User talk:Stwalkerster/Archive September 2009
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sudo.
[01:17] <MoPmakesandwich> !helpmebot make me a sandwich
[01:18] <Helpmebot> What? Make it yourself.
[01:18] <MoPmakesandwich> !helpmebot sudo make me a sandwich
[01:18] <Helpmebot> Okay. ( http://xkcd.com/149/ )
You are AMAZING for having that on there. I love it. Cheers, Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 06:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- :D thanks Stwalkerster [ talk ] 01:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Happy Labor Day!
Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A NobodyMy talk 05:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Burneside Clay Shooting Club
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Burneside Clay Shooting Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Guest9999 (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Closing AfD
Hi Stwalkerster. I am a fairly new editor to Wikipedia, mostly involved in AfD, speedy deletion, and disambiguation pages with links. I am trying to get more involved in the project, and I was wondering if you would think it is appropriate for me to close this AfD as "keep" per WP:SNOW, and WP:Articles for deletion/Common_outcomes#Places. I just wanted to get some administrator guidance before I closed my first AfD (besides this withdrawn one). Jujutacular talkcontribs 05:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Disregard my question, I should've more thoroughly read WP:DPR. I was involved in the discussion, and therefore should not close the AfD. Sorry for the trouble. Jujutacular talkcontribs 23:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Mike Valerio
I see you had a question about this article . It article would be improved considerably by replacing the phrase "worked on" with a clear statement of just what his role is for each film. The other important thing is to try to get an article accepted in Wikipedia for his principal film; this will require finding several reviews of it and using them as references. The difficulty is that otherwise it does not appear clear that the projects he has worked on are important. What you find for reviews of his work will make the difference. I cannot tell whether the NYT article that is partly about him will be considered sufficient otherwise. The rule here is that the community decides. I'm just trying to help by telling you wha they usually look for. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm aware. My point was trying to point the user who actually did have the question to a slightly better way of helping themselves, while still trying to be friendly and helpful myself. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 11:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
ACC account
Grazie - Gracias - Danke !Skier Dude (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 |
 U IZ BLOCKED! |
NW (Talk) 23:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is a bad sign....... I don't actually remember doing that. *hurries off to construct some anti-drunk measures* Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Cheers
I wouldn't drink that. WikipeBeer is the beer anyone can edit. For all you know, some vandal decided American Wikibrews shouldn't just taste like piss... Shoemaker's Holiday Over 205 FCs served 00:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I removed the template, as even when it was at the bottom, it still interfered with the redirect. Until It Sleeps alternate 19:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News