User talk:Jmabel/Archive 66

Speedy deletion nomination of Nelson Cunningham

A tag has been placed on Nelson Cunningham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The-Pope (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I decided to undelete it--my reasoning is on The-Pope 's talk p., & the advice to the user is on mine. Basically I will generally undelete any of my deletions that might have a chance if someone makes a reasonable appeal , give them a chance to improve it, and send it to AfD if they do not. I am not infallible--and it's easier than arguing. On the very rare occasion where someone makes an appeal of something ridiculous, it's of course another matter. Please never hesitate to reverse any of my deletions you think appropriate to reverse, & just let me know--there is no need to ask me first. DGG ( talk ) 16:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Jmabel, I got your name from the Editorial Team participant list, and wanted to tell you that we will be testing out assessment metrics in the Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, your talk page says you are only moderately active, but I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not interested in getting involved in formal assessment of articles. - Jmabel | Talk 04:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Mystery aircraft photo

Hi, I think I have found the answer to the mystery photo you uploaded (women building a Boeing aircraft wing in the early 1900s). From a 3-view drawing that I have I would say that is almost certainly the upper wing of a 1919 Boeing-built Thomas-Morse MB-3 biplane. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 21:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks! -- Jmabel | Talk 00:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Subgenius-JHVH-1-by-St-Ken.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Subgenius-JHVH-1-by-St-Ken.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattbuck (talk • contribs) 06:51, 3 October 2010

Falls City Masonic Hall

Falls/Fall City Masonic Hall

Hi Jmabel -- Thanks for taking nice pic, now used in new stub article Falls City Masonic Hall. Could possibly please comment at its Talk page, regarding the proper name of the building. I am not sure how to interpret your photo description, as suggesting the name of the building from its inception was "Falls City Masonic Hall" or whether perhaps you mean there was a clerical error in the NRHP listing in 2004 that yielded that name, rather than "Fall City Masonic Hall" (with no S). Hope you can help. Thanks either way for your pic! --doncram (talk) 21:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Oddfellows Hall (Seattle, Washington)

Thanks for your followup there. By the way, i've been working on List of Odd Fellows buildings and similiar fraternal organization list-articles, and creating articles for all of the individual notable buildings, and I am happy to come across other photos of yours, like the Oddfellows Hall in Capital Hill area. Hope u may be glad to know more of ur photos are getting good use. :) --doncram (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Subgenius-JHVH-1-by-St-Ken.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Subgenius-JHVH-1-by-St-Ken.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

If you will look at the discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_3#File:Subgenius-JHVH-1-by-St-Ken.jpg you will see that the last thing there is me asking a question, trying to find out exactly what someone's issue is before I proceed with OTRS. How can you possibly close the discussion in that state? - Jmabel | Talk 06:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Acciones armadas de extrema izquierda en Chile (página de wikipedia en español)

Hola Jmabel. Ojala usted me pueda ayudar. Dos wikipedistas -- Jcestepario y Petronas -- siguien borrándome mis ediciones. Parece ser que quieren tapar los crímenes de los guerrilleros del FPMR y MIR en Chile. Lo que más me molesta es que dicen que la mayoría de los caidos de los uniformados en Chile fueron asesinados por las propias fuerzas armadas de chilenas.

Uno me ha borrado hace poco lo siguiente (1ra. Restauración, a pesar de contar un extracto del Informe RETTIG que tanto promueve):

El 25 de marzo, una bomba explota en el interior del Hotel Araucano, frecuentado por personal militar. Pierden la vida dos suboficiales del ejército: Armando Lara Arriagada y Alejandro Avendaño Sánchez.

Tambien me borraron esta contribuccion mia (2da. Restauración junto con la fuente provista):

En agosto la policía secreta chilena descubre un poderoso arsenal del FPMR en Carriza Bajo, conformado por 3.115 ametralladoras M-16 y 281 lanzacohetes.

Y esto (Mi 3ra. Restauración):

El 2 de noviembre estalla una granada dentro de un autobús repleto de policías matando al menos a cuatro.

Y ademas esto (Mi 4ta Restauracion):

Andrés Pascal Allende, dirigente del Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria (MIR), dice que a lo largo de la dictadura murieron entre 1500 y 2000 miembros del MIR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Breitkopf (talk • contribs) 01:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC) --Breitkopf (talk) 01:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea why you are turning to me on this. I have only the most minimal involvement in the Spanish-language Wikipedia. - Jmabel | Talk 05:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Ed Miliband

Hi Joe,

I thought Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Is Ed Miliband "Jewish", "of Jewish descent", "Jewish atheist"? would be of particular interest to you, and that you might have helpful insight into this issue. Cheers! Jayjg ^(talk) 18:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Montevideo

Hi! How are you? By the looks of it you are busy in RL but I've begun a big translation of Montevideo the capital city of Uruguay at Wikipedia:WikiProject Uruguay/Montevideo. Can you help us translate it? It may take a week to fully translate or longer and fully write. It doesn't need to be done immediately and can be gradual... Once the translation is done it can further be expanded, there must be a wealth of sources on it. But if you look at the current state of it the only decent part of it is the history and even that needs improving. And it a major South American capital city.... I'd be very grateful if you could help out. I'll also invite a few more Spanish translators to help so between us we ought to be able to accomplish it..♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll try to look in. I am definitely busy in real life, and most of my wiki time lately has been on Commons. - Jmabel | Talk 06:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for helping in Montevideo. Since you started WP Ethnic Groups you might be able to explain to me how the scope of category (Uruguayan society/Demographics of Uruguay/)Ethnic groups in Uruguay relates to that of Category (Uruguayan Society/)Immigration to Uruguay. Does their content overlap or is there some essential difference? Thanks. Hoverfish Talk 01:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC ) -- P.S. Greetings to the Pike Market if you pass by. I was a Seattlite for a year or so back in 1984. Hoverfish Talk 01:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I haven't really been active on the Ethnic Groups project for a couple of years, you'd do better to ask on the project talk page. It would help if you would give precise category names and links that you are asking about instead of these slightly vague descriptions. - Jmabel | Talk 02:20, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Infernal Noise Brigade at RampART.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Infernal Noise Brigade at RampART.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Given our rather more stringent requirements for fair use that have been adopted since 2005, I suspect that this may no longer conform. While there is no way to take a photo of this defunct musical group, I don't think having an image is really necessary to the article. - Jmabel | Talk 05:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Last Exit on Brooklyn

I've exhausted my sources, but I think notability has been established. Perhaps you could add to it from any local sources you may have access to? Yworo (talk) 03:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:SEA Activity Check

Hello Fellow WikiProject Seattle members,

My name is Russell, and I saw that the Seattle WP was tagged as only semi active, so was BOLD and decided to jump in and see about revitalizing the project. Your recieving this message because you are listed as a participant in the project. If you are still interested in participating, please update the table with a status. If you do not respond by Jan 1, you will be considered inactive. If you want to opt out before then, simply remove your name from the table.

Questions, comments, concerns, let me know on either the project or my talk page.

Thank you, and have a great day.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Seattle at 06:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC).

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 03:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

About emergencies

Thank you Jmabel, your watchfulness is much appreciated. I left a comment in Talk:Montevideo#More_of_the_same. If we cannot source all this, or if it is not essential, I guess we can just skip it. Hoverfish Talk 21:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

ID'd another church

The church at "42nd Street, looking from near the Reservoir" is West Presbyterian Church at 31 West 42nd, built in 1862. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

And another one: the church marked as "Chelsea Church 32nd Street" is identified in Dunlap's From Abyssinian to Zion (2004) as a church on Mulberry Street. I've updated the categories on this and the other one. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

A third one: the church on 34th Street is the 34th Street Dutch Reformed Church, built 1860, dissolved 1920. Updated. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I kind of suspected West Presbyterian but wasn't confident enough to say it. The others I hadn't a clue. - Jmabel | Talk 01:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Another one: "42nd St & Fifth Avenue" is actually the old St. Bart's on Madison at 44th. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

So they lied! - Jmabel | Talk 02:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Yeah -- I don't think whoever prepared those stereo cards at the time took great pains in identifying what the subject was. Although this time at least they got the general neighborhood right - I was amazed at the Chelsea 32nd Street church that turned out to be on Mulberry Street. (If Dunlap is correct, of course.) Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

We're running over 10% active misidentifications in this set. - Jmabel | Talk 03:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello

I was just wondering if you ever plan on returning to Romania. Of course this financial 'crunch' has slowed down things around here, but I'm sure quite a few things have changed since 2006 (it's harder to notice changes from the 'inside'). Anyway... as a Romanian and someone who visits Wikipedia pretty much daily, I couldn't help but congratulate you on the work you've put into articles and commons related to my country (not to mention my city, Bucharest). Thanks!

I've also read your travel log from your time spent here. It's always interesting to see this place through the eyes of a foreigner. In fact I'm sure you've portrayed things in a better light than most Romanians would have.

Oh, and Merry Christmas! Or Happy Holidays! or whatever politically correct phrase is used these days in the US. I believe those American sitcoms I keep watching keep me up-to-date on these things :)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giuseppe86 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

As always, I forgot to sign Giuseppe86 (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I certainly hope to get back to Romania someday, but my only near-term travel plans are domestic. - Jmabel | Talk 04:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

WP Seattle activity check - reminder

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Seattle at 12:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC).

Notification

Hello. This message was sent to notify you about this ongoing discussion (Iaaasi (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC))

Banner merge

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Seattle. AdmrBoltz 01:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})

Article Tahash Timeline

Please look at the article Tahash, and on the Discussion Page: "Consensus on Timeline" give your opinion about the Timeline. Thank you. --Michael Paul Heart (talk) 12:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but it's a topic I don't know much about, and it's a long and contentious argument in which neither side seems to have summarized its arguments. - Jmabel | Talk 16:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

mike hudson

[1] - Nice!Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks. I've been able to add images to about a half dozen articles that lacked them, just from that one conference. - Jmabel | Talk 07:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Service award level

There has been a major revision of the the Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.

Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

Herostratus (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Actually, you advanced three levels (!) to Master Editor... which I think you were eligible for anyway under the old system, considering your high edit count, and I assume you just weren't bothering to update, but since I was here I updated you anyway. Thanks for your many contributions to the Wikipedia! Herostratus (talk) 07:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks. I had been paying no attention, I'm sure someone else updated me the last time, too. - Jmabel | Talk 16:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Baritone question

A year ago you posted a question regarding a photo of a woman playing a baritone that subsequently was posted to Commons:File:Honk Fest West 2010-296.jpg. The answer is that it is an american baritone, probably mid-century, maybe a Conn (Conn-Selmer). The bell is positioned as a European would be used to like that of a tenor horn or continental baritone, but it is adjustable and would normally be in a bell-front orientation. (A straight bell could also be swapped on a Conn Constellation to become an American Euphonium - not that there was any actual difference in bore to justify the name)--Rwberndt (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! - Jmabel | Talk 20:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Aziz efendi-muhammad alayhi s-salam.jpg

Hi Jmabel. Just FYI, I have listed the above linked file that you restored at WP:PUF. Feel free to comment there. Jujutacular ^talk 00:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Wall Street has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011

Wall Street, a page you edited has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for May 2011. We encourage you to participate in improving this article. You can also vote for next months article of the Month here. --Kumioko (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Jewish ethnicity

Hi Jmabel. A discussion has arisen regarding Jewish ethnicity at Talk:Ed Miliband#Ethnicity in infobox. I thought you might be able to provide some insight. Thanks! Jayjg ^(talk) 00:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Seattle

Template:WikiProject Seattle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Hawaii Territory

Regarding your contribution at Talk:Territory of Hawaii from 2004, and the redirect I have a question.

There is now

• Territory of Hawaii oldest edit from 16:38, 22 May 2004 and
• Hawaii Territory oldest edit from 19:12, 19 April 2003, which is a redirect to the former since 18:13, 22 May 2004.

Do you think Territory of Hawaii could be merged into Hawaii Territory? So it is properly documented that a Hawaii Territory article already existed in 2003 and credit is given to the original creator? There are no overlapping edits and the 2003 article has no talk page, therefore the merge should be easy? HawaiiLibre (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lenny Bruce at the Fillmore.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lenny Bruce at the Fillmore.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

I suspect that by our current, heightened bar for the use of non-free images, this image no longer meets our criteria. - Jmabel | Talk 23:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Posters are standard in film article infoboxes to viually identify the film, how does this differ? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Because it's not an article about these particular performances, and we already have another image of Bruce. I'm not happy how tight Wikipedia has gotten on this issue, but it's not for me to set policy. I'd be perfectly happy if someone were to write up an acceptable non-free use justification, but I'm not interested in investing my own time into what I think will be a losing fight. - Jmabel | Talk 23:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

I'll take a look. That the poster advertises what turned out to be his final performances seems to me to be a significant factor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Yup. As the caption indicates, that's why I added it. - Jmabel | Talk 01:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I've added a FUR. Feel free to fix it if I've erred. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Bet you didn't think this problem would rear its ugly head again

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shining_Path&action=historysubmit&diff=418534579&oldid=415793412 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.9.68.183 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Economics

When added to the interests/activities section on Facebook profiles, the first picture of that topic's Wikipedia page becomes the topic's icon. It didn't seem right that the icon for economics was a picture of a vegetable market ---> hence the shift up of the stock market picture. On second thought, I didn't have to remove the picture entirely, I could've just shifted it further down the page. Mod0001 (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jmabel. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle7.
Message added 16:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Hillman City, Seattle

Hello! Your submission of Hillman City, Seattle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Article OCNative (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Hillman City, Seattle

Calmer Waters 18:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

How to change the name of Desaix ?

Moved from my user page. - Jmabel | Talk 00:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The name of Desaix is not Louis Desaix (as it is written on Wikipedia English) but Louis Charles Antoine Desaix ! (As you can see on his baptismal certificate http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Extrait_acte_bapteme_desaix.jpg). I am not able to change this name on wikipedia ! Could you help me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolege (talk • contribs) 17:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

• As long as the appropriate redirects exist it is of little consequence which particular form of a person's name is used for the article page. Most people are generally known by something shorter than their full legal name (let alone baptismal name). We usually put the page at the most common form of the name. A couple of prominent examples would be Ronald Reagan (page not at Ronald Wilson Reagan) and François Mitterrand (page not at François Maurice Adrien Marie Mitterrand). In short, I don't think the page should be moved. - Jmabel | Talk 00:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Soft Expert page

Hi Jmabel,

I'm Valentin Dumitru and i'm tring to create a page for the company Soft Expert. But every time I create it Andrei deleted it. He sait i can talk to you about this.

All I want is to creata a page similar like one of this (Siveco, Senior Software etc.) and to add it to this index.

Please help me with this.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valentin.dumitru (talk • contribs) 10:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

• I know nothing about the company. I presume that if it is a significant company involved in software there should be a good bit about it online. Can you provide two links to reliable sources independent of the company that write about it, and where the content indicates encyclopedic notability? -- Jmabel | Talk 15:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

• Hi, Thank you for your reply. Here are some link that can be helpful:
• http://www.onwindows.com/Partners/Soft-Expert/2017/Default.aspx
  
• http://pinpoint.microsoft.com/ro-RO/PartnerDetails.aspx?PartnerId=4295584706
  
• http://www.marketwatch.ro/477/Industry_Watch/Administratie_publica/furnizori
  
• http://www.marketwatch.ro/1007/Enterprise_Applications/ERP/furnizori/5
  
• http://www.marketwatch.ro/454/Technology/SFA/furnizori
  
• http://www.marketwatch.ro/1010/Enterprise_Applications/ECM/furnizori/2
  
• http://www.marketwatch.ro/1003/Managerial_Tools/HR/furnizori
  

I hope those links are enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valentin.dumitru (talk • contribs) 09:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

The first two are possibly useful for some basic facts, but not for notability, and they are not particularly reliable sources, since they clearly wrote it themselves ("proves our ability... Our solutions... clienţilor noştri..."). Does show that they are a Microsoft partner, but that's not notable: I've worked for small companies that had that status and certainly were not of encyclopedic notability. There's also really no assertion here of anything notable: nothing about doing any specific significant projects, etc., just generalities.

As for the others, they rather annoyingly put me through a subscription thing (which I hope I'll have an easy time canceling) and so far I still see no indicatio that gives me any access to the pages. However the URLs all ending in furnizori all lead me to expect to see more of the same, rather than news stories. So my assumption so far would be that there is nothing here that would be the basis for an encyclopedia article. - Jmabel | Talk 16:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

• Hi
  

Do you thing that more than half of the companies listed on the page "Lista companii din romania" indicates encyclopedic notability?
If this is a major issue how come those pages exist?
Would be fare that anybody gets the same treatment.
Thank you for your time

• • I have no idea, and to work out whether "more than half" are notable, I'd have to read a lot of articles I'm not interested in. If you want a general review of the area, or want to get some people working on establishing standards of notability in this particular area, I'd suggest you start a Request for comment. I won't be at all surprised if the conclusion is that a lot of these should be deleted, but I don't have time right now to focus on that. - Jmabel | Talk 16:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
  • If you start a request for comment, feel free to refer to this conversation as an indication that I suggested you do so. And if you want me to help edit the English in a draft request for comment, I'll be glad to do so. - Jmabel | Talk 16:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you for your answers. I don't want to start a request. I just wanted to add some information about Soft Expert and Manager Financiar ERP. Manager Financiar ERP if and ERP system developed in Romania by this company and this ERP it is studied in the Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest Romania. I'm lecturer at this university and I teach my student about the ERP system. I even have a PhD on this field. If you thing this is publicity that is you opinion and nothing more. All I wanted was to add some informations about the ERP use in my PhD research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valentin.dumitru (talk • contribs) 13:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

• • It's not a matter of whether it is 'publicity', it's a matter of whether notability can be demonstrated. Again, if you can find two published sources writing independently about the company, that would be the easiest way to demonstrate that it meets that threshold. - Jmabel | Talk 15:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:POUM Obreros.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:POUM Obreros.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I restored the image to the article. Not only is it a more interesting and informative image than the flag which replaced it -- because it shows both the flag and a party slogan -- but the flag image itself (from Commons) is dubiously "free" or authentic. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

The Knowledge Network: Invitation to participate in our closed beta

Hello!

My name is Gabriel, and I represent a startup company called Planeto (http://planeto.com). We are currently developing a new type of community we call the Planeto Knowledge Network.

We all have knowledge and interests in various forms, of different topics and areas. We might even be experts at something. Our Knowledge Network is an attempt to gather and connect people who have a passion, and would love to share that passion by communicating their insights and knowledge with other people with similar interests.

I noticed your high activity in the Liberalism section of Wikipedia, as well as your interests on your user page, and thought you might be a nice candidate to join the invite-only beta of our network. You could be a manager of a domain of knowledge regarding Liberalism, which you seem to be interested in. Among other activities, you can start discussions, and create quiz questions regarding Liberalism for our players to be tested on, in order for them to be certified as "experts" on the topic within our Knowledge Network.

There are also a wide range of other topics to choose from that needs a manager (or curator, as we call it), should you feel that you might be more interested in another subject.

Sounds appealing? Send me a mail to gabriel@planeto.com and I'll invite you to our closed beta!

Have a nice day! :)

Zedekiel (talk) 10:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

No thanks, far too busy. - Jmabel | Talk 14:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Interview with Wikimedia Foundation

Hello Jmabel, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser here at the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign we're seeking out and interviewing active Wikipedians like yourself, in order to produce a broader and more representative range of "personal appeals" to run come November. If you'd like to participate in this project, please email me at amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Interviews are typically conducted by phone or Skype and take between 30-90 minutes. (Note: This invitation is open to any interested Wikipedian — If you're reading this, and would like to be interviewed as well, please contact me.) Thanks! Aaron (WMF) (talk) 04:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't have much interest in doing this. - Jmabel | Talk 04:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Wells Fargo Photo

You posted a stereo photo of a building to the History of Wells Fargo talk page. You asked if anyone could identify it. I read the sign as saying "Express" so it is not one of the banking offices. And the street name on that sign cannot be either "California" nor "Montgomery" streets. It is not long enough and does not have the right typographical shape. My guess the photo shows another Wells Fargo Express location. Hope this helps. Nick Beeson (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• I've added this to the discussion at commons:File talk:Wells Fargo Express, San Francisco, Cal, from Robert N. Dennis collection of stereoscopic views.jpg. - Jmabel | Talk 20:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Des Moines Beach Park

Here's the coding for the infobox for the Des Moines Beach Park. Nyttend (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks, but wasn't looking for an Infobox, just a reference number (for the category on Commons). - Jmabel | Talk 17:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

By the way, you may want to see WP:NRHP help. Nyttend (talk) 04:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 17:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Jmabel/Archive 66! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

User:PbJellytime

Hi Jmabel, I am a new user to Wikipedia and have been assigned to create an article in my college english class. I have chosen to create an article on a historic hotel on my college campus. I noticed that you have a lot of experience on Wikipedia and made contributions to the Camlin Hotel article and I was hoping that you could view a draft of my article and give me some advice on how to improve it. Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Here is a link to my sandbox: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pbjellytime17/Clemson_House_sandbox Pbjellytime17 (talk) 03:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Quick observations:

• Lacks a lede.
• Lots of one-paragraph sections, almost always an indication that either you need to write more or sections should be combined.
• You say this is your campus, so you probably should be able to take a photo of the hotel and use it to illustrate the article.
• There is a broken reference link. Fix it.
• I assume "Past-Clemson University President" means "Former Clemson University president"; however, unless he was already a former president at the time referred to, it should simply be "Clemson University president".
• I took the liberty of separating "Notes" and "References" sections and of improving the Wikisyntax of the latter.
• Your references section does not seem to follow any known standard. May I suggest considering using {{citation}}?
• The following is not standard academic style, but it is standard Wikipedia style: where many statements use an identical reference, we generally do not repeat the reference over and over. Instead, we give it a name, and have multiple footnotes lead to one reference. For example, on first use <ref name="Reel">Reel, Jerome V. The High Seminary. etc. etc.</ref> and on subsequent use <ref name="Reel" />.
• "...on clear days the Blue Ridge Mountains can be seen in the distance" is exactly the sort of thing that most needs a citation, but it's uncited.
• "...built in 1950 ... construction ... took 10 years": so did construction start or end in 1950? (Yes, it's clear later in the article, but it should be clear within the paragraph.)
• "world-reknown violinist" ==> "world-reknowned violinist"
• Clearly Dean Rusk, Yehudi Menuhin, and Beverly Sills deserve links, as do Clemson University and Clemson, South Carolina.
• You list several references you never cite. Are these really references (you used them in constructing the article) or just works you are aware of (which belong in a separate "Further Reading" section)?

That's all on a quick scan; I hope it's useful. - Jmabel | Talk 04:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the McGinn pics

Mr Mabel, I used one of your excellent photos for the bio box in McGinn's article and just wanted to say thanks; the generation of original, quality content is really important. TomPointTwo (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Featured article review for Rosa Parks

I have nominated Rosa Parks for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You have received this notice because you have been identified as one of the top five editors of the article by edit count. Brad (talk) 03:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Unused NRHP images

Hi Joe, you might like Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Unused images. It a list of images which could possibly be used in one of the NRHP lists. It's now updated daily. We use this a lot at the Dutch Wikipedia. multichill (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

• Might be useful to someone, but not to me. For example, it makes perfect sense that most images of the Black Diamond Cemetery are unused, Wikipedia would need only a couple, whereas I took about two dozen. - Jmabel | Talk 16:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
  • The images are on the page because no image at all is used at National Register of Historic Places listings in King County, Washington. Once we selected one the images won't show up in the next run. So the page only shows images that could potentially be used. multichill (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
• Ah. Weird. OK. Those Black Diamond images have all been on Commons for at least a year, but I did just tag them. - Jmabel | Talk 17:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Ah, because you tagged them they show up in the page. multichill (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:POUM Obreros.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:POUM Obreros.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Five and a half years ago when I uploaded it, I believe my tagging was in accord with policy, which has since changed. I will pursue the currently required justification, but this seems an incredibly delayed warning. In that time, I could easily have left the project, no? - Jmabel | Talk 01:14, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Sadly, like a lot of backlogs, it CAN take 'years' for someone to note there is an issue :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Can you at tell me whether you agree with my assessment of its copyright status, which I have written at File talk:POUM Obreros.jpg? - Jmabel | Talk 01:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Rosa Parks FAR

[2].  Volunteer Marek  20:22, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Michael McGinn

Hello,

You've previously participated in discussions about the article on Michael McGinn, the mayor of Seattle. I've written a critique of the article on its talk page, and have also raised my concerns at WP:BLPN. Your input would be welcomed. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Puget Passes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Puget Passes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Portuguese translation

Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Portuguese to English translators and wondered if you could translate John VI of Portugal and/or Amélie of Leuchtenberg? Thank you or obrigado.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Those are pretty big & I'm pretty busy. I'll try to get to it, but probably slowly over the course of a month or so. - Jmabel | Talk 01:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Amélie of Leuchtenberg should now be complete. Not sure when I'll get much time to work on John VI of Portugal, but it will remain on my list. - Jmabel | Talk 01:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rabih Mroué

Hello! Your submission of Rabih Mroué at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Marrante (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to add a little bit to this. My sense is that a WP article about a person is inherently a biography, but your article is more about quotes and lists, with almost nothing about the man's life. This is an interesting person and I think a bit more about his life and the thought behind the theatrical titles can be added to this to make it a better candidate for the front page. As for the other requirements of DYK, everything is fine. Marrante (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Jmabel,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Terrorism in Peru

A topic you have written extensively on, I thought you might want to check out Talk:Terrorism_in_Peru#Requested_move --Descendall (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 06:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jamal Joseph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Gangster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Done. - Jmabel | Talk 16:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rabih Mroué

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening invitation

Hello, Jmabel: Thank you for your contributions to Horticulture – or Gardening – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a WikiProject to improve horticulture and gardening articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics. If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Northamerica1000(talk) 04:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, but not a topic where I have any expertise. Glad to see someone doing it, though. - Jmabel | Talk 05:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

John VI

Hi JMabel

I left some stuff for you on the John VI talkpage. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 23:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Administrator Page Project

Hello, my name is Alex and I'm part of the group of students working on the new Admin page project. You said you were interested in taking part in an interview over skype about being an administrator on Wikipedia. Please leave me a message on my talk page about possible times during the next week or so when you're free. It should take about half an hour. Your help is much appreciated and I look forward to the interview. Stepiena (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm on eastern time, so Monday the 2nd at 9pm for me and 6pm for you sounds great. My Skype name is alex.stepien55. Stepiena (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• I'm joe.mabel. - Jmabel | Talk 02:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Seattle meetup

If you get a chance, take a look at Berliner Motor Corporation and let me know if you have any clues as to how I can find more about the lives of Joe and Michael Berliner. Also, my company has lots of openings -- see [3]. I can probably answer questions or find someone who can. Thanks! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hi-Q (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hi-Q (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi-Q (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ^Bongo_matic 15:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Queen Anne Blvd.

Hello again, Joe. I came across the article on Queen Anne Boulevard and I am trying to determine if there is actually a street named Queen Anne Boulevard, or if this is only the name of this loop of streets. It appears to me that there no such named street. If you get up to the top of Queen Anne Hill sometime, perhaps you could check this out and see if there is a street sign bearing the name "Queen Anne Boulevard". A picture of such a street sign would be good proof. Regards, •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

• Refers to particular portions of several streets, mostly in the usual street grid although a small number run at 45 degrees for a few blocks; it is not one particular named street. The route is distinguished from the other streets in the neighborhood by the color of the street signs (brown rather than green; same color-coding is used elsewhere in the city for other boulevards laid out by the Olmsted firm as part of the parks system, e.g. Ravenna Boulevard, Lake Washington Boulevard, Green Lake Way). The Donald N. Sherwood materials that are the first citation in the article are among the several sources that are explicit (and mutually consistent) about the route. - Jmabel | Talk 06:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Dan Savage

Hello. Way back in 2004, almost exactly eight years ago, you made this edit to this article[4], stating that Savage's opinions frequently clash with 'what Savage has been known to call the "gay establishment".' A version of that text is still in the lead of the article. An IP user has just commented on the talk page, asking where that quotation comes from, and saying they haven't been able to find any sources where Savage uses the term 'gay establishment'; I've done my own search and can't find any either. I realise this is going back a bit, but do you remember when exactly you saw him use the phrase? Or were you just paraphrasing/describing his views rather than quoting him directly? (If it's the latter, we should be embarassed - we'd have kept an unsourced quote in a BLP for eight years.) Robofish (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Geez. No, I've heard him use the phrase more than once. No idea if it was in print or not. I know he used it with respect to, for example, Seattle Gay News and that era's steering committee of the city's annual Gay Pride march. This was long before we had our current standards of citation, and there is no way I remember my source 8 years later, though I'll try to follow it up some time. If someone had asked for citation within, say, 6 months, I probably could have made good.

Of course, these days, the way his career has gone, Savage increasingly is part of any perceived Gay establishment in Seattle. - Jmabel | Talk 20:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)