User talk:Tariqabjotu/Archive Forty-Two
You're invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes). In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list. To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
|
||||||||||
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
: 11 May 2009
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
: 18 May 2009
- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
: 25 May 2009
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
: 1 June 2009
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
: 15 June 2009
- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
: 22 June 2009
- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Happy first edit day!
| HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! | from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing Tariqabjotu/Archive Forty-Two a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee | ||
: 6 July 2009
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
re: Your Message
Hi Tariqabjotu, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 16:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
: 27 July 2009
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 13:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Re:Asmahan
Greetings Tariq! I must admit even though I'm an admin, I'm still a little new at using the functions and didn't know that we were not allowed to edit articles we protected. The reason I did it is because for weeks now two users have been edit warring (you could look at the talk page) and long-term mediation has failed. Instead of temporarily blocking the users (which I though of doing but then changed my mind), I decided to protect the article and let them list what they want done on the talk page. After discussing their demands, I would add them to the article in an NPOV manner. The only reason I resorted to protection is because of the non-stop warring that was happening and each side complaining about the other user reverting his edits. The block should expire a day from now and until then I have to address Supreme Deliciousness's concerns on the talk page (took care of Arab Cowboy's I think). I know the whole thing seems unorthodox and I might not be explaining the situation correctly, but I would greatly appreciate it if you allow the block to continue until its expiration date. Welcome back and thanks! --Al Ameer son (talk) 18:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know it's probably not my place to say anything, but as one of the first people to attempt to help moderate that page, I wholeheartedly support what Al Ameer son is doing here. I've posted on a number of different places around here to try to get help in dealing with the edit war on that page, and nearly all have lead to dead ends. No one seems to want to get involved, aside from blocking either the editors or locking the page - but that's been tried and has been ineffective. The two editors there are tried and true edit warriors; this battle has spilled over onto other pages as well. Thus, Al Ameer son's rather hands-on approach is both needed and effective. I'm just hoping that after this, the two editors can get along better. My apologies if I'm overstepping my bounds by posting here, though... — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I had no intention of unprotecting the page. I'd just like to think it would have been possible for what you did (i.e. translating their positions into good edits) to be done while the article is not protected (but that the parties would have agreed to let you do the editing). Or to have hashed everything together on the talk page, rather than in the article, while the protection was in place. It was especially strange to me because -- now maybe I'm reading this wrong -- it seemed you addressed Arab Cowboy's edits first (because he was the first to comment), rather then let them both comment before taking a stab at a solution. Hence, why I said it looked like you were editing on-demand. But, anyway: yes, it did work, and I suppose that's all that matters; it just... as I said... looked odd. -- tariqabjotu 13:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I didn't feel too comfortable doing it after reading the policy explicitly stating the protecting admin shouldn't edit the article while it's protected. Anyway, that was the first and last time you'll see me do that. Hopefully, the remaining problems, if any, will be resolved without edit wars. Thanks again for the advice and for being understanding. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
: 3 August 2009
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for stepping in at Paul Krugman
Thanks for stepping in at Paul Krugman. I had earlier suggested protection for the page from User:William M. Connolley, but withdrew my suggestion as it seemed that we were working towards a 1RR agreement. However, one party was unwilling, and so that process seems to have broken down. So its best if it's protected for a while. Thanks, LK (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Demonyms and adjectives
I wasn't seeking to suggest that American usage was less courteous than UK English (my experience would suggest the opposite), but that this particular issue might grate more on ears on this side of the Atlantic because of differences of usage, particularly as Hispanic as a demonym is unusual here. I had no beef with your reply, indeed you indicated a preference for a solution in line with my observation: my objection was to the editor who swept the discussion away, considering it to be matter ended after just one reply, which was not unequivocal. Obviously it is true that some words can serve as both nouns and adjectives, including many national descriptors, but to my ears, and obviously those of the other contributors to the thread, this was not such an example. Kevin McE (talk) 07:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello
The same editor you blocked has returned to the Wage slavery discussion page and I fear for the worse. This editor has a long history of ownership and not playing nicely [1]. Not sure what is appropriate here, but would like to just inform you of the return of this presence who did not seem to understand his block, as to why's and where for's. skip sievert (talk) 04:37, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
User:Ratel warring? vandalizing? bad faith?
User Ratel is trying to archive an active discussion in Aktion T4. This User Ratel is clearly involved in the discussion.
- First attempt to archive the active discussion
- Second attempt to archive the active discussion
- Third attempt to archive the active discussion
- Fourth attemot to archive the active discussion
comment made by 190.25.101.144 (talk) 05:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
A block 'review' of sorts on AN/I
A user has asked that your 3rr block of Tarc be reviewed on AN/I. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_Review: is the link. After some discussion with the user, another admin shortened the block (which seemed reasonable to me). Just figured I'd give you a heads up that folks were talking about you (however tangentially) on AN/I. Protonk (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also, it now appears that the Sanction log can only be edited by admins. I'm feel Tarc's case is an obvious violation, since the article is under probation and he was edit warring on it. --William S. Saturn (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- I was aware of that page before I made the block, and I intentionally did not add Tarc's block to it. I didn't/don't think it's necessary. -- tariqabjotu 10:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
: 10 August 2009
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:your message on my page
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello
Fipplet and several IPs have been showed as the same user and Fipplet is now blocked http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fipplet
Could you please lift the block on the Golan page since he and his account where the only one doing large edits against the majority? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
It's now the 18th, according to Wikipedia's clock
...so Gatesgate can be unprotected! :^) Or, if we're supposed to wait, rather, until EST rolls around, cuja edit the booking photo's caption to read "Cambridge police booking photo of Gates taken after his arrest on July 16. 2009. Charges were dropped five days later," per talkpage consensus? ↜Just M E here , now 00:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Notice: I've left this same message on the talkpage of an admin who's contributed to the article, User:Xeno. ↜Just M E here , now 00:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- As you appear to be currently on a short break, I've fulfilled this request. I will watch to ensure edit warring does not re-occur. Best –xenotalk 00:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- No roblem. Yes, Im sitting in an airort right now. And, besides, some of the keys on my keyboard stoed working so it would have been said <<Cambridge olice>>. -- tariqabjotu 02:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
: 17 August 2009
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News