Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit
Welcome message!
Hello, Sam O' Donnell! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Vengeance 01 (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sam O' Donnell, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Sam O' Donnell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


March 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to James Pattinson have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. Your recent edit(s) to the page James Pattinson appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Removing the citation doesn't help your case. I've already warned you about original research in articles. It's clear from the discussion below that this is what you're doing. This is a BIG DEAL - please read WP:OR and understand it. Questions can be left here. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Pattinson

edit

Hi. Sorry, but you need to:

a) go with the sources wrt his bowling style. Honestly, I don't give a stuff if he bowled a particularly quick ball in 2011 - perhaps the radar gun was juiced? Who knows. All sources say fast-medium, so he's fast-medium.
b) not add too much clutter to the lead. Again, it makes no difference who he bowled that ball to. When, yeah, maybe - especially as it was more than nine years ago now - but against whom and where is irrelevant.

Take a step back, read some other articles (the good ones, not the crap ones) and have a think about it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Blue Square Thing: First of all he didn't bowled one odd bowl to Dravid at 154 he regularly clock over 145 km/h in that summer. Even after his injuries he still bowl quicker than Cummins and Hazelwood on regular basis as for going with source same source of Cricket Australia use to mention Mitchell Johnson as a Left arm fast-medium bowler till 2012. What the fuck ??? Isn't same Johnson who bowled thunderbolts during Ashes 2013. If Pattinson isn't fast i doubt highly in case of many young quicks including Umesh Yadav,Bumrah,Cummins etc. Its not 70s where we have bowlers like Thommo,Holding, Andy roberts bowling at over 150 for fun. Thank you very much. Sam O' Donnell (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Find the sources. Until you have them, you're in WP:OR territory and that'll end up with problems. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
When I say, it becomes a problem, I mean it. You must stop adding your opinion to a WP:BLP article. Without sources, this is obvious OR and that becomes vandalism. It's really simple: find sources or stop. Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ramprakash1000 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramprakash Diwedi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 23:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply