This category is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Is anybody else bothered by the fact that this category is ungrammatical? "Briton" is a substantive (as in "I am Arthur, King of the Britons"—"King of the 'oo?"); the corresponding adjective is traditionally "British" (or less commonly "Britannic"), though nowadays to avoid confusion/anachronism we might prefer to say "Brittonic" or "Brythonic". We might even forego the adjective in favour of "of ancient Britain". Q·L·1968☿ 02:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Actually, I see there's a 'Category for Discussion' procedure (one of the many things in the WP:* side of the project that I'm blissfully ignorant of). Bear with me if I make mistakes; I've never used this procedure (that I can remember). Q·L·1968☿ 18:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)