Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-03-26/Technology report

Technology report

Why will Wikipedia look like the Signpost?

Share this

As you have probably read on this week's op-ed, or via various other channels of announcement, 3 April will see the introduction of the Typography refresh (or update) for the Vector skin on all Wikipedias. Other projects like Commons will have this update rolled out a few days before. You may also have tested the beta option. Basically, this means you will see some, and may see other changes on Wikipedia. In short:

H1 and H2 headers will show in a serif font.
The body font may show on a different font, depending on your operating system and installed fonts.
The font size and leading (line height) of body text are increased slightly.
The body font color becomes a very dark gray instead of black.
~~Pre-formatted text that is wider then the screen will show a scrollbar.~~ [Removed last minute]

Other features that were in the beta but were not strictly typography-related, such as the restyled table of contents, thumbnail and blockquote styling, have been removed.

For most Windows readers, this means the headers will show in Georgia and the body text will stay in Arial, albeit slightly larger. For most Mac users this will be the same, but where the pages would normally show in Helvetica, it will now show in Helvetica Neue (it may be hard to see any difference).

On Linux, effects may vary. Where several distros and browsers all had their own default font settings, resulting in many different looks, the new typography should equalize them all to use Liberation Sans for body text. The headers may show in Linux Libertine, Georgia or Times, in that order of preference, depending on which of them are installed.

Georgia may look familiar; the Signpost has used it for its headers for some time now. And that is why...

Tech News highlights

VisualEditor news

You can now double-click or press the ↲ Enter key on an image or template to change its settings. [1] [2]
Pages that don't exist will now show as red links in the edit mode. [3]
You will no longer be able to try to use VisualEditor on pages translated using the Translate extension, and you will see a warning if you try to edit pages marked for translation. [4]
You will now see a full warning, including the most recent log entry, when you try to edit protected pages with VisualEditor. [5]

Future software changes

You will be able to use the Hovercards tool as a beta feature on all wikis from March 26.
You will soon be able to include the Whatlinkshere special page in other pages. [6] [7]

← Previous "Technology report"

In this issue

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Forget Hovercards, I want hoverboards! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification, once the Typography Refresh comes out of Beta I'll lose this pretty new Table of Contents? You can pry it out of my cold, dead hands! I don't ever want to see the old ToC again, please! --Nicereddy (talk) 01:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So what's the answer to the question posed in the title? Tony (talk) 02:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Georgia may look familiar; the Signpost has used it for its headers for some time now. And that is why..." — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the sentence beneath the numbered list, "Other features that were in the beta but were not strictly typography-related, such as the restyled table of contents, thumbnail and blockquote styling, have been removed."

I was wondering if, based on that, the table of contents will revert back to the dark gray background it has when Typography refresh isn't enabled. --Nicereddy (talk) 02:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Tony was replying to your comment. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the TOC styling is not part if this update. Basically, anything not related to fonts has been abandoned. But there is a gadget that does apply a different styling to the TOC, category boxes and image thumbs in the Testing and Development (bottom) section of the gadget preferences. Give that one a try. (Note, may clash with the beta.) — Edokter (talk) — 12:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Hover' feature is very clever and useful IMHO, but what is to be done when is directs to the wrong information when there is an alternative meaning? How does the reader correct it?Apwoolrich (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Want the latest Signpost delivered to your talk page each month?

Home

About