This category is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why is this listed as pseudoscience? Are we using "pseudoscience" in the sense of "unprovable claim", or "theory that cannot be falsified?" Or do we simply mean an obsolete, discarded scientific theory, i.e., abandoned because it was replaced with Spherical Earth 24 centuries ago? --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
There have been (and are) more modern proponents of the flat earth theory, especially since the writings and teachings of Samuel Rowbotham in the 19th century; they call themselves "Zetetics", and they typically advance their arguments by (1) recourse to the Bible, and (2) purporting to "prove" that the earth is flat using scientific methodology. According to pseudoscience, it includes "methodology, belief, or practice that is claimed to be scientific, or that is made to appear scientific, but which does not adhere to an appropriate scientific methodology, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, or otherwise lacks scientific status". See the Bedford Level experiment for a great example. Good Ol’factory(talk) 22:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
