Content deleted Content added
→References: Update ref Vandamme-2014. Verified that the Vandamme-2014 quotation (starting, "Countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have..."). However, the parenthetical comment at the end is not part of the quotation, so that has been dropped. |
→Etymology: Replace with sfn Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 118:
== Etymology ==
The name ''Pakistan'' was coined by [[Choudhry Rahmat Ali]], a [[Pakistan Movement]] activist, who in January 1933 first published it (originally as "Pakstan") in a pamphlet ''[[Pakistan Declaration|Now or Never]]'', using it as an [[acronym]].
Rahmat Ali's concept of Pakistan only related to the north-west area of the Indian subcontinent. He also proposed the name "Banglastan" for the Muslim areas of [[Bengal]] and "Osmanistan" for [[Hyderabad State]], as well as a political federation between the three.<ref>''[[South Asian Studies]]'', Volume 11 (Department of Political Science, University of Rajasthan, 1976), p. 69</ref><ref>Sugam Anand, ''Modern Indian Historiography: From Pillai to Azad'' (MG Publishers, 1991), p. 178</ref>
Line 783:
* {{harvtxt|Solomon|1997}}
* {{harvtxt|Rajagopalan|2011}}
* {{harvtxt|Paul|2012|p=11}} "The regional powers such as Israel or Pakistan are not simple bystanders of great power politics in their regions; they attempt to asymmetrically influence the major power system often in their own distinct ways."▼
* {{harvtxt|Buzan|Waever|2003}}
▲* {{harvtxt|Paul|2012|p=11}} "The regional powers such as Israel or Pakistan are not simple bystanders of great power politics in their regions; they attempt to asymmetrically influence the major power system often in their own distinct ways."
* {{harvtxt|Vandamme|2014|p=14}} "Countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have enough influence to not be considered small, but not enough to be major powers. Within the limits of their regions, they play a significant political role. Thus instinctively, they would qualify as middle powers. While it is not the objective here to question the characteristics of Jordan's definition of middle powers, we argue that Pakistan is in fact a middle power despite its being nuclear-armed. When looking at the numbers, for instance, it appears that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan can be classified as middle powers."
}}<!--end refn-->
Line 830:
* {{cite book|last=Wynbrandt |first=James |title=A Brief History of Pakistan|url=https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofpa0000wynb|url-access=registration|publisher=Infobase Publishing|year=2009|isbn=978-0-81-606184-6}}
* {{cite book|last1=Zia|first1=Nadeem|last2=Burton|first2=Bruce|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1hzTEAAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PA2002|title=Corporate Governance Challenges in Pakistan: Perceptions and Potential Routes Forward|date=24 October 2023|publisher=De Gruyter|isbn=978-3-11-077306-4}}
{{refend}}
'''Etymology'''
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book|last1=Aziz|first1=Khursheed Kamal|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=jB5uAAAAMAAJ&of=PA88|title=Rahmat Ali: A Biography|year=1987|publisher=Vanguard|page=88|isbn=978-3-51-505051-7}}
* {{cite book|last1=Tummala|first1=Krishna K.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HSQZj1_FrosC&pg=PA42|title=Public Administration in India|year=1996|publisher=Allied Publishers (P) Limited|page=42|isbn=978-8-17-023590-3}}
{{refend}}
| |||