid." Northcutt kept the stories on the website and in her books, citing them as a "funny-but-true safety guide", and mentioning that children who read the book are going to be much more careful around explosives.[13]

The website also awards Honorable Mentions to individuals who survive their misadventures with their reproductive capacity intact. One example of this is Larry Walters, who attached helium-filled weather balloons to a lawn chair and floated far above Long Beach, California, in July 1982. He reached an altitude of 16,000 ft (4,900 m), but survived, to be later fined for crossing controlled airspace.[14] (Walters later fell into depression and committed suicide.) Another notable honorable mention was given to the two men who attempted to burgle the home of footballer Duncan Ferguson (who had an infamous reputation for physical aggression on and off the pitch, including four convictions for assault and who had served six months in Glasgow's Barlinnie Prison) in 2001, with one burglar requiring three days' hospitalisation after being confronted by the player.[15]

"Male and female Darwin Award winners: Line H0 indicates expected percentages under the null hypothesis that males and females are equally idiotic."[16]

A 2014 study published in the British Medical Journal found that between 1995 and 2014, males represented 88.7% of Darwin Award winners (see figure).[16]

The comedy film The Darwin Awards (2006), written and directed by Finn Taylor, was based on the website and many of the Darwin Awards stories.[citation needed]

Rules edit

Northcutt has stated five requirements for a Darwin Award:[1][9]

Nominee must be dead or rendered sterile edit

This may be subject to dispute. Potential awardees may be out of the gene pool because of age; others have already reproduced before their deaths. To avoid debates about the possibility of in vitro fertilization, artificial insemination, or cloning, the original Darwin Awards book applied the following "deserted island" test to potential winners: If the person were unable to reproduce when stranded on a deserted island with a fertile member of the opposite sex, he or she would be considered sterile.[17] Winners of the award, in general, either are dead or have become unable to use their sexual organs.

Astoundingly stupid judgment edit

The candidate's foolishness must be unique and sensational, likely because the award is intended to be funny. A number of foolish but common activities, such as smoking in bed, are excluded from consideration. In contrast, self-immolation caused by smoking after being administered a flammable ointment in a hospital and specifically told not to smoke is grounds for nomination.[18] One "Honorable Mention" (a man who attempted suicide by swallowing nitroglycerine pills, and then tried to detonate them by running into a wall) is noted to be in this category, despite being intentional and self-inflicted (i.e. attempted suicide), which would normally disqualify the inductee.[19]

Cause of one's own demise edit

Killing a friend with a hand grenade would not be eligible, but killing oneself while manufacturing a homemade chimney-cleaning device from a grenade would be.[20] To earn a Darwin Award, one must have killed oneself, or rendered oneself sterile; merely causing death to a third party is insufficient.[citation needed]

Capable of sound judgment edit

The nominee must be at least past the legal driving age and free of mental defect (Northcutt considers injury or death caused by mental defect to be tragic, rather than amusing, and routinely disqualifies such entries). After much discussion, a small category regarding deaths below this age limit also exists. Entry into this category requires that the peers of the candidate be of the opinion that the actions of the person in question were above and beyond the limits of reason.[citation needed]

In 2011, however, the awards targeted a 16-year-old boy in Leeds who died stealing copper wiring (the standard minimum driving age in Great Britain being 17). In 2012, Northcutt made similar light of a 14-year-old girl in Brazil who was killed while leaning out of a school bus window, but she was "disqualified" for the award itself because of the likely public objection owing to the girl's age, which Northcutt asserts is based on "magical thinking".[21]

Event must be verified edit

The story must be documented by reliable sources: e.g., reputable newspaper articles, confirmed television reports, or responsible eyewitnesses. If a story is found to be untrue, it is disqualified, but particularly amusing ones are placed in the urban legend section of the archives. Despite this requirement, many of the stories are fictional, often appearing as "original submissions" and presenting no further sources than unverified "eyewitnesses". Most such stories on Northcutt's Darwin Awards site are filed in the Personal Accounts section.[citation needed]

Informal rules edit

In addition, later revisions to the qualification criteria add several requirements that have not been made into formalized "rules":[citation needed]

  • Innocent bystanders cannot be endangered.
  • The qualifying event must be caused without deliberate intent to end the nominee's own life (or fertility). (To discourage notoriety-seekers from injuring themselves purposely to win a Darwin.)

Reception edit

The Darwin Awards have received varying levels of scrutiny from the scientific community. In his book Encyclopedia of Evolution, biology professor Stanley A. Rice comments: "Despite the tremendous value of these stories as entertainment, it is unlikely that they represent evolution in action", citing the nonexistence of "judgment impairment genes".[22] On an essay in the book The Evolution of Evil, professor Nathan Hallanger acknowledges that the Darwin Awards are meant as black humor, but associates them with the eugenics movement of the early 20th century.[23] University of Oxford biophysicist Sylvia McLain, writing for The Guardian, says that while the Darwin Awards are "clearly meant to be funny", they do not accurately represent how genetics work, further noting that "'smart' people do stupid things all the time".[24] Geologist and science communicator Sharon A. Hill has criticized the Darwin Awards on both scientific and ethical grounds, claiming that no genetic traits impact personal intelligence or good judgment to be targeted by natural selection, and calling them an example of "ignorance" and "heartlessness".[25]

Notable recipients edit

Books edit

  • Northcutt, Wendy (2000). The Darwin Awards: Evolution in Action. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-0-525-94572-7.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2001). The Darwin Awards II: Unnatural Selection. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-1-101-21896-9.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2003). The Darwin Awards 3: Survival of the Fittest. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-0-525-94773-8.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2005). The Darwin Awards: The Descent of Man. Running Press Miniature Editions. ISBN 978-0-7624-2561-7.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2005). The Darwin Awards: Felonious Failures. Running Press Miniature Editions. ISBN 978-0-7624-2562-4.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2006). The Darwin Awards 4: Intelligent Design. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-101-21892-1.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2008). The Darwin Awards V: Next Evolution. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-0-14-301033-3.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2008). The Darwin Awards Next Evolution: Chlorinating the Gene Pool. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-4406-3677-6.
  • Northcutt, Wendy (2010). The Darwin Awards: Countdown to Extinction. New York City: Dutton. ISBN 978-1-101-44465-8.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b Northcutt, Wendy. "History & Rules". Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  2. ^ "Darwin Awards: History and Rules". Retrieved February 24, 2020.
  3. ^ a b Freeman, Andy (August 7, 1985). "Darwin Awards". Google groups archive of net.bizarre. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  4. ^ Mikkelson, Barbara (November 12, 2006). "Carmageddon". Snopes. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  5. ^ "2003 Darwin Awards". May 4, 2006. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  6. ^ "2004 Darwin Awards". July 26, 2005. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  7. ^ "2005 Darwin Awards". August 7, 2005. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  8. ^ "2006 Darwin Awards". April 2, 2007. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  9. ^ a b Hansen, Suzy (November 10, 2000). "The Darwin Awards". Salon. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
  10. ^ Hawkins, John. "A Conversation with Darwin (Webmaster of the Darwin Awards)". Right Wing News. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  11. ^ Clark, Doug (November 14, 2002). "Let's hear it for natural selection". The Spokesman-Review. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
  12. ^ John (April 14, 2008). "Pet porn, rocket cars and hand grenades". 123-reg. Archived from the original on August 31, 2012. Retrieved August 31, 2012.
  13. ^ "'Darwin Awards' author dedicated to documenting macabre mishaps". CNN. January 3, 2001. Archived from the original on January 19, 2013. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
  14. ^ Greany, Ed; Walker, Douglas; Hecht, Walter. "Lawn Chair Larry". Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  15. ^ McSean, Tony; Nash, Pete. "Ferguson 2, Thieves 0". Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  16. ^ a b Lendrem, Ben Alexander Daniel; Lendrem, Dennis William; Gray, Andy; Isaacs, John Dudley (December 11, 2014). "The Darwin Awards: sex differences in idiotic behaviour". BMJ. 349: g7094. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7094. PMC 4263959. PMID 25500113. 
  17. ^ Northcutt, Wendy (2000). The Darwin Awards: Evolution in Action. New York City: PLUME (The Penguin Group). pp. 2–6. ISBN 978-0-525-94572-7.
  18. ^ C.J.; Malcolm, Andrew; Sims, Iain; Beeston, Richard. "Stubbed Out". Retrieved August 15, 2012.
  19. ^ Cawcutt, Tom. "Phenomenal Failure". Retrieved August 15, 2012.
  20. ^ Northcutt, Wendy (2005). "Chimney-Cleaning Grenade". Retrieved August 15, 2012.
  21. ^ "Darwin Awards 2012 – too young to include?". December 10, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
  22. ^ Rice, Stanley A. (2007). Encyclopedia of Evolution. Infobase Publishing. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-4381-1005-9.
  23. ^ Bennett, Gaymon; Hewlett, Martinez Joseph; Peters, Ted; Russell, Robert John (2008). The Evolution of Evil. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 301–302. ISBN 978-3-525-56979-5.
  24. ^ McLain, Sylvia (May 9, 2013). "Evolutionary theory gone wrong". The Guardian. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  25. ^ "Why the Darwin Awards Should Die". Sharon A. Hill. July 3, 2017. Archived from the original on December 20, 2021. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  26. ^ Torontoist (January 3, 2013). "Toronto Urban Legends: The Leaping Lawyer of Bay Street". Torontoist. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
  27. ^ "Charles G. Stephens". Niagara Daredevils. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2015.

External links edit