AngelicDevil29

December 2022

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sindh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Uanfala (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Please also note that Wikipedia is not the place to write based on one's own personal experience and knowledge: all content added here needs to be based on published sources. See WP:OR. – Uanfala (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sindhi language. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sindhis. - Arjayay (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Wrong information

This two lines are wrong, that's why I changed it AngelicDevil29 (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lanjwani, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lanjwani. - Arjayay (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sindhis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

In the page of Lanjwani there is no citation, kindly I wanna mention a book by sheikh sadik ali sher ali Ansari AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Chhalgiri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chhalgiri. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 04:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Commendation for work in Sindhis

	Appreciation notice
	Hello, User AngelicDevil29, I have noticed you're contributions on tribe section of Sindhis and I have to say it is a work that is commendable, Please take my salute. happy contributings in advance! ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️

Starkex (talk) 11:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Jamote moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jamote. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tails Wx 23:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jats of Balochistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balochi, Saraiki and Sindhi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lasi people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Angaria and Doda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

List of Sindhi Tribes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Sindhi Tribes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

I have added more three citations. Can you now review the page and publish it. Thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

dear onel5969 I have added alot of citation, and sent it for review but still my article has not been published, kindly publish it quickly, as most of content I have written is from Wikipedia articles itself. Thanks I'm waiting. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your edit on Qaimkhani

Please do not change or vandalize information of sources as you did to Qaimkhani, without giving a valid reason for the change in source in the edit summary. Thank you. No2WesternImperialism (talk) 07:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I just moved the section "see also" into history section. Thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sindhi names into Draft:List of Sindhi Tribes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sindhi tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rupani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Numria Tribe. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

I created numria tribe article and the content is copied from the book i cited on that page. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for Sindhi clothing. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 23:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

ok thanks, I didn't knew how to add attribution, so thank you for telling me, I will put them attribution in future. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 03:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

What about other harassing me? AngelicDevil29 (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

BabbarBaloch was blocked indefinitely. Please be careful not to get baited into making edits that are not acceptable. Instead, let an admin know, such as at WP:ANI. DMacks (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 14:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to The Crafts of Sindh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sindhi Embroideries

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sindhi Embroideries, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Sindhi Embroideries you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes i was about to do it, as the article is still unfinished, you told me last time but i forgot how to add attributions, should i edit it on the content or in reference list? And thank you for putting attributions. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

I already added the attribution by including the template {{Creative Commons text attribution notice|cc=by4|from this source=yes}} at the end of the relevant citation. — Diannaa (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok thanks again, i will use this code in future for giving attributions. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sindhi tribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Hi AngelicDevil29, why you're removing Baloch continuesly and linking the The tribes as per the existing articles and also formatting according to your own concerns ? أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

at the List of Sindhi tribes ? You also removed First Baloch, Then Changes format, Then Removed linked to Pirzada to Pirzado ? Also removed Koli, Afghans and Pashtuns those are also exist in big districts of Sindh province? Without any edit summaries? أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

the spelling are used differently in Sindhi, the pirzada is spelt as pirzado in Sindh, and I did not removed koli tribe only moved it to other tribes section, also koli is spelt as kohli in Sindh, yes afghan/pashtuns, even muhajir and other people do exist in Sindh, but as I said this page is also showing which tribes are real sindhi tribes, also for knowledge that to which these tribes belong to like jats, rajputs or arabs. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

this page is specifically is about Sindhi origin tribes, as balochs are different community/ethnicity, that's why I have removed baloch name, also pashtun/afghan descent is not used, only arabs/mughal/turkic origin tribes are used. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

please revert your edit because Baloch is a vibrant ethnicity in Sindh many independent state before 1947 was ruled many Baloch tribes and still Baloch make big occupation in Sindh province then why you're removing Baloch continuesly , even you removed Pashtun they live in major districts of Sindh and Afghans also those, You Also changed Gurjar to Gujjar that's not about what locally a tribe know dear Brother It's about existing article is Gurjar and Gujar should be replaced with Gurjar, in the same way Pirzado is linked with Pirzada so Pirzada should also be fixed, Here I also one more point when Gurjar is already mentioned at top why you put Gurjar again? Don't take any objections as personal brother أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

dear, balochs are different racial people, they are not sindhi racially, and those independently ruled states are mostly into balochistan province, and you need to understand the purpose of this article creation, this article is only about sindhi tribes not about the tribes living in Sindh, if we follow your way than many foreigners also reside in Sindh but they can't be sindhi tribes, they differently can be tribes of Sindh but not sindhi, also pashtun are different people, how can I use them into sindhi tribes, this is funny. And gujar is normal spelling for tribe/caste in pakistan if you open the article it also mentions gurjar with gujar spelling, same goes for pirzada, and above gurjar, rajput and Jat is used for race or origin purpose not for tribe/caste, gurjars are different racial people. Also I don't where are you from, as I myself am sindhi living in Sindh,having knowledge about Sindh, done lot of research as well, if you want balochs to be mentioned than I can make separate sectuon for it but not for Afghans or pashtuns, they are not sindhis. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Brother lest Talk here what is your concern I also linked one article about Baloch people of Sindh in my last summary Wich also raised strong about the Baloch tribe of sindh what do you think about it.? أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 20:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Thats better lets talk here first, i have added a separate section for baloch and pashtun origin tribes, i hope now you probably wont have any issue, you can add citation into that section. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I'll do request to change at least Pirzado to Pirzada and Gujar to Gurjar and also don't format Baloch, Gurjar, Rajput, Jats sammat formatting to new format Rajput, Jats, Sammat because rajput is not a major tribe of sindh Valley do Format according to their population and what you said Baloch didn't ruled over Sindh what about talpure dynasty and state of Sindh ? And many other independent states kingdoms ruled by Baloch in Sindh all are mentioned on The article of Baloch people in Sindh then why you're not making changes according neutral point of view? what's wrong with Baloch ? Tribes of Sindh ? Lashari, laghari khosa And many subtribes of Baloch live in Sindh then why you're still opposing? I do request to think about it other wise I'll do share my concern with administrators or senior editors because this is totally biased narrative أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

No pirzado is the term used in Sindh, you can ask anybody in sindh, also if you read gurjar artile, you will find alternative spellings of it, and rajput, jat and sammat are major tribes of sindh, all of these not tribes but races themselves, you need to read some history, and please do contact with admins, as im also condused, it will help me too, im being serious thanks. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I am also from Sindh Karachi I do request to read Baloch people in Sindh also check refrences and census reports of Sindh Government binded on this article then how you can still insist that Baloch are not present in Sindh province lest built Wikipedia community together do not remove or copy paste or format things according to your own concerns do respect and work together as Pakistani wikipedian this article was created by you What you said it doesn't mean you can not other give chance to contribute to this article as it's totally against the Wikipedia neutral point of view and policies. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

sister I'm not denying about the presence of baloch or pashtun tribes in Sindh, my only concern is to not mix baloch tribes into sindhis or any other, only put things into order, I have made a separate section for baloch/pashtun tribes on my page, you can check it. Thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Dear brother I am not a female and please give your email ✉️ address so we can talk and share things for future to work on other Sindh and Pakistan related articles if do you think it's better to work together أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

ok my bad, we can talk here, it's OK, also I think you are new Wikipedian, am I right? Also can I ask your ethnicity? AngelicDevil29 (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

]] (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

now if you have any other source which claims lunds to be gurjar/arab/Chinese whatever you can cite it and nobody will change it until any other authentic source claims lunds to be something else, so as i have already cited a source you can't change it without any of your source, even if my source is false and bold, but it is what it is. So kindly change the lund article to my edit.

I would like to reply this statement brother first of all I have not any confusion regarding the Lund ( Tribe ) as being Baloch they're Baloch 100% sure but they're not the descendants of Huns what you are talking is different from the concern I raised and I also raised concerns about Zardari (tribe) also these two tribes are Baloch only then your question of Lund being Gurjar, Arab or chines not reflect my concerns. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hahaha Wikipedia doesn't work on basis of personal beliefs or opinions, you can believe whatever lunds to be, but Wikipedia meeds source, and i do believe that lunds are also ethnic vice a baloch & sindhi tribe but racially they are not. And why you removed the lund page? 😁 AngelicDevil29 (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

This is not a question of religion brother no matter whether they practice Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism or Islam it's their personal choice. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

hahaha it's not freedom of religion, I said this in the context that baloch consider themselves to be of arab descent,(you can check the main article) and an arab is never been a Hindu, they are definitely jews, Christian etc arabs but not a hindu arab, same goes for turks, so some lunds being hindu supports the source I cited that they are either huns,or gurjars or any other Aryan origin people. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 17:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

What is your ethnicity bro? أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

did you deleted the Lund article on Wikipedia? AngelicDevil29 (talk) 18:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I have visited the article Lund( tribe) that looks fine but brother be careful for next moves please just because you can be blocked permanently as I have read the warnings ⚠️ given on your talk page by many senior editors and many editors also warned you don't add poor sources,unreliable and addition of unsourced content that reflects vandalism. Well Have a Good day 🤗🤝. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Worry about yourself, as these warnings are of those days when i used to do mistakes like you are doing now, changing anything without any source, might get u in trouble. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 21:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

okay brother best of luck I am not new to reach Wiki and I know Wikipedia policies. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 00:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

I didn't and can not delete any article brother as i have not the authority to perform such actions أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Confusion about Home land and Terotarial expansion of Sindhi tribes.

@AngelicDevil29, Hi brother I am leaving some paragraphs & quotes from the article List of Sindhi tribes " Sindhis (Sindhi: سنڌي‎ (Perso-Arabic); सिन्धी (Devanagari); /ˈsɪndis/[1] sˈɪndhiː, romanised as sin-dhee) are an Indo-Aryan ethnolinguistic group who speak the Sindhi language and are native to the Sindh province of Pakistan. Besides Sindh the historical homeland of Sindhis are regions around Sindh, such as Kacchi Plain, the Lasbela and Makran regions in Balochistan,[2] the Bahawalpur region[3] of Punjab,[4] the Kutch region of Gujarat,[5][6] and Jaisalmer and Barmer regions of Rajasthan, India." read this brother clearly mentioned that Sindhi tribes are those speak sindhi language and live in Sindh province the further written that Home land of Sindhi is Punjab, Balochistan, Kutch, Gujarat, Rajasthan it's mentioned that Sindhi people live also out side the Sindh wether they speak Sindhi language or not so it's clear Pashtun tribes Baloch tribes, Gurjar tribes, Pashtuns tribes and other subtribes that I've added to the list they speak Sindhi or not because they live in Sindh province as well as out of the Sindh province they're Sindhi. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

🤦🏻‍♂️ all these region have significant sindhi population historically and they speak sindhi or sindhi dialects, and you need to understand the original sindhi people and those came from other regions can not be called sindhis, for example a soomro is a sindhi tribe they mostly live in Sindh but historically they also reside in south Punjab and kutch,jaisalmer, probably in Balochistan as well. Those tribes you added are not sindhi tribes, so I'm going to remove them, and kindly educate yourself. Thanks. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Brother, please educate yourself first. First of all you're putting so many imaginary tribes without any sources of citations and even such addition that you're putting continuesly don't have any article pages. And you're assuming such tribes and putting them.? For what reason brother I have revert your edit as it reflects Vandalism because you're continuesly doing this and putting text without linking with other Wikipedia articles or citations I have added all the tribes and sub tribes those have Wikipedia articles pages too but you removed all selectively according your your own like and dislike it doesn't support the policies of Wikipedia that is neutral point of view and Soomora or Sumra lives in Punjab Uttar Pradesh and Rajsthan they don't speak Sindhi language at all they speak Sindhi language only in Sindh province but that's not the matter I told you brother that Pashtun Baloch or some other tribes wich I've added to the list all live in Sindh province wether they speak Sindhi or not then why you remove all. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Read the book, "the Musalman races found in Sind, Baluchistan and Afghanistan" i have put the citation already, and there is not a single tribe i write without knowing that they live in sindh and speak sindhi. Im not like you so un ordered person, if you again vandalise i will complain to any admin here. You are so uneducated, who doesn't even have basic knowledge about a race, ethnicity and tribes. Its really wasting my time. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Brother go and read my last comment at your I have already mentioned you there you can remove if you think such subtribes don't live in sindh simple. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 23:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Look,the page List of Sindhi tribes is about sindhi tribes/Castes not about tribes living in Sindh, do you understand the difference? In Sindh you will find, punjabi tribes, pashtun tribes, muhajir tribes, kashmiri tribes, Balochi tribes, even probably Chinese tribes, so what by living in Sindh do they become sindhi, absolutely not, only those baloch and few pashtun decent tribes who have been living in Sindh for hundreds of years, and are now completely assimilated into sindhi people, culture, language, even facial features,only those can be considered as sindhi ethnic people, not others, it's like if you go to Russia or China, will your tribe become a Chinese or Russian tribe? Of course not. Until and unless your many generations live there and get assimilated into these people than maybe your children can be called as Chinese or Russian tribes, even then they will be called pakistani descent Chinese or Russian, so understand this basic division of people. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 23:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Brother I got your point ☝️ Calm down and work as contributor also try to understand when I said something be police and constructive very fist day I just told you that I have some suggestions and concerns that we entirely solved. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

finally you understood, phewww!!! 😌

But this was so basic thing, you must have knew it already, it's common sense though. Anyways next time please be careful. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

please add Jamali(tribe), Ogahis and removed your tagg from my talk page that you mentioned need help etc. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 23:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Ogahi is already mentioned, and I have written Jamali tribe, and I will delete that tag. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 01:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

okay brother thank you 🤝🤝🤗 أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

no need 🫡 AngelicDevil29 (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Attribution for public domain material

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't know to do this,but thanks for doing it. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

You were previously advised about this in May, so please make sure that you remember next time. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sindhi traditions and rituals, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Regarding List of Sindhi tribes

Hello User AngelicDevil29, I hope you are fine and doing well. I have noticed your contributions to List of Sindhi tribes and while you have performed it very well tirelessly, you have made some problems regarding citations. Apparently you have placed citations randomly in the page, Citations are to be placed after a paragraph/note/explanation because otherwise it doesn't look professional.

for example citations should be created like this:

Topic (1st Explaination)

• Hello, this is a citation to explain the topic, and this citation is to further explain the topic.

And not like this:

Topic (2nd Explaination)

Incase you are having troubles understanding this, feel free to check WP:CS
Thank you for reading this. ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 10:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

actually I can't put citations on each and every tribe, as they are so many, that's why I used the citations in a one section related to the content. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Adding material not supported by citations

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wassan, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I added two citations at wassan, then i made any changes. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 14:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

"some important branches of the Samma are Unar, Thebo, Junejo, Channa, Abro, Gaad, Kehar, Kachelo, Mahar, Mahesar, Thahim, Wasan, Palijo, and Jokhio (Ansari, 1901)." This the copy paste text from one of the citation I mentioned at Wassan, it has different spelling but the tribe is same, I don't make any changes on Wikipedia without any citations, unless it's just minor grammar or spelling mistakes AngelicDevil29 (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Neither of those sources support the text you added. One doesn't seem to mention "Wassan" and the other mentions it as a person's name. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie actually it seems to be the chronic problem of@AngelicDevil29's most edits, as their edit history suggests. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Citations with Quotes

Hello, @AngelicDevil29 I think it's more valuable to provide Quotes, if possible, from the citations, as it pays more attention to the actual context of the references. I saw most of the References given by you on many articles, mostly without any quotes or some without accessable URL links; some time page numbers also had no mention. As you put a refrences on Langah (clan) page but without quotes

Don't take it personally; I'm just asking for the more valuable edits if possible. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.

أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 23:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

ok thanks, I will the quote the citation now onwards. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced additions

@AngelicDevil29 what is the source of your claim for "Sindhi origins"? Literally no reference I'm able to find so far stating them to be so. I'm afraid, if you continued causing such disruptions on such large no. of pages, you may get blocked. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

kindly read "Origins and History of Jats and Other Allied Nomadic Tribes of India: 900 B.C.-1947 A.D." citation on page no: 117, which mentions "It is not unlikely that the Langahs were Rajputs from Sindh and some say that they were Panwars, and that they are allied to the Bhuttas, Kharrals, Harrals and Laks". Which clearly proves that langahs are sindhi, and they still live in Northern Sindh. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

and there are many references, which you don't believe, calling them to be written by British people, or older than 1900s which is absolutely weird. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

This is author's speculation, which does not imply that Langahs are Sindhis. You still need references citing Langahs to be Sindhis/found in Sindh. And if you think that avoiding colonial sources is absurd, you need to read this. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

The author clearly mentions it, its funny how you believe rest of the book but not a single paragraph. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your edits

@AngelicDevil29 I have observed that you have been changing ethnicity of a large no. of people to Sindhi since last multiple months, by adding obscure and outdated references. There is nothing wrong as long as you adhere to WP:RS, but if you continue to add unreliable sources/uncited claims, you may be get blocked on wikipedia. Please keep in mind following points while editing:

• Avoid colonial sources: Colonial era sources are usually not a great source for Castes and ethnicity, so please avoid them.
• Use 3rd party sources: In simple words, avoid governmental surveys and instead use academic references.
• Avoid original research: Do not conclude on your own what any source might mean. In other words, describe ethnicity of any clan which is stated in the reference.

I hope you will adhere to these principles. Otherwise, I would be forced to bring this issue on Administrators' noticeboard. Sutyarashi (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 please avoid personal remarks in your edit summaries. I have nothing against your edits, it is only that I am asking you to provide reliable, verifiable sources not some random book from 1860 or 1910. You have completely ignored that colonial era sources are not reliable and are using them. Even then, they do not mention what you are insisting they do. You have also breached WP:3R rule. If you do not reply to this or keep reverting, I will surely bring case of your disruptive editing on Administrators' notice board.

I hope you can understand this. You just need to provide academic sources in support of your claims. This is one of five pillars of Wikipedia. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Final warning

You are treading toward an indefinite block. You have added or reintroduced Raj era sources on numerous articles despite being warned about this multiple times. Please revert these changes immediately to prevent any further suspensions on your account. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't remember all the pages. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 you probably just need to undo all of your recent reverts, and also on the articles on which you're casuing disruption for past multiple months. Otherwise, you can be indefinitely blocked as you have not only breached WP:3R but also have passed personal remarks about me when I reqeuested you to avoid colonial era sources or making unsourced edits. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I guess you also breached :WP:3R and I have not passed any personal remarks, you can mention. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 really? Then what was this[1]: you have your own rules, which I don't follow your so biased Tiggered person, is there any way to talk someone educated unbiased person regarding these two articles, I mean are you serious?

Believe me, if I bring your this comment alone on ANI, you will get blocked. Also, your edits on Langah (clan) in which you kept references and reverting inspite of being requested to not do so by multiple editors on your talk page, comes under disruption. So you can't say that i breached WP:3R when i was undoing that.

I believe, the only right option you have left with is what @Yamaguchi先生 and before it, Ohnoitsjamie has already told you. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I didnt changed anything except for rearranging words on langah page. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 the online source you added in the Langah (clan) again depends on the RAJ source "The Musalman Races found in Sind, Baluchistan and Afghanistan by Sheikh Sadik Ali Sher Ali Ansari Deputy Collector in Sind (1901)" as it states clearly. So it's not recent at all, and I've removed it due to this. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gaad

Hello, AngelicDevil29

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Actualcpscm, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gaad, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Recommendations

@AngelicDevil29 hello, Good morning 🌞 have a nice day I have some recommendations regarding the pages that you have created ( The Sindhis of Balochistan and List of Sindhi tribes) there is a great mess in sections likes ( list of Jat\Rajput\Gurjar\Sammat etc in thes list section there are more then 50% addition have not any existing articles I think list is very long and it's very hard for the readers to read it and there should be old mentioned of such tribes Clans names those have existing articles to link and red link and black link should also be remove what أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 03:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I think list is very long and it's very hard for the readers to read it and there should be no mentioned of such tribes Clans names those have existing articles to link and red link and black link should also be remove what do you think.? أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 03:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Well the purpose is for these pages are public's knowledge and information, i have seen more longer Wikipedia pages than these two, and there are no red links, i have kept these two articles very clean, ordered in bullet, with each letter, i think its best way possible for Wikipedia readers to get this information. And sure there are existing articles, but this pages are showing these articles togather in one page, its making more convenient and easier for public, if the want to read the main article they would simply open the main article, and there are other articles being created after seeing my created articles, best example "list of Punjabi tribes". Plus there are many other Wikipedia articles about different ethnic tribes of world, such as "Kurdish tribes" etc also there are earlier created articles of Sindhi tribes, which are incomplete and full mess, for example "Sindhi names" there are many tribes which are not even Sindhi, plus the article name is altogether wrong, I would like it to be deleted. But it is still on Wikipedia. So I think compared to others "list of Sindhi tribes" and "The Sindhis of balochistan" articles are very clean, simple, ordered and most authentic. If may say. But if you have any other ideas to improve them, I would love to hear. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 04:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 okay I got understand but there is also one major problem that is many names of the tribes of clans are linked with same pages like many clans tribes linked with Samma , Channa and abro some other also أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Many other tribes also linked with Jat Muslims article Also just linked Channa, Samma, Abro, Dodai and so on... Well I don't have any issue if do you think it's all okay. 😊😊 أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, @AngelicDevil29 I have seen your contributions on Lasi people page recently you added Lasi is a Tribal group of Jat and Rajput? Without any sources? Why you're declaring more then 50 pages as Rajput, Jat or Sindhi ?? Even without providing a single reliable sources? With page no or Quotation? Even you're declaring many pages as Sammat Sindhi , Rajput or Jat without providing even a single source??. Please also go and Read Lasi people page in the Center text there is written Lasi people have small Tribes Like Gurjar jatt rajput and other and also Keep in mind Gurjar is an independent and distinct ethnic group Gujjar don't have any genetic relationship with Pashtun Baloch jatt or rajput but many Gujjar's clans became rajput in 14th and 15th century by the process of Rajputisation but Gurjar don't have any direct genetic relation with these groups so don't try to mix or declair Gurjar as clan or sub tribe or any other ethnicity without providing any reliable sources this is the core reason you have received last warning ⚠️ my friend please don't praise disruptive editing. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Well there is not much difference today, many rajput, jat, gurjar even sammat tribes are use these terms interchangeably, you will find many tribes with sources claiming to be of rajout but other would claim them to be of jats, also that changes were my precious edits, when I didn't mentioned quotes on citations. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

the links which direct to Samma, Jat Muslims, is to show that these are tribes/clans or sub castes of samma, jats or rajputs, as these clans/Castes don't have their own page created, that's why I put links to samma/jats if anyone in future creates the main pages of these castes I will redirect the link to that. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Your edit to The Sindhi Jats has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

I have copied almost everything from the jats and muslim jats of Wikipedia articles, how could this be copyrighted, anyways AngelicDevil29 (talk) 23:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

There was a little copied from Jat Muslim but you just added a large amount that's a match for content on this page. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 02:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I copied the content from the jatland and wrote in my own words, ot from the link you shared, i even didn't knew about that link, also i swear my intentions are not of violation of rules. But thanks, and is there anyway to write the content again, which you removed, without having any issue of copyright, and thanks again for helping me out, I really appreciate @Diannaa AngelicDevil29 (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

and this the source I got the content [2] not from the the link you mentioned. And I would like to know is there any way to write that content with my own wordings, or there is no way to write it again, thanks. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 02:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

It's not unusual for content to be present at more than one location on the Internet. Jatland is not compatibly licensed, and is not a reliable source regardless. Do your own research and write your own prose; don't copy from anywhere. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

ok thanks dear. I will not do this again. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption and addition of poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

thanks alot for blocking this guy from wikipedia ...such a mess he had made by wrting his unsourced and poorly sourced views everywhere Gangster2345 (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AngelicDevil29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I acknowledge that I have done lot of distruptive edits, poorly sourced content, and other mistakes, I just want to say to all administrators that just give me last one last chance, I promise I wont do any further mistakes, because I won't be editing anything on Wikipedia anymore, I will only add links if necessary, correct Grammar and spelling mistakes, if I ever again do anything against the Wikipedia rules and policies, then I must be blocked forever and I would not have any say on that, but as for now I humbly request to administrators of Wikipedia to unblock me. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I am confused, you say you won't be editing anymore, and then go on to describe the types of edits you will make(note that any change to Wikipedia is considered an "edit"); perhaps you mean you won't add substantive content to articles? We don't want you to promise that you will never make a mistake, or will never break a rule, we all make mistakes. We want you to understand your mistakes and learn from them. Just saying you will never contribute information again does not show us you have learned from what you did wrong nor does it guarantee that it will never happen again. Please specifically tell us how your edits were disruptive and what you will change going forward in a new request. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AngelicDevil29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thanks @331dot for the response, what I meant in my first request for unblock is that, I have done disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, but it was all in good-faith, I didn't knew much about the citations I was putting with my edits, which for the administrator @Yamaguchi先生 blocked me for indefinitely, but now I have learnt about my mistakes and I can guarantee that I will never repeat these mistakes, I will make sure anything I edit is with support by a good citation. That's I again request to all administrators of Wikipedia to give me final chance, and unblock me or block me for a certain period of time so I can wait for it. Thanks alot. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your mistakes were not made in good faith. That is very, very clear looking at this talk page. You were warned over and over and over and over and over again and decided not to listen to these warnings. Nothing here convinces me you've bothered to do so yet. There's no indication, even now, that you have the slightest understanding of WP:RS, for example. Yamla (talk) 19:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

{{unblock|reason= dear administrator @Yamla i absolutely acknowledge what you said, but i know my sole purpose for those edits were to give knowledge and information, at beginning i didnt had any knowledge of Wikipedia i just edited, i even didnt new about my talk page, but once i got aware about those things, i edited content with citations, not knowning if the citation was reliable or not, i only read the content written in citation example a book,news, or any website and edited articles, thinking this is all I am required, but later when i am blocked now i have realised that i cant put any citation but rather a academic, reliable sources only, i was also told not use any raj citation by @Yamaguchi先生 ever since I did not out any such citation, only when i created the page Sindhi Jats I used poorly citations, and soneone removed them, but I reverted as i thought the content is already supported by the main linked articles which probably made it clear that what i have written is already is written in the main articles which i linked, and i was working on finding more citations, and I told the user who removed my content to not make any changes as i putt the two citations there, not knowning those citations were poor, or not reliable, but as you and other administrators have been very kind and helped to read about disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, i have read the link u mentioned and i have got everything, plus i know that i will mostly not be making major edits, once if i get unblocked, i will mostly improve articles by correcting grammar, spelling and general edits, like many other Wikipedians do, and i guess i deserve a only last one final chance, and if i ever again do any disruptive editing or poorly sourced edits, then i would myself ask you to block me permanently, but as of now i really humbly request the Wikipedia administrators to unblock me. Thanks again~~~~}} AngelicDevil29 (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AngelicDevil29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

dear administrator @Yamla i absolutely acknowledge what you said, but i know my sole purpose for those edits were to give knowledge and information, at beginning i didnt had any knowledge of Wikipedia i just edited, i even didnt new about my talk page, but once i got aware about those things, i edited content with citations, not knowning if the citation was reliable or not, i only read the content written in citation example a book,news, or any website and edited articles, thinking this is all I am required, but later when i am blocked now i have realised that i cant put any citation but rather a academic, reliable sources only, i was also told not use any raj citation by @Yamaguchi先生 ever since I did not out any such citation, only when i created the page Sindhi Jats I used poorly citations, and soneone removed them, but I reverted as i thought the content is already supported by the main linked articles which probably made it clear that what i have written is already is written in the main articles which i linked, and i was working on finding more citations, and I told the user who removed my content to not make any changes as i putt the two citations there, not knowning those citations were poor, or not reliable, but as you and other administrators have been very kind and helped to read about disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, i have read the link u mentioned and i have got everything, plus i know that i will mostly not be making major edits, once if i get unblocked, i will mostly improve articles by correcting grammar, spelling and general edits, like many other Wikipedians do, and i guess i deserve a only last one final chance, and if i ever again do any disruptive editing or poorly sourced edits, then i would myself ask you to block me permanently, but as of now i really humbly request the Wikipedia administrators to unblock me. Thanks again

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=dear administrator @Yamla i absolutely acknowledge what you said, but i know my sole purpose for those edits were to give knowledge and information, at beginning i didnt had any knowledge of Wikipedia i just edited, i even didnt new about my talk page, but once i got aware about those things, i edited content with citations, not knowning if the citation was reliable or not, i only read the content written in citation example a book,news, or any website and edited articles, thinking this is all I am required, but later when i am blocked now i have realised that i cant put any citation but rather a academic, reliable sources only, i was also told not use any raj citation by @Yamaguchi先生 ever since I did not out any such citation, only when i created the page Sindhi Jats I used poorly citations, and soneone removed them, but I reverted as i thought the content is already supported by the main linked articles which probably made it clear that what i have written is already is written in the main articles which i linked, and i was working on finding more citations, and I told the user who removed my content to not make any changes as i putt the two citations there, not knowning those citations were poor, or not reliable, but as you and other administrators have been very kind and helped to read about disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, i have read the link u mentioned and i have got everything, plus i know that i will mostly not be making major edits, once if i get unblocked, i will mostly improve articles by correcting grammar, spelling and general edits, like many other Wikipedians do, and i guess i deserve a only last one final chance, and if i ever again do any disruptive editing or poorly sourced edits, then i would myself ask you to block me permanently, but as of now i really humbly request the Wikipedia administrators to unblock me. Thanks again |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=dear administrator @Yamla i absolutely acknowledge what you said, but i know my sole purpose for those edits were to give knowledge and information, at beginning i didnt had any knowledge of Wikipedia i just edited, i even didnt new about my talk page, but once i got aware about those things, i edited content with citations, not knowning if the citation was reliable or not, i only read the content written in citation example a book,news, or any website and edited articles, thinking this is all I am required, but later when i am blocked now i have realised that i cant put any citation but rather a academic, reliable sources only, i was also told not use any raj citation by @Yamaguchi先生 ever since I did not out any such citation, only when i created the page Sindhi Jats I used poorly citations, and soneone removed them, but I reverted as i thought the content is already supported by the main linked articles which probably made it clear that what i have written is already is written in the main articles which i linked, and i was working on finding more citations, and I told the user who removed my content to not make any changes as i putt the two citations there, not knowning those citations were poor, or not reliable, but as you and other administrators have been very kind and helped to read about disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, i have read the link u mentioned and i have got everything, plus i know that i will mostly not be making major edits, once if i get unblocked, i will mostly improve articles by correcting grammar, spelling and general edits, like many other Wikipedians do, and i guess i deserve a only last one final chance, and if i ever again do any disruptive editing or poorly sourced edits, then i would myself ask you to block me permanently, but as of now i really humbly request the Wikipedia administrators to unblock me. Thanks again |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=dear administrator @Yamla i absolutely acknowledge what you said, but i know my sole purpose for those edits were to give knowledge and information, at beginning i didnt had any knowledge of Wikipedia i just edited, i even didnt new about my talk page, but once i got aware about those things, i edited content with citations, not knowning if the citation was reliable or not, i only read the content written in citation example a book,news, or any website and edited articles, thinking this is all I am required, but later when i am blocked now i have realised that i cant put any citation but rather a academic, reliable sources only, i was also told not use any raj citation by @Yamaguchi先生 ever since I did not out any such citation, only when i created the page Sindhi Jats I used poorly citations, and soneone removed them, but I reverted as i thought the content is already supported by the main linked articles which probably made it clear that what i have written is already is written in the main articles which i linked, and i was working on finding more citations, and I told the user who removed my content to not make any changes as i putt the two citations there, not knowning those citations were poor, or not reliable, but as you and other administrators have been very kind and helped to read about disruptive editing and poorly sourced content, i have read the link u mentioned and i have got everything, plus i know that i will mostly not be making major edits, once if i get unblocked, i will mostly improve articles by correcting grammar, spelling and general edits, like many other Wikipedians do, and i guess i deserve a only last one final chance, and if i ever again do any disruptive editing or poorly sourced edits, then i would myself ask you to block me permanently, but as of now i really humbly request the Wikipedia administrators to unblock me. Thanks again |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

AngelicDevil29 (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank God you have been banned ..(Personal attack removed) ...You almost edited all Baloch tribes as SIndhi ....with sources from colonial era and other unknown authors.....no reliable sources you just wrote your own views every where .....

i thank the wikipedia administration for blocking him.

thanks again Gangster2345 (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

yea it's normal like you were blocked as well, and I hope any admintrator looking it, can block you again for such remarks. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

i was never blocked i have just started editing on wikipedia that too upon my friends request ..

but yes great thanks to the administration Gangster2345 (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I know ur are same person babbarbaloch, anyways, if you keep using the language you use in your home, or personal attack on other Wikipedians and also removing contents from sourced articles like you did at Sindhis of balochistan then you r not far from getting blocked again. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@AngelicDevil29 are you sure Gangster2345 is a sock-account? Because this definitely permits a block on them. Sutyarashi (talk) 07:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

no I don't know this for surety, but this person's keen interest in Babbar (tribe) made me to speculate, also we had little conflict a long ago, so he literally came to my talk page and personal attack me and call me cancer, which also indicated that this person is same as @Babbarbaloch who was blocked for using bad language once, but again i cant say all this for sure, probably administrators could check and confirm. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

i dont know who you are talking about Gangster2345 (talk) 15:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

i dont know who is he talking about i just created this account some days ago after getting sick with every baloch tribe getting editted as sindhi jatt from unreliable sources Gangster2345 (talk) 15:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AngelicDevil29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had made a request for unblock 2 days ago, it has not been reviewed since, so I'm making another request for unblock as now I have learnt about my mistakes and I won't be repeating those same mistakes again, so the block is unnecessary. I really deserve one last final chance, I know I have been warned over and over and over and over and over again, but at time I didn't learnt properly about WP rules and was repeating the same mistakes unknowingly, So I once again request to the Wikipedia administrators to kindly unblock me, Thanks alot.AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Adding additional requests does not speed up the process, which is conducted by volunteers, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot can I remove/delete the unnecessary sections on my talk page?

Confusion about Raj sources.

Hello @Sitush I was reading WP:RAJ in which it was mentioned that British/Raj era sources should not be used on Indian caste system, So does it also apply to Pakistani castes and tribes example: (The Imperial Gazetteer of India) etc? And other sections mentioned there, are those mentioned citations to be avoided or is it OK to use only those mentioned citations? Thanks AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, yes, it applies to Pakistan and Bangladesh, too. Raj = British India = all of them. Even if the RAJ essay didn't exist, we generally prefer post-World War 2 sources for, well, everything, everywhere. - Sitush (talk) 20:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)