This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Political movements are not political ideologies. Therefore the cleancat tag. Intangible 19:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'd like to enter a Kingsley Amis article, "Why Lucky Jim Turned Right" (1967/1970) that analyzes the mind of the "anti-" leftist. In Amis's case
the emphasis is on anti-England, but applies to the anti-American mindset as
well. Is this the proper place to post a 4,000 word article?
I am trying to address this very issue in all articles about "-isms", "theories", "belief systems", "ideologies", "views", "-ologies", "-sis's" and etcetera. There are far too many of them. In my organization of things I am finding that inevitably we can organize them in terms of being either concepts or theories. Under theories I find that invariably they can be considered either theories, movements or both. I think that is all we need: theories and movements. Everything else should be merged. Please also see User:Gregbard/Concepts and theories.Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
