User talk:Deed89/Archive 1

Welcome to the Films Project

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for June has been published. July's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the spotlight department.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! AnmaFinotera

-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:11, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

The Beaver (film)

I have partially reverted your edits at this article, as IMDB is not considered a reliable source at Wikipedia. If you have any questions about this revert, just respond here. Thanks. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about not adding a summary (I will do that in all future edits) and no more IMDb sources. I'll read the guidelines thoroughly first before making any more edits. Thanks for the welcome and help! :-) ~dee 16:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ace of Base has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/aceofbase.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Are external links (in the External Links section--not the body of the article) to OFFICIAL MySpace pages allowed for bands (esp. when they don't have an official website)? ~dee 12:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Fine. Just keep the external links to a minimum; maybe 2 or 3. Policy is WP:EL - a MySpace site does meet that policy. They cannot, of course, be used as reliable sources.  Chzz  ►  12:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, Chzz! ~dee 12:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter

The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter

The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open

The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Xx Faktor

Hello Deed89, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Xx Faktor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 06:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem; we see candidates for adminship that don't know the criteria from each other. In this case, you were absolutely right about the page being speedable. Trust me, once you've deleted thousands of pages- or in Fastily's case tens of thousands- the criteria become much more a part of your memory! Courcelles 07:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 10:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion declined: Discover coorg

Hello Deed89. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Discover coorg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to books. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

No probelm. If you are going to do New Page Patrol, which is a good and useful thing to do, it is worth reading WP:CSD carefully; and there is good advice from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) I've been newpage patrolling and using CSD for quite a while, if you need any help you can ask me. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 17:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

In that case, Giftiger should adopt me! :-) ~dee 17:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Courcelles's talk page.
Message added 17:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MB

Hi & thx for your message! Yeah definitely! I think the best place to go for info is their website. Plus he's done tons and tons and tonsssss of interviews. Do you have the article in your sandbox or something? I'd love to help writing it. Cheers! 62.212.66.205 (talk) 11:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

P.S Can you send me your email? it would be the fastest way to reach me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.212.66.205 (talk) 12:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I haven't finished yet; once I am relatively close, I will upload to my sandbox and send you a note. Your input will of course be greatly appreciated. ~dee 14:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

hi

Since you care about saving articles from speedy deletion do you think you can help me save an article from getting deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kip 78 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to try as long as the article is worthy. There are many articles tagged for deletion I do not "care" about saving . ;-) ~dee 14:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

NVM, I just went through your contributions and I suppose you're referring to Kevin feng since it's the only article you created and is currently tagged for deletion. I don't know who this person is, but looking at the deletion discussion page...apparently, you have to prove he is notable outside the game show he participated in. Well, there's no way you can do that unless he is notable outside the game show. ~dee 15:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

He's a PUA like many other PUAs that have pages on Wikipedia. Would you like me to type out a list of all the PUAs on Wikipedia who have maybe even less media coverage than Feng? I did include plenty of secondary resources that show him as a new PUA working alongside more established PUAs including The Asian Playboy, so I fail to see how he is only notable for being on TV show. Kip 78 (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

No need for the list, I'll take your word for it. Perhaps it would be a better idea to check with the editors of all those other "PUA" pages you mentioned since they have already managed to keep their articles up with fewer resources! I'm not particularly experienced in this niche; admittedly, it is not a topic that interests me at all (but I might give it a shot). Further, I feel as though your comments would be better off on the deletion discussion page where other editors can see them. You don't want to convince me, you want to convince them. ~dee 19:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 12:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 21:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Giftiger wunsch's talk page.
Message added 21:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Did you send it yet?

I didn't get an email yet. I just want to make sure I didn't miss it. By the way I'm still on vacation and don't sign into my main account from public computers. I check my inbox every other day :) 62.212.66.205 (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I haven't been in the right frame of mind to complete it yet. Perhaps I will be able to send you a first draft by Wednesday, though. In the meantime, I'm rewriting 3 other articles and editing a few others...trying to get my creative juices flowing again. How's Amsterdam? Hope you're enjoying your time there. :-) ~dee^(talk?) 21:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Reply

He will be reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism when necessary, when he makes vandalistic edits after final warning. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I'll do it if you wish, but you can do it yourself as well with twinkle. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem, and you did it just all right. Of course it leads to a blank page, because IP-users don't have user pages. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

You just got my deepest thanks for the barnstar! :D DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

DARTH SIDIOUS 2 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

;) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Division Bell

Dear Dee, re your comment at Talk:The Division Bell: may I ask you to consider what the actual dispute is about: not whether to include the quote at all but how to present it. IMHO, this way it is presented - highlighted in a box - is a violation of NPOV. Str1977 (an experienced editor) ^(talk) 20:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter

The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Bernin-ger

) Got the draft and looks great! You could put it live and make edits as you go so that other editors can chip in and help I think. 62.212.66.205 (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

New Sources

Can you help with sources for the Kevin feng article? I have several new ones but the more the merrier. By the way this is Kip 78 I forgot the password of my other account though. Pickupthing (talk) 14:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Like I mentioned before, I'm not interested and I have a lot of RL issues to deal with at the moment that I have hardly had the time for Wiki the last two weeks. However, I would be willing to offer you an extra pair of eyes after you finish adding the sources and let you know if his notability is better reflected within the article. I always check my watchlist so I'll spot it right away. ~dee^(talk?) 14:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Translation

Hello! I saw you know a little bit of sami language. Can you translate Welcome to Norway Portal into sami?? Thanks.--An13sa (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I've been away for the past couple of days (travels). Do you still need this? ~dee^(talk?) 07:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Done anyway. :-) ~dee^(talk?) 07:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.--An13sa (talk) 12:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Hi. Thanks for tagging Donald I. "Sarge" Boyd just now - I have deleted it. However WP:CSD#A1 "lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article" wasn't the right tag - the subject was clearly Mr. Boyd. The right tag was WP:CSD#A3 "Any article... consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title... and/or images." It may seem a niggling distinction, but it's important to try to get the right tag, because that generates the right message for the author's talk page, and also because, if you can't find one that fits, that may mean the page is not speediable. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:15, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me, John. I'm really trying my best to get a hang of these tags, hopefully, this'll be the last time I mess up. :-) ~dee^(talk?) 14:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

WikiThanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Fæ (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deed89. You have new messages at Courcelles's talk page.
Message added 16:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GOCE drive invitation

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting. This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated. We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". >>> Sign-up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DanCooper.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DanCooper.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. >>> Sign up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Virtual team

RE: Technologies used by virtual teams entry. Please review and comment. --User:Cmarti75

Checking it out. ~dee^(talk?)

Hello Dee. Yes,the new version is also on my User page. I am relative new at writing articles on this site so much thanks for your help. --User:Cmarti75 —Preceding undated comment added 23:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! GOCE November 2010 backlog elimination drive progress graphs We have reached the midway point in our backlog elimination drive, so here is an update. Participation report — The November drive has 53 participants at this point. We had 77 participants in the September drive. In July, 95 people signed up for the drive, and in May we had 36. If you are not participating, it is not too late to join! Progress report — The drive is quite successful so far, as we have already almost reached our target of a 10% reduction in the number of articles in the backlog. We are doing very well at keeping our Requests page clear, as those articles count double for word count for this drive. Please keep in mind the possibility of removing other tags when you are finished with an article. If the article no longer needs {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, or other similar maintenance tags, please remove them, as this will make the tasks of other WikiProjects easier to complete. Thanks very much for participating in the Drive, and see you at the finish line! Your drive coordinators –The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

K Feng

Hey. I rewrote this article so that it meets the notability guidelines that the other admins nitpicked about but it turns out that kevin doesn't work at abcs anymore so the article again fails notability. How do i get it deleted again? Thanx and sorry to trouble you so much about this............Kip 78 (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have reached the end of our fourth backlog elimination drive. Thanks to all who participated. Stats GOCE November 2010 backlog elimination drive graphs 58 people signed up for this drive. Of these, 48 people participated in the drive. Although we did not eliminate the months we planned to (January, February, and March 2009; and August, September, and October 2010), we did reduce the backlog by 627 articles (11.2%), which was over our goal of 10%. 49 awards will go out to 33 of 48 participants. Check out the complete list of barnstar winners here. Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the September 2010 backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering these barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Our next drive is scheduled for January 2011. In the meantime, please consider helping out at the Wikification drive or any of the other places where help with backlogs is needed. Thank you for participating in the last 2010 backlog elimination drive! We look forward to seeing you in January! Your drive coordinators –The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 503 editors 2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives Our encounter with Jimbo Wales Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned Report on our inaugural elections Guild Plans for 2011 New barnstars introduced Requests page improved Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011! – Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news

Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 backlog elimination drive Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! The drive is halfway over, so here are some mid-drive stats. Participation GOCE January 2011 backlog elimination drive progress graphs So far, 43 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 25 have participated. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now. Progress report We have eliminated two months from the backlog – January and February 2009. One of our goals is to eliminate as many months as possible from the 2009 backlog. Please help us reduce the size of this part of the backlog if you haven't already. Another goal is to reduce the entire backlog by 10%, or by 515 articles. Currently, we have eliminated 375 articles from the queue, so if each participant copy edits four more articles, we will reach that goal. Thank you for participating in the January 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success! Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk), The UtahraptorTalk to me, and Tea with toast (Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 19:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

Help request

{{helpme}} Gregorian Bivolaru -- I added a reference at the beginning, but it mucked up the page at the end. There IS a reflist, but I'm not familiar with this layout of references...are they not automatically added? Any help would be appreciated! ~dee^(talk?)

I replaced the "refbegin" template with a "reflist" and your citation is now diplayed and no cite error message. However, there are now two #1 references, so I'm leaving your help request live. Apologies for my inadequate instrusion. Tiderolls 12:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

What a mess. I'm not familiar with the referencing style, but can't say it does much for me. I started to make some changes, but Tide rolls is making some changes, so it won't work well if two editors are playing with refs at same time.--SPhilbrickT 12:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Tide / Phil - do you want me to sort it out?  Chzz  ►  12:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Phil, I see your 'under construction' - so I'll stay out of it; pls give me a shout if needed. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  12:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Responded at your talk page Chzz (does it make sense to IRC?)--SPhilbrickT 13:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict, sorry if the following will be discussed by the others already) Dee, the problem is, the rest of the references are actually notes. {{Refbegin}} does not transclude references which use the <ref> tags. I suggest moving the rest of the 'references' into a ==Notes== section while keeping the ==References== section purely for holding the missing {{Reflist}} template. The notes don't actually reference to any part of the text either, which is bad (they are vritually useless unless someone wants to slog through all of them and attach them to specific parts of the article), hence the multiple issues template at the top asking for references and the [citation needed] tags in the text itself, despite the article seeming to already have a lot of them. The original Romanian article seems to have the same problem as well. :/ --Obsidi♠n^Soul 13:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

FWIW I've stepped away to watch and learn, so don't hesistate to attack the problem on my account. This will definitely go a long way towards my WP education. Thanks to all. Tiderolls 13:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion: put the ones that you can identify into standard <ref> </ref>. Bung the rest at the bottom - in a separate section, or the same one, whatever; doesn't matter. As 'non-linked refs' - just bullet-point 'em.

If you like, you can use {{refbegin}} and {{refend}} around that block, so they 'look' like references - all that does is, uses the same font/styles as the reflist.

Then others can hopefully move 'em into place, later.

Chzz is 103.<ref> Book of Chzz </ref>
== References ==

{{reflist}}
{{refbegin}}
*Some generic reference here
*And another
{{refend}}

Chzz is 103.

References

• Some generic reference here

• And another

...but, basically, fix it as best you can; see where we get to.  Chzz  ►  13:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

OK, I've removed the UC template. There is a proper refs section now. ( used WP:LDR style. I'll try Chzz's suggestion for the notes section, and see if I can figure out where any go.--SPhilbrickT 13:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Wow. I'm so lost but I think it's beginning to make sense. The article needs a 'rewrite' so I think I'm going to go through all the ref-notes, translate them, make use of whatever I can as proper inline citations/refs and the rest as notes. Big job! ~dee^(talk?)

Just saw the talk page. Everything's clear now, thanks! ~dee^(talk?)

I'm going to take a break now. Looks like you are on the case. Eventually, notes that have been resolved, either converted to proper refs or abandoned as useless should be removed from the Notes section. The talk page can be a record. --SPhilbrickT 15:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I have to go off for a while now too, but will work on it some more later and finish it in the next couple of days for sure. Thanks a lot for your help. :-) ~dee^(talk?) 15:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! I'll try to check the article out later, but I may forget, don't hesitate to poke me if you want me to take a look.--SPhilbrickT 15:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Please note I converted your refs to LDR. You don't have to follow that for additional refs; the style will co-exist with the usual referencing, but I think it makes the edited page a little tidier.

Nice work, that article was in dismal shape in terms of references, you are making it much nicer.--SPhilbrickT 17:09, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

OK; best of luck, Deed89. References are certainly one of the most complicated things, but also of course the most vital. If you need any help with it, any time, give me or Phil a shout, or use a {{helpme}}. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  18:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion

Guild of Copy Editors January 2011 Backlog elimination drive Greetings from the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We have reached the end of the month and the end of another successful drive; thanks to all who participated. Statistics 54 people signed up for the year's first Backlog elimination drive. Of these, 40 participated. One of our goals was to reduce the size of the backlog by at least 10%. We managed to reduce the backlog by 633 articles, or about 12%. Another goal was to eliminate as many 2009 months as possible from the queue. We eliminated January, February, March, and April—4 out of 12 months is not bad! In addition, we eliminated 37% of all remaining 2009 articles from the queue. Chaosdruid copy edited Kutch Gurjar Kashtriya for 32,711 words, which is the largest single article completed in one of our drives so far. This article counts as six 5000-K articles, and Chaosdruid wins the "most 5000-K articles" leaderboard category. Way to go! A complete list of individual results is here. Barnstars If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the November 2010 Backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering the barnstars within the next couple of weeks. Thank you for participating in this year's first Backlog elimination drive! We hope to see you in March. Your drive coordinators –S Masters (talk), Diannaa (talk), The Utahraptor (talk), and Tea with toast (talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:James-White-Vegas Pics 054.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:James-White-Vegas Pics 054.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Deed89, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Deed89/Judy's Book. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Gregorian Bivolaru

Hello, I found out about what you wrote here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gregorian_Bivolaru at Facts "The more I edit, read into this article and check facts,..."

from the exmisa forum (that forum was forced to move from exmisa.ro to exmisa.org and the new site was under continuous DDoS attack in the last 2 weeks and it may have still problems).

so if you want me to translate something (I'm not translating at professional level) or have other questions about MISA, tell me please. Can you use my e-mail?

Cos07 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judy'sbook.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Judy'sbook.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days and ends on June 30, 23:59 UTC. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! There is also a referendum to appoint a Coordinator Emeritus. Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. >>> Sign up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:57, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter

The April 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261 Report on coordinators' elections Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives Guild Plans for 2012 Requests page report Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Deed89. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

GOCE March copy edit drive

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC) >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ken Mahoney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Best Man

Rice pudding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lebanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graphs Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

San Jose Hospital & Trauma Center deletion discussion

I have been finding tidbits of info on San Jose Hospital & Trauma Center since the discussion of this article's fate started. You can see what I added in the article.Bill Pollard (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. I am in the process of trying to get more info from a couple of persons who know more about the hospital. Whether they respond with useful information, only time will tell. The next time I write an article about such a subject, I guess I will from the start try to solicit info from various places. It would have helped if I asked for handout flyers when I was there. I live in Florida and I don't know when, if ever, I will be in that vicinity again. Again, thanks for your help.Bill Pollard (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

CSD template

Hello, I saw that you tagged معايير استخدام المصادر الالكترونية علي شبكة الانترنت for speedy deletion with the {{Db-g1}} CSD template. I've changed the deletion template because, according to the criteria of speedy deletion, it says "This excludes poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism and hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material." The article contains Arabic text, so that article does not fulfill that criteria. Thanks. -- Luke (Talk) 18:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Twinkle not working right?

Occasionally, Twinkle doesn't work properly when it comes to the "rollback" feature, and it simply doesn't appear (in these cases, I can only 'undo' manually). Is this a problem with my settings or something else? Thanks. ~dee^(talk?) 14:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Clear your browser's cache and retry. It is working here (I'm using the secure server, my browser requests the scripts every time new!). mabdul 15:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

THANK YOU ^^ :-) ;-)

Thank you I was desperately trying to change the school name.By fluke,the page name became wrong.I was speeding to make 10 edits so that i could move it to the current name .THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sathya dyan (talk • contribs) 14:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mind and meditation

Hello Deed89. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mind and meditation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please check out WP:CSD - the criteria are deliberately tightly written, and if you can't find one that fits, the page is probably not speediable. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)