Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 202

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 195 ← Archive 200 Archive 201 Archive 202 Archive 203 Archive 204 Archive 205

Swim (Emily's Army EP)

Article was deleted in a mass deleting spree of a deleted accounts pages. I noticed that this notable page, that was in fact been edited by more than just him was accidently deleted. -RaisedByWolvesInReverse (talk) 03:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Pinging acting admin @JamesBWatson:.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
It wasn't "accidently deleted". The deletion was made under speedy deletion criterion G5, "Pages created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, and which have no substantial edits by others". There were two edits by other accounts, and two by an editor not logged in to an account. Those four edits were: one edit which added a category, two one-character edits which corrected a spelling mistake, and an edit which made a few minor changes such as removing an unnecessary capital letter and removing a genre. There were indeed "no substantial edits by others". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry if you aren't, but you must understand that this user has created a lot of accounts and we've had cases where people have created new accounts to evade a block and tried to get their deleted pages restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Vishuddhasagar

Article was deleted without any reply on talk page or discussion. No chance was given to justify notability. --- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 05:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

I see that there were several claims of importance. So I think the A7 delete can be overthrown. But do you have any more independent references to add so that it might survive an AFD? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
I can find more references if I get the old content. It won't be much difficult. He is one of the most respected and followed Acharya among Jains. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 06:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  Done I have moved it to Draft:Vishuddhasagar. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot :) I'll try to improve the article and resubmit for approval soon. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 09:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Medicalresearch.com

I, Eminentdomains, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eminentdomains (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

User:JoseSenitio2/sandbox

I spent 2 hours this morning creating a new version of the article and it was merged with a draft version - losing all my changes which I wish to re-submit -JoseSenitio2 (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adaobi Eke

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Adaobi Eke (talk) 22:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC) 

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adaobi Eke

Yaar Nee

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -171.161.56.16 (talk) 13:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done I have put back an earlier version from before it was blanked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Volunteer Houston

Volunteer Houston is the by far the largest volunteer action center in the Houston. Founded in 1974, it is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization and enjoys widespread support from and visibility in the community. -Pck2002 (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:John Solie

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Stevensammons (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

I, Stevensammons, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevensammons (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. Steven, this was hagiograpy – blatantly promotional crowing of the subject's virtue and opinion characterization. Nevertheless it still might have been undeleted for reworking (though never acceptable as written), but a more significant problem makes that impossible. It contained multiple copyright violations and plagiarism. For example, content from here, here and here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Jerome Strong at SFMOAD, Nov 2008.jpg

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015061010027601 -Mdann52 (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52:  Done. Don't forget to update the page to show the release.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

File:The Center for Longevity building on Viceroy Drive, Dallas, Texas.jpg

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015061210017261) -Mdann52 (talk) 10:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52:  Done.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute

Permission for text received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015060510019521 -Mdann52 (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52:  Done.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Trisotech

I, Scrat55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scrat55 (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Company gained more notability, will try to submit again. -Scrat55 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @RHaworth: as the admin who previously deleted this submission under G12 and G13. Hasteur (talk) 18:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have not restored the copyright violating versions though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Chekottu Ashan

Religiously eminent person -117.213.17.18 (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Religiously eminent person -117.213.17.18 (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done Copyright violations are not restored. --NeilN talk to me 13:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Religiously eminent person -117.213.17.18 (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done I see no reason why the WP:A7 should be overturned. Please note: "If you feel that an article deleted under any of these criteria was deleted in error, please contact the deleting administrator. If you discuss, but are unable to resolve the issue, you may raise the matter at Wikipedia:Deletion review." --NeilN talk to me 14:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Island Heat

Today I encountered the second article nominated by the contributor who nominated this article. No one else weighed in at the AFD for Island Heat, and the nominator's second nomination triggered my concern that the nominate didn't understand that we don't nominate articles on notable topics just because we think the current state of the article falls short, I'd like to look at the article to see if it was really on a non-notable topic. Geo Swan (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Non-Admin Response @Geo Swan: This seems to be a common theme within your arguments for keeping any article you have had a hand in creating. Instead of questioning the motives of the nominator let's try to assume good faith, you need to convince people why your articles meets the inclusion criteria in this case 3 different people agreed on deletion, not just the nominator. At any point this is not the venue to have an AFD overturned you will need to first approach the deleting admin User:Davewild or Deletion Review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Evidently in that case, you consider this user a nobody? Mdann52 (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • A lapse, my apologies. I must have misinterpreted that final delete as the final comment of he closing administrator. Geo Swan (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @Mcmatter: This request was not triggered by a failure to AGF on my part.
  • I wasn't clear, I was requesting userification. I apologize for the confusion.
  • In case anyone is confused by McMatter's personal reflections -- I have no previous history with the Island Heat article. I asked for userification of this article due to a concern that an inexperienced nominator may not have fully understood their obligations under WP:BEFORE. Discussions here should be about the pros and cons of userifying this article. Geo Swan (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

2600hz

I'm looking to get the history of this page so we can someday improve it offline. The page had a lot of valuable links to articles, awards and press releases that the organization had achieved. Even if the page is not allowed on Wikipedia, it's content was useful and I'd like to save it -Darren Schreiber (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC) Darren Schreiber (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

@Darren Schreiber: it's at User:Darren Schreiber/2600hz (draft), complete with all its history. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

wernrt burklin

I, 2601:58C:C300:96D8:DDCB:C677:7DB8:6624, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:58C:C300:96D8:DDCB:C677:7DB8:6624 (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Corrected link to the correct title.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 20:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:Verifiability and WP:Biographies of living persons to understand why this will not be accepted without references to reliable sources to verify what it says. JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Emma_Swift

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clintric (talk) 06:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Clintric:   Done. Pinging for information user Ivetliviya9 who created this article, but then requested deletion. JohnCD (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

2014 Formula One season

This article was deleted at AFD in 2010, and subsequently recreated, and has since had several thousand edits. I request the pre-deletion history be grafted to the beginning of the current article. Another contributor is arguing that the 2010 deletion of this article justifies the deletion another article, 2021 World Championships in Athletics today. Others have argued that, although the 2021 event hasn't been held, notable milestones, like the choosing of Eugene Oregon as the host city, above other cities, has been made.

If the Formula One article's AFD happened before any notable milestones had been documented, then its deletion is irrelevant to the other discussion. Geo Swan (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 02:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)`

The question is, what milestones would those be, realistically? The release of the race schedule, I assume, since F1 races in different countries every year... —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
I wouldn't support this, as in 2010, anything about the 2014 season was just speculation, so that previously deleted page would just be useless speculation. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
@Geo Swan:   Done, though I don't think it will help. The version deleted at AfD was a one-liner: "The 2014 Formula One season will be the 65th FIA Formula One season", but earlier there was an elaborate skeleton which was PRODded, redirected to Future of Formula One, then the redirect deleted at RfD here and the target at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of Formula One. You would have to dig into the sources of the skeleton version to see whether there were any significant sourced milestones - the few I looked at were not specific - on the lines of "X has renewed their F1 contract till 2015". JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Journal of Physical Security

This article about a journal was deleted 5 years ago because at the time it did not meet wikipedia notability criteria. It now has an ISSN and may well be notable. Please restore to the Draft namespace so we can try to establish notability. -★NealMcB★ (talk) 14:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nealmcb:   Done to Draft:Journal of Physical Security. This was actually a PROD deletion so could be simply restored, but if you have new material you may as well improve it before moving it back to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

A.J._Joshi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clintric (talk) 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Clintric:   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since this article was a re-creation of one deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Joshi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm looking to get the history of this page so we can someday improve it offline. The page had a lot of valuable links to articles, awards and press releases that the organization had achieved. Even if the page is not allowed on Wikipedia, it's content was useful and I'd like to save it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clintric (talk • contribs) 11:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

What organization? The article was about a person. At the AfD, the sources were described as "simply press releases, the subject's own Twitpic account, a crowdsourced directory of business startups, a non-Archived deadlink to a page on planetdnb.com whose URL contains "/forum/10-plugs", and several webpages that don't include the word "Joshi"". In any case, articles deleted at AFD will not be restored here, and your first call should be to Joe Decker who closed the AfD; he may be willing to email you the contents. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Mahnama Sultan ul Faqr Lahore

it is a notable Islamic e-magazine and the article is totally based on neutrality. -Markangle11 (talk) 11:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Sultan ul Faqr Publications

It is a notable publication house in Pakistan and I want to work on the article by adding more sources. -Markangle11 (talk) 11:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Vishal Group

I, Rahulrajmehra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I now have the required links for this page's authenticity -Rahulrajmehra (talk) 16:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Rahulrajmehra:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ray Carr

I, CVActor1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CVActor1 (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@CVActor1:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Billboard Rhythmic Airplay number-one singles

The category reflect the list of songs that reached number one on Billboard's Rhythmic chart, but the ones who wanted it deleted singled it out because they don't see it as a legitimate chart and given that we have 27 other categories related to the Billboard charts, so I see this as biased and unfair. I believe this should be restored, -Robert Moore (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. Hi Robert. At the top of this page it says what it is and is not for:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted... This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes ... will not be overturned through this process. ... Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

In short, this page very explicitly tells you your request is misplaced here. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess Wikipedia in general won't hear or help me when it comes to deletions. This is frustrating Robert Moore (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Robert Moore, that wasn't what was said above. At deletion review such deletions can be considered and are sometimes overturned. But not at this page. DES (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Maurice Claypole

This was my first attempt and I was too busy to try to sort out the problem with the referencing which was the only reason for it not being accepted. I would appreciate a second chance to sort this out. Thanks -Celia612 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wendell Mobley

Page was speedy deleted via G12 as copyright violation; prior versions were not a copyright violation. I know because I wrote the original version myself. Please undelete only the revisions that are not a violation. -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer:   Done - pre-copyvio revisions restored. Ping Jimfbleak for info. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception

I, Strasburger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Strasburger (talk) 23:37, 30 August 2015

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia. JMHamo (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Strasburger:   Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Articles_for_creation/Sigma_Omega_Phi_Fraternity

because we want to make the corrections and resubmit. -Qpid diamond (talk) 01:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Qpid diamond:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Sigma Omega Phi Fraternity. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Saumya.omer/sandbox

I, Saumya.omer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saumya.omer (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It will have to be less like an advertisement to be accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

nainsingh mahar

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nainsinghmahar (talk) 11:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nainsinghmahar:   Done - I have restored the page, but moved it to the Draft space at Draft:Nainsingh Mahar, as it is not acceptable for the encyclopedia in its present state. More advice on your talk page soon; meanwhile, read WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORKA

I, 86.188.53.125, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.188.53.125 (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:ORKA. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katch 22

I, Mike-eastman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike-eastman (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

This page cites the actual facts about the London Band Katch 22, formed in 1964 / turned professional in November 1967 -Mike-eastman (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment: This has been CSD:G13ed twice already and been refunded. Hasteur (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Mike-eastman:   Done to a new location at Draft:Katch 22. Normally, we are reluctant to restore pages which have been restored once and then abandoned again; but in this case I see you did edit the page extensively after the last restoration, just never re-submitted it. The edits seem to have confused the layout considerably, so you will have quite a job to sort it out. Please do that and re-submit as soon as convenient. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

I, Moonandback, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This submission was declined based on lack of notability. I remain confident that an article on this topic belings in Wikipedia and am continuing to assemble support for its notability. Moonandback (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

@Moonandback:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


Rocket (film)

Want to improve the article from sources. Google results lots of news sources about this film -Variation 25.2 (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

@User:Mcmatter, There are reliable sources for the Rocket (film) Search - Variation 25.2 (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Variation 25.2:   Not done the article Rocket (film) was deleted per WP:CSD#G5 as the work of one of a sock-farm of undisclosed paid editors. We are normally reluctant to restore pages like that, so you may have to start from a clean sheet; but you can ask the deleting admin, Smartse if he is willing to restore or userfy the article as a basis for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
As User:Variation 25.2 is a user in good-standing I don't have a problem with this. I've moved the deleted version to User:Variation_25.2/Rocket_(film). Please ensure it is all sourced and NPOV before moving it back to mainspace. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 16:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Mass killings in capitalist regimes

I'm aware that the decision to upload the article was unpopular among the community, but the article's supporters stand firm behind the argument that if a communist version of the page can exist, then a capitalist version also can. I added the newpage template to most recently deleted one, and spent over an hour fixing the links, quotes, etc. The sources used were reliable. The bias was quickly being removed. The article has the 1st amendment right to exist alongside the communist one. -Socialistguy (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Greetings, both "socialistguy" and myself have approached Dennis about the matter. He has stated that he deleted it as a routine matter. I would like to begin the process of supporting its appeal. I do believe that upon fair-minded consideration, the appeal will be granted. Thank you. Youknowwhatimsayin (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Youknowwhatimsayin:. The admin who closed the deletion discussion, user Jayjg (talk) is not currently active, so your appeal should be to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
You can start a discussion at Deletion review. If the community decides the article should be recreated then it can be. During the discussion the article can be temporarily restored for people to examine the changes. Chillum 17:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. A discussion has started over at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Mass_killings_in_capitalist_regimesover there. As a way to facilitate the situation, perhaps someone could archive box the discussion here. Youknowwhatimsayin (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

ConsensusDOCS

The ConsensusDOCS page is being completely blocked by a "manager" (not sure exact term), who has been unresponsive. I do not believe it was fairly blocked. He even completely blocked the conversation we had after being unresponsive for over a week. The issue the manager claimed was the webpage was "promotional." I believe he made this determination because the bottom half of the page included the contract catalog, which simply listed the contracts ConsensusDocs publishes. I offered to remove this part, but he did not respond, and ultimately deleted the page. The first half of the page stated facts and history of the company. I don't believe any reasonable person would see this was promotional. I am asking for the page to be reinstated, or at the very least the first half of the page. I appreciate you consideration. Thank you. -17:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)208.185.217.66 (talk)jorhowar

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Judo do summary decisions and not following community discussions

It's a case of pages deleted as a result of summary decisions and not following community discussions The single most glaring piece of misinformation was the claim that Judo do has been an Olympic sport since 1964 It is possible to delete some parts of a page's history, while leaving the current revision of the page intact, so that readers are unaware of the partial deletion (unless they attempt to visit a deleted old page revision) If you think ONLY ONE translated sentence is incorrect!!! French translation = The judo do simultaneously judo entered as a demonstration sport in the Olympic Games program Summer 1964 Tokyo. Check Bibliography =

<long bibliography redacted>

Are all this books about this subject Blatant hoax???--Aikikai45 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)}}

@Aikikai45:   Not done. If an article starts off with misinformation like that in the first line, nothing in it can be trusted. It is not up to us to comb through the article checking which claims are true and which are not: The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. I suggest you write a new version at Draft:Judo do, putting in only material that you have verified and can cite to a reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD: reliable source is on the article !!!--Aikikai45 Draft:Judo do may take a week or more. The Articles for creation process is slightly backlogged. There are 572 submissions waiting for review!!!(talk) 15:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I see the article was just recreated... Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
And still seriously problematic.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

summary decisions of RHaworth for (G3: Blatant hoax) but not following community discussions CHECK THE BIBLIBOGRAPHY ABOUT JUDO-DO AND STOP SAYING IT IS JUDO! -Aikikai45 (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Moved up from other section Hasteur (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

AJ_Joshi

I, Clintric, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD A7. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This submission was declined based on lack of notability. I remain confident that an article on this topic belings in Wikipedia and am continuing to assemble support for its notability. Clintric (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

@Clintric:   Not done I have already told you above that, because this was deleted after WP:Articles for deletion/AJ Joshi, it will not be undeleted here. You must ask the closing admin, Joe Decker (talk), and if he does not agree go to WP:Deletion review. Removing the earlier request from this page and asking again will not get you anywhere. JohnCD (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Emma_Swift, again

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clintric (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment There's a bunch of back and forth between deletion, restoration, and Author request speedy deletion. @Clintric: can you explain why this is? Hasteur (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
@Clintric:   Not done - suggest you improve Draft:Emma Swift and re-submit it for review. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tui Allen

I, Antonymillen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Antonymillen (talk) 22:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

@Antonymillen:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ben Lang (entrepreneur)

I think I did some work on this article before it was deleted in the Orangemoody fiasco, and I'd like to at least see what it was. -Brianhe (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Brianhe:   Not done. He's an Israeli internet entrepreneur who has made a mapping application. His picture may jog your memory. You did some tweaks and copyediting, but the article was basically Orangemoody so I don't want to restore it, at least until I have read all the LTA material. JohnCD (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

George Oliveira

This page is relevant and informative, the reasons to undelete this page are the same reasons that had created it in the first place, this page was deleted by some user vengeance and negative reputation campaign against its subject.thanks -Olijojo (talk) 10:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Olijojo:   Not done. The article was not deleted for the reasons you suggest, but because it was created by one of a group of scammers who tell subjects that they can create and protect Wikipedia articles in return for money. See WP:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Karanovic & Nikolic

intend to continue editing -Jennifergrubac1234 (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jennifergrubac1234:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Pete Lyon

I, Adelphi14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adelphi14 (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article exists at Pete Lyon. -- GB fan 18:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Automatic temperature controlled coat

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 43.254.111.122 (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. I presume you are user User:Aravindkumarp1993. I have looked at User:Aravindkumarp1993/Automatic temperature controlled coat, but I am afraid it would be a waste of time to restore it, because it is not suitable for Wikipedia. It describes your own ingenious invention, but an encyclopedia is not a place to announce new things. To understand this, read the Wikipedia:No original research policy, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."
You may get some ideas about where you could publish this at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. If you would like a copy of the text, I will email it to you on request, if you enable email on your account (at the bottom of the "User profile" tab under "Preferences"). JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Boogie Knights (band)

I would like to try to redevelop this page, making sure it meets notability and reliability guidelines. As part of this process, I would like access to the deleted pages' content (it has been deleted twice). I am happy to do the development on Special:Mypage, but undeletion is the only way I know to see the history. -Etoile ✩ (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Etoile:   Done. This was a PROD deletion, so could have been directly restored to the mainspace, but it's in pretty horrible shape, so I have put it at Draft:Boogie Knights (band) where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk)

File:Complete Restoration Corporate Office, Utah.png

OTRS ticket granted, Please undelete and insert the template, then move to commons and delete: VRTS ticket # 2015071310012538 and {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 20:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done, image restored and tagged appropriately. Someone else will have to move to commons. Either way, the file name will remain unchanged so the image can be used in an article regardless of whether it's here or on Commons. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tea in the United States

I, Marybethmccabe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marybethmccabe (talk) 23:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Marybethmccabe. I have deleted the draft as a blatant copyright violation.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith St John

I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keith St John (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

@Keith St John:   Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.. Please also read WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Linked to prior request. There was only one edit made to the article and like John said, it wasn't one that would improve it for acceptance to the mainspace. To be very honest, there wasn't any content in the article aside from the infobox. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Judo-do techniques

All content is intended to be factual, notable, verifiable with cited external sources, and neutrally presented. -Aikikai45 (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. The logs show that it was restored today, moved to draft space, and then deleted again because we already have an article on that topic: Judo do. Please consider expanding that one instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • The requestor also unilaterally moved Judo to Judo and Judo-do, which I reverted. I'd suggest protecting the latter title as well. How much more AGF are we going to expend on this? --Finngall talk 06:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
@Catfish Jim and the soapdish:@WikiDan61: If this is notable enough to be included as a derivative of Judo in the main Judo article, it needs to be notable as a martial art and should be able to stand on its own as a Wikipedia article. My take is that it should be allowed to be tested at AFD.--Aikikai45 (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Aikikai45, right now you're facing a possible block from editing because what you're doing right now is extremely disruptive. The article was deleted several times by JohnCD as a hoax. The impression I got was that the article had been deleted because some of the claims were so hyped up in the article that they constituted a hoax. The AfC article was deleted because you requested that it be deleted via WP:G7. Why you requested this is anyone's guess, but I'm assuming that it might have been because you weren't happy that John wasn't allowing a mainspace creation at that point in time. If you want the AfC version restored then that's fine - but it will not be moved back to the mainspace until it passes notability guidelines at AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I've blocked them for 48 hours for disruptive editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Texanol

Please restore the article to my userpage. I'm the author of the german article to Texanol--Kopiersperre (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutrilayer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- GB fan 20:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
    • @GB fan: I don't want the article back. I just would like to know, what it contained to compare the information with my german article. May you send me the text by mail?--Kopiersperre (talk) 07:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Email sent -- GB fan 12:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/THE LADAKH TOURS (2)

I, Ladakhii, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ladakhii (talk) 18:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC) It is exist and want to edit -Ladakhii (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Previously requested and denied above. --Finngall talk 19:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Diamantopoulou, Eirini

I, 2A02:582:930:3800:50EF:ABB:AF19:190F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:582:930:3800:50EF:ABB:AF19:190F (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Clerk comment: Looks like this IPv6 address created a page over the original contents that were G13d on August 23rd by Sphilbrick. Original creator appears to be Tserginis Hasteur (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

m saif ullah khalid

this page is about real personality "Save page" button below -119.160.69.85 (talk) 10:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Also, please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves - see WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Camp Walden

I, Pattwala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pattwala (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

@Pattwala:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Vader - Reborn in Chaos

This is a compilation album by Vader, the so called administrator who deleted the page has a history of deleting valid pages. More info on the album, including album artwork http://www.metal-archives.com/albums/Vader/Reborn_in_Chaos/17719 and also on the bands official website here http://www.vader.pl/reborn-e.html Cannot request the administrator to do this because he/she is a troll and has been inactive for years -84.203.56.111 (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

  • This is going to be a technical   Not done because there's really nothing to restore here. The reason it was deleted was because of no context and looking at the content, I can see why it was deleted as such. It was only a list of tracks and no other information about the album. It didn't even come close to being an article and restoring it would pretty much require someone to instantly write a new article from scratch. It'd be much better for you to create a new article yourself. You can do this by going through AfC (if you don't want to sign up for an account) or signing up with an account (or into an account if you already have one) and creating the page. Just make sure that it would pass notability guidelines per WP:NALBUM, as musical albums are not automatically notable because the band that created them is notable. On a side note, I would really like to ask that you assume good faith about other editors. While I'm not familiar with this now inactive admin, this particular deletion does not give off the impression of any abuse, nor does their talk page show any overwhelming evidence of abuse. It's generally considered to be very poor manners to come in here and write something that can very easily be taken as an WP:ADHOMINEM attack against another person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_202&oldid=1142568613"