Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 256

Archive 250 Archive 254 Archive 255 Archive 256 Archive 257 Archive 258 Archive 260

Factom

I want this article to be undeleted bcoz of the reasons stated below.

The article was deleted due to copyright infrigement of two links

1. https://news.bitcoin.com/bill-melinda-gates-awards-grant-factom/

  I dont know why the above link has been included in copyright infrigement. The link leads to a Site which is a News Site for Crypto related articles. And The Link clearly Mentions that a grant has been Given to Factom coompany which the wiki page belonged to. So this indeed is  not a copyright violation.

2. https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2016/06/17/st-awards-199k-austin-based-factom-inc-iot-systems-security

 This Link also leads to a Government website which provided a grant to the Factom Company which the wiki page belonged to.

So Copyright Violation on this link is also a flase Statement. You can personally check the Links and decide if it has some copyrighted Content.

Hence i request you to please Undelete the Page as It complies all the rules of Wikipedia. The copyright infrigement are just false Statements.

Regards, Jayesh. -Jay8291 (talk) 09:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

That is not how copyright works. At all. We do not allow users to copy-paste content wholesale from websites, full stop. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 11:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Actually www.dhs.gov is public domain, so copying is permitted on Wikipedia from this site. However credit is required to avoid the false impression of who wrote it. But you should ask the administrator that deleted it. Are you suggesting that there was no copying from the Bill and Melinda Gates story? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


Well Nothing was Copied from any Articles. Only the link was posted in Reference Header for reference to the Funding received from the companies. Like Factom received received Funding from DHS so an Link was posted just for Reference. Same with Bill & Melinda Gates Article. How can just posting a Link for Reference became a Copyright Infrigement ??-Jay8291 (talk)

Draft:Savoy (Electronic Rock Band)

I, Mikehayes91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mikehayes91 (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Packwood sisters

I, Daftcelt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daftcelt (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gestoos

I, Exipple Studio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gestoos 09:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  • I've given them a username block because the software was created by Exipple Studio, but I have no true issue with unblocking them or restoring the article as long as they follow COI guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Fnatic Logo 2016.png

image accidentally removed due to vandalism -Prisencolin (talk) 01:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  Not done - the image was deleted on Commons. This request should be submitted at commons:Commons:Undeletion requests. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

THEUSAISAMONSTER

The article has been recreated as"The USA Is a Monster", but the original article's content is unavailable. -Morganfitzp (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done Morganfitzp, it looks like the deleted history was actually at USAISAMONSTER, which is now a redirect. The pages had been deleted as A7, however since the deleting admins aren't very active anymore and there's an active entry that looks to establish notability, I see no reason not to restore the history. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)! For some reason I remembered there being a lot more in there. Guess I'll have to build the article out from more external source material. Morganfitzp (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Luis150902/Archives/1

Speedily deleted under criterion G7, I want to refund talk archive back -Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

lalit mangal

Lalit is an active investor and techie. all young entrepreneurs should know about him. This person tried to solve lot of problems faced by startups. -106.51.140.241 (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

This article has three A7s (including the most recent deletion) and an AfD on its sheet, and in fact has been deleted so much the earth has been salted. A7s and AfD'd articles will not be restored here, and while salted pages could *technically* be restored here, the reality is that most of these pages were salted because the user repeatedly creating them has no idea how Wikipedia works and does not even want to attempt to learn. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

draft:nuup

Necessary reason and information provided proving it is not promotional. The page is about new technology initiated by the government -Manivannan184 (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

No, because it was clear advertising. SwisterTwister talk 22:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bovey Tracey Potteries

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) HouseOfMarbles (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bovey Tracey Potteries

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I've restored this, but I'm concerned that their username signature comes up as their old, promotional username. I've asked them to change this, as it can come across as a way to get around the COI username guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Professor Masud Ahmed Cheema

I, 103.255.4.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.255.4.83 (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Robin and Lucienne Day Foundation

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ateliertally (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Peter B Lloyd/sandbox

I, Peter B Lloyd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peter B Lloyd (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I've restored it, but I doubt very seriously that this will ever pass notability guidelines, especially as it's currently written. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Cantstandya/List of tallest buildings in Arizona

I, Cantstandya, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cantstandya (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

wish to resume -Cantstandya (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Suvayan Sengupta

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -SushmitaGhosh (talk) 05:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

I started writing about Mr. Suvayan Sengupta with the username SenguptaSuvayan as I was not aware that such an username is off the wiki policies. I had simply written the social contributions made by Suvayan Sengupta and details of his Television career.I hereby request the restoration of deletion of the same.

Draft:Mahmoud Sabri

I, 86.188.103.194, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.188.103.194 (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • There have been two requests to restore this, once in May 2015 and once in March 2016. No edits were made in either situation, so it's unlikely that this will be restored a third time unless we have a very good assertion that you will edit the page this time around. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • our original author sadly passed away as a result of cancer, on November 19th, a brave battle fought throughout 2016. We are now taking over the baton to carry through to conclusion. We believe under these exceptional circumstances a restoration could be accepted. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.188.103.194 (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
That is an explanation that would justify a third restore. I'll restore it again. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Harborough Singers

I, Macgyvor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Macgyvor (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft I am still working on -Macgyvor (talk) 14:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

D'n'D

It was a redirect to Dungeons and Dragons. However, it changed into another target without further discussion, which is proven non-notable. I found this discussion. It must be undeleted as redirect to Dungeons. -George Ho (talk) 10:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • @George Ho: Hmm... it looks like the edit history is a little complicated, as it was moved to several different locations. The basic history of the page is that it started off as a page for the Serbian musical group by the same name. It was PRODed, but was never actually deleted because before a full week could be completed, someone decided to turn it into a redirect. There was a bit of an edit war over this, which resulted in the RfD discussion. Technically the redirect was improperly done, as the users involved should've waited for the PROD to run its course before unilaterally blanking the page and turning it into a redirect. A couple of years later there were attempts to delete the page at its then current location, DnD (Serb pop duo), which was then successful. I suppose the PROD was a bit improper, given that there had already been a PROD a few years prior, but the duo didn't pass notability guidelines and ultimately would've been deleted at AfD anyway.
However all of that said, there's no reason why you can't turn it into a redirect now, as there was never any consensus to delete the page when it was a redirect. You have two options, though - you can either redirect it to Dungeons and Dragons or you can redirect it to the dab page at DND, since DnD and dnd redirects to the dab. D'n'D is a bit more specific, but it might be good to redirect it to the dab page just for uniformity's sake. I'll leave it up to you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • TL;DNR - the page wasn't ever deleted because it was a redirect and the one attempt to delete it that way ended as a keep, so there's nothing to stop you from re-creating a redirect now. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Flinching Eye Collective

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Joseph Jensen (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Joseph Jensen The article was declined once because it contained a lot of copyright violations and then again because there weren't enough significant improvements since the first decline. Given this, I think that it'd be better if you worked on a fresh new copy rather than to restore something with a history of copyright violations. This way there wouldn't be anything in the article history that you'd have to be worried about, plus it'd be a nice show of good faith. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)`

Draft:Stephen Anderson Smith

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2603:3011:1807:D300:449A:4F5:F01D:845B (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Stephen Anderson Smith (G 13 (TW))
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 18:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Monica Aggarwal

I, Bluebiketech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bluebiketech (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 18:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Roy Butcher

I, Chanelle821, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chanelle821 (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Eurythmics SADIFT.jpg

I want to reuse one of previous revisions. The current version has four different covers, and I would like to use one of the covers to avoid excess. -George Ho (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

A previous single version has a woman at a typewriter. One version has Japanese writing across it, and the other is over exposed and tilted. So what would you like? It may be better to upload a better copy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
The woman with a typewriter should do. --George Ho (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Pinging Graeme Bartlett. --George Ho (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I suggest that you upload the image from http://www.45cat.com/record/rcapb40339 as it is less contrasty and not tilted like the deleted version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
  Already done Vanjagenije (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khazzanat al-Jahiz

I, 2607:F140:400:A02D:3D09:2365:A9CB:86C3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2607:F140:400:A02D:3D09:2365:A9CB:86C3 (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


So that I can address the issues and re-publish. -2607:F140:400:A02D:3D09:2365:A9CB:86C3 (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Joshua travagli

the circumstances have changed and i want to add more reference to the page so to prove he is notable. -Ynaps (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • This was deleted at AfD and was closed by Samwalton9, so I'll ping him here. Technically this would have to go through him, if circumstances have changed since then. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 18:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
    • @Ynaps: Your article (User:Ynaps/sandbox) is sufficiently different from the original that you can simply re-create it (at Joshua Travagli). Whether it would survive another deletion discussion I'm not sure, but this is the wrong venue for discussing that; there's no need to undelete your previous attempt, because you already have a new, better, one. In your previous attempt to create the article you moved it to Wikipedia space, which isn't the correct area so I moved it back to your sandbox. If you want to publish it, move it to the (article) namespace in the Move drop-down list. Sam Walton (talk) 14:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Cyber Anakin

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Since I was a sole contributor of the now deleted article, I wish to request an undeletion of just the talk page of the concerning article and userfy it as a subpage of my user page for my further reference. -Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 10:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: An editor has expressed a concern that SpacemanSpiff (talkcontribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Seriously? Do you even know what an encyclopaedia is? —SpacemanSpiff 10:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Did someone told you to be here? If so this is called canvassing, a potentially blockable offense, whether we all like it or not. See WP:CANVASSINGBugmenot123123123 (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
@Bugmenot123123123: SpacemanSpiff is an administrator, and this page is patrolled by administrators (what a surprise!). Your comment above is very rude, I think you should strike it through. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
I apologize for any kind of overreach here. But I still wish to express the concern regarding the timing between when Vanja posted a response in his talk page and when Spaceman put up a note. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
"Apologize for any overreach"? He's just done this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (8th nomination). Talk about WP:POINTy behaviour. This is a bad faith, disruptive editor and he should be indef banned forthwith imo. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft:Plastics Hall of Fame

I, Castelargus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Castelargus (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


--Castelargus (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Castelargus: It looks like G13 was postponed on this three times in the past, once in July 2014 and twice in March and September of 2015. I don't think that this was done by you, but I note that your last edit was made in 2013. My concern is this: it looks like this page has been around since 2012 and had its deletion postponed three times. That's a lot of leeway and even though those requests don't seem to have been done by you, we need something to show that you will actively edit the draft, as you've only returned to edit after this latest G13 resulted in the draft's deletion. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the info. I had lived under the impression that my draft had been deleted three years ago, and was suprised to receive the request recently to act on it again. As you may recollect and see from my discussion in 2012, my proposal then was denied to grade the article as a STUB for further completion by other users. If this move is impossible to realize even now and difficulties prevail which cannot be overcome, I will give up and abandon the page (and the work and time invested) for good. Best wishes for the New Year 2017 --Castelargus (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for restoration, will be back to work on it ASAP ! Best --Castelargus (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Long and Samus

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Samusaran (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Long and Samus, i wasn't even done with it, i was going to do it, but now what, it's gone, i know about this, i need to fix it now, and that i was not done

It was deleted because it was considerably unsuitable for our policies; Wikipedia is not Facebook. SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Long and Samus

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Samusaran (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Long and Samus: i know, i need to fix it, so can i have it back

  •   Not done Offhand I can't see where the content would be of any use to Wikipedia. What you wrote is pretty much just a personal essay and reflection on the character of Samus Aran and other characters. One of these characters seems to be Solid Snake from the Metal Gear series and I can't place where the character Long is from, which makes me think that this is probably an OC. I'm sorry, but this just isn't what Wikipedia is meant to be used for. I think that it would be a better idea for you to create your own wiki via Wikia, where there aren't as many guidelines. There's no chance of this getting restored on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Kingjeff/Templates

I wish to use the templates and tables placed here. -Kingjeff (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MACHO Project

I, Wjs64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wjs64 (talk) 22:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Hans-Karl Stepp.jpg

Hans-Karl Stepp has been restored by Dapi89 from redirect - would be suitable to resurrect image of subject -KylieTastic (talk) 18:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Very much appreciated (if possible). Dapi89 (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jason_R._Matthews

I, Drnorthcoast, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drnorthcoast (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I intend on providing further cites and supprotive content -Drnorthcoast (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:VUMA3D Software

I, BBE-VUMA3D, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BBE-VUMA3D (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Omnipause neurons

I, MultiPoly, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MultiPoly (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Book-The Target (talk) 09:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done You blanked the page, so that was taken as you requesting deletion and normally we restore those. However even if it hadn't been deleted as user request it still would have violated WP:NOTWEBHOST because there was nothing on the page that would have benefited Wikipedia. A further look at the material just now also shows that it was copied from [1], which makes it a WP:COPYVIO - which will also not be restored on here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  • It's on pages 12-13. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Julie Weitz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AkaJules (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I think this article was deleted without a sufficient review of more current content available.

"Comment: Certainly interesting and thanks for your efforts but this still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall. If the exhibitions were major museums, this would've immediately satisfies WP:CREATIVE but this is still questionable. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)"

Third party news sources are available here: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/museums/la-ca-cm-julie-weitz-touch-museum-20160103-story.html http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/museums/la-ca-cm-julie-weitz-touch-museum-side-20160103-story.html http://gizmodo.com/watching-these-videos-may-make-you-feel-as-good-as-doin-1758786275 http://www.kcrw.com/news-culture/shows/art-talk/video-evolution-at-young-projects http://hyperallergic.com/334964/artists-fascination-with-the-soft-tingling-sensations-of-asmr/ http://laist.com/2016/02/07/touch_museum_julie_weitz.php http://lacanvas.com/cutting-the-web-an-art-show-for-the-digital-age/ http://www.youngprojectsgallery.com/julie-weitz

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Assumption (film)

The director of this film has contacted me asking why this project was removed from wikipedia. Their release date/year has been pushed back but reliable sources remain. Please advise. -2602:306:3B28:4140:C5F7:7FAC:AA1A:B9CB (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The reason given to delete was "Non-notable film, no reliable third party coverage" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Request by 24.205.201.166

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.205.201.166 (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Unless you tell us what page you want to restored, there is nothing we can do here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Kris Degioia

My page was made without me even knowing it, and I was cited in Mark_ Washington page, then for some reason my page was deleted and then re crated by somone I do not even know and then I found out tonight that it was deleted for "sock puppet" This is not my fault and it should had never been deleted to begin with. It's not a paid page nor is it a promotional page, I have so many notable cites and references that aren't even PR releases that prove my notability. I can provide them for you if you need them. This is not fair in any way shape or form, thank you for your time, I hope you can see my point of view and let my page go back up. KDegioia (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)kris degioia KDegioia (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

  Declined. The article was originally created by you (or someone using your name with account User:Krisdegioia) in October. It was confirmed to be re-created by a paid editor who was abusing multiple accounts. Sorry, but it is indeed fair, and required by policy, to deny publication to authors who abuse Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Editor blocked. Any further requests should be reverted on site as per WP:BE and WP:DENY. Mkdw talk 07:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Marin Roglić

This article was deleted for G7 because the author seemed to panic after a COI template was added to the article. Regardless, this was a good article that I intended to work on before it was deleted. -Laurdecl talk 09:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done history merged. Look in history to see earlier versions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

The Voice Kids Indonesia

Please restore this article The Voice Kids Indonesia. However, the article was deleted in accordance with speedy deletion criterion G5. Nasriya (talk 05.43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Poojnm1985 page.

  • [[:I intended to add this article, so that i can tag the school under "list of schools in banglore" page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_schools_in_Bangalore I have seen, there are lot of articles about different schools in banglore, i just intended to add one for SAMVED SCHOOL. hence created that article, please let me know, why this is not permitted.]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | [{{fullurl: I intended to add this article, so that i can tag the school under "list of schools in banglore" page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_schools_in_Bangalore I have seen, there are lot of articles about different schools in banglore, i just intended to add one for SAMVED SCHOOL. hence created that article, please let me know, why this is not permitted.|action=watch}} watch] ) · [revisions]

No reasoning given. -Poojnm1985 (talk) 03:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done Perhaps U5 was not the right criterion to use for deletion, as it was some kind of attempt. However the page was very promotional, and so we won't be restoring it. You can start again from scratch at Draft:Samved School and refrain from extolling the school. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Atlas Wealth Management

I, Atlaswealth, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Atlaswealth (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

I would STRONGLY suggest changing your username, as Wikipedia does not allow usernames which imply shared or promotional use. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
@Atlaswealth: Your username is a violation of Wikipedia:Username policy. I will restore the draft after you change it to something that represents only you as an individual. Go to WP:CHU/Simple and request that it be changed. You can name yourself something like "John Smith at Atlas Wealth" if you want to retain the association with your employer, as long as it is clear that the account belongs to you and you alone, with no one else accessing it. Organizations and roles (like "Marketing") are prohibited from having Wikipedia accounts. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Simontomp/sandbox

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Simontomp (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

  • It's actually at Draft:John Wilcox. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Simontomp It looks like you requested that this be restored back in April, but made only one, non-substantial edit to the article the day after it was restored and then abandoned it. We need some sort of assurance that if this is restored a second time, that it will be edited and improved. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Tokyogirl179 I am retiring shortly and will have more time to edit my draft. I will also add additional books that my subject has had published since my original draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simontomp (talkcontribs) 13:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Rafael Carbajal

This page was originally deleted in May, 2016 because he didn't appear in any fully professional league. According to this article he became the manager for Canadian Soccer Club in the Uruguayan Segunda División in 2016. The league is considered as a fully professional league.[2] Shotgun pete (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC) -Shotgun pete (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Since you want to challenge the G4 deletion you should ask the deleting administrator User:Fences and windows. Making it a draft would be a good idea, until you can add the references and statements to prove notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Deletion was after 2012 AfD. Shotgun pete, I'll restore to User:Shotgun pete/Rafael Carbajal for you to work on. If the change in status / references is enough, explain this on the talk page to avoid another speedy deletion, tag AfD on talk page too. If still edge case, go to deletion review. Fences&Windows 14:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Ahsan Habib Bhuiyan

Hello, I'm not getting why this page is being deleted! Barrister Ahsan Habib Bhuiyan is a young politician from Bangladesh. He attend national media from bangladesh such as GTV, NEWS 24 etc. So, why this page is being mentioned as non-notable person? -Shrabon Mohsin (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) For reference, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahsan Habib Bhuiyan. --Finngall talk 17:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahsan Habib Bhuiyan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Samwalton9 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Canvass for a Cause

Athough there are many issues with this page, there is sufficient notability and references to justify a page. The page should instead be rewritten rather than deleted. A05613169 (talkcontribs) 15:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
In addition, the article was previously deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canvass for a Cause. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Crtew/Tomohiro Kojiri

I, Crtew, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Crtew (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

ITV Racing

It is a brand new page, and I need some help in creating it -Dustybin (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Dustybin - This is not the place to request help in creating a new page. It was tagged for speedy deletion, and it appears that you, in good faith but against the rules, removed the speedy deletion tag. The place to ask for help is the Teahouse. In the meantime, I have moved your page to Draft:ITV Racing, where it will not be deleted due to the lack of references. You should ask for help in providing proper references. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Haver Analytics

I, 160.79.44.228, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 160.79.44.228 (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

160.79.44.228 (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alain Landry

I, Bionitech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bionitech (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jewelry manufacture

I, Phoebe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. phoebe / (talk to me) 03:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Please note that I didn't submit this draft to AFC in the first place; User:RHaworth took it on themselves to submit an unfinished draft without working on it or telling me. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 03:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
@Phoebe: It was in draft space. Anyone can work on it or submit it. You don't own it. If it had been in your user space or your sandbox, it would likely have been left alone. In any case...
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Bodhtree

The article Bodhtree Consulting Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you, -Mahi kapoor (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodhtree (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bodhtree (company)

I, Mahi kapoor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mahi kapoor (talk) 05:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The draft article is not deleted and not being proposed for deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ISBO Nations Cup

I, Mattyazz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattyazz (talk) 20:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Userspace Header

I request the undeletion of the template "Userspace Header" which was deleted under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, and I object to the tag that this page is a test page. This is not a test page, as I have already tested it, and I intended to put it up as a publicly available template. I do not see why this page should be deleted. -Skipper1931 (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done Did you have any documentation or sandbox pages to go with it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  • No, but I was going to add those. Thanks, -Skipper1931 (talk) 11:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Michael Stewart (Semi-professional soccer player)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mbsnim4 (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC) Michael Stewart is a semi-professional soccer player. If the pages are visited his details about playing in the league are proven including games played, minutes, titles won as well as interviews.

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael B. Stewart (soccer player), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user postdlf (talk · contribs), or the person who deleted your version of the article, Athaenara (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:William H. Bell

I, Ted.gehring, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ted.gehring (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Biblio (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rollett Stability Factor

I, 78.33.29.104, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 78.33.29.104 (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I didn't know if the page was restored last time, obviously it was, I will really make an effort to complete the submission, Dr Rollett has died and I would like to complete it as a tribute to him. Please restore it and I will make sure I get down to it. Thank you for your patience. -Jonhuwmac (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

@Jonhuwmac: please see WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Wikipedia doesn't exist for tributes. In any case....
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)