Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 33

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 → Archive 40

Air Ambulance Card, LLC

Air Ambulance Card is a medical evacuation provider... several medical evacuation and air ambulance posts exist. Air Ambulance Card certainly meets the notability requirements as laid out in your Wizard as it has been written about in multiple highly regarding publications, including The New York Times and Wall Street Journal. The editor noted a possible copy violaton, which will be edited when the page is reinstated. -Atticusrominger (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Diannaa (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOTChA_Chart

This term is referenced in several locations, including: https://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/wiki/index.php/GOTChA_Chart I think it is beneficial to have an article with it since this does not have a reference elsewhere within Wikipedia. -PgMP (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Done Restored as a contested proposed deletion, though I have no idea what the subject is based on reading the article. The article itself should be rewritten and some sources added. Protonk (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

TimetoPlayMag.com

This is a well-known toy and family products review site that is quoted and featured in every major news source. The company holds widely attended events throughout the year. The heads of this company are known as toy experts and their reviews significant to all major toy companies, all of whom have Wikipedia pages of their own. I have provided more than double the amount of legitimate sources than most Wikipedia articles offer and feel that the repeated deletion is unwarranted. -Litzky (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Protonk (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:TsavoTheSearchPromo.jpg

This image is used for press releases for Tsavo LLP and we have sent an email to permissions@enwikimedia.org with fair use release contained. -Tsavomusic (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The file has not been deleted: You need to add an {{OTRS pending}} note to its description page. As I see your account is currently blocked, I have done that for you. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done - or resolved - OTRS has been received. Skier Dude (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Martin Coleman (American Football)

No reasoning given. -74.102.195.195 (talk) 12:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done I see you have given your reasoning at the deleting administrators talk page. Where I would have referred you anyways since a deletion as hoax isn't one of the uncontroversial cases we would handle here. If that doesn't clarify, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I will also note that even if he were not a hoax, the person described would not meet our standards of notability anyway. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Yep. From what I can tell, he's a running inside joke. I can't find it now, but before I had found a message board thread about it. But even though the NCAA has no record of him, I am willing to admit there's a .000000001% chance that he's real. If that's the case, he's not notable. --B (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Brookson Accountancy

Article about a company and its journey not to promote its products, similar to SJD Accountancy page! -Andysloan22 (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done. The article was deleted as unambiguous promotion or advertisement. Reviewing the content of the page I agree with the deletion decision. Wikipedia is not a host for a business web-page. Rather it is an encyclopedia, which requires sourced and neutral content. The absence or presence of other articles does not legitimize otherwise unacceptable articles. Protonk (talk) 22:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Danny Kee

The subject (person) is in fact notable on the basis that this individual launched the careers of several famous artists/musicians within the music industry who went on to sell millions of records (including but not limited to Faith Hill, Hank Williams, Jr. Kathie Lee Giffords, Lynrd Skynrd, etc., all of whom are household names in American pop culture). Additionally, there is plenty of reliable third-party reference material available about Kee - Jennifer Ember Pierce's "Off The Record" devoted an entire chapter to this individual's inspiring story. Danny Kee is regarded as a leader in the music/artist management field, which makes him especially notable to students, new and aspiring artists, songwriters, and musicians researching the entertainment industry. -Mhurtado77 (talk) 00:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done. This article was speedily deleted and as such cannot be unilaterally overturned. I've looked at this google books search (as it indexes Billboard as a book) this news search and a web search and I haven't come up with much. You can ask the deleting admin to restore the article or comment here (or just post here and I can ask him). Protonk (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Elle Merhmand

Elle Mehrmand is a true and real artist. Deleting and depriving her of a wikipedia page is a total mistake. Her work in performance, new media, technology, telecommunications, and gender studies are all viable and important to contemporary art and practice. She is a real, relevant, and living human being. Please do not make the mistake of excluding her as she is a real and working artist. Her work has not only been exhibited in the US, but worldwide including her work with Micha Cardenas and EDT, bang Lab. -62.83.129.105 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

This article has already been undeleted per a previous request. However, it's been nominated for deletion. Therefore, you need to make your case in the deletion discussion for this article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

The Potter's House, UK

Article was deleted under the G11 criteria. I am requesting on behalf of user:Pastorponixon‎ that it be refunded and placed in his userspace, as he and I believe that the article can be included into wikipedia without the promotional fluff. For your consideration, -Phearson (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done Userfied at User:Pastorponixon/The Potter's House, UK Spartaz Humbug! 04:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Jill Kenton

reasoning -93.97.183.39 (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done There is no deleted article at that location. Spartaz Humbug! 04:06, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

BidRivals

have created a better article which falls even more clearly in wikipedias guidelines -Keithmonti (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Keithmonti (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done where is the draft you created? Spartaz Humbug! 04:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Reverse trading

Asking for userfication to User:Juxo/Draftspace/Reverse trading motivation: working on an article to clearly and unerronously describe Put options and Call options which are inherently tied together (one mans short put is another's long call, one mans gamble is another's insurance) in one easy-to-read and easy-to-understand article( see Talk:Put option almost everyone complains about errors and being confusing ) -Juxo (talk) 14:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse trading. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Celph Titled

reasoning -70.181.74.17 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I am trying to get this page unlocked for creation. Celph Titled is definately a notable artist. http://celphtitled.com He is part of the Army of the Phaorohs, not the mention the solo album he did with the legend Buckwild. ALSO, he has one of the most popular underground hip-hop albums ever, the Gatalog. I don't know why he is not yet considered a "notable artist" by Wikipedia... the guy makes millions of dollars from making music. Not to mention the tons of albums he has been lead producer on...

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celph Titled (2nd nomination). Note also that if he is actually notable, then we would be getting links to somebody else's websites, not his own. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Best Place at the Historic Pabst Brewery

User creating the page is a newbie and wants the content back. It'd be useful if an admin could userfy it for User:Butterflyangelblue (see user talk. -—Tom Morris (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

It's been in the user's user space the whole time: no need to userfy. User:Butterflyangelblue/Best Place at the Historic Pabst Brewery. Your first resort is to ask the deleting admin (i.e., me) Acroterion (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Makio

deleted on claims of rollerblading not being a notable subject. This is not only highly inaccurate, but hints at the party requesting the deletion perhaps having a suspiciously biased opinion or motivation as well. -72.207.43.65 (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user The Bushranger (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. Accusations of bias will not help your case; please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith. What the article needs if it is to be kept is references, both to verify what it says and to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

African American Policy Forum

I work at this organization, which is a reputable one (the reason why it was proposed to be deleted) and is housed at Columbia Law School and UCLA Law School. -128.59.178.61 (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Darrenhusted (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. I can't imagine what you mean by "...is a reputable one (the reason why it was proposed to be deleted)"; do you imply that Wikipedia only covers disreputable organizations? The actual reason cited was "Notability not established, reads like an advert." Being reputable, or being a good cause is not enough for an article; what this one needs, if it is to be kept, is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish notability. As you work for the organization, you should read the guideline WP:Conflict of interest before editing about it. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Paribrajakacharya paramahansa shree mad swami nigamananda saraswati deva

Swami Nigamananda has obtained Siddhi (perfection) in four different Sadhanas, like Tantra, Gyan, Yoga and Prema.After churning the sea of Sadhana and delving deep into various scriptures, He had extracted nectar from it, which He presented to the world in the form of five books, namely, BRAHAMCHARYA SADHANA, YOGI GURU, GYANI GURU, TANTRIKA GURU and PREMIKA GURU.The seeker of any faith will stand to benefit from them. The principles laid down in these books, if practiced carefully, will lead a man to definite success in spiritual pursuit -Dcmpuri (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Swami_Nigamananda, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.Spartaz Humbug! 11:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikicars

Old deletion (2006); i'd like a copy of what it was, in a subpage in my user space, thanks? May have been deleted twice, actually; in this case, i'd like both copies... -Jerome Potts (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done There isn't really anything there. Its all variations of
Wikicars.org was started in June, 2006, by [[Internet Brands]], the parent company of sites that include CarsDirect.com, Autos.com, and Autodata Solutions. Internet Brands is involved with additional open content websites, acquiring [[Wikitravel]] and [[World66]] in April of 2006.
The other version just says the same thing with less words and more blatant links. Spartaz Humbug! 11:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! Why do you suppose it was deleted? The first time it says "CSD A7"; wuzzat? --Jerome Potts (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:CSD#A7 is one of the criteria for speedy deletion: an article that "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." If a new article makes a "credible claim of significance or importance" it won't be speedy-deleted, but if it is to be kept in the long term it will have to meet the requirements of WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Courtney Henggeler

challenging WP:PROD -However whatever (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

You don't need to come here for that: you can simply remove the PROD tag. As it says on the tag: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." Protonk has removed it for you. JohnCD (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done It actually was deleted and I restored it then removed the tag. I got caught up with something else and didn't post a message here. Sorry. Protonk (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
My mistake - I should have looked more closely at the history and log. JohnCD (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Charles A. Findley

reasoning -66.31.62.40 (talk) 17:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

The article was previously deleted after five years because it did not have verification of notability. There are now outside sources as well as direct references about the person. I hope that now meets you requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.62.40 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 12 March 2011

The article has been posted again, but has been nominated at WP:Articles for deletion. The place to comment is the deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles A. Findley. JohnCD (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Ideal Cleaners

It should be undeleted because there is no valid reason to delete it in the first place -76.84.79.61 (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Done Done, but this sort of article is almost guaranteed to be deleted as an article about a non-notable band. Unless they have signed to a major label, charted, or performed in a major tour (or have had substantial coverage in reliable sources), it may be deleted again. Protonk (talk) 18:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

James Romig

This composer has written many significant works, including many for percussion that are performed around the world. He has recently won the significant Aaron Copland Award, and continnues to make a mark as a composer. As a fan (I have performed his music), I would like to add to his Wikipedia page. I feel that significant links are available to make the listing "notable." -SerialMusician (talk) 00:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I've restored this to User:SerialMusician/James Romig where you can improve it with reliable sources. Originally it was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Romig but that doesn't' really amount to consensus and the deleting administrator has retired. So you can just ask me for feedback before moving it back. If necessary we have another discussion.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I've made the updates. Is it sufficient, now, to be undeleted? Thanks! SerialMusician (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, i moved it back as you certainly have gone beyond the 2007 version ad discussion. Nevertheless, I'm not sure abut his WP:Notability or the significance of the Aaron Copland Award but would leave that up to a 2nd AfD if someone more knowledgeable in contemporary classical music sees fit.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Tahir Jarwali

he hold the important place in shia muslim community and the page is not for promotion -122.161.10.141 (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. Please review our inclusion guideline and consider to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Jarwali.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Syed Hasan Muttaqi Meesum Zaidi

he is the important personality of shia community and the page is not for promotion plz restore the page -122.161.10.141 (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.meesamzaidi.webs.com/. Moreover, text copied from a personal page usually isn't really encyclopedic to start with. If you think he meets our inclusion guideline, feel free to recreate it, writing in your own words and based on reliable sources.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Qohort

does not meet any criteria for deletion - if it does, can you pl explain? -99.111.72.146 (talk) 17:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

(a) it was a copyright violation from http://www.qohort.com/. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste for why material must not be copied into Wikipedia unless a formal copyright release has been made as described at WP:DCM; (b) it did not show the significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability, and (c) it was somewhat promotional in tone (as is often the case with material copied from a website). From the text, it seems this is a new startup: it is unlikely to qualify for a Wikipedia article until it has been operating long enough to attract independent comment. JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Hickory Park Restaurant Co

I am currently working on an assignment for my college information sourcing course at UNC, and after 5 hours of work, my page was deleted. Without a page, I will get a failing grade. The reason for deletion was "advertising/promotional" and I will go through and make it more objective. Please give me the opportunity to do so. It will take me forever to start from scratch. Please, I am begging you. -DanpUNC (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I will userfy the content to a subpage. It should not be moved back to the mainspace until you not only make it more objective, but you cite to published third-party reliable sources that are completely independent of the restaurant. If your teacher is looking for a good Wikipedia article to be written, and knows what is needed to accomplish that, then he or she will likely give you a poor grade if you post the article with only the primary sources you were citing, which also means the article will likely be deleted later even if its userfied in the short term. You have to do the writing work but, while we have a strong ethos here not to do people's homework for them, my allegiance is to Wikipedia so I want to balance that with putting you on the right path to producing a decent article. Accordingly, see here and here. The article is at User:DanpUNC/Hickory Park Restaurant. Note regarding the title that I intentionally left off "Co"; see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomads Golf Club

The article is important as it references an organisation that is Global and contributes large sums of money to internationally recognised charitable causes. I dont see how you can state the importance of the organisation without biasing the article. I have permission to use the text on a brief history by the SA National body and can provide that as proof. Furthermore, on multiple occasions I posted to the articles Talk Page in the hope that resolution would occur there after consultative discussion. Can the article please be moved to my userspace so I can fix up any problems with it?-Highlanderdownunder (talk) 02:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done Restored by deleting admin. See also Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_28#Nomads_Golf_Club. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

xtradb

Important software. Unable to read the history. I want to read about it. -205.151.6.205 (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done. The article was deleted as an advertisement. You can read about it on its own website. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

VMIX

We were not aware our page was being marked for deletion and would like to edit it so that it conforms with guidelines. If this is not possible, we would like to access the content, so that we can redraft the page using some but not all of the old content. The person who drafted the page is no longer with our organization. Thank you! -206.251.240.27 (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Yukon Gear & Axle

I would like to modify the information on the site by including additional references to establish notability and to re-write the article to be more neutral in point of view -74.93.105.21 (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

The article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon Gear & Axle, so you will have to approach user Ron Ritzman (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion. He may be willing to userfy the deleted article for you - place it in a user sub-page to be worked on - but you will have to register an account, which is easy and free (unless you have one already). JohnCD (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I've logged in using my account, please allow me to "userfy" it. Thanks Boqle (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  Done Userfied to User:Boqle/Yukon Gear & Axle. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Paramahansa_Shree-Mad_Swami_Nigamananda_Saraswati_Deva

Site was updated now with proper cite reference as demanded by you with few reliable source. If you required additional source kindly informe and request your honor to restore this article. -Nilanchal 04:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Ed Murphy (labor/social justice)

reasoning -Victoriakereszi (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


Hello there, This photo was taken by Zoeann Murphy and I have complete permission to use it. Do you need something in writing?

Thanks for your time, Victoria

  • I assume you are referring to File:WDI Logo with name jpeg format.jpg and File:EdPhoto.JPG. Is that correct? Protonk (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
    • Victoria, we need to know where the image came from and we need some kind of proof that's available for use under CC-By-SA. Let's start with who gave you permission to use it. Did they take the image and did they have all rights to it (ie they weren't being paid to take it by someone else)? And, if so, can you show us some evidence that either they've given you all rights to the image or that they release it under CC-By-SA? I know it seems a lot of faff, but we have to be sure make licenses are legit so that people can reuse the images without worrying about violating copyright. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Hi HJ- Can I submit an email or letter from WDI stating that they give me permission to use the image and the Logo? Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. victoria Victoriakereszi (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakereszi

Yes Protonk these two images. Victoriakereszi (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakereszi

  • Ok. I'm going to direct you to a help page. I'm going to swing back to this discussion in a half hour or so, but please do read this help page (at least the few paragraphs at the top) to get a sense of what is required before posting an image on wikipedia which has been copyrighted elsewhere: Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Protonk (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Victoriakereszi (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakereszi

  • Ok. If you have read the help page what I am about to tell you will be review, but it is nice to go over it again. Basically due to our licensing and copyright policies it is insufficient for an image or file to be permitted to be distributed on wikipedia alone. Everything on wikipedia that is not fair use is explicitly available for any downstream use, commercial or otherwise. So if you add text to a wikipedia article anyone can take your text and re-use it for nearly any purpose--the same is true for an image. If you want to upload a file which you do not own the copyright for we have to receive some evidence that the file has been released for distribution under a compatible license. This can be as easy as editing the source page to declare the photo to be freely licensed or you may email our Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team with information about the source and license. The logo may be uploaded as a fair use image (meaning we restrict downstream use but you can retain rights) however fair use images (referred to generally as "non-free content") are much more restricted in terms of use and inclusion. I hope this helps. Protonk (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


Thanks Protonk. How do I edit my source page? I am new to wikipedia and I can't find my files for the life of me. Victoriakereszi (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakereszi

  • I should have been more clear. When I said "source" for the images I meant the source outside wikipedia (if it is available online). For the purposes of explanation, let us pretend that File:EdPhoto.JPG is based on a photo from Flickr. Each photo page on Flickr has copyright information, so if you had a photo on Flickr that you wanted to upload to wikipedia you could simply edit the Flickr page to release the image under a compatible license. The same can be done on a company or personal website. If the image is not hosted on a website then you probably need to have the copyright holder email the Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team. Is that better? Protonk (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

L._Craig_Martindale

This article should be restored. Martindale was president of The Way International for over 15 years and radically transformed the organisation, often on a whim, changing both the structure, content and operating practices of The Way before being dismissed after being caught abusing his power in an extramarital affair with with several married women working for the organisation. This history should not be lost as it has fundamentally altered The Way International and reaction to 'the purge' Martindale introduced (see main article on The Way International) continues to shape this organisation today -59.167.157.228 (talk) 01:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

While I'm usually the first to argue that expired PRODs should be restored no matter how bad they are, I am reluctant to restore an unsourced biography of a living person to article space. I would much rather send this to the incubator. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
This article's history contains serious BLP violations. It should not be restored, even to an incubator. Definitely not. The text can be e-mailed to any (logged in) editor who wants to work on it. Unfortunately, the tone of the IPs request would make me suspect he may lack the neutrality to work on this one.--Scott Mac 08:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Alexandra Wallace (student)

was erronously deleted, despite 4 references from reliable news sources, admin probably unaware of importance of this article, as he/she probably does not live in California, USA -UCRGrad (talk) 09:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

    • Absolutely not. See WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. This was not a biography, but a narration of a stupid youtube racist rant that's hitting the papers today. No evidence that this person is anything other than a fool who's today's news. Clearly an attack article.--Scott Mac 09:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Webcams_(Website)

There are literally hundreds of thousands of porn websites out there, very, very few of them can be considered notable. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC) - Webcams as a website, was for two times nominee at XBIZ_Award in 2009 and last time this year in 2011. Various references was used in sections: Live Peep Shows and Third-party sellers and covers adult videochat area and affiliate_programs in this adult website area. Firmly i believe a reason like literally hundreds of thousands of porn websites comes only to destroy, with no relevant ground. Webcams_(Website) is a part of a adult industry niche. Adult videochat websites are different in important aspects than a porn website and Beeblebrox it is into a serious error. For all this reasons i request Webcams_(Website) undeletion article. -Makeet (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webcams (Website), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Beeblebrox (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

CheckMyARMonline

This page directly explained why this website is noteworthy. The website is the ONLY website in the world of its type. The page did not violate section A7. I was not informed of the speedy deletion prior to it taking effect, which did not allow the page to be edited to comply with A7 even further. -DorkKnight (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done I'm sorry but as an A7 deletion, it can't be restored here. You'll have to discuss this with the deleting admin and if you still disagree, file a deletion review. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Saint Croix official football team

Removed as it was a talk page of a deleted article. An anonymous user who I believe had also engaged in the AfD discussion had recreated the talk page to offer some evidence of notability. I chose to reply on the article's talk page rather than the user's talk page as I was worried the IP address may change before they saw my response. I believe this deletion was not in line with CSD G8 as the page was useful to wikipedia and included deletion discussion that was not found elsewhere. -Stu.W UK (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done I can confirm that the same IP participated in the deletion discussion. On the other hand it seems to be stable and is also still active, while the page was deleted almost 24 hours after your reply and was rather a reaction to the deletion than a contribution to the AfD. In the long run we don't keep these pages, but you may want to point it out to the tagger User:Aleenf1 and the deleting admin User:Sphilbrick. Anyways, I've restored this to your talk page, so you can follow-up, e.g by contacting the IP or by moving it to the Afd's talk page (an option that we don't have for speedies). --Tikiwont (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Martin Coleman (American Football)

Martin Coleman was in a member of the Pittsburgh Panthers Football team starting in the Spring of 2005. The link below is to the Official University of Pittsburgh Athletic Dept list of Athletes for the 2006 season. http://www.pittsburghpanthers.com/genrel/091506aac.html

He is also included in the book of "Pittsburgh Panthers football players" http://www.amazon.com/Pittsburgh-Panthers-football-players-Schottenheimer/dp/1155773241


In the official newspaper of the University of Pittsburgh: The Pitt Chronicles. On April 29, 2007 Martin Coleman was one of few Football players at Pitt to receive the "Blue Award" for his high GPA http://www.chronicle.pitt.edu/?p=158}}

No reasoning given. -74.102.137.237 (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done What was already said above at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Martin_Coleman_.28American_Football.29: Even if he actually existed and had been part of the team, he still wouldn't meet our inclusion guideline for athletes. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Horst Albrecht von Preußen

had correct reference citation and was in compliance with bio on living people -108.21.231.131 (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

  Blocked You'd need to file a successful unblock request under your account and then approach the deleting administrator, User:The Hexer. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Chris DeRosa

I am a follower of this (as well as many other) musicians. I enjoyed the information on this article (it was informative) and am puzzled as to it's omission. Is it possible for you to revisit it and modify the content as to not violate your standards (if that was the case)? -72.43.171.69 (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

the grunt band not accounted for

reasoning -Woztok (talk) 15:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC) The grunt band not accounted for: I regret such low IQ brainheads exist in admin, but sadly they are in every major business, and I fail to see apart from a position of little knowledge that Night Gyr can come to the conclusion that he can speedily delete an article. It is quite possible that he gets some power from this as a fetish, which ought to seek medical advice. The article was brief and concise to save space, if I had known that it required more approval and many hands before being accepted then we should be told so in a few words. An encyclopedia lists a subject, and this subject was about Grunt bands of all shapes and sizes including the word grunt, the grunt band not accounted for was a piece of pop history very suitable for an encyclopedia..it told of a band -- a pioneer band that existed with some great history of pop personnel involved, which readers would find interesting if they are looking for connections to events of the pop scene in the 1970's The band had status in its embryo stage, a tour and a record with Liberty records...some of those members were with other hit making outfits, so why on earth isn't that interesting? therefore I request it is undeleted. If you want it more padded out with facts I will see what can be done.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Woztok (talk • contribs)

Answered at length at User talk:Woztok. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Earwig Music Company

A label that exists since 1978 and has since (until today) released dozens of records (Lps and CDs) of notable blues artists just cannot lack 'notability', but rather the article lacks proof of notability - I'm willing to add what maybe has to be added to prove its notability ! -StefanWirz (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

A record six different attempts to create an article about this label are recorded. Not a single one made any effort to provide any evidence of notability, relying instead on the flat statement that it existed. I would suggest you create a new draft article at User:StefanWirz/Earwig, polish it up and get some feedback; then ask the blocking administrator to unblock the name (which has been "salted" to prevent a seventh recreation). --Orange Mike | Talk 14:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Actually, this is the version that was deleted first as an expired PROD. (tagged by an SPA with the edit summary "prop") The subsequent "delete delete salt" fest should not have happened. It should have gone to AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Don't know who were the people having tried six times (in vain) to create this article and have nothing whatsoever to do with them ! Furthermore, I'm not able to view the old article Ron Ritzman kindly provided because the link is obviously restricted for "simple" users ("only for Administrators, Researchers" that's what it tells me) --- please advice how to be able to see the content - Thanks in advance (... and sorry not to be an expert in Wikipedism, but in blues records and labels ;-) !! StefanWirz (talk) 14:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Did what I was told to: User:StefanWirz/Earwig --- What's the next step of the procedure ? StefanWirz (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
I just took a look at it. Not bad: but you need real, external sources, not links to the company's own version of its history. This is especially true for claims about awards, etc.; you need links to awards websites and the like, not to the subject's own version of things. --Orange Mike | Talk
Don't want to win a beauty contest with it, but I feel that now the prime objective, to prove that label's "notability" has been served --- What about a decision to my request now ("Done" or "Not done")? ;-) StefanWirz (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to be proactive here, keep you from running into problems due to lack of real documentation which could lead to challenges to the asserted notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate that, but could you please explain what you mean by "lack of real documentation" in light of my recent changes (added quite a few new references and withdrew totally the "Earwig story" references - as was your kind proposal) - sorry for being kind of a stubborn guy with the object of my expertism (see for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Country_Turtle_Records and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Post_War_Blues ;-) StefanWirz (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Since there hasn't been a decision here, I now have changed the article's name; it is now (hopefully ;-) discussed under Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earwig Music Company StefanWirz (talk) 10:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Kings of Chaos (online game)

The article in question was deleted through proposed deletion with the summary: Expired PROD: non-notable game, no references from reliable, third-party published sources. I believe the article should be restored because it had at least one source providing it with significant coverage (Washington Post), as the last AfD (which was closed as keep 2 months before) suggests. -Joshua Issac (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. After the AfD it should not have been deleted as uncontroversial. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises - Kangaroo

A sustainable wildlife enterprise is not a particular business or is advertising for a business. A sustainable wildlife enterprise is an Australian cooperative system formed for the cooperative sustainable use of wildlife - and in particular to promote conservation through sustainable use - much like the game management systems in South Africa and Scotland (for example). It is a concept not a business. Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises was a system developed by the Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corp and the National Landcare Association. References include: A Strategic Plan for Trialling Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises and Implementation of Sustainable Wildlife Enterprise Trials - Integrating biodiversity and wildlife into agricultural production found at www.rirdc.gov.au.

There is currently a pilot project in central QLD and this might be the cause for someone thinking the page need deleting? Either way, the article can be cleaned up to fit within wikipedia's guidelines better. I believe a Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises is an important concept for australian agriculture and conservation of biodiversity within farming systems. If you cannot undelete the page could you send me the content so we can make another website (userfy?) -AWS10 (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The concept of promotion does not only relate to businesses. The deleting admin, RHaworth felt that it needed to be fundamentally rewritten, but you can ask him for clarification. Anyways, I've emailed you the content. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Nhttpd

It's a normal stub and I want to improve it -94.36.192.151 (talk) 03:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The remaining tags indicate where the problems are.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Victor Sierra (band)

the band is now known as one of the first steampunk bands of Europe and begin to be rather famous among the steampunk community in the US -Arkad (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Sierra (band), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

journalists being attacked while reporting the news

i would like to be able to access my material -Pcw3187 (talk) 08:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Pcw3187/Sandbox. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Mike Dooley

"This page is currently protected and can be edited only by administrators. The reason given is: Continually recreated vanity page." We want to re-submit an article about author and speaker, Mike Dooley, featured in the 2006 film "The Secret" and referenced at - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_(2006_film). We realize the previous submissions were too subjective and we are trying to resubmit a more objective listing. Your help is much appreciated. -Hopekoppelman (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially. You may want contact the administrator who closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dooley, user Luigi30 (talk · contribs). but I would suggest you make yourself thoroughly familiar with the guidelines that I'll post at your page and prepare a userspace draft first. If you don't get an answer or if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review where a good draft is essential. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Myah Marie

Myah Marie is an artist similar to any other obscure artist who have pages. The president is there to justify her page. In fact, I can't believe she doesn't have a wiki page. The justification required to create a page is negated by the fact that other artists with less productivity and fame have their page. Further, people clearly want to information about her. The page has been created SEVERAL times and deleted. While the article may not meet each criteria set a demand for knowledge should be considered. Finally, there is a demand and she is working on her debut album. -Fitchhollister (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myah Marie (2nd nomination). --Orange Mike | Talk 19:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Already deleted six times and salted. I have advised the applicant to make a userspace draft if he thinks he can demonstrate notability, but "working on an album" doesn't sound enough. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Carvelli

I have a published work I would like to add to make Carvelli noteable. He was published in the DJ Times November Issue, Page 41. Charted as number 6 Most Added Track and #38 above Diddy and Lil Wayne.Rach Beau (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC) -Rach Beau (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carvelli, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --B (talk) 20:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I talked to Ron Ritzman and he said. "It was not deleted because of your unfamiliarity with any of our rules. It was deleted because 6 editors agreed that the subject does not meet our notability guidelines. I'm afraid the consensus on this one was clear. However, if you disagree or know of some sources that were missed then you are welcome to have the deletion reviewed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)" Can this be taken into account and re-think the result.Rach Beau (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

When he says "you are welcome to have the deletion reviewed", he is suggesting that you take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. This page that we are on now - "Requests for undeletion" - is only for non-controversial undeletions. Deletion review is the forum to use when you are asking for someone's judgment to be overridden. --B (talk) 23:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Mark Sanders

reasoning -90.192.202.250 (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


Designer with works exhibited in several museums, including in MoMA New York (permanent exhibition - no -spill cutting board) Surely this means 'of sufficient noteworthiness' for Wikipweadia ? and "Not notable enough to justify an entry" does not apply

Other Facts British Engineering Excellence Awards (BEEA) Designer of the Year 2009-2010 More info about Mark Sanders as Designer of the Year

Designer / Engineer / Inventor of Strida Folding bicycle (multi-award winning folding bicycle sold globaly) Designer / Engineer / Inventor of If Mode full sized Folding bicycle (Gold IF design award winner, Eurobike award Winner & taiwanese excellence award winner) Designer / Engineer / Inventor of One-Touch Can-opener & One touch Jar opener's ((multi-award winning kitchen products aimed at senior's and people with weak hands, yet useful for all ages & sold globaly)

Seen in deletion log ..... "the end sentence "Currently he works a boring salary job in the Washington D.C. metro area." sounds rather like vanity to me... CLW 15:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC) This sentance is obviously in error as Mark Sanders, is--90.192.202.250 (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC) based in UK

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Sanders, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hall Monitor (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Dr Paul Knapman

I know have verifiable sources and would like a copy of the original so that i may use it as a basis of a new article. Thankyou -WebManAtTheNetShop (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I undeleted this to userfy it for you, but there was already an entry in your userspace at User:WebManAtTheNetShop/Dr Paul Knapman which has been moved to mainspace at Paul Knapman. As you were the author of both, a history merge is unnecessary, so I have simply re-deleted the first one. No more to do here. JohnCD (talk) 10:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Bhaskar Mukherjee

The deletion policy of biography of Bhaskar Mukherjee is very ambiguous. If any Spam authority or organization nominate a person for inclusion his/her name for their biographical source how the person become a Spam? A person earned all the prestige in his life and some one else can make him/her a spam by simply sending a letter to him/her!!! What a joke!!! Are the admin deleteing pages without analysing any thing? What a non-accepting proposition. At the the person have qualitative articles in so reputed journals like JASIST, Elsiever's Library & Information Science Research, Journal of Academic Librarianship, IFLA Journal, Scientometrics and published book by Chados, UK. I have little doubt about any professional from LIS field in India having such a parallel profile with Bhaskar Mukherjee. There are so many other entries with low profile also available in wiki. I feel the administrator must not have some biasness towards the person, which leads noice. So it is better to unblock the file to edit with necessary modifications before final uploading to wiki. It is highly objectionable to delete a entry without considering the fact. -220.227.97.99 (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaskar Mukherjee, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user BigDom (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 07:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_call_state_model

I was reading about SS7 and CAMEL, when i try to understand the basic of CAMEL, I got error like this page is removed. This will be very useful for beginners to understand it. I got error as "This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 00:11, 2 December 2010 Malinaccier (talk -121.242.37.82 (talk) 05:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user GeorgeLouis (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to propose it at Articles for deletion. The reason proposed for deletion was that the article is unreferenced, and has been for more than four years. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Simba-Dickie-Group

Hi. This article was deleted with comment "A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". In de-WP you can see that this company produces games and toys and has more than 3500 employees. The company has a lot of established trademarks. That should indicate enough of importance. Greetings -Heiko (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

With the intwerwiki links and brands it does indicate importance but from the article it also looks rather like a holding company that merely owns and 'represents' notable brands such like Schuco or Bobby-Car. I've restored it to your user-space at User:Heiko/Simba-Dickie-Group, so hopefully you can improve it a little before moving it back. Any doubts can then be brought to WP:AFD. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Fabes

I would like to have the article restored to my userspace so I can work on it to attempt to address the problems that led to deletion -B-Fir3 (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The page was originally deleted because it was considered an "Attack Page" or because it did not indicate the importance of a real person. I would like the opportunity to fix this, and by allowing me to review the article, I would be able to salvage real quotes and information that were among other things that have been considered "attacks". I do not intend to relist the article unless I am able to ensure that it is not 100% true and is NOT an attack page. Please let me know if this is possible. I would sincerely appreciate this chance. Thanks in advance.

  Not done and will not be done This has already been declined by the two deleting administrators. Please review our policy regarding pages about real people. The chance you still have here, is to contribute constructively to building an encyclopedia. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

While I understand the stance you maintain on the topic, I do not feel as though my request was made with harmful intent. I am not asking for the page to be reinstated. I do not expect to re list the page at all. As wikipedia admins have made clear to me, it serves no purpose. However, the fact remains that I did write the original article (which should not have been listed), and I am requesting to view what I had written for myself and myself only. I recall questioning people on the topic and using real quotes for the article, and having not saved it originally has been troubling me for quite some time. As I'm sure you know, I listed the article in 2008 and the mere fact that I am here trying to recover my work should speak for itself. I do truly apologize for the nature of the page ("attack page"), and I do not intent to list anything like that ever again. I am only asking for your permission to view MY own work for personal reasons. It isn't important how this is achieved; if you could e-mail me a copy of the page that would be enough.

I understand that my actions in the past may make you reluctant to comply with my current request. That is fair, after all I had originally re-listed the page twice. I have since matured and learned why the page was unacceptable and against Wikipedia's terms. So I am promising not to re-list the page, for whatever that is worth right now. I believe I have demonstrated sufficient regret and remorse for my actions for you to believe that I am being honest. As it stands, I am truly just looking for a gesture of kindness and good faith. I have been wishing to recover the page (a page that I had written and should have never been posted to wikipedia) for personal reasons for years, now. I am just hoping that someone (you) is willing to take a few moments of their time to help me out. If you would please consider my earnestness on this subject, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks in advance. -B-Fir3 (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I've replied once more on your talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_33&oldid=1088683879"