User talk:Favre1fan93/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Reasons for reversions

Just wondering if you had some. For what it's worth, I think it's clear how a Timeline section in an article about the MCU means it's the timeline "as depicted in the MCU". Just like Short films, Television series or Other media; no emphasis or reassurance needed. I also believe a table of contents should show folks the chapters, most of which here are on Level Four. Anyway, fine to disagree, but it helps to give reasons, preferably in edit summaries. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Mentioned you indirectly at the MCU talk page, consider this pinging. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congratulations on being on Wikipedia for ten years, and thank you for all the work that you do! InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Boba Fett

How do you know if the character qualify as a main, recurring, featured, or guest character? Is there a Wiki page for that?― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 03:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Literally by the credits. Starring Tem Morrison and Ming-Na Wen, all others in the end credits get "Co-Starring" credit. They are recurring "Co-stars" if they are in three or more episodes, "Other co-stars" if 2 or less. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Oh, Thank you! ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 22:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Toby Maguire as Spider-Man.jpg

You might want to fix the spelling to Tobey since I cannot move files without leaving redirects. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Fixed! Thanks for the catch. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Never Meet Your Heroes

I added critical response and audince viewership info over the last couple days for Draft:Never Meet Your Heroes. I know you said in the talk page that more production info could possibly be added, but I'm not finding much of anything new. In its current state, do you think the draft can be moved to the mainspace? Maybe other editors will find new production info. -- Zoo (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Eternals

It isn't a prose issue. You have "Censorship" as a subheading under "Theatrical", making it a single subsection. Single subsections violate CHicago Style rules for writing. I'm not saying you don't have enough content, I'm saying that you're suggesting that there should be 2 separate subtopics to "Theatrical", when you only have 1 subheading.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 18:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I've only ever seen it be an issue when you have a level 2 heading followed immediately by a level 3 heading. If there is substantial prose between the level 2 and level 3 heading, in which the level 2 heading adequately covers that prose, and then the level 3 heading separates off additional related prose, that shouldn't be an issue against any styling rules. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Can you show me where that's an exception? I don't see that here.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

This isn't codified in our MOS as far as I'm aware, so it's really up to editors to follow such formatting if they choose. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

The explicit rule isn't, but the writing styles are in our MOS. THat's how we create consistency across articles, and why we use oxford commas, and we put periods outside of quotes for non-complete sentences.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Spider-man full names

Can you point me to the discussion where the Spider-Man characters are to be referred to by their full name instead of their on-screen credited common name? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

The formatting for every MCU film is as such, which over the years established the consensus for such formatting. There never was a discussion regarding it to my knowledge, it just established itself to be such as a unifying format across the MCU scope of articles. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Favre1fan93, this clashes with WP:FILMCAST though, "All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source." so my edits were trying to get that in line with what was presented in the movie. The credited names are also reasonably listed for MCU: heroes and villains are referred to as regular name / hero name. Captions and audio descriptions also support common name. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

It has become WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS across the MCU articles, presenting full names when helpful, but limiting some naming (if necessary) by credits/what is actually said within films. If you'd like to present a larger discussion on it, I'd suggest doing so at WT:MCU since it would affect many of the articles within the MCU taskforce. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There was a similar discussion about this at WT:MCU a couple months ago, in which no new consensus was produced in regards to how we call characters. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Marvel TV on Netflix

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and the other ABC shows have been on Disney+ over here for the last few years so I wouldn't be surprised if we get info on that happening in the U.S. soon. Not so sure about the Defenders shows but the speculation that they could go to Hulu in the U.S. and Disney+/Star everywhere else seems more likely than them ending up on the U.S. Disney+ due to their content. Having the Star version of Disney+ is funny because we get things like Alien and Deadpool sitting right next to Encanto and Frozen. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Yeah I'm hoping that will happen for Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.! We have Agent Carter, Inhumans, and Runaways at the moment, so I'm sure it'll fit right in! As much as I enjoy Hulu, I'm slightly jealous of you and others for the Star hub, because if this isn't the perfect scenario to put the Defenders series there, I don't know what is. I somehow have a sneaking suspicion they're going to go on Disney+ here in the US, especially with how brutal Moon Knight sounds with that Empire article today, and the rumors of a Daredevil season 4 in development that wouldn't go to Hulu, it makes sense to keep it all on Disney+. Hopefully Marvel announces where they end up on or shortly after March 1! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

What If

Why did you revert my edit? It's a superhero show, why shouldn't that be the first thing a reader sees? Orchastrattor (talk) 01:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

As stated in my revert, the short description is already lengthy and adding "superhero" to that is unnecessary. For the lead, given there are multiple other genres associated with the series, they should not be noted in the lead as it can become excessive. It should stick to the country of origin, what type of series it is by style (regular series, limited, anthology, etc.) and a note also that it's animated. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Nova

See what you can do: https://comicbook.com/marvel/news/nova-project-live-action-plans-marvel-movie-sabir-pirzada/ Kailash29792 (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This could probably be the Draft:Untitled Marvel space-centered series, but we’d need a source corroborating that. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Justin Kroll further tweeted that it is likely a series (seen here at ComicBook.com) and that ComicBook.com source speculates it likely is the space series. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

RT Data

Hey, where is the consensus for the 18 months you mentioned in edit summaries please? I think the wikidata is easy to edit by a human so don't see need for 18 months but open to opinions. Not sure where the best talk page for this is? Indagate (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I never said there was consensus, but merely what seems like a reasonable time frame to switch over to Wikidata. Unfortunately, many readers and editors are not very familiar with Wikidata, so we shouldn't be switching over "recent" releases to the template pulls if editors are looking to continually update the score data. That's why I suggested perhaps around 18 months after release, as that seems like a reasonable amount of time that data will have "settled". Additionally, User:RottenBot goes around occasionally to update articles to the Wikidata if available. I had previously about run frequency, and while not a clear answer, they noted the bot runs 2-3 times a year, and themselves suggested some time post release of current releases to switch over to Wikidata. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

The recent MCU films seems to have RT data at it's own article, Phase Four, and list of Marvel films, so the templates mean they only have to be updated in one place rather than three. How about an edit button next to the content rather than next to reference so easier for editors to find place to edit in first months? They don't specify time frame, 18 months seems way too long, RT scores seems to be mostly in place in first weeks with rare edits after that. Happy to open discussion up wider to get consensus. Indagate (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, after the creation of the bot/template, I went through and made the pre-Phase Four articles and info to the Wikidata and formatted as such to note the ability to edit at Wikidata. I do personally think 18 months is an adequate time (or at the top end of a time frame) for switching over to Wikidata integration, but this feels like a discussion that should be held at WT:FILM to try to gain some consensus on when that should occur, if at all. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Problem user invoking unrelated policies to justify their edits

What should I do if a user is improperly invoking policies that have nothing to do with the edits they’re making to justify them?--CreecregofLife (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

@CreecregofLife: I think I know what you're referring to, and I've asked the user in question about one of those rationales—which, IMO, does not apply (although the underlying issue of notability absolutely does). —C.Fred (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

What If...? accolades table

Should the accolades table be removed for What If...? since it only has three awards nominations as of now, or are the rules different between animated and live action series? -- Zoo (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

It has three awards so that's fine. Hawkeye has two awards (with a total of four nominations among those two), so while it has more total nominations than What If, it has less award distinction. Hope that makes sense. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Thanks. Good to know for the future. -- Zoo (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that is current consensus, and I'm not entirely sure if that is written down anywhere, so I apologize if I've steered you in the wrong direction. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

It makes sense. Even if that isn't the consensus it probably should be. I just wasn't making the connection that it was the number of awards and not the number of nominations. -- Zoo (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Right because you could have 8 nominations for X type of award, but it's still one award ceremony being nominated, so that works fine as prose. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show/archive1

Since you have experience in working with TV articles, would you mind leaving comments on this PR please? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Avatar vs avatar

Are the episode captions not a good enough source for capitalizing avatar? Normally I'd agree it shouldn't be capitalized, but I noticed the episodes capitalized it the other day. -- Zoo (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't feel like a proper noun, so it shouldn't be capitalized in my opinion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Perception's Twitter

You're sure about this? If so, do you think we can use this, this, this, and this too? InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The purpose of WP:TWITTER-EL (which covers it as a reliable source) and the verified system, is to prevent editors from adding in clearly random users, like this one replying to the Moon Knight tweet. This is clearly their account as they link to the account from their website. I think it's in the clear. Obviously, we'll hope they create their case study articles for these projects, but this could suffice for now. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

All right.  Added for all four. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Radio Times

Is Radio Times a good source to use for the songs in Moon Knight? They have a list of the songs from each episode and we don't have all of them listed. -- Zoo (talk) 15:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes it would be a reliable source. I don't know if this is stated in the documentation for the episode infobox, but I at least tend to only make note of "prominent" songs featured within the episodes, and to a lesser extent any over credits. Some of these songs I recall from watching were only used as short transitional music, versus "A Man Without Love" or "Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go" in episode 1. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

If you have time, would you be able to do a c/e run of the Thanos article? I spent most of the week doing my own c/e, as well as expanding and adding new sections in my sandbox. I published my edit a couple days ago but want some fresh eyes to go through it. I'm hoping to nominate it to be a GA soon. -- Zoo (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

What If...?

Wow, I published my edit removing the adult categories then immediately saw "Last edited now by Favre1fan93" and guess you started editing before me. What a coincidence! – SirDot (talk) 16:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:The Tomb (Moon Knight) comic comparisons.jpg

Hey, if possible (by guidelines), I think it would be better to have File:The Tomb (Moon Knight) comic comparisons.jpg as two different images and in the article place them together instead of one merged image. When viewing the image by itself it's still very small and hard to understand what I'm actually looking at. Gonnym (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Gonnym: I wasn't sure about that, and had assumed both being non-free files, it would be better to have them exist in one file, such as File:Spider-Man actors.jpg. But if they need to be separate images, I can reupload them as such. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I have very little knowledge about fair usage of files here, which is why I said if it was possible. File:Spider-Man actors.jpg is both larger and also does not require looking at small details for comparison, while this image is smaller and does. Anyways, if it's possible, it would be a great improvement for me, as the current image (for me) is too small to view properly. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

In terms of sizing, they were both the same width and height individually, and I just stacked them on top of each other. Within the article, they'd still render as the size they basically are now. We could up the |upright= size to help, but I also think it's less about the fine details, and more the fact the composition is strikingly similar between the two (bare/white office, doctor behind a desk, Marc sitting in a chair in front, etc.). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Question

One of Wikipedia's rules states that the talk page of every article cannot be used as a forum. Does asking for a list count as a forum? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaweed Brain1993 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Seaweed Brain1993: Since you're obviously alluding to the edit which I reverted, I'll answer. Your request was in violation of WP:NOTFORUM because it was unrelated to improving the article, so I removed it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I would say your new discussion at Talk:I Am Groot § I Am Groot episodes violates WP:NOTFORUM as well, but I'll wait to see if someone else reverts. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

The addition on I Am Groot's talk violated WP:NOTFORUM, I'm not (yet) aware of the the other instance, but knowing InfiniteNexus and their approach to editing, I'm assuming it was also in violation. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Television director/writer categories

Now that "The Tomb" is in the mainspace, I was going to make a "Television episodes directed by..." category for Aaron Moorhead & Justin Benson since it appears we are making categories for the directors and head writers for each MCU series. Do you know which name should go first since the order was flipped in their MK episodes? Or even though they're usually a duo, should they have their own separate categories? -- Zoo (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

I would look at their other work, and see if you can figure out how they've been credited and in which order. Hopefully it's mostly one way than another and that could solve your answer. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Arrowverse cancellations

Nope, not all have been cancelled, only Legends and Batwoman. There's been immense media discourse around this, but the series's articles do not elaborate on that other than single sentence mentions of cancellations (unlike Netflix's GLOW). Since I'm travelling, could you or anyone please do something about it? Here's a start. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

At least a reply would be appreciated. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Never mind, done with it. Though I think more content must be added. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Drafts

I really think that you and the others should stop creating episode articles in the draft namespace and instead work on it in your userspace. If editors like that are going to jump over your heads then at least make it harder for them finding those drafts. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I think that's a bit of an overreaction to one page being moved. It would just make it harder for everyone to edit and people would still make drafts not knowing that the info was in some random userspace. -- Zoo (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I was about to comment the same thing. Hopefully we can avoid another situation like this after the discussion on WT:MCU is resolved. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Family Law

Hello. Could you help me with some advise, pleace? There is a TV show on The CW that already broadcasted for two seasons, in Italy, and renewed for the third. But there is no reliable source in whole internet, that season 2 was broadcasted at all. The episodes exist, and there is this unreliable source, and that's all. What can be done for the show article and for many actors articles? For example, Erica Cerra doesn't have a word about being her a regular in the show. Thank you. IKhitron (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Well, I suppose you've decided to ignore my question, because there is no answer "I don't know" here. I'm surprised, and next will not ask you for help. IKhitron (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@IKhitron: Sorry, things were busy and I forgot to respond. Do any of the following help you? [1], [2], [3] - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

As I already said, I searched a lot. I'm not asking for help to search, I'm asking what to do if there is a fact, but there is no source. IKhitron (talk) 02:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Avengers

I think your updates to the Avengers articles re: listing all the sequels is the right move, but I do think having Age of Ultron, Infinity War, and Endgame all as headings in the TOC for The Avengers (2012 film) but no sections for the new films or even an "Other"/"Future" section seems like it is putting a lot of emphasis on the fact that we are excluding them without actually explaining it to readers. I'm just wondering if it makes sense to condense those into a single "Sequels" section like Age of Ultron has, and maybe in the cases where we are specifically excluding future films we should say "direct sequel" somewhere as a way to explain that we are only including the ones that are actually sequels? - adamstom97 (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I disagree with keeping The Avengers' sequel section all separated like that. Each film doesn't need its own subsection, and each one of those subsections is too short to be justified. Once those two other films are released, we could have two subsections, one for the Infinity Saga and one for the Multiverse Saga. But for now, with less than one line for those two films, that would also be unnecessary. —El Millo (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I think it's appropriate to mention on Endgame's article about the two, but beyond that, I don't see the need on the other three proceeding films. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

If you're saying that we don't need to mention the two newly-announced films in the Sequel section of the first three Avengers films, I agree with you in principle, but we'd have to be constantly battling with editors adding it in. But about the individual subheadings, why do you think that's important to keep? That goes for @Adamstom.97 too, I see no use for it. —El Millo (talk) 21:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm fine with removing the subheadings. If this needs to be a larger discussion not just on my page, sure, since we should then adjust the other franchise articles like Cap and Thor's pages. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh great. I don't think we need a larger discussion, I'll just reinstate the edit at The Avengers and see the rest of the articles later. We'll wait on what Adamstom has to say on the inclusion of the two new Avengers films to see if we keep them or remove them. —El Millo (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

If it is just a single section for "Sequels" that only includes the first three and mentions "direct sequels", or something like that, to explain why the new two aren't included, then that aligns with my thoughts. I agree with adjusting the other franchises, we don't really need subheadings for each sequel if the sections are going to be such short summaries. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Daredevil: Reboot or Revival?

Hello There, Favre. This is regarding Daredevil: Born Again. Is it a revival or a reboot as Vincent D'Onofrio and Charlie Cox are reprising their role here. Seaweed Brain1993 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It's a revival. — SirDot (talk) 15:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I frankly think we have to wait see. If they start the series with some explanation about this being a different universe from the original, I wouldn't call it a revival. BD2412 T 16:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Amazing job continuing to keep all of the MCU articles in-line, especially getting all of the little details and updates right after Comic Con. It's great to still be working with you on these articles after all these years. adamstom97 (talk) 03:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Adamstom.97: Thank you Adam! Likewise - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

The Defenders/The Punisher

Hello Favre1fan93,

I noticed that you were working on numerous Marvel pages. Because I do not master Wikipedia's tabs completely, I wondered if you could add a Primetime Emmy Award nomination (2018) for Outstanding Original Main Title Theme Music for The Defenders, as sourced on the Emmy Award official website here and here, and a BMI TV Award received by The Punisher in 2020, as sourced on Variety here and on the official website here.

If you cannot/do not want to make these edits, no worries.

Regardless, have a nice day. 129.194.0.220 (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Moon Knight: Asylum Draft Ready

Hey there,

I have added more production info to the Moon Knight episode Asylum and was just sending this message here to make sure you were aware of this in case you did not see the talk page! I was hoping you could check it and see if the article is ready for mainspace. Thank you!

-Dcdiehardfan (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Never mind, the move has already been made Dcdiehardfan (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Criteria for a fictional character to get their own Wikipedia Page

Hello Favre, I hope you are doing well. I am interested to know what are the criterias needed for a fictional character to get their own Wiki page. Seaweed Brain1993 (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

There are many factors. First, they should probably be notable in their own right to even warrant one. Then after that, if they are solely a character to one medium (film or TV for example), those WikiProjects and MOS's also have guideline which you can find to further detail if a character page should be made. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Question on NFILM#1

Hello, Favre1fan93! I'm interested in your interpretation of WP:NFILM's first criteria? We disagreed here, as you said that 2 refs aren't enough for WP:GNG, if so, do you think 3 is needed? Also, there's another disagreement here for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra (2007 film) (2nd nomination), I don't think the keep votes are convincing, they suggest that WP:NFILM is met (which criteria, because the critics aren't nationally well known?). I'd be interested in your opinion. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

@VickKiang: For GNG, it says significant coverage. For me, that means as a rule of thumb there are probably 10 reliable sources used in the article, or at the very least five. So yes, as with Art Machine, having just two references (of which those reliability were called into question) was not enough for GNG in my view. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

She-Hulk episodes 1-4

Since reviews are coming out today for the first 4 episodes, is it fine to make drafts for the other three episodes early like we did with the Ms. Marvel drafts once early reviews came out for the first 2 of those episodes? -- Zoo (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

I think it's still too soon, unless from the reviews we can pull meaningful production info or direct review material. From the ones I've been looking at, they've mostly covered the premiere, and then the generalities of what happens in the next three. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The only call outs I've really seen past the first episode is Patty Guggenheim's appearance in the fourth episode in Rolling Stone and THR. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, when I first asked it was because I saw RT had reviews for all 4 episodes. Then I realized episodes 2-4 had the same reviews and scores. I'm keeping an eye out for episode specific reviews/info, but I'm not seeing much either. -- Zoo (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for all the work you've put in for the first 2 episodes. It's nice getting them to the mainspace so quickly. -- Zoo (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Iron Man's armor (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

The content I removed from this article was, in addition to being unencyclopedic in-universe cruft, also copied wholesale from [4]. I clearly stated this in my edit summary but you blindly reverted me. Have you forgotten that you are the subject of a still-open CCI? You need to be very careful around copyright issues because it seems to me that you still don't understand the issue. Don't revert that edit again. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Premeditated Chaos: The descriptions, yes, those have been copied verbatim, but that doesn't mean the names/mark numbers should be removed. The source can still be used to support that information. Given the article is literally about the armor's used by Iron Man in the MCU, that isn't cruft given they all fall within the scope of the article. Additionally, you didn't just remove the parts you've noted were copyright concerns, but other material in that table that was sourced by other references. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

It is overly detailed information that is entirely in-universe. It has no encyclopedic relevance. That level of detail would be appropriate for Fandom, not Wikipedia. I'm not going to continue this argument with you. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

What level of detail do you imagine the reader who searches for Iron Man's armor (Marvel Cinematic Universe) is looking for? BD2412 T 17:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

BD, your revert of my removal has restored material clearly identified as copyrighted in the edit summary of my removals. Favrefan has admitted above that "The descriptions, yes, those have been copied verbatim". As an administrator yourself, you ought to know better than to restore copyrighted material. I am going to re-remove it again.

As to the substance of your question, on Wikipedia, a general-purpose encyclopedia, I think they would be searching for real-world information about the development and use of the armor in the films, as props and special effects. Please review WP:UNIVERSE for why it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia articles to be filled with in-universe detail. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

As I said, the sources were still useful to support the Mark numbers of these armors, which I've reused in a new prose statement explaining such with this edit. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

(edit conflict) There is no problem with including in-universe information in an article about a fictional entity, provided that the article also includes real-world info. Now, I'm not arguing that the copyright violations be restored, but the other info that did not violate copyright should not have been deleted. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Since when...

Since when have other than main-on credits' cast counted as "main cast" in Marvel Studios' Disney+ series? --CAJH (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

@CAJH: He appears after the main-on end and the "Georgia Peach" film logo as "Also Starring". Hence, he's another "starring" actor. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I can't recall if definitely so, but I believe that may have happened with a previous Marvel Studios series. I can try and check. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I already did. This is the first time. --CAJH (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Well as stated, he is explicitly given "Also starring" credit in them, so that is the same consideration as what MCU editors have been calling "starring" based on appearing in the main on end. As I said, I don't know why this was done this way, but it shouldn't be treated differently. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I agree, the "also starring" credit is separate from the main end credit list where the actor is also listed so it makes sense to include this as an addition to the main cast. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:46, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Vision series

There's a new rumor of a Vision Quest series with the writers room beginning next week. Is it worth making a draft and see if anything is confirmed by Marvel/the trades, and if not just let it get G13'd, or should I just not bother with a draft? -- Zoo (talk) 01:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Briefly saw that Vision Quest rumor. Unless the trades pick it up, I say avoid a formal draft, but might be worthwhile to put in your sandbox so you have some info ready? But even then, that info now might not be usable as its from unreliable sources. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

ZooBlazer Actually, I see it's coming from Jeff Sneider's who's been breaking some of this recent news, so actually maybe a draft is warranted... - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

I'll probably do that. If it's confirmed it'll be easier to just update info instead of starting from scratch.

Edit: I can put one together tonight -- Zoo (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

ZooBlazer You can use CBR to start! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Would it be best to call it Untitled Vision series or use the rumored Vision Quest title? -- Zoo (talk) 01:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm, I think Draft:Vision Quest (TV series) as that's what the reported title is. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Looks like it was already created -- Zoo (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have fleshed out the draft with the CBR report and added the section info to the TV series list and Phase Seven draft. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Trailblazer101! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion

I know you contribute a lot to WP:WikiProject Television and so you would be familiar with specific approaches the project takes. I recently nominated two season articles of The Chosen (TV series) for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 1) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 2). In both cases, they are essentially verbatim copies of the main article content and they don't meet the project's critieria for splitting (IMO). We don't count episode summaries per WP:NOTPLOT, leaving the article with about 500 words of redundant prose. Per my arguments in the deletion discussion, we don't create season articles for every show simply because the show itself is notable. Notability for the season itself is necessary. Am I off on this? I'd appreciate your input. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Alternative to the new column in Mid-credits and post-credits scenes in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

I think it's too busy. It may be a bit of a pain to initially code, but would suggest as an alternative color-coding the rows for film, TV, and other. BD2412 T 19:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't think it's busy at all. Personally I despise color use if just to state something that another method (ie the column) works just as well. Colors can also present WP:ACCESS issues. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps it would look less busy if the tables were separated by Phase. It would reduce the amount of headers, and maybe the "Medium" column could be removed for Phases One and Three. —El Millo (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Possibly. Phase four is still rather chaotic - I think because I would expect the third column to group everything of the type within the phase, rather than having subgroups of things by type within the phase that happened to occur chronologically. From the perspective of the narrative as a whole, I don't think it matters that much whether the scenes were in a film or on TV or in a one-shot or the like. BD2412 T 21:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Narratively, no, it doesn't matter (mostly) where the scenes were, but we should still inform the readers what type of medium each is without having them navigate to said articles. Maybe {{note label}} is the answer. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

I think the general presumption would be that it's a film unless stated otherwise (and therefore we would only need to indicate when otherwise). BD2412 T 23:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with the added column, but if we want to avoid that we could separate the tables for films, shows, shorts, and Special Presentations. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I would much rather maintain the chronological order, but that's just my opinion. BD2412 T 02:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

How about something like Template:MCU cast indicator so can have key at the top, and just a letter next to the entries title? Indagate (talk) 08:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

@Indagate: Yes, I felt that with just using {{note label}} and {{ref label}} could work. But I still feel the column is fine. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I feel that the column groups together scenes coincidentally connected by being in the same media in a way that makes it appear that this grouping is meaningful, when it is not. BD2412 T 16:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

How about you try your different proposals in your respective sandboxes and link it here? Perhaps from seeing them done it'll be easier to see what works best. —El Millo (talk) 16:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I am not that comfortable working with tables. Also, if the "Media" column is kept, it should be moved before the "Title" column. My eyes are not as young as they used to be, and I am having trouble scanning across the blank spaces and connecting the content in the "Title" column with the corresponding row of the "Description" column. BD2412 T 19:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Hey, changed the media to notes in sandbox per above [5]. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

@Indagate: Yes, I prefer this. BD2412 T 17:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Sure that's a good method, but the template types need to be adjusted so they act like {{Cast indicator}}. The ones in table need to be {{ref}}, and I think the ones in the "key" just need to be {{note}}. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Also, TV series/episodes are self explanatory, so we could reduce the note usage to just One Shots, I Am Groot and Special presentations, with a prose line added along the lines of "All are films or television series unless otherwise noted." - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

The MCU being made mainly of films, I don't think we would even need the All are films or television series unless otherwise noted clarification. —El Millo (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

I was just fixing that. I kept the ones in the table as {{ref label}} to have them look the same as they did before. If the look without the brackets (^F instead of ^[F]) is preferred, changing it to {{ref}} will do. —El Millo (talk) 19:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, copied to live with those changes. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 21:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

InfiniteNexus (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, Favre1fan93! Have a quantumanic new year! InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

—El Millo (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—El Millo (talk) 07:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Trailblazer101 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Favre1fan93!

Happy New Year!

Favre1fan93,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Favre1fan93!

Happy New Year!

Favre1fan93,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 05:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)