Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 164

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 160 ← Archive 162 Archive 163 Archive 164 Archive 165 Archive 166 → Archive 170

kraftwurx

I intend to work on the article for re-submission -Bill c nabors (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraftwurx, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user CharlieEchoTango (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kraftwurx

I, Bill c nabors, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bill c nabors (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article you wrote was fairly promotional in tone, to the point where you'd pretty much have to re-write it from scratch to remove all of the promotional tones. I'm also concerned that the mainspace article was deleted at AfD and declined at AfC. A search doesn't really show anything to prove that this company is really notable enough to merit their own article, so I kind of feel that even if I did restore this article, it'd just be prolonging the inevitable because you'd still have to run it through deletion review in some form or fashion and I really don't see where this company passes WP:CORP to where the prior AfD would be overturned. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AZair

I, 217.11.251.233, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 217.11.251.233 (talk) 09:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Shaker Photo Studios

Shaker Photo Studios is a landmark of Cleveland Businesses with over 50 years of photographic history. a local competitor studio Motophoto has a page, we have been open for 50 years compared to their 25. I would formally like to request a general info page for Shaker Photo Studios -Shakerphoto (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. We don't restore unambiguously promotional articles, and what else might or might not exist on Wikipedia is not relevant. The requester has been blocked as a spamusername as well. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Living advantage, Inc. (2nd request)

Hi, could you let me know the part I can improve? Last time I already followed your instruction to edit, however, the page still be deleted. I want to try my best. Thank you. -207.151.35.5 (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. See the answer to the previous request above (#Living advantage, Inc.). As previously instructed, you need to discuss with the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Project Vigeye

  • Project Vigeye · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] deleted page Project Vigeye (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): borders on spam)

A report on the Project Vigeye taken from CVC India's website is given here: http://cvc.nic.in/vigeye11012011.htm Now it is five years since the launch of the tech tool. It has a purpose and has served/ is serving its purpose. It has been studied by Harvard Law School and presented in the World Bank's International Corruption Hunters Alliance program in June 2012 as a whistleblower innovation. It is high time the page is taken up for undeletion and rewritten with available material on a Google search }} Project Vigeye is a citizen empowerment technological tool of CVC India and was launched on 9th December 2010- International Anticorruption Day. It was deleted on the same day as its launch ! The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 14:45, 9 December 2010 Lectonar (talk -14.96.55.30 (talk) 01:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Lectonar (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Peppur/sandbox

I, Peppur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peppur (talk) 03:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. It isn't deleted, and there are no deleted revisions. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marina Civic Center

I, Mdecarmo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

University of Toronto United Nations Society

It is unfair for the University of Toronto United Nations Society's page to have been deleted for various reasons. The first being that when Jayakumar RG questioned the notability of the page, I sent a response defending the page's notability. This can be found on his talk page, User_talk:Jayakumar_RG. Ronhjones on 20 May 2014 deleted the page. Secondly, aside from the reasons I mentioned on Jayakumar_RG's Talk Page, (separate and distinct organization, does not fit in the University of Toronto wiki, rich history of its own), it has grown significantly over the past few years and become more prominent within the university community. It is unfair for Jayakumar to claim that it is not notable because it was only founded in 2002. I object to the proposed reasons as to why the page is not notable enough. Lastly, the deletion of the University of Toronto United Nations Society page is inconsistent with other Wikipedia pages that exist. There are other wiki sites such as the North American Model United Nations (NAMUN), which is the sister organization and, in spite of the flowery rhetoric put on their wiki, does not have as rich of a history as the United Nations Society. Moreover, the equivalent of the University of Toronto United Nations Society at York University also has its own Wiki page, York University Model United Nations. Both of these wiki pages have less information and less sources than the page I contributed in May 2014. I hope that the wiki page is restored and undeleted for these reasons. If anything, I'm willing to work with Admins to improve the page. Thank you. -Agmateo (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done Agmateo, I will need to warn you that the existence of other pages (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) does not automatically mean that other pages should have articles, as there may be reasons why those other pages can remain on Wikipedia or it may just be that they haven't been deleted as of yet. Other than that, I don't see why this can't be placed in your userspace where you can work on it and provide sources to show that it passes notability guidelines. Just make sure that you're aware that notability can really only be proven by coverage in independent and reliable sources (WP:RS) and that the society's relation to notable organizations (UoT, United Nations, etc) does not automatically guarantee notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). The main cause for concern was that the group wasn't independently notable of UoT and I have to share this concern, as the sources on the page were entirely WP:PRIMARY, meaning that they were released by the group, the UoT, or by someone/something otherwise affiliated with the UoTUNS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

World Professional Boxing Federation

I'm a Public Relations Officer for the World Professional Boxing Federation (WPBF). The WPBF page's content in wikipedia is written and edited by me,the WPBF organization has a legitimate copyright,please verify with WPBF official website,and contact us via Email: info@wpbf-usbc.org -Superman886 (talk) 13:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Superman886:   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Professional Boxing Federation, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. More to the point, Wikipedia doesn't really care about the organization's copyrights or anything like that. We look at whether or not the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. Also, you have a conflict of interest and shouldn't have created the article yourself, as is explained here. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Browning

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Peterthorn79 (talk) 13:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Note that the deletion log is incorrect; we do not restore G11 deletions on request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  Not done I did restore to take a look but deleted it again. While this was an abandoned draft and technically qualified for uncontroversial restore, the deletion criteria included WP:CSD#G11, which denotes extremely promotional content. I tend to agree. In my opinion the material was a glorified CV written in an overly promotional, fluffed up manner. Coupled with the three rejections by reviewers, and the fact that it's unlikely it will meet the inclusion guidelines, it's obvious that this is never going to improve. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zambuk074/sandbox

I, Zambuk074, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zambuk074 (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I ask that my contribution be undeleted as I put a lot of time into it, and I have not saved it anywhere else. I apologize for my absence, but I have only just arrived home having been away since July.

The page I believe you actually mean has not been deleted. See User:Zambuk074/sandbox (if you don't edit it soon it likely will actually be deleted as abandoned). The page you linked in your request had only one edit by you, had no content but "Thank you FireFlySixtySeven" followed by your signature", and thus was deleted as lacking context.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

ontario glove shooting

Page name might not be exactly as indicated, as I'm going from memory. I remember this page existing and wanted to reference it, but for some reasoning it's gone. I do believe it qualifies as notable, but I'm not a notability expert. There are references in mainstream media for this event, most recently http://www.therecord.com/news-story/2598212-ontario-glove-shooting-20-years-later/ . (I haven't dug up any earlier references, but I could certainly verify the ones attached to the article.) ~~korbitz~~ -Korbitz (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? No reasonable permutation of capitalisation allowed me to find it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
@Korbitz:   Not done Unfortunately like Jeske I couldn't find trace of that page ever existing in any form. In fact when I searched for it the first hit is this page :\ But, as long as it meets WP:GNG, you're welcome to create it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Land Stewardship Project

I, MeganNEmpls, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 'Page was not approved to be published due to peacock language use. I would like to make edits and resubmit for approval' -MeganNEmpls (talk) 19:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done For now. Tokyogirl79 included WP:CSD#G12 in the deletion criteria, which is a copyright violation (pasting text from an external website). We generally don't restore such material, but I will defer to her judgement in this case. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
It was also deleted as blatantly promotional (CSD G11) and really did need quite a rewrite, but looking at the development, I'm fairly convinced this was a backwards copyvio (the blog copied the draft's content) though unfortunately, the Wayback Machine does not have any archived versions to check.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I'd honestly recommend that you just re-write it from scratch. In my past experience I've found that it's just easier to do it this way because it really forces you to look at what you're writing and think about what you need to change. In most of the cases where I've restored very promotional text the users made minor tweaks and left most, if not almost all, of the promotional text behind and it actually took more time and effort to work from the original, promotional text than it did if they were to re-write everything. I'm not sure if this is because the editor honestly doesn't see how it is promotional, if it's because they're looking for the quickest and easiest way to finish the article (ie, make the fewest amount of edits they can), or if it's because they really want to present their topic in the best light possible, but whatever the reason it's usually better with very promotional articles like this one to start off from scratch. To be honest, this is usually what I do with very promotional articles that I've cleaned up in the mainspace- if it's particularly bad I just nuke it and replace it with a new article from scratch. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Rahul_N_Anushka

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Atmarketindia (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  • @Atmarketindia: I also have to note that the page was extremely promotional and looks to be very closely paraphrased from the official website, so it's unlikely that Y will restore the article to its former state any time soon. Articles must be written in your own words and not contain any promotional text. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Rahul_N_Anushka had helped many actors and actress in bollywood movies and comedy shows. Their dressing made actors and actress in bollywood more beautiful and stylish. They started their brand in Lakme India Fashion Week Mumbai 2009 with the commitment to provide stylish and beautiful designs. Well Known Actress in Bollywood like Juhi Chawla knows about Rahul N Anushka. Through Wikipedia platform i want to aware about trends and designs of Rahul N Anushka Rahul N Anushka have been contributing to the fashion industry for the last five years, and I believe talent should not be hidden.

click the "Save page" button below -Atmarketindia (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  • @Atmarketindia: Still   Not done. The page was deleted via A7 and will not be restored through this forum, especially since it was extremely promotional in tone and contained copyright violations. (WP:COPYVIO) Your best bet is to start from scratch and write a new article. Posting new requests here will not accomplish anything. Normally I'd suggest deletion review, but I can honestly say that the chances of it getting restored is extremely slim due to the promotional edits and copyright violations. They'd just tell you to write a new version in your own words, without being promotional. To be honest, I'm actually kind of worried that you're just here to promote the designer, especially since your name somewhat sounds like it's representing a business. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, be aware that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by notable people having worn clothing from this designer and you can only show notability through independent and reliable sources (WP:RS). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Sadek telecom

Mobile Servicing Center, Ma Moni Manshon Biswanath Notun bazar, Sylhet. Call me : (phone number removed) -Sadekmiah (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. An advertisement written in a foreign language? This is the English Wikipedia, and you clearly don't know the purpose and goals here. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

John Searl

I have a long-standing interest in the subject of this article and thought it contained some fascinating information – the talk page in particular. I would be grateful if somebody would userfy it for me for reference purposes.

Jake Rilko (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. That said, they can send you a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion via email; would this be acceptable? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for the prompt response. I will try the deletion review forum.

Jake Rilko (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jake Rilko: You can ask the deleting admins of both John Searl and Searl Effect Generator to userfy the articles before taking the case to WP:DRV. Other than that, I see nothing controversial in userfying the talk page somewhere, or emailing you the content. What do you prefer? ~Amatulić (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Alison Becker

Charming on Ferguson. Interested in body of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.48.206 (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Wikipedical (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs more independent references - see WP:Notability (summary) and WP:Entertainer. JohnCD (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Barklage

I, Davidbarklage, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This page was not yet published as I was waiting to fully update it before publishing. Also, the claim of a copyright infringement is not fair because it is my own LinkedIn that has the content. -Davidbarklage (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

@Davidbarklage:   Not done. We cannot publish copyright material on the basis of a claim by someone on the end of a wire, a formal copyright release is required. However, there is little point in making a release for this, because it is too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, and (though this is not made clear enough to new users) Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to tell the world about themselves. That is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 17:38, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/D3DGear

Continue to work on this page -216.58.126.24 (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

City-Data

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -DeDe4Truth (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I had edited the City-Data page and entered a Controversy section with a lot of information surrounding all the abuse the moderators inflict on the forum members as well as other businesses owned by the same owner as CD. I had verifiable links that I included for each edit comment. I am requesting that my edits be restored.

Thank you,

DeDe4Truth— Preceding unsigned comment added by DeDe4Truth (talk • contribs)

This page was not deleted, and your changes were still in the page history, I simply undid the COI editors removal of the content.This page is only for Page deletions not for reverting edits in the page history.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:NYWO RAM Duke's Hall Easter Concert 2014.jpg

Permission received in Ticket:2014110110006598 ---Mdann52talk to me! 20:49, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done, already restored by Mike V. I fixed a broken cc-by-sa template. Should be OK now. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Education in Early Texas

I, Raykeon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Raykeon (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done, restored. However, something that looks like a school essay won't be accepted for main space. The article has a worthy topic but needs a massive rewrite. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lacey_(band)

I, 2.217.205.167, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.217.205.167 (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

it is a topic of public interest -2.217.205.167 (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. As an aside, we don't care about "public interest", we care about whether others have taken note of them or (in this case) if they meet any of the criteria listed here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dad (short film)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mquiupm (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

lostkeyz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jakebloom2 (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that A7 deletions cannot be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Actually it was deleted twice in November, and just re-created today in a substantially identical version, and tagged with A7. I have deleted it again, and protected it from re-creation. Since I am the deleting administrator, I will say that if you feel the deletion was improper, or any new information has come up that might make the subject notable, take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  Not done (as an admin considering restoring) reasons: rapper, and DJ (I will usually be very happy to delete articles on these topics) second references are youtube and facebook. Look at WP:BAND to see what it takes to have an article here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Supplier Segmentation

I, Logisticsmans, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Logisticsmans (talk) 11:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New Chamber Opera

I, *reoc*, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. *reoc*

  Done, restored by Graeme Bartlett. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Smith Curry

I, Climber192, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Still working on page...Subject is doing increasingly remarkable work -Climber192 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nac Mac Feegle

Deleted at low-participation AfD, based on Google Books search at https://www.google.com/search?q=%22nac+mac+feegle%22+pratchett&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1&gws_rd=ssl there appear to be enough independent reliable sources documenting the fictional element that I can improve the article. Requesting Userification to user:Jclemens/Nac Mac Feegle for improvement. -Jclemens (talk) 05:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jclemens: Crivens! There's no keeping them down, so   Done, but check with the deleting admin, Wifione before restoring to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Will St Leger

Request for undeletion of page, deleting administrator citied 'person not notable' - references show otherwise and I'm wish to update — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diagear (talk • contribs) 14:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@Diagear:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Comedy in General

This is a brand name and it is the first upcoming library for all the "legendary" uploads for this century. This page has the same right to be up on Wikipedia as much as break and 9gag and the thechive. you find the site on the first pages of google when you search for "Comedy". that is even closer then break 9gag and thechive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zihauk (talk • contribs) 13:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm not the first admin to delete this page, but I just deleted it again under criterion A7, non-notable website, and G11, spam. There's no secondary coverage of this barely-a-week-old website, So A7 seems to clearly apply. —C.Fred (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
ok
What if it is on the first page on search results already?
Search it on Bing and Google and check if you still want to keep it here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zihauk (talk • contribs)
(Non-administrator comment) It does not appear anywhere in Google search results for me (at least not in the first 1000 hits). Google searches give different results to different people - a website you have been visiting a lot will appear much more prominently, and a brand-new website that you have never visited might not appear at all, as was the case for me. --bonadea contributions talk 14:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Also, search engine results have no bearing on Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
So, as a formal reply to this request,   Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning websites will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club

I, 82.6.184.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Need more time to complete article. 82.6.184.221 (talk) 08:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Declined pending further information. This has been restored twice with a pledge that it would be worked on, but over more than a year no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. I am willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

The Code Project

I'd like to ask that this page be restored to "draft" or "userspace draft with the hope I could get a copy of the original page to be updated to comply with Wikipedia's editorial guidelines (specifically: Reliable sources) before resubmitting the article. -207.219.70.50 (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done. Although this was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Code Project, low participation in the discussion meant that it was a WP:SOFTDELETE, so the article is restored on request. It may be nominated again unless notability can be established by more references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

UK-RUSSIA BUSINESS COUNCIL

The UK-RUSSIA BUSINESS COUNCIL is a not for profit organisation promoting bilateral trade and investment between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Russian Federation, UK exports to Russia and secure the benefits of trade for the British Industry, knowledge support vital for U.K. companies to make the most of emerging opportunities U.S.-Russia Business Council is a similar organisation and should be also deleted according to this logic. -82.26.93.225 (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies or organizations. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause, and in regard to U.S.-Russia Business Council, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, though that article also lacks independent references and is likely to be nominated for deletion unless some evidence is provided of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Composter/sandbox/Deep democracy

I, Composter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Composter (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@Composter:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tejaswi Hiremath

I, Tejaswi.hiremath, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tejaswi.hiremath (talk) 10:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Please read WP:Autobiography. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 11:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
@Tejaswi.hiremath:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have moved the page to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/B. V. Mallapur since that is the name of its subject. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

don't delete of this page and page name Sandeep Yadav Vice President of All India Yadav Mahasabha Delhi Pradesh because i am real person for this article and page name

Sandeep Yadav Vice President of All India Yadav Mahasabha Delhi Pradesh -103.255.224.198 (talk) 13:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. You should not write about yourself on Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:Autobiography. Also, Wikipedia is never to be used for publicity or promotion purposes (see WP:NOTPROMOTION), and the article offered no evidence that the subject is notable. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Likeavirgin.jpg

I think I made a mistake on replacing this outstanding image with the current infobox image that is already part of an album. I think I like the deleted image more than the current one that I substituted for. -George Ho (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@George Ho:   Done, image is restored and added back into the article. Please be sure the tagging is still correct. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:45, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES

<advertisement removed>

@Jayaramtvm:   Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion (like the blatant advertisement you posted here), or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

k.chanakya raj

last time i uploaded the biography by creating the name k.chanakya raj it was deleted saying the reason that the page contents the data about the person and the society. After this issue i removed the data of society and uploaded another article by keeping that name but again it was the deleted.iam keeping the correct information please restore my article -Mohan.bogada (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
@Mohan.bogada: I will not restore the article because (a) it was far too promotional in tone, Wikipedia is not for promotion; (b) it had no references to verify what it said; and (c) it gave no indication that he meets Wikipedia's WP:Notability test, which looks for evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Redcar Past & Present

I haven't even started the page how can you delete it !! I don't understand that have I broken a rule I was unaware of or not followed a set procedure ? -Redcardotorg (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Comment: from deleting admin: - this was an WP:CSD#A3 deletion, fifteen minutes after creation the article contained nothing but a repeat of the title. I will explain to the requester how to make a userspace draft, and how to change username. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Discover Exploration Limited

This page was deleted for no apparent reason. Discover Exploration Limited is a company out-of-the ordinary. It is the first oil & gas company to enter the Comoros and the first one to be financed by The Carlyle Group. I provided plenty references from the FT, Reuters, Bloomberg, etc. I would appreciate receiving a valid explanation before seeing my hard work deleted in just a few minutes. -Clipper2014 (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@Clipper2014:   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. The article hardly said anything about Discover Exploration - it was all about Carlyle Group and CIEP. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society of Quantitative Analysts

I, Peghd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peghd (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm kind of hesitant since the page is fairly promotionally written (at worst) and at best it is written in a very casual tone that is not suitable for Wikipedia. This is likely because large portions of the article was taken from the official page. I do see that there is an ORTS ticket, but it appears to be for an image and not for the content. The thing about giving permission for any official content is that while it may not be considered a copyright violation any more (assuming that it was for the text), the content itself is still considered to be promotional and would still be considered unusable for Wikipedia. Since much of the page was already taken from a WP:PRIMARY source and you'd have to essentially re-write everything anyway, I'd recommend that you just start from scratch and write a new article in your own words in a neutral point of view. On a side note, I did see that all of the sources were primary and much of the article was just you listing various people who have spoken for the society. Please be aware that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Living advantage, Inc. (3rd request)

I believe the page shouldn't be deleted because I am not intended to advertise this organization but contribute the information to public. Therefore, could you let me know which part I can improve? (delete or add some content?) Thank you so much! -Yupingw (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Not done For the same reason you were given above. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
@Yupingw: This is bordering on WP:TENDENTIOUS, and may lead to your account being blocked. Repeated requests will not result in restoration of the article. Read the answers you have already received in the sections above #Living advantage, Inc. and #Living advantage, Inc. (2nd request). ~Amatulić (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

User request -DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 06:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Global Advertisers

I, Pareshbhanushali, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pareshbhanushali (talk) 07:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done There wasn't really anything to restore. The content as a whole was "Global Advertisers is India's largest Out-of-home advertising company,Global advertisers owned by Sanjeev Gupta. Global Advertisers offers a variety of out-of-home advertising displays. The Head Office located in Mumbai,India." There was no other content and there were no sources on the page. I have no problem with you creating a new draft of the article, but there really wasn't anything worth restoring- especially since so much of the past edits were unambiguously promotional and even the material posted above was fairly promotional in tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

In Your Face with Drew Garabo

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cenflamark (talk) 08:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done I was concerned that the page read as fairly promotional in tone (or at least way, way too casual for comfort), and it looks like this is because it is taken from the official bio for Drew Garbo. Please understand that we cannot accept copyrighted material on Wikipedia and even if the station gave permission via WP:ORTS for its use, it would still require a total re-write to fit Wikipedia's requirements for phrasing and neutrality. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science

This is one of the top theoretical computer science conference in India. It deserves a Wikipedia entry. -Arindam (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Arindam: the deleted article's only reference was the conference's own website, but Wikipedia has an inclusion criterion called Wikipedia:Notability which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If you can provide such independent references, you are welcome to make an article, but I suggest in the first instance you do it as a draft - click on Draft:International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science and make the article there. JohnCD (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORANGE Sorting Machines

I, Cling.george, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cling.george (talk) 11:10, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Cling.george:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, note the need for references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability, and make sure the article does not read like an advertisement. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Tumor (Band)

Tumor (Band) meets more than one of the musicians and ensembles criteria(which includes bands). This article was deleted in order to include it into the Chris Pohl article. As this article does not exist at this moment, a undeletion is neccesary.

Tumor meets the following criteria:

  1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.
    • 1998: Neues Fleisch
    • 1998: Neues Fleisch Operation 2
    • 1999: Seelenfresser
    • 2002: Zombienation
    • 2005: Killer Tekkkno
    • 2005: Welcome Back, Asshole!
  2. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country. Tumor performed on X-Treactor Festival on 26 of June of 1998 (Resources: http://www.willemeen.nl/programma/ and http://www.lastfm.es/festival/1238983+X-Treactor+Festival
  3. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable), on Fear Section label (as well as many other Chris Pohl albums). Reference: http://www.discogs.com/label/34536-Fear-Section
  4. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. In this case, Chris Pohl, member of:
  5. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; Tumor is one of the most representative Electro-industrial and EBM genres.

Thanks for your patience. -J-888 (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done, more or less. There was no deleted article at Tumor (band) because it had been moved to a user's sub-page and subsequently deleted by user request. I have restored it to Draft:Tumor (band) because the article that was deleted in 2008 isn't fit for main-space publication.
@J-888: Please flesh out the article, including adding reliable sources. Note that sources like discogs are created by users (much like Wikipedia) and is therefore not considered a reliable source for referencing.
I note that Chris Pohl did exist, and was deleted in 2011 via WP:BLPPROD. That article is only a single short paragraph with zero references, and wouldn't be useful to restore. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terradise

Djhaldeman (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Djhaldeman:.   Done - in fact, I have done better than just restore your draft. It was declined in November 2103 because the way it was presented made it appear to be about the word Terradise as a neologism; but since then another user, Voceditenore (talk), has rewritten it to make clear that it was about the nature reserve, and I have accepted the article and published it to the main encyclopedia at Terradise. Thank you for your contribution, and I hope we will see more articles from you! JohnCD (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TheGeordiePedro

I, 80.194.44.70, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.194.44.70 (talk) 12:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice. I have restored this reluctantly, because I think it has almost no chance of becoming an acceptable article:
JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_164&oldid=1083424678"