User talk:Howicus/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Here's a golden retriver for you!
|
Golden retriver |
| Thank you! Joey7898 (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC) |
nowthis adoption school
Howicus, many thanks for the adoption program. It's is helping me greatly to organize how Wikipedia works. Still, my head is swimming about referencing. Would you please take a look at my notes in the Reliable Source section to see if I'm on the right track? Nowthis (talk) 22:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Nowthis. I looked over what you have, and it looks good to me so far. Only thing I'd say is that in some cases, non-independent sources can be used to support basic, uncontroversial facts. For example, you could cite the website of a company for the company's founding date, or the location of their headquarters. Of course, involved sources still can't be used to establish notability, or for anything controversial. See WP:ABOUTSELF for more on that. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your thank you!
I've added a couple more that I can think of, and I've also posted a suggestion at the naval template talk page: What do you think? Xyl 54 (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
This even applies for infoboxes.
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 10:39, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Um, hi. My involvement with that article is pretty minimal. I just helped the article creator with the infobox image and fixed a reference. I didn't really check the links. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 16:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Hello, I am Parks. I have noticed that you believe what I have written is incorrect or biased. While it is true that everyone, including me, holds an opinion, using a watchdog group as a reference does not automatically convey that it is invalid. Many sources are very biased, but as long as they aren't deceitful, they are worthy of sourcing. That said, while the Humane Society of the United States claims to be an animal welfare group, they have an unheard of anti-pet agenda and many controversial programs.[1] Thank you. http://www.humanesociety.org/ is not a good source for this information, they have a very obscure pro-animal liberation bias. Parks1997 (talk) 03:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Frankly, I don't trust the watchdog site to be neutral. Using only sources that lean one way or the other leads to an unbalanced article. Perhaps a compromise could be reached, where the article says what the HSUS says, and then the watchdog site's objection to it? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. Alright, I get the point, sorry for templating you. No hard feelings? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, last thing, I'm going to take the discussion to the article talk page, to make it more visible to other editors. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- I could agree on that. It's very easy for an organization, especially something like the HSUS, to misrepresent themselves to acheive their goals. That's why there's watchdog organizations to balance them out and set them straight. Parks1997 (talk) 03:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Parks, you have just been editing out my additions to the article on HSUS, without grounds, save perhaps for that you don't like HSUS. I sourced these items properly and many had to do with current programs. i used no sources from HSUS itself to demonstrate them. I also left intact your references from Humanewatch although I don't think that they would meet anyone's test of non-bias. Please do not vandalize my edits when they are consistent with the wikipedia rules. vetman Vetman (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Parks, Vetman...sorry to say this, but I'm realizing I don't really have the time to give the HSUS article the attention it deserves. Please try to work out your differences on the article talk page, and if the discussion there goes nowhere, consider getting a third opinion. Sorry that I can't be more help. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pantheism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pantheism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 January 2014
- News and notes: German chapter asks for "reworking" of Funds Dissemination Committee; should MP4 be allowed on Wikimedia sites?
- Technology report: Architecture Summit schedule published
- Traffic report: The Hours are Ours
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Sociology
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Michigan gubernatorial election, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michigan gubernatorial election, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Thanks for the help on IRC today! TiMike (talk) 03:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC) |
Please comment on MediaWiki talk:Histlegend
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on MediaWiki talk:Histlegend. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 January 2014
- Book review: Missing Links and Secret Histories: A Selection of Wikipedia Entries from Across the Known Multiverse
- News and notes: Modification of WMF protection brought to Arbcom
- Featured content: Dr. Watson, I presume
- Special report: The few who write Wikipedia
- Technology report: Architecting the future of MediaWiki
- In the media: Wikipedia for robots; Wikipedia—a temperamental teenager
- Traffic report: No show for the Globes
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: vUnity (January 28)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/vUnity.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Howicus,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
How did that even happen?
While I'm sure you appreciate my invitation to the Teahouse, it was sent to you in error. Haha. (I was declining an article that you didn't create or submit....how did that even happen?!? Sorry about that!) Julie JSFarman (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi! On the live chat, you mentioned an interest in doing a collaboration of Draft:Honest Kids with me. Thanks! Bananasoldier (talk) 05:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Synthetic phonics
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Synthetic phonics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
The Helping Hand Barnstar
|
The Helping Hand Barnstar | |
| Howicus has helped me countless times thru IRC. When I was starting on Wikipedia he answered all my silly questions without complaint. I don't know how I would have begun on Wikipedia without Howicus. Roborule (talk) 16:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Aw, you're makin' me blush! Thanks! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 16:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:A Beautiful Mind (film)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:A Beautiful Mind (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the help with the mass revert on the Number-fidler account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- No problem! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission implementation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission implementation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 February 2014
- Technology report: Left with no choice
- Featured content: Space selfie
- Traffic report: Sports Day
- WikiProject report: Game Time in Russia
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Howicus, I recognize you from the live chat. Now! I am also an aspiring editor, and I hope that I will be seen as being fair and adhering to Wikipedia's ethical policies. Just wielding your powers for yeilding sake is an abuse of power and it is against Wikipedia's policies. If you Bothered to take the time to read the correspondence between myself and Wgolf you would realise that Wgolf KINDLY asked me to categorise my Article- Something that such an EXPERT like you did not pick up on. Thanking him and asking him to remove the box was purely based on the Box regarding the categorization. I Was at no point referring to the hideous box at the top. But people like you and Santaku and Huon on the live desk are DRUNK with power! I am systematically and speedily working on my referencing so that I can move to other articles. But when people like yourselves try and make it harder for people tp progress to the next stage then it becomes PERSONAL. If you do not like the way I work or other people work Wikipedia has a method of Arbitration. Oh by the way, I hope I'm not talking to a BOT D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowhen1966 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC) Cowhen1966 (talk) 09:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Cowhen1996. First off, I want to be clear that I hold nothing against you personally or against Cecil Jay Roberts. My interest is in making sure that your article is in line with Wikipedia's policies. The box at the top lists issues with the article. It shouldn't be removed until those issues are resolved. I didn't see your conversation with Wgolf. All I saw is that they removed the box, and I don't think it should be removed yet. The article still needs independent, reliable sources to support the material in the article, especially since Roberts is a living person.
- Another thing though...you've mentioned "abuses of power" a few times. I want to make it clear, I'm just a volunteer editor like you. I don't have any more power than you, just experience. If you're feeling harassed or bullied, I'm sorry. I'm just trying to make Wikipedia better (and I realize that's what you're trying to do too). Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:49, 14 February 2014
Hello Howicus, Thanks for your response and all points have been noted. in future, I would endear you to take the time to check an editor's history so that you will be well informed of all correspondence! That way, we can avoid unnecessary editorial conflicts and possible vandalism. I say this because if you had checked Wgolf or my history, you would have noticed that I told him I was working on the referencing. You could have then given me some time to work on it rather than overriding Wgolf's action .That is what I mean by abuse of power. The fact that we can slap boxes on each other's work doesn't mean that we shouldn't have any relational ethics. Perhaps we can achieve more. For the record, I do not feel bullied or harassed at all- I was just drawing your attention to proper working relations among editors. I have pasted the guidelines that hopefully we should all be working towards. This article refers to the General standards and the declining of a submission. However, for the purposes of this correspondence I am referring to the General Standards and I hope this clears up the confusion. I hope to cite all my sources today after which I will alert you and kindly ask you to remove the box. Looking forward to working with you and meeting some other editors at the tea house. From one editor to another, Cowhen1966Cowhen1966 (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
(UTC)General standards and invalid reasons for declining a submission
Information.svg AfC participants should follow the standards set by the standard policies and guidelines for what makes an acceptable article. As a rule of thumb, article submissions that have at least a 50% chance of surviving an AfD nomination should be accepted and published to mainspace. If you're unsure whether a particular submission should be accepted or declined, ask for advice from other reviewers at the project's talk page. Also, for submissions about particularly specialized subjects, consider asking for assistance on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Avoid the following errors Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material. The content and sourcing policies require inline citations for only four specific types of material, most commonly: direct quotations and contentious material (whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons. Avoid declining an article that meets the criteria for requiring inline citations because you wrongly assumed that the absence of little blue numbers meant that no inline citations existed. The use of <ref> tags, although popular, is not required. Editors may choose any form of inline citation, not just the most popular one. Many new editors choose a different style, and their choice is officially protected by Wikipedia's citation guidelines.
Avoid declining an article because the references contain bare URLs or other reference formatting problems. Instead, run the Reflinks Tool or tag the article with
 |
or
 | This article has an unclear citation style. (February 2014) |
.
Declining an article because it contains formatting issues, such as no wikilinks to other articles, or because it has no sections, is not acceptable. Instead, fix it yourself, or accept the article and tag it with maintenance templates to alert other editors to the one or two issues that you believe need to be resolved first. Declining an article because you personally don't like the citation style or formatting is not acceptable. Avoid declining an article because the reliable sources are not free or online. Books, magazines, and other print-only sources are perfectly acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowhen1966 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 15 February 2014Cowhen1966 (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Intention is for INFORMATION ONLY ( THIS IS NOT AN ARTICLE)Cowhen1966 (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Howicus, I have qouted all the sources I used to write the article. At least one good thing has come out of this, and that is, I must back up every statement I make with a source. Now, I can get on with some REAL work and help others quote their sources appropriately. Thanks for the heads up! Much appreciated and hope there are no hard feelings. The last thing we want is to get into juvenile editorial conflict. At least you have saved me from getting sued or from any possible libel. Do remove the box as soon as you get a minute. Regards and thanks!Cowhen1966 (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Howicus, since I have not heard from you, I may need to request for mediation. I do not want to get into edit warring with you. I am asking you nicely once again to review your contribution to the page I created. I am willing to give you 24 hours to make the changes. Failing that I will have to start a process of arbitration. I am new to this, and if i feel that people are targeting my work unfairly then I will involve administators to tell me where I am going wrong if at all? In good faith,Cowhen1966 (talk) 23:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, could you tell me again what changes these are, exactly? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I beg your pardon?Cowhen1966 (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- You said "I am willing to give you 24 hours to make the changes." What did you mean by that?
- Also, I have posted a message at Talk:Cecil Jay Roberts listing some concerns I have about the sources used in the article. I thought you might want a more detailed explanation of my concerns, and I placed it on the talk page so that other editors watching the page will see it too. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
24 hours is more than enough to remove the template. If you do not remove the template, then you will begin an edit warring seeing as your reason for putting the template on my article is subjective. I have seen the articles you have created some of which have even been declined. I sincerely want to treat you with good faith and adopt good practice. I expect you to act as hastily as you did to vandalise my article by removing the box. I have cited Independent sources so if you dont like them that is your problem. The rest is subjectiveCowhen1966 (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, I think you're a bit unclear on how Wikipedia defines independent sources. On Wikipedia, "independent source" means independent from the subject of the article. This essay explains the definition well.
- As far as the tag goes, I still feel the article needs improvement, as I detailed at the talk page, and I'm just using the tags to show where the room for improvement is. I don't think the tags should be removed until the issues are fixed. The article is improving, but it's not quite there yet. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)I HAVE POSTED A LINK ON THE ARTICLE'S TALKPAGE! PERHAPS YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE EXCERPT WITH REGARDS TO COMMON SENSE EVALUATION. THERE IS MORE INFORMATION WITH REGARDS TO WIKIPEDIA GUIDELINES ON THAT PAGE. HOPE IT HELPS. As fr the article I will invlove arbtration so I'm informing you now.Cowhen1966 (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia has many policies and guidelines about encyclopedic content. These standards require verifiability, neutrality, respect for living people, and more.
The policies, guidelines, and process pages themselves are not part of the encyclopedia proper. Consequently, they do not generally need to conform with the content standards. It is therefore not necessary to provide reliable sources to verify Wikipedia's administrative pages, or to phrase Wikipedia procedures or principles in a neutral manner, or to cite an outside authority in determining Wikipedia's editorial practices. Instead, the content of these pages is controlled by community-wide consensus, and the style should emphasize clarity, directness, and usefulness to other editors.[2]
These pages do, however, need to comply with Wikipedia's legal and behavioral policies, as well as policies applicable to non-content pages. For example, editors may not violate copyrights anywhere on Wikipedia, and edit warring is prohibited everywhere, not merely in encyclopedia articles.
Oh and by the way, I DO FEEL BULLIIED AND HARRASSED BY YOURSELF AND SITEKU. Why did you remove my template? Are you starting an editting war?Cowhen1966 (talk) 03:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you feel bullied and harassed, it was not my intention to do so. I don't think arbitration is the right solution here, but I won't (and can't) stop you from seeking it if that's what you feel is needed. Also, if you're referring to the template on Italian cruiser San Marco, I did not remove it. You're a good-faith editor, I know that, and I'm sorry to see that you're frustrated. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I am also sorry that we got off on the wrong foot! In fact, Cowhen1966 (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)now that I have had time to look at the past few days leading up to this, I realise that Siteku is the one who has been stirring things up! Can you believe he has gone as far as to put my article up for deletion? Anyway, I want you to know that I do not hold any grudges against you. And if you happen to be in touch with Huon, please tell him I am sorry! Regards!Cowhen1966 (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Howicus,
I spoke to you about the Sagat (rapper) and Jump Chico Slamm Pages.
I wondered how I should go about getting you the information that I compiled to correct the wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerumino (talk • contribs) 01:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Kerumino. Well, if the information is website links, post it here or at Talk:Sagat (rapper). If it's not available online, then my ability to help you may be limited, since I can't verify the info myself. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Howicus I do have some comments with supporting links that may be of help.
funk Dat was a crossover song with a total reach to 46 countries. (not a minor hit)
so even though it wasn't a "major hit" I believe the description "minor hit"
is unnecessary
- 3 In Billboards Us Dance Club Play
- 54 U.S. R&B Charts
http://www.musicvf.com/song.php?id=36322&artist=Sagat&title=Why+Is+It%3F+%28Fuk+Dat%29
Billboard hot 100 chart 17 weeks peak at #63 http://www.song-database.com/chhist.php?sid=22221&from=spu&type=ht
- 1 on the Dutch dance Charts
http://dancehistory.nl/charts/top500-1991-2000/9
- 77 In the Top 100 Dance Charts for 1994
http://dancechart.net/1994-top-100-dance-charts
- 25 Top 40 Uk
http://www.officialcharts.com/archive-chart/_/1/1993-12-04/ http://www.officialcharts.com/artist/_/sagat/
Inspite of the statement "a minor hit"
Sagat Funk Dat and Fuk Dat
Appear in over 25 Remixes and 60 compilations.
from 1993-2012 As of Early January 2014 This is a very popular underground song in EDM.
Comps
http://www.discogs.com/artist/11915-Sagat#t=Appearances_Compilations&q=&p=1
Remixes http://www.discogs.com/artist/11915-Sagat#t=Appearances_Mixes&q=&p=1
Influence on other Artist http://www.rap-up.com/2010/10/19/video-premiere-nina-sky-you-aint-got-it-funk-that/
http://www.whosampled.com/sample/65123/Nina-Sky-You-Aint-Got-It-%28Funk-That%29-Sagat-Funk-Dat/
many more by search terms "funk dat remix" and "fuk dat remix"
I don't know of any songs that can be called a "minor hit" that have so much impact 20 years later.
thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerumino (talk • contribs) 18:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
On Sagat:
Soundtracks
- "The Kiss of Death"
<Fuk Dat Written by Faustin Lenon Performed by Sagat Courtesy of PolyGram Records http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113552/soundtrack> NOTE: Fuk Dat and Funk Dat are both Produced By. Jump Chico Slamm http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=517003 http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=348421
Jump Chico Slamm
Production
- Hermann Carter Tumblin down E-Legal records 1992
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=67201
- Tapp It's Your Birthday e.P. Yeah Yeah 1993
- Sagat Fuk Dat Maxi 1993
- Sagat Funk Dat Maxi 1994
- Blaksam Mr. Phat (pockets) Max'n 1994
- Tommye Miller [[I need to go away (all by mself) id 1993
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=162192
- Sagat Luvstuff Maxi 1994
- Tapp Summertime CLR 1997
- Sagat My Poem Is L.P. Maxi 1994
- Sagat Get Outta My Face Maxi 1995
Remixes
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=5092869
Discography
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=7347
- "Jamma Quadrant One" "Batte Con" CLR 1995
- "Galactic Alignment" Rush Hour 2012
http://www.discogs.com/Jump-Chico-Slamm-Galactic-Alignment/release/3682733
- "Pyrotechnics E.P." Cyberjamz 2012
- "The Way You Move" Imperial Underground 2013
Jump Chico Slamm and Chico Slamm are original monickers used as a Producer beginning in 1989
Jump Chico Slamm is a member of Jamma Quadrant One
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B007BBIVGG/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1062667/a/jamma+quadrant+one.htm
http://winniecooper.net/tag/jamma-quadrant-one/
http://www.salespider.com/cpida-6bfc9262133d3a0a4fb0978b8423f9d3/summertime-jamma-quadrant-one-12
http://www.tower.com/vatte-con-vinyl/wapi/119771265
http://wikibit.net/mp3/Jamma-Quadrant-One
https://www.gemm.com/store/BRR/item/JAMMA-QUADRANT-ONE-SUMMERTIME-12-/1430608285
http://cdnavigator.com/s-1280458.htm
(Jump Chico Slamm is a producer entity and uses "Other names" to represent his Vocal Artistry or as an M.C./recording artist.
---sUPPORTING Sagat as a secondary artist name apart from Jump chico Slamm.)
(notice the release date 1992 - 1 year before Sagat Fuk Dat was released)http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=67201)
http://rushhourmusic.com/?p=1032 http://www.allmusic.com/album/handraizer-mw0000116040 http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2011/09/andy_rooney_retirement_kurt_cobain.php http://www.mtv.com/artists/sagat/
Top 200 tracks of the 90s
http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7854-the-top-200-tracks-of-the-1990s-200-151/
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Beavis_and_Butt-Head
Blacksam M.C. Also Jump Chico Slamm under the Alias "Blacksam" http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=526595
Proposed sidebar -
Jump Chico Slamm, Jump "Chico" Slamm, Chico Slamm
{{Infobox musical artist
|name = Jump Chico Slamm
|image =Jump Chico Slamm.jpg
|image_size = 200px
|caption = Chico Slamm in 2012.
|background = solo_singer
|birth_name = Faustin Moran Lenon
|birth_date = January 4, 1970
|birth_place =[[Fort Bragg, N.C.], U.S.
|origin = Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.
|instrument = Vocals, synthesizer, keyboards, turntables, Latin Percussion, Congas, Timbales
|genre = House, Drum and Bass, Carribean, Hip House, Fusion
|occupation = Record producer, Label Owner, rapper, Songwriter, singer, D.J.
|years_active = 1989–present
|label = Imperial Underground, (current)
Yeah Yeah, CLR, Cajual E-Lega, Maxi, Cuzn, Max'n, Dj World, id, (former)
|associated_acts = Hermann Carter, Jamma Quadrant One, Sagat (rapper), Tapp, C.A.T., Chico Slamm
|website = jumpchicoslamm
IMAGE of Jump Chico Slamm
https://twitter.com/JumpChicoSlamm
Faustin Lenon and Jump Chico Slamm as Songwriter - see credits http://www.discogs.com/artist/719249-Faustin-Lenon http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=67201 http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=526595 http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=162192
Proposed Categories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Musicians_from_Baltimore,_Maryland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:House_music
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Electronic_dance_music_genres
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:African-American_male_rappers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:African-American_record_producers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_music_industry_executives
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Remixers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_dance_musicians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_house_musicians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_electronic_musicians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Songwriters
Jump Chico Slamm
Current Label: Imperial Underground Records
https://play.google.com/store/music/album/Jump_Chico_Slamm_The_Way_You_Move?id=Bqm4o35d6324g3dtvs6mg54msdq
So basically this should be enough information to put things in perspective
differentiating between Jump Chico Slamm as a producer established years before Sagat
--Sagat is not a rapper who produces as Jump Chico Slamm
--Jump Chico Slamm is a "Music Producer / Record Producer" who uses "Sagat" amongst other aliases
as an M.C. or as some say (Rapper)
supporting Sagat has changed the Artist name to Sagatmanchu http://www.reverbnation.com/artist_877246/bio https://www.facebook.com/pages/Sagatmanchu/128895690459600?sk=info http://www.youtube.com/user/SAGATMANCHU http://deephousepage.com/forums/showthread.php?t=215881 http://www.reverbnation.com/sagatmanchu
I hope this is the way to get this started. I use discogs for the actual proof provided by the printed label of the said release. Thank You Much for your Help Howicus
Please comment on Talk:Don Benton
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Don Benton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:CREDO mobile logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:CREDO mobile logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 February 2014
- News and notes: Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Wikipedia editor faces down legal challenge
- Technology report: ULS Comeback
- WikiProject report: Countering Systemic Bias
- Featured content: Holotype
- Traffic report: Chilly Valentines
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Skaramuca
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skaramuca. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Justin Bieber
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Justin Bieber. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Howicus:
WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation
The Signpost: 26 February 2014
- Featured content: Odin salutes you
- WikiProject report: Racking brains with neuroscience
- Special report: Diary of a protester: Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest
- Traffic report: Snow big deal
- Recent research: CSCW '14 retrospective; the impact of SOPA on deletionism
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Chris Christie
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris Christie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
CWology
Howicus - Thanks for your help and suggestions! Much appreciated! I needed those "help me" references and will go back and put them in where they should be. CWology (talk) 02:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- No problem! Feel free to contact me if you have any more questions, or try the Teahouse, a place for new users to ask questions. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thank you for introducing me to the project. I have leanred so much in chat about how things are done. 400 Lux (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014
- Traffic report: Brinksmen on the brink
- Discussion report: Four paragraph lead, indefinitely blocked IPs, editor reviews broken?
- Featured content: Full speed ahead for the WikiCup
- WikiProject report: Article Rescue Squadron
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Unreliable sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Unreliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2014
- Traffic report: War and awards
- Featured content: Ukraine burns
- WikiProject report: Russian WikiProject Entomology
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:ANI#Content manipulation on 2012 Italian Navy Marines shooting incident in the Laccadive Sea because we need fresh set of eyes with a view to resolve content related editorial differences. Onlyfactsnofiction (talk) 10:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, but that discussion didn't go anywhere then, and it's not gonna go anywhere now... Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:House of Gundulić
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:House of Gundulić. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2014
- WikiProject report: We have history
- Featured content: Spot the bulldozer
- News and notes: Foundation-supported Wikipedian in residence faces scrutiny
- Traffic report: Into thin air
- Technology report: Wikimedia engineering report
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Editing
I have had a couple of people edit incorrectly on the page. They are changing who quoted statements according to reference number and adding words to a direct quote. what is appropo to deal with this situation?
Thank you, Susan Susan Macafee (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The Ribbon International
I have had a couple of people edit incorrectly on the page. They are changing who quoted statements according to reference number and adding words to a direct quote. what is appropo to deal with this situation?
Also, I am being harassed about the page.
Susan Macafee (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Susan, sorry to hear you're running into difficulties. I've looked over the discussion on the page, and I think part of the problem is that it's perhaps not clear enough where the direct quotes begin and end. Template:Quote may help to distinguish them. Also, I'm afraid I have to agree with NeilN in one respect. Wikipedia's purpose is to inform, not to capture emotion. The language in the article should be detached and dispassionate, describing events without commenting on them.
- Now, a word about what you called harassment. Please try not to take criticism of the article personally. It may seem like your article is being unfairly criticized, but believe me when I say that every new article gets (or should get) the same scrutiny. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 16:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:UKForex
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:UKForex. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Pig blood image for Pig blood curd
Thank you so much for uploading File:Pig blood jelly.jpg. I managed to upload a newer version. I have a 50-50 shot at doing that, but only a 10% chance of making the initial upload. If there's anything you ever need, please just ask. Again, many, many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
The Ribbon International
The tags have only been on the page for three days. Now he is threatening to edit. I have seen tags on pages that have been there for years. I work during the day, and have to take time out for all this chat on talk pages. Apparently he doesn't have a life other than Wikipedia, which I do. As I mentioned numerous times the people involved in "The Ribbon" are in their 60s and 70s and not computer savvy that is why I have been the only person working on the page. The person who has been working on the page with me is not computer savvy, as you know she load three pictures in a PDF file. She also works during the day and has a life other than Wikipedia. She will be retiring from her job this week and will have more time to work on the page. I am waiting for more information and photos, and to editing before I paste the link on other pages so it is not an orphan, and would be open for other people to contribute.Susan Macafee (talk) 18:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Susan Macafee (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Any Wikipedia page is open for any editor to edit, orphan or not. That's more or less the whole point. If NeilN or another editor feels there is something on the page that needs fixing, they are free to fix it. If you disagree, you are likewise free to undo the change, and then discuss it on the talk page of the article. And, if you don't have as much time as NeilN, by all means tell him that. Ask him to wait, politely, and see what he says. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2014
- Comment: A foolish request
- Traffic report: Down to a simmer
- News and notes: Commons Picture of the Year—winners announced
- Featured content: Winter hath a beauty that is all his own
- Technology report: Why will Wikipedia look like the Signpost?
- WikiProject report: From the peak
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Persecution of Hindus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Persecution of Hindus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Howicus
I for got to mention that The Ribbon Starts Here is now posted on You Tube (about 45 min.). Susan Macafee (talk) 01:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
sup howicus
thanks for the extra info. read through a bunch, more to go.(i dont write this way in articles). if you get a chance check my articles and give a heads up to any missteps. i heard yall need extra help on the first, so hit me up with some basics--The emperor of planet earth (talk) 06:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
|
enjoy. The emperor of planet earth (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC) |
sorry man, had to try it.
Please comment on Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2014
- WikiProject report: Deutschland in English
- Special report: On the cusp of the Wikimedia Conference
- Featured content: April Fools
- Traffic report: Regressing to the mean
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Tq
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Tq. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)