Illinoiswiki10

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Kirk (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Kirk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Turning Point USA, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Illinoiswiki10, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Illinoiswiki10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Illinoiswiki10 (talk) 20:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I just resubmitted my page for "Charlie Kirk" please let me know if this still does not work. Added more references.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Kirk (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Kirk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Kirk (conservative activist) has been accepted

Charlie Kirk (conservative activist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JSFarman (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Jake Leahy 2017.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jake Leahy 2017.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Charlie Kirk.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie Kirk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rod Drobinski

The article Rod Drobinski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable if he did not win the election

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rod Drobinski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rod Drobinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Drobinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

You're Welcome!

I appreciate the liberty trophy and your kind thoughts. Thank you for bringing my attention to the Jake Leahy article. A couple articles that may interest you about people in the mitten are Gregory Creswell and Scott Boman.--Libertyguy (talk) 23:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Paid editing warning

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Illinoiswiki10, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Illinoiswiki10|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia.

This is to verify that I am not a paid editor.

Helene Walsh

Hi. I reviewed your article Helene Walsh. Please do not use words like "controversial" to describe a living person without including reliable sources that verify this claim. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Turning Point USA logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turning Point USA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@properties moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, @properties, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Conti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Conti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Conti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 18:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:@properties

Hello, Illinoiswiki10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:@properties, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:@properties

Hello, Illinoiswiki10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "@properties".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)