The 1604 Arica earthquake is an earthquake that occurred at 1:30 pm on November 24, 1604, offshore Arica, Chile (formerly part of the Spanish Empire). The estimated magnitude range is Ms8.0–8.5 and up to Mw8.7–9.0 and Mt8.8–9.0. It had a destructive tsunami that destroyed moust of Southern Peru, including Arica and Arequipa. 1,200–2,800 km (750–1,740 mi) of coastline was affected by the tsunami. The recorded effects of this earthquake are very similar to those for the 1868 Arica event, suggesting a similar magnitude and rupture area of the megathrust between the subducting Nazca Plate and the overriding South American Plate. Tsunami deposits have been identified on the Chatham Islands that are likely to have been caused by a trans-Pacific tsunami caused by the 1604 earthquake.

1604 Arica earthquake
UTC time1604-11-24 18:30:00
Local dateNovember 24, 1604 (1604-11-24)
Local time13:30
MagnitudeMw8.7–9.0[i]
Depth30 km (19 mi)[3]
Epicenter18°30′S 70°24′W / 18.5°S 70.4°W / -18.5; -70.4
FaultPeru-Chile Trench
TypeMegathrust
Areas affectedArica, (then part of Chile), Arequipa, Peru
Max. intensityMMI XI (Extreme)[3]
TsunamiYes
Casualties100+[3]

Tectonic setting

edit

Off the coasts of Peru and Chile, the Nazca plate subducts underneath the South American plate along the Peru-Chile Trench. At the location of the earthquake, the convergence rate between the two plates is 6.0 cm (2 in)/year. Large events at the plate boundary are relatively common, with similar large earthquakes occurring in 1687, 1784, 1868, and 2001. In the area of the earthquake, the Nazca Ridge functions as a semi-persistent rupture barrier. This inhibits the ability for most earthquakes to continue rupturing through this area. As a result, this earthquake cycle is considered to be bimodal, which means that the recurring earthquake is either a large (up to Mw 8.5) or a truly giant (Mw 9.0) earthquake. Only the 1604 and 1868 events are considered to have been the latter truly colossal events.[4][5][6][7]

Earthquake

edit

Little is known about the earthquake, but it is interpreted to be similar in size and faulting to the 1868 Arica earthquake.[8] The cities of Arequipa, Tacna, and Moquegua experienced shaking of Modified Mercalli Intensity VIII, while Cuzco and Ica experienced VI shaking.[2] Shaking was strongly felt in Lima.[1] The rupture length is thought to be between 400–450 km (249–280 mi) long.[9][10] It is believed that the 1604 event was unable to rupture north of the Nazca Ridge, which means that only the absolute largest earthquakes (such as 1868) can pass through this semi-persistent rupture barrier.[11]

Tsunami

edit

The tsunami was widespread and impacted many countries. The tsunami, along with the 1868 event, is considered one of "the greatest historical tsunami events along the Perú-Chile Trench" and "among the greatest tsunamis ever observed in the Pacific ocean".[12][13] Tsunami run-ups height were estimated to be around 16 m (52 ft) high.[14] It was recorded along at least 1,200 km (746 mi) and potentially up to 2,800 km (1,740 mi) of coastline in South America between Lima and Concepción.[15] Weak waves arrived in Northern Peru.[16] At Arica, the tsunami indundated up to 10 km (6.2 mi) inland.[16] In Oceania, the Chatham Islands have recorded what is very likely evidence of tsunami from this event as well.[17]

Damage

edit

Arica was destroyed and rebuilt after the earthquake, while Arequipa was so severely damaged that only the San Francisco monastery remained standing.[8] Camaná, Moquegua, and Tacna suffered major devastation. In Pausa, a majority of houses were destroyed.[1] In Pisco, only certain parts of the town experienced major damage.[11] The city of Ica was slightly damaged despite being far from the rupture area. Landslides reportedly occurred between the latitudes of 15.5 and 18.5S. Other ground deformations such as cracks and liquefactions occurred as well.[1] Damage was reported across the Pacific ocean.[8] Overall, damages from the earthquake were comparable to the 1868 earthquake.[8]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Mw 8.7–9.0[1]
    Ms8.0–8.5
    Mt8.8–9.0
    Muk 9.0[2]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d Dorbath, Cisternas & Dorbath 1990, p. 571.
  2. ^ a b Wong et al. 2012.
  3. ^ a b c National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service: NCEI/WDS Global Significant Earthquake Database. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (1972). "Significant Earthquake Information". NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. doi:10.7289/V5TD9V7K. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  4. ^ Villegas-Lanza et al. 2016.
  5. ^ Okal, Borrero & Synolakis 2006, p. 1643.
  6. ^ Giovanni, Beck & Wagner 2002, p. 14-4.
  7. ^ Loveless, Pritchard & Kukowski 2010, p. 22.
  8. ^ a b c d Lomnitz 2004.
  9. ^ Comte & Pardo 1991, p. 39.
  10. ^ Dorbath, Cisternas & Dorbath 1990, p. 559.
  11. ^ a b Okal, Borrero & Synolakis 2006.
  12. ^ Spiske et al. 2013, p. 32.
  13. ^ Dorbath, Cisternas & Dorbath 1990, p. 563.
  14. ^ Kulikov, Rabinovich & Thomson 2005.
  15. ^ Okal, Borrero & Synolakis 2006, p. 1638.
  16. ^ a b Spiske et al. 2013, p. 40.
  17. ^ Goff et al. 2010.

Sources

edit