Jujutacular
Note: I am only semi-active lately, so I may be slow in responding.
Welcome to my talk page.
- Post new entries at the bottom of this page.
- If I left you a message, please respond on your talk page. If you left me a message, I will respond here.
I feel it is only fair that you restore the above article so I can bring the following links which highlight Benson's notability under GNG to those who voted to delete the article in the deletion debate. Unfortunately I didn't get the chance to do this while the article was up for deletion and it got deleted very speedily. See: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. They are just an example of some of the articles relating to Benson showing coverage across a range of national and international media. Many thanks, --IrishTennis (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
And a couple more, [9], [10].--IrishTennis (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Good sources, thank you for digging these up. I would say the best option would be to create a draft page and submit at WP:AFC, since this was already deleted through AFD discussion. Would you like me to restore to your userspace where you can get a submission ready? Jujutacular (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes that would be perfect. Thanks for your help! --IrishTennis (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Done: User:IrishTennis/Robbie Benson. Jujutacular (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes that would be perfect. Thanks for your help! --IrishTennis (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jujutacular, I'd like to ask you to reconsider this. The photo is a derivative of non-free content due to performance rights -FASTILY 07:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Done, thank you. I searched for a while but could not find strictly that photos of dance qualified as a derivative work. Jujutacular (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection edit
Hello, Jujutacular. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Devinks30 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins edit
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers edit
Hi Jujutacular.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Jujutacular. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Coats of Arms Gallery Deletion/Move to Commons edit
Hi, I saw you deleted a gallery I created about 10 years ago that should be moved to Commons: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Coats_of_arms_of_U.S._Cavalry_Regiments. Could you please restore to my user space so that I can do that? Thanks! Hammon27 (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- I see that it's been done! Sorry for the delayed response. Jujutacular (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#File:Aneptunelogon.gif edit
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#File:Aneptunelogon.gif. Mdrnpndr (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
File:GardenStreetBridgeSchuylkillRiverSkylinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.jpg edit
The 2009 File:GardenStreetBridgeSchuylkillRiverSkylinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.jpg is a fine photo, but many more skyscrapers have been built, so a new photo is needed. Do you have a current one, or can you take a new one?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- I don't live near Philadelphia, the photographer is User:Massimo Catarinella, they may be able to help. However doesn't look like they've been active the past few years. Jujutacular (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
Obituaries
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I made some edits. Just letting you know. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like good stuff! Thank you for letting me know. Jujutacular (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Jujutacular. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Add a page please edit
Hello, could you put a page for him please : https://fr.blastingnews.com/tv-gossip/2017/05/paul-darbos-de-linfluenceur-au-youtubeur-001674153.html
He's a 27 years old French Internet personality. Just put his name and infos I will make the page. Thank you, Advim Advim (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
FA nomination for George Washington article edit
Hello Jujutacular. I am about to (re)nominate the George Washington article for FA and have been instructed to inform anyone who once attempted to do so. All the best -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Jujutacular. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular edit
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) edit
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/War of the Worlds Plane Crash Set" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/''War of the Worlds'' Plane Crash Set. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/War of the Worlds Plane Crash Set redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Belated holiday greetings edit
Wayman Mitchell AfD edit
Feel free to vote at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wayman_Mitchell.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
FPC closer edit
Hello Jujutacular, FPC closer doesn't seem to be working for me. My OS is Windows 10 and I tried using Edge 81.0.416.72, Chrome 81.0.4044.138 en Firefox 75.0. When I click on "Close FPC", nothing happens. --MrClog (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity edit
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 14:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WSMlogo.gif edit
Thanks for uploading File:WSMlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:UsebareURLs edit
Template:UsebareURLs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)