Congratulations

  100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 313 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

 This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

. Buster Seven Talk 15:09, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, Rschen7754. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 19:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cyberpowerChat:Online 19:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, Rschen7754. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 20:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cyberpowerChat:Online 20:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

15:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

May 2015

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Interstate 8 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • a network of roadways important to the country's economy, defense, and mobility.<ref name=NHS-FHWA>{{{FHWA NHS}}</ref> The freeway from the eastern junction with [[California State Route&nbsp;98]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

16:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

The Center Line: Spring 2015

Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

15:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Activity note

I'm busy in real life again; I'll still be checking in on things but unless something is particularly time-sensitive I may postpone my involvement or response to the matter. --Rschen7754 17:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

17:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

  The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

  • Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
  • Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
  • Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
  • Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.
Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from May 2015

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in April 2015.
 
About · Subscribe/unsubscribe, 19:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California State Route 247

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article California State Route 247 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dough4872 -- Dough4872 (talk) 01:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California State Route 247

The article California State Route 247 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:California State Route 247 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dough4872 -- Dough4872 (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California State Route 247

The article California State Route 247 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:California State Route 247 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dough4872 -- Dough4872 (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

Access dates in Template:Cite Caltrans map‎

They shouldn't be hard-coded like that. If I need to use the template to cite something, my access date for the map will be different than yours, and my citation should use the date I accessed the map. Even your dates may change as re-access or re-download the various maps over time. Unlike an archive date, which has to be fixed and is more like a publication date, an access date should always be individually specified. Imzadi 1979  05:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I suppose, though pretty much every access date of a source shared between articles (bridge logs, traffic stats, etc.) in California is hard-coded in, even from before I started redoing the articles in 2012. --Rschen7754 05:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Specifying them in the articles individually is fine, but the shouldn't be hard-coded into the new special templates. The access date on a footnote is a notation that either or both of 1) the content was verified to that source on that date or 2) the citation was added near that date. If I'm expanding an article and citing a Caltrans map next month, the access date on that citation should bear next month's date. Sometimes it's appropriate to back date the citations if the editor actually downloaded a copy of the source; in that case I'd say that editor should use the download date since it's like an archive date in that sense. But otherwise, the access date should always be the date that the editor accessed the source to verify the information he or she added to the article, not a default for the source. Imzadi 1979  05:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration case opening

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Technical 13/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

Your GA nomination of California State Route 195

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article California State Route 195 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

15:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California State Route 195

The article California State Route 195 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:California State Route 195 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of California State Route 195

The article California State Route 195 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:California State Route 195 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of West Virginian -- West Virginian (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted for Technical 13 arbitration case

Hi Rschen7754, in the open Technical 13 arbitration case, a motion has been proposed.  Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz Read! Talk! 19:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

Arbitration motion regarding Arbitration enforcement

By motion, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:

  1. The case is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement";
  2. During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page, may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case.
  3. Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the main contact page.

You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement arbitration case opened

By motion, the committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:

  1. The [Arbitration enforcement] case [request] is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement";
  2. During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page, may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case.
  3. Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the main contact page.

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has, per the above, accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 13, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. Apologies for the potential duplicate message. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Kww and The Rambling Man Arbitration Case Opening

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 13, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz Read! Talk! 18:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Change from announced time table for the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case

You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

A new sockpuppet of banned user User:DegenFarang

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I'm not familiar with all the procedures on this, but since you took care of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DegenFarang, I wanted to point out that User:Handpolk is 99% likely to be another sockpuppet of DegenFarang (no other person on Earth loves the word "peacock" as much as this guy. The articles edited, the tone, the scorched Earth style, the lies about agreement, the obtuse warnings on talk pages, and the inability to civily interact with any other editor ever make it clear. Hopefully he isn't disguising his IP somehow, but it is plainly obvious the same person. 2005 (talk) 03:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

@2005: could you please file a request at SPI? I've stepped down from my SPI (and steward) roles and don't do much sockpuppetry stuff anymore. --Rschen7754 03:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
I was just trying to figure out how to do that. I did want to post here also because if you had any memory of DegenFarang (including the threats against various editors) perhaps you would easily recognize Handpolk as a sockpuppet and at least put a temporary block on his account to prevent him from making any more messes before the sock investigation could take place. Anyway, I hope you'll give consideration to doing something. Thanks. 2005 (talk) 03:48, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
I handled a few hundred cases in my time at SPI, and that case was over two years ago, sunfortunately I don't remember. It's usually best to do these things at SPI anyway, so that things are better documented if he comes back again, or if CheckUser is required. --Rschen7754 03:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you counsel me how to handle this editor spreading baseless allegations about me in numerous venues? If they'd like to go to SPI that's fine but they should not be permitted to make this attack across numerous pages where we disagree on content, in an attempt to discredit me and ignore my argumrnts. The truth is this editor feels ownership over a huge number of non-notable articles, they are all about to be deleted and they are panicking. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 04:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Motion passed in AE arbitration case granting amnesty and rescinding previous temporary injunction

This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.

On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:

  1. Paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Arbitration Committee's motion of 29 June 2015 about the injunction and reporting breaches of it are hereby rescinded.
  2. The Arbitration Committee hereby declares an amnesty covering:
    1. the original comment made by Eric Corbett on 25 June 2015 and any subsequent related comments made by him up until the enactment of this current motion; and
    2. the subsequent actions related to that comment taken by Black Kite, GorillaWarfare, Reaper Eternal, Kevin Gorman, GregJackP and RGloucester before this case was opened on 29 June 2015.

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 24, 2015

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 02:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

@Dank: I left a note on Brainboulton's page - while I am flattered to have three articles on the main page in 6 months, I am a bit worried about reader fatigue as well as some other road editors not getting to see their articles run. (WP:HWY/TFA) --Rschen7754 02:47, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
  • Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
  • Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
  • American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


My RfA

 
Pavlov's RfA reward

Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Oppose so you get only one cookie, but a nice one. (Better luck next time.)
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC).

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

14:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

A kitten for you!

 

I started thinking about you since WP:SPI has a bit of a backlog, but then noticed that you haven't edited in about three weeks. Hope all is well!

Steel1943 (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Life is good these days, it just leaves less time for Wikimedia... and I've been on vacation the last few weeks, and have another trip next weekend. --Rschen7754 22:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2015

Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)