Mjs32193
Welcome!
|
Wikipedia and copyright edit
Hello Mjs32193, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Lucky 7 (TV series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2712966/episodes . These must be in your own words. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I did not get those summaries from IMDB. They are the official summaries from the ABC press releases, which seem to be used everywhere. Anyway, I will rewrite them if that is an issue. Thanks Mjs32193 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 1916–17 Connecticut Aggies men's basketball team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination' by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 
' Olowe2011 Talk 07:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 1915–16 Connecticut Aggies men's basketball team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination' by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ' Olowe2011 Talk 07:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
January 2016 edit
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Snooki & Jwoww episodes, contributed colours that were not WCAG AAA Compliant, causing problems for users that have accessibility issues, which must be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about this at WP:COLOR and Template talk:Infobox television season#Colour, which provide further information about contributing compliant colours to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian? 01:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Re: Rivalries edit
I got your message about putting "Rivalry" in the "game name" field of basketball schedules. If you say a discussion has concluded that this is appropriate, I believe you. But it sure demonstrates that people who participate in these discussions don't think very logically or consistently, because "Game Name" in all other instances refers to an actual name applied to the game. And that means that future generations will go on Wikipedia and receive the misinformation that every time Georgetown and Connecticut played a basketball game, it was always known as the "Rivalry Game," because that's what Wikipedia has agreed it will tell them the game was called. The navigation template already includes a "rivalries" link, which ought to have been enough, and if we really needed to advertise the "rivalry" article we could have simply added a "See also" section in each relevant season that includes a link to the "rivalry" article. But now we've decided to confuse the situation by misusing the game name field – and then actively defend that decision. Bad choice. Mdnavman (talk) 19:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)mdnavman
- I understand what you are saying, but for now I believe that we should keep consistency between articles. Also, from a casual viewers perspective, they will not know it is the "game name" as that is only seen by editors, they will just see that there is a rivalry between the two teams. Maybe changing it to "game info" would be more suitable in the template. Because the template of CBB schedules has changed since the last discussion, feel free to bring it up again at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball.Mjs32193 (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napheesa Collier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incarnate Word Academy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for creating the article but is this note above points out, there is a link to a dab page which should be improved. The process is relatively easy, it even provides a link to click on. That may bring up a page which looks confusing at first but if you haven't done it because you didn't know what to do please let me know and I will try to explain. I could just fix it myself but I hope you would be interested in knowing what should be done.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm aware that I linked a disambiguation link but it is only because I could not easily find exactly which school she went to and I did not have the time. It's on my list of things to research when I have some time. Feel free to fix it if you would like.ThanksMjs32193 (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- I fixed it for you.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Why... edit
did you remove the game name in this edit?--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread the edit, I thought you were doing the opposite. My bad.--S Philbrick(Talk) 23:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of David Benedict edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on David Benedict, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.uconnhuskies.com/genrel/david_benedict_1007070.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Soccer standings edit
I am updating ALL men's DI soccer standings daily... I realize you want to see UConn's standings up-to-date, but, if you do only a partial update on the American standings, you could confuse me, because I am easily confused at the usually early hour I do the updates... If you wait, I will get them done ASAP (or as soon as all scores are available...) Thanx muchly... GWFrog (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Invite to the African Destubathon edit
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Mjs32193. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (2017–18 Connecticut Huskies men's basketball team) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating 2017–18 Connecticut Huskies men's basketball team, Mjs32193!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this useful article! This will hopefully get filled in as the season progresses.
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
CBB standings templates edit
Hello. Thank you for completing most of the women's CBB standings templates. However, in the future, it's appreciated more if you listed teams in alphabetical order from the outset. (example, at {{2017–18 Big East Conference women's basketball standings}}, Butler is at the bottom.) This aids future changes in the early win-loss columns. What I do is go back to the beginning of the previous season standings, if alphabetized, and just copypaste it into the current season then just change years. Thank you. — Wyliepedia 00:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red edit
 You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Big East edit
It is not accurate that the AAC claims the BE history with respect to basketball. They only kept the football history with the split, and that was to keep the Big East BCS berth (which is a moot point now). Take a look at the AAC media guide, where the history starts in 2013 (page 93 is a good reference point, but the record book section consistently goes back to 2013). Compare this to the Big East media guide, where the records back to 1979 and where the 2011 UConn national title season is explicitly claimed (page 110 and others). The split explicitly called for the non-football history to be retained by the BE because the AAC was primarily concerned with being a football conference and the money associated with this. “Keeping” the BE charter was to keep the BCS berth only (if they were a new conference they would have had to give it up). The folks who drove the article split on Wikipedia were mostly football editors. Rikster2 (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- In that case, then both conferences were new. Regardless of who claims the records, they are both essentially new conferences starting in 2013 (Although officially only the Big East was new, and the AAC was a continuation). If the AAC did not sell the name and rights to the new Big East, then they would have chosen another name and we would not even be having this discussion. It's not entirely unusual for a new conference to claim old records (See Yankee Conference for example), I don't believe that means we should erase the old conference from existing. The only difference with the Big East is that the old and new conferences have the same name. I used to work as a beat writer for the AAC so I know at least at first they claimed all old Big East Records, but it looks like they might have changed it now that they have some records of their own. I'll take a look at some of the old releases I have from them. Mjs32193 (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- That’s not accurate. The history explicitly went with the Big East as part of the agreement. This is no different than how the Cleveland Browns or Charlotte Hornets are treated on Wikipedia and this case is much more straightforward. All primary sources agree - the Big East MG, the AAC MG and even the NCAA records (see pages 6 and 9 in the official NCAA record book). Rikster2 (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also, the “old” BE isn’t being erased - it’s just that (1979–2013) is only relevant for football. And, yes, if the Catholic 7 had chosen some different name but the hoops history had gone with them in the agreement then we would still have this discussion. Conferences realign and rename all the time. Rikster2 (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- That’s not accurate. The history explicitly went with the Big East as part of the agreement. This is no different than how the Cleveland Browns or Charlotte Hornets are treated on Wikipedia and this case is much more straightforward. All primary sources agree - the Big East MG, the AAC MG and even the NCAA records (see pages 6 and 9 in the official NCAA record book). Rikster2 (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Mjs32193. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (2017–18 VCU Rams women's basketball team) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating 2017–18 VCU Rams women's basketball team, Mjs32193!
Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time creating this page - good work!
To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 02:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating 2017–18 St. Bonaventure Bonnies women's basketball team, Mjs32193!
Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time creating this page. Good work.
To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 02:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (2017–18 Saint Louis Billikens women's basketball team) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating 2017–18 Saint Louis Billikens women's basketball team, Mjs32193!
Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time creating this page.
To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 02:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (2017–18 Saint Louis Billikens women's basketball team) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating 2017–18 Saint Louis Billikens women's basketball team, Mjs32193!
Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time creating this page.
To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 02:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Basketball articles edit
If you're not going to fill in the schedules as didn't do at 2017–18 Kansas Jayhawks women's basketball team, please don't put the section. It's pointless and looks ugly. Corky 01:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks... edit
Welcome and thanks for your contributions including: 2018 American Athletic Conference Women's Basketball Tournament
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help.S Philbrick(Talk) 16:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Mjs32193. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Burden of Truth (TV series) edit
Can you explain why the demo figure is 1 when the main source lists zero? The zap2it source listings have a habit of reporting one instead of zero. Do you have any other source to prove it was one? Given the first source reports all demos and zap2it averages them, the zap2it is more likely to be incorrect. Also I noticed you got the IP banned, for simply upholding the source. That seems out of line. helmboy 22:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- PS, don't add bare ref urls. helmboy 22:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- That is not the case, both sources list the rating as 0.1; The share is not listed in showbuzz, if you look closely, they list 18-49 women, 18-49 men, and 50+ shares. They do not list the total 18-49 share. Mathematically, the sum of two rounded numbers does not necessarily equal the total, especially when dealing with percentages. Further, men and women are not the only two demographic choices for gender by Nielson so it does not include everyone. TVBTN lists the total share. I hope this clears it up. Also, for the record I may have been the final straw before their ban, but they had many other warnings that they deleted from their talk page before I posted my warning. Regarding references, I usually run reflinks but I forgot, my bad. Thanks Mjs32193 (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Your not looking closely showbuzz lists three columns for demo, three columns for share and one for total viewers. total 18-49 share is not used, it's an average of Men/Woman 18-49, which zero plus zero is zero and zero averaged is zero. Share has to be averaged and not totaled like demo can be. TVBTN lists an average of Men/Women share and obviously they got it wrong or included 50+ in their average. And you seem to have escalated the report to a level 3 which to a number of admins is an automatic ban of IP, I don't think a report or level 3 was justified for a single undo that was inline with original source. Remember IP's are people too. helmboy 22:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have put it back to the original source average until you can prove the TVBTN is not in error. helmboy 22:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- That is not how the shares work. What I am trying to express is that there are more than just two demographics. They do not simply just average the men and women shares. The original source does not list the total share and there is absolutely no way to figure it out by looking at just the information that is provided and I firmly stand by that. I cant find another source, but I would call on you to try find one as well before reverting. The source I posted clearly states that is is the share and I have no reason to believe it's wrong, where as the other source you can make a guess by averaging the men and women, but that is not necessarily accurate. Either way, I am not going to fight it any more.
- As stated the point is mute, as if you add zero and zero or average zero and zero, the result is still zero. You don't need a Combined 18-49 column to work that out. helmboy 23:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- In terms of the warning I placed on the IP, it was in addition to multiple level 4 warnings that were posted by others before me. Mjs32193 (talk) 23:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Judging anyone on something unrelated to their talk page history is what will make editors leave and this wiki has a too low level of editorship to lower that with unjustified reporting. helmboy 23:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I did not mean to judge anyone, I was simply following Wikipedia:UWLEVELS. Mjs32193 (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- That is not how the shares work. What I am trying to express is that there are more than just two demographics. They do not simply just average the men and women shares. The original source does not list the total share and there is absolutely no way to figure it out by looking at just the information that is provided and I firmly stand by that. I cant find another source, but I would call on you to try find one as well before reverting. The source I posted clearly states that is is the share and I have no reason to believe it's wrong, where as the other source you can make a guess by averaging the men and women, but that is not necessarily accurate. Either way, I am not going to fight it any more.
- I have put it back to the original source average until you can prove the TVBTN is not in error. helmboy 22:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Your not looking closely showbuzz lists three columns for demo, three columns for share and one for total viewers. total 18-49 share is not used, it's an average of Men/Woman 18-49, which zero plus zero is zero and zero averaged is zero. Share has to be averaged and not totaled like demo can be. TVBTN lists an average of Men/Women share and obviously they got it wrong or included 50+ in their average. And you seem to have escalated the report to a level 3 which to a number of admins is an automatic ban of IP, I don't think a report or level 3 was justified for a single undo that was inline with original source. Remember IP's are people too. helmboy 22:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- That is not the case, both sources list the rating as 0.1; The share is not listed in showbuzz, if you look closely, they list 18-49 women, 18-49 men, and 50+ shares. They do not list the total 18-49 share. Mathematically, the sum of two rounded numbers does not necessarily equal the total, especially when dealing with percentages. Further, men and women are not the only two demographic choices for gender by Nielson so it does not include everyone. TVBTN lists the total share. I hope this clears it up. Also, for the record I may have been the final straw before their ban, but they had many other warnings that they deleted from their talk page before I posted my warning. Regarding references, I usually run reflinks but I forgot, my bad. Thanks Mjs32193 (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I went through the edit history and noticed IMHO that the edit warnings by the other editors seemed to be unjustified and a number of the other editors have a history of adding warnings to editors over minor issues. helmboy 00:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail! edit
Message added 02:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
AussieLegend (✉) 02:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2018–19 Mississippi Valley State Delta Devils basketball team has been accepted edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Smartyllama (talk) 18:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Contribute to Draft:Scott Disick edit
Hello, I have received permission to draft an article, Draft:Scott Disick, and had the draft page unprotected by an admin. I saw that you had commented on the talk page of the article Kourtney Kardashian regarding Scott Disick, and thought you may be interested in contributing to the draft. Also, if you are interested, we are trying to have a discussion on Talk:Scott Disick. Mukedits (talk) 19:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 UConn Huskies football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Knapp. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018 NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Tournament participants edit
A tag has been placed on Category:2018 NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Tournament participants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:2017–18 MAAC women's basketball season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 UConn Huskies football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SECN.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Attendance edit
Hi, is there a place that you check to find the attendance to games? The UConn—St. John's game in particular was a sellout, but it usually takes an hour or so for the attendance to show up. Is there a more efficient place to get the data from? - RockinJack18 20:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)