User talk:Cahk/Archive 10

Slaven Doslo

Thanks for your comment. Unsure of why a page cannot be created for this award-winning actor. Please advise. (Wildroosteruk (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)).

@Wildroosteruk: You are welcome to create a page for the actor. However, citations must be provided for any living persons. Provided you have one valid citation that can be verified, that's not a problem at all.--Cahk (talk) 10:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Citations to specific magazine articles related to direct mentions have now been added.

@Wildroosteruk: Provided the citation is validly linked, the notice will automatically be removed in a week. You can also remove the notice on your own if you so wish to.--Cahk (talk) 10:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Shruthy Menon

Articles about living people that fail to establish importance need to be marked for Speedy Deletion as per CSD A7, not PROD. --WannaBeEditor (talk) 10:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

@WannaBeEditor: I have been told in the past by admin to BLPPROD?--Cahk (talk) 10:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ocabc logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ocabc logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

for the page Dr Bijoy Kumar Sahoo

Hello,

we would like to request you not to delete this page because it is from the organization only we send these data of chairman to other news portals. We haven't copied this content from anywhere.

It has been months that we have been trying to create an account of Dr. Sahoo and you people delete the entire thing without giving us any solution to the problem. It would be highly appreciated if you can suggest changes.

@Writer SIS: I have not tagged the page you mentioned for deletion today. When I tagged the page way back in November, I replied to your message saying you can ask for undeletion [1]. If you need assistance with the article, you can head over to the Wikipedia:Teahouse or read Wikipedia:Your first article. --Cahk (talk) 08:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

How do we remove these "[hide]This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (January 2016) The neutrality of this article is disputed. (January 2016) This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (January 2016) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (January 2016) This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (January 2016)" ???

@Writer SIS: You are not supposed to remove the tags. Another Wikipedian expressed concern about the article you created, and depending on administrator review, they may decide to edit or delete the article in the future. Further , please sign your post if you are to leave a message on another person's talk page. --Cahk (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Deleting of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UserTitaniumman23/My_Edits

Hello, i created with a spelling mistake, can you delete it please Titaniumman23 (talk) 08:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Titaniumman23: It will be deleted by an administrator shortly.--Cahk (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Thank you Titaniumman23 (talk) 08:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Raja ahtesham Ahmed

Hayee brother. I av made a page of my self .but i don't have my information about how to create it properly please visit my page and ake corrections if possible. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.33.134.152 (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You may wish to see WP:GNG for explanation.If you need assistance with the article, you can head over to the Wikipedia:Teahouse or read Wikipedia:Your first article.--Cahk (talk) 19:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Ralph Wallace

Hi! I haven't a clue why a blank page I supposedly created 5 years ago was deleted, and the reason stated was not appropriate - Since my presence here on Wikipedia was in support of a charity named Childrens Fund (http://childrensfund.net/). I have since left the charity. C (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ralph Wallace: Thanks for your message. The page would not have been blank if I tagged it. Unfortunately I tag hundreds of pages every week, and cannot specifically recall what I saw on yours. Suffice to say if the page had information that promotes a charity in formats like our mission is/contact information, etc, it is deemed to be promotional in Wikipedia.--Cahk (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2016 (

Deleting Robert Canetti article

Hello, Following your request, I added the article about Robert Canetti page Thank you Let me know if it is OK (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

I have edited the Robert Canetti article, adding two in-line references and removing the "Prod" tag which Cahk had placed. I wouldn't say it's "ok", it still needs more references to establish Canetti's notability. But it is no longer in immediate danger of deletion. It might be safest to make it a "draft" instead of leaving it in article space, until someone has found some better references. I have tried, but didn't find much; someone who knows about music, and can read Hebrew, might do better. Maproom (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, please, check the article now, I added references and also Citations when you asked.

Thank you

@Strad21: The PROD tag has since been removed per Maproom. No further review is required.--Cahk (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

I have few publications from NYT, from Dusseldoefer Nachrichtem -20.9.1983,Rheinische post etc

I have the copies of newspapers, but I cant find it in internet.

What can I do? scan and pdf files?

Thank you so much for helping

@Strad21: You can cite newspaper, etc without internet citation. You can find different citation styles here Template:Cite news.--Cahk (talk) 19:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Sema Peyman

Yolu fuck of bitch Chalk Sema Peyman big ressam turkish stars No deletion freak Chalk okey...

Gurpal Chahal

What's the problem with my article can you tell me. You only know to add deletion tag but don't tell me what's wrong in article . That article about govt representative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternallight12 (talk • contribs) 08:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

@Eternallight12: My warning pertains to your removal of the speedy deletion tag. As far as what's wrong with the article, you should refer to WP:GNG for information about notability of people.--Cahk (talk) 08:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Can you tell me what's wrong with my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternallight12 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

As I mentioned, notability of the person is not noted in the article. Another user was also trying to tell you the same onTalk:Gurpal Chahal. If you need help, you can head over to Wikipedia:Teahouse for assistance. --Cahk (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Gopal Sharman

could you please give me some time to edit my article before you decide to delete it. I think there should be at least a days notice. This is about a well known playwright and artist in any case I dont see any reason for this pointless deletion. username Akshara2016

@Akshara2016: The article is not at risk of being deleted. The BLPPROD tag is to alert you to add references. Given you have done this step, my tag has been removed.--Cahk (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

'Speedy Deletion'

Hi, I created an article, The Unlucky 31 and it was requested to be deleted or something like that, but here's the thing, I wasn't finished with it yet, so... that's why there were no references. However, if you want me to go ahead and get those in there now, I will.

Tjsmith9656 (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tjsmith9656: I only tag pages for CSD, and administrator deleted the page. You can request for undeletion here[[2]]. You should note if you plan on building a page before publishing, it would be best to do it in your user page sandbox, or as a draft article. Otherwise, other patrollers will similiarly tag the page in the future.--Cahk (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Thank you so much, I will try and do that as soon as possible! Thanks, and have a good one! Tjsmith9656 (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Margaret Thatchpurr

Thanks for your message. I've created this page as a temporary page to be deleted by midnight eastern tonight. This page was designed to teach my college students about the usefulness and free access of Wikipedia (plus the usual lecture about civic responsibility to share accurate information and share knowledge in general). Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maggieothecat (talk • contribs) 06:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

@Maggieothecat: Thanks for your message. It may be best that you create the test page in a draft format, or in the sandbox. Other new page patrollers will tag the page for deletion, even if I remove the speedy deletion tag myself.--Cahk (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Bishalbaishya2012

Would you please explain what additional rights. Probably I can use it for good purposes. cite: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Bishalbaishya2012&section=6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishalbaishya2012 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

@Bishalbaishya2012: No offence, but if you can't initiate a proper talk page message (i.e. new section, signature, etc), you are definietely not ready to be an administrator. You should know long time editors (like myself) do not need admin power to edit Wikipedia. I have the additional power to review and rollback vandalism. Please don't start asking for those rights unless you can demonstrate you have a need, and knows how to use them properly. --Cahk (talk) 08:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Travel Hyte tagged for deletion and even deleted and all my materials lost

Can I retrieve my content? It was tagged for deletion and even before I could context it has been deleted. could you show me where I can retrieve my contents because it took me time and labor to put it together and made sure there was no advertisement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joewolems (talk • contribs) 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@Joewolems: I only tag pages for CSD, and administrator deleted the page. You can request for undeletion here[3]. It would be my advice to you to only create your article in your user page sandbox, or as a draft article. Your article has been nominated multiple times for deletion, and it would be wise that you only create articles in the format I described above, or you risk having the article Salt'd.--Cahk (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Page for Hans de Wit

Thanks for your feedback while creating the page for Hans de Wit. I already added references and revised the text as suggested. Hopefully it is now up to the standards of Wikipedia. Let me know at convenience. Education2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Education2016 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

@Education2016: The page was only tagged because it lacked proper references/citation for the subject of the article. I see they've been added now so the tag can be removed.--Cahk (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Need Help for Article - Rupesh D.Gohil

Hi

Need help for article name Rupesh D.Gohil

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupeshgohil (talk • contribs) 05:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

@Rupeshgohil: I am not sure what you need help with - If you need assistance with the article, you can head over to the Wikipedia:Teahouse or read Wikipedia:Your first article. --Cahk (talk) 10:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

deletion of my article on Jayna Tida

Hello Cahk

I've just joined wikipedia and unfortunately the first article I wrote was deleted. The subject I wrote about was an actor Jayna Tida. I have noticed many articles about her on the internet and in the news as she was recently part of a huge Indian period drama Ek tha raja Ek thi rani (noted on wikipedia) where her name appears red. I work for a production house and once was sent her biography on email and I noted that she had a huge body of work and was surprised she didn't have a wikipedia page. Considering many actors who have merely just done small appearances have wikipedia pages denoted to them. I have no personal interest in this subject but I felt going by the articles on her she was a candidate for a wikipedia page. I feel I haven't been given a correct reason for the deletion on the page I created. As I feel the article follows all guidelines as its not biased and simply states what has been written in newspapers and internet article. I found over 30 articles on this actress however have only referenced 11 till now on the wikipedia page. I would request for you to review the article again and research the actress. If she doesn't qualify for a wikipedia page then there are many others who definitely shouldn't have one denoted to them either. I can only request for a second review as I feel this person is notable for a wikipedia page.

Kind Regards Jennifer Brown — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennifer2427 (talk • contribs) 09:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jennifer2427: I tagged the page for deletion, and an administrator deleted the page after review. Unfortunately I tag hundreds of pages every week, and cannot specifically recall what I saw on yours. The tag has nothing to do with bias, but simply it did not meet notability requirement. Please review WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG for more information on what makes one notable for an article on Wikipedia. Feel free to seek another opinion on Wikipedia:Teahouse. --Cahk (talk) 10:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for you're message. I shall have a look at Teahouse. However in the meantime I would like to know how I can retrieve my article content which has been deleted. I assume its still there somewhere but just not online. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennifer2427 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jennifer2427: You can head over to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.--Cahk (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Shrikanth Narayanan

Hi, I'm a student of Shri's creating this wikipedia page (created an account with his name to help track the edits). I've added numerous citations for his article supporting most of the facts in the article. I hope the file doesn't get deleted since its not really an autobiography! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrikanth Narayanan (talk • contribs) 09:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

@Shrikanth Narayanan: The article is not at risk of being deleted. However, the way your user name is being used will likely result in your account being blocked by an administrator. You cannot edit under a living person's name as it creates confusion for the readers.--Cahk (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

MilCoins

a challenge coin can be made for anything a milcoin is strictly a military coin. I dont see it anywhere on wiki. Do you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milcoins (talk • contribs) 13:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Milcoins: A quick Google search for anything related to milcoin is said to be a "military challenge coin". As such, it really is just a sub-specie of Challenge Coins. Feel free to find sources to demonstrate otherwise.--Cahk (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

vintagebeef article

The information is copy and pasted i did not realise that this was a problem although i did edit the first article it is not entirely my own — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gag reel Gaming (talk • contribs) 09:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Doctor Today article

I would like to request the information that was deleted back, it was still in sandbox mode and was not yet published. I received notification at approximately 9:30 and within half an hour the article was deleted without even giving me time to rectify it or discuss it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blingzing (talk • contribs) 10:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Blingzing: I don't have the power to undelete it. You will need to discuss the matter with the administrator (User:Cryptic) who deleted the page.--Cahk (talk) 18:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much!

	Appreciation
	I just want to thank you for helping me out with the 'speedy deletion' bullcrap. Thanks! Tjsmith9656 (talk) 20:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hillbilly Shartmobile

Wat GiraffeHelper87 (talk) 11:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

/* AIV */ Add that offender 73.9.140.124 has been blocked for 7 days

Hi! Thought I'd give you a heads-up that IP user 73.9.140.124 has been blocked for seven days for repeated vandalism on the Charlene McMann article. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  17:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Hi, do you know anything about infoboxes? If so, please let me know. I'm keeping numerous articles in my sandbox, to avoid publishing so they won't be deleted (they're my fictous cities); and I need help with some of the infoboxes. Can you help me out? Thanks.
Tjsmith9656 (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

@Tjsmith9656: You can find a list of the infoboxes here Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes. Not sure what else you are looking for? --Cahk (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:AIV

If you're going to add multiple reports, can you add them all at once, instead of one at a time? You make difficult for others to add reports, when you add 7 of them, one right after the other, creating constant edit conflicts. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 10:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@Thewolfchild: Sorry - I use Twinkle to flag accounts as I patrol, so I am not sure how to add multiple reports at once?--Cahk (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, if you're able to do that, it would be great. But if it can't be done, then don't worry about it. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 10:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Semyon Kirov's article

Hello dear Cahk,

I don't see any point of deleting this but you can edit it as much as you want. Semyon Kirov is a famous person in a famous Russian game called Tanki Online.

Hassan Kalwas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassan Kalwas (talk • contribs) 10:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@Hassan Kalwas: Editors tag pages for deletion. It is up to an administrator to determine the next course of action. The article does not indicate why the subject is important (and also lack any citation to back up any claims made in the article).--Cahk (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Why can't I create a page on wikipedia for a indian Classical singer with so many international achievements? Please reply!Sayori Bhadra (talk) 13:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Hello Cahk,

I wish to make or edit some articles in the Wikipedia but I'm still a beginner and I need some trainings. Can you please help me in finding some pages that I can edit or make for a beginner?

Thank you, ~HK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassan Kalwas (talk • contribs) 17:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Hassan Kalwas: You can use your account Sandbox (look to the top right hand corner, and it's next to the talk page), the Wikipedia:Sandbox, or you can head to the Test Wikipedia site for a more in-depth testing (https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Create_a_new_page)--Cahk (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Creating a page of a renouned artist of Classical music arena

Hello @Cahk, why have you nominated my article Shyam Sundar Goswami for deletion? it has got enough resources (none of them are-self made) and citations. Moreover you have deleted the unnecessary points. O why now this deletion process? Morover notability is a biography of a world famous musician... I hope you can understand.Sayori Bhadra (talk) 02:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Sayori Bhadra

@Sayori Bhadra: While I have nominated your article, another editor has subsequently decided there are enough notability for the article to stay. I am not sure what you mean by "unnecessary points" - once the article is tagged, you cannot remove the tag as the original author. You were warned to stop that behavior or you would be banned from editing.--Cahk (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk:So when will this deletion tag be removed from the article??

Sayori Bhadra (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sayori Bhadra: it's already gone, for now ...--Cahk (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Okay thank you

Sayori Bhadra (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Putting a subtitle in Wikipedia app search results for better understanding

@Cahk: Hello, I consciously beg a help from you. Could you please tell me how I can put a subtitle for the page Shyam Sundar Goswami in Wikipedia app search results as of other renouned singers like Kaushiki Chakraborty, Ajoy Chakrabarty, Parveen Sultana etc.? Please reply as soon as possible. Need your help desperately. Sayori Bhadra (talk) 04:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sayori Bhadra: I don't understand what you mean by 'subtitle'. The search result does show the article ... please elaborate. --Cahk (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk:

How is the subtitle (I mean the encircled area) created? Need your help. Sayori Bhadra (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sayori Bhadra: Unfortunately I don't know the answer - perhaps you can head over to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions and ask other editors.--Cahk (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of RockOnTanuj's page

Please advice where can I get back my deleted page's content in order to correct it according to the guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockontanuj (talk • contribs) 11:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Rockontanuj: You can head over to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.--Cahk (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

What exactly I am missing?

Hi,

I have seen that you deleted my page. This is not the first time I am getting the same page Minfolo deleted by someone saying this - (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

I have tried my best but can't able to create the page for company Minfolo. Can you further explain me this or what I am missing? And on more help (I know you can) can you send me the corrected version of the page so that I can see my mistake and never do it again.

-) Kingnkv (talk) 12:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

@Kingnkv: While I nominated the page for deletion, I was not the one who deleted the page. If you wish to retrieve the page back, you will need to message the administrator who deleted the page. I suggest you head over to WP:CORPDEPTH for more information on what makes an organization notable enough for a page here.--Cahk (talk) 18:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please keep my page

dont delete my page. Tomorrow I write my all contents

@Arunzybo: I tag the page for deletion, and it's up to an administrator to decide what to do. --Cahk (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Sir please. My content writer tomorrow write all contents and company profile and all details. This is genuine details

@Arunzybo: Again - Once a page is tagged, it's up to an administrator to decide whether to keep or delete the page. Also, you should not be using Wikipedia for advertising purposes.--Cahk (talk) 21:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Sir this is not a advertising purpose. I am communicate my company profile with all peoples

I don't want advertising for my company

Sir please share this details to admin

Or remove tag for deletion

Any advertising contents found. You will delete that contents and keep my page

@Arunzybo: You should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and WP:NOTADVERTISING. You can be banned from Wikipedia for violating the rules. I will not be removing the tag, and will leave it to an admin to decide on the course of action.--Cahk (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok if your admin remove my page.... After how to create permanently in our page in wiki. Please reply

@Arunzybo: Please seriously review the links I referred to in my previous messages, and on your talk page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not Yellow Page or online directory.--Cahk (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

My company is same as ResellerClub and go daddy but go daddy and ResellerClub pages on wiki... Why

@Arunzybo: You must demonstrate why the organization is notable. This is generally done via third party, reliable sources. The article you created has no third party sources whatsoever. Again, please refer to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). You can also ask question at Wikipedia:Teahouse.--Cahk (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Communicating your company profile with people in Wikipedia is an advertising purpose. Wikipedia does not have company profiles, only encyclopedic articles about notable companies, people, and concepts. Communicating your company profile is an advertising purpose. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Dolma Kalem

I have been added reference for his page Dolma Kalem there is any problem?

@Winproxy: A reliable source needs to be published. The subject's own website does not count.--Cahk (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Mena Holding

during me establishing the Mena holding company page I discovered that the page delete ..why they let me finish my page structure

@Deedeehafez: I see that you have left messages with administrators on this matter so I will defer to them to answer your question.--Cahk (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Charlene McMann articles and page

Cahk, You put more negative information on my article of Dupage County which is not to be used as a reference or shared. It is only used for the person finding their case number and court date. You are violating the 'Office of the Clerk of Dupage County' and you can be arrested for posting that information to Wikipedia. Plus, I was not convicted of 3 felonies, you have that wrong too. Not even attorneys can use that site, it is a violation. After a few times looking records up you will be blocked and in "red letters" will tell you. I have asked to be deleted from Wikipedia for all the slanderous things you and others working Wikipedia have gone out of your way to tarnish me further. You have continuously put negative information on about me. I never gave anyone any permission to even put my name on Wikipedia. I'd like to know the person or persons that is putting these tabloid journalism type articles on. I want to be taken off of Wikipedia. I've asked very nice and after I did a day ago and you put more things on. I am 65 years old and have major health problems, mental and physical and cannot take this constant harassment. I've contacted your board members and Mr. Wales and asked he takes me off too. I've contacted my attorney because this kind of harassment you are doing upon me is jeopardizing my health further. I did not go to trial because of my health issues. You will be held responsible for any further heath issues I may get for this constant harassment you are pushing on me. I have been suicidal from this whole ordeal and trying to move on with my life and Wikipedia won't let me and wants me to be destroyed or commit suicide. The whole case was a lie to begin with and I was targeted for my political view. All I did was a clerical error in bookkeeping and put more money into the organization of my own money. In a press release my attorney put out said if I was in my county where I live there would not be any charges filed at all. I'm going to eventually write a book, but mentally and physically I cannot right now. I'm going to expose everyone who has ruined my life. So, for the last time I'm asking to be deleted. Charlene McMann

To the extent that your comments are valid, I've removed the reference to the Clerk of County page reference. However, you have violated the rules about WP:THREAT. You have also violated rules about Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Sock puppetry amongst other rules. You seem to be blaming news organizations (WP:NEWSORG) for reporting the case. If you feel you were wronged, you have the option to appeal the conviction in court. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia on facts and we make no judgment as to the correctness of the decision. There was no consensus as to deleting your page. You are also confused about Wikipedia - I have, as majority of the editors here, no connection to Wikipedia or its parent organization. We are all editors, from all over the world that contributes to the project. I should add you are talking to the wrong person - I am not an administrator, and do not have the ability in removing the article. I will be referring the matter to an administrator as your message is explicitly threatening, in contravention of Wikipedia rules.--Cahk (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok

Ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agoncharov5 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Charlene McMann

I know you're discussing my deletion and I wanted to let everyone know, I'm not threatening anyone with a law suit all I said was I cannot deal with this mentally and have to turn it over to my attorney. I never would threaten anyone. I'm not like that. Also, all the news media web sites that pick just one AG's rests release, that's exactly what web sites do, it's all a news cycle that spins their own tabloid words. I have a close friend who is a anchor on the morning news on NBC5 and I've known her for over 20 years. I contacted her recently to talk to her about the whole thing and she didn't know about it, and she's a journalist and a morning anchor on the news and she didn't even know it was on her web site. She was shocked because she knows who I am and have helped with the media on numerous occasions on our charity events. I'm working on getting these articles removed from these web sites. Also, not one media person contacted my attorney for his press release. They just copied the AG's press release. So, with that I just put up a web site with my attorneys press release for anyone to see. I just put it up and the name is charlenemcmann.com. I'd like you and others to view my attorneys press release before making any kind of decision. I'm just trying to mentally and physically move on with my life. I'm still getting charity event invitations from many people that know me, because they know me for who I am and not the person the AG's office is claiming. All I want is to be deleted all of Wikipedia altogether so I can put my life back and try to move on for whatever more years I have on this earth. I dedicated the last 18 years of my life to cancer and it has taken a toll on my health watching people suffer and die. I have cancer all in my family and that and my husband are the ones that made me even start the last 18 years of this journey of my life. My mother was a breast and colon cancer survivor. I never committed a crime and never did in my life. I was targeted for my political views on social media. That's all I have to say. I'm hoping everyone will look at my web site to see my attorneys press release. I'm sorry I don't know how to use Wikipedia or communicate with people on here and you are the only one I can get to leave a message. I'm sorry! Thank you for your time and attention. Charlene McMann — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:900:73A2:3C07:4250:16B7:EA42 (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

While I appreciate the reconciliatory tone of your message, your edit pattern suggest it cannot be relied upon. "I'm putting you on notice if she harms herself you will be held responsible","Wikepedia will be held responsible if she dies" and of course, your last message which I quote "I've contacted my attorney because this kind of harassment you are doing upon me is jeopardizing my health further. You will be held responsible for any further heath issues I may get for this constant harassment you are pushing on me." I can appreciate the negative publicity is stressful, however, as I've mentioned before, you have the option to appeal the case in court. It is not my place to advocate on your behalf, nor is it appropriate given you have abusively used multiple accounts and IP addresses in violation of Wikipedia rules. --Cahk (talk) 18:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Ms. McMann - I know you are reading my talk page so I will leave my message here for you. I don't know you (and vice-versa), and frankly, your article's existent on Wikipedia (or not) makes no difference to me. I would not have come into contact with your article, if not for the fact you (or your supporter) actively attempted to conceal the conviction section on your article (way back in February). As a recent changes patroller, I detect and revert attempts at vandalism. Since then, multiple accounts and IP addresses of yours have been used to further vandalize the article. Quite contrary to your claims, "I was going to turn it over to my attorney" and "You will be held responsible for any further heath issues I may get for this constant harassment you are pushing on me" are EXPLICIT legal threats. I have been nothing but polite (even if our views differ significantly), but your editing pattern has become an irritation. I sincerely suggest that you stop editing, and let the process plays out. You have nothing to gain to by using sock accounts/IP addresses to continue editing in the mean time. Ironically, Wikipedia's prominence in search engines is a result of the constant attempts at removing information and search engines capturing the information each and every single time. --Cahk (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

WP:AIV Reports

Hey - regarding your report here, this user has never edited, there are no deleted edits - and nothing but a username to go on. Yet you said the account was "only being used for promotional purposes". This sort of thing should be reported to WP:UAA - as WP:AIV is only for serious vandalism, or spam in progress. It's the second report I've declined from you today - so I figured I'd drop you a line and explain. SQL^{Query me!} 14:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@SQL: I am aware of UAA vs. AIV, and makes reports to both. The user in question had 2 edits when I reported it to AIV - both on promoting the school. The user subsequently changed the username to "Hollie at OakTreeSchools", which is why you did not see the edits. With respect to "Gill arsh tarsikka", it was because he removed the CSD tag after the 4th warning - again, the article was CSD'd before an admin gets to see it.--Cahk (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Faberlic

I updated the page and also provided my reasoning of why it should be included in the encyclopedia, with 3rd party reference on the company's recognition. Although I am still not sure if I contested it the right way? (looks like there are multiple ways of doing it, and I am not quite adept at them yet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bajwaba (talk • contribs) 08:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Bajwaba: You are not allowed to remove the Speedy Deletion tag from a page you created. An administrator will determine the next course of action. You can, however, leave the reason of your contest by clicking on the button on the page.--Cahk (talk) 08:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I didn't know I was removing the tag while contesting it! Anyway, I've written the reason for why I disagree with speedy deletion decision. Still figuring out how wiki editing process works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.218.42 (talk) 08:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Bajwaba: Not to worry - lots to learn on Wikipedia! --Cahk (talk) 08:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

New mariasfixing sock

Thanks for adding Mindimoo to the "mariasfixing sockpuppet factory" portion of the program. By the time I actually got around to it, you'd beaten me there. Thanks again. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  18:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Aloha27: No problem. I left another message for Ms. Mcmann on my talk page. Hopefully the sock will stop (though unlikely).--Cahk (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Pretty sure the powers that be are about to issue a site ban for McMann's IP address. That ought to quiet things down a bit. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  19:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

All righty, I'm not even sure how to proceed with this. I've been comparing Milowent's history with Mindimoo and I find this troubling. I've put the information here Thoughts?   Aloha27  talk  20:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Aloha27: While coincidental, I think the benefit of the doubt goes to Milowent. All three of us created our accounts on Wikipedia around the same time, and I have to have some faith that long time editors will disclose COI, if any.--Cahk (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

TechieMe vs. Emotiv Systems

I'm trying to get TechieMe (talk · contribs) to engage on Talk:Emotiv Systems. See the new section I added there, and the note I left on his talk page. There do seem to have been two "Emotiv" companies, doing roughly the same thing, with one key person in common between them. But I can't find any sources which describe what happened. TechieMe might have more info, if he can be induced to communicate more effectively. Let's see if we can get him to talk. Thanks. John Nagle (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Mena Holding

my page for (mena Holding KSC) Deleled during my editing in wikipedia through you as i was trying to adding for than resources & OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS FROM NEWSPAPER ALSO BIG WEBSITES FOE NEWS IN MY SOURCES CAN I KNOW WHY? & PLEASE i NEED CLEAR FEEDBACK asap THANKS FOR YOUR CORPORATION — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedeehafez (talk • contribs) 08:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@Deedeehafez: Your question was answered by one of the administrator ... you should review it here [4].--Cahk (talk) 08:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Robin Rhode

Hi,

I'm not to sure what is happening here, but you said to leave you a message.

So this is my message to you, Robin Rhode himself has requested that the profile image be removed and replaced with the candle image.

So please stop editing my changes.

I don't know the rules of wikipedia, but just please help.

Kind regards, Dale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalewyngaard (talk • contribs) 11:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your edit was reversed because no reason was provided in removing the image. If the subject of the article wants his image removed, he may decide to pursue it through Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team.--Cahk (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Sibghatullah Asad

I need more help I have more things to write them in wikipedia but I don't know how to write them here in wikipedia. Could you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibghatullah Asad (talk • contribs) 08:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

@Sibghatullah Asad: Our hosts at Wikipedia:Teahouse will be glad to assist you if you have questions.--Cahk (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibghatullah Asad (talk • contribs) 08:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

National Youth Service Kenya

How long would you like my article to be ?? Can't understand why you deleted it. Deluxejay (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

@Deluxejay: To be clear, your article had nothing but three words and have no context for an article. I tagged the article, and an administrator deleted the page.--Cahk (talk) 17:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

ok but are you a human — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piertert (talk • contribs) 10:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		As the dust settles on Charlene McMann, you have my admiration for refusing to give in to the article subject, despite repeated sockpuppetry and messaging. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 23:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@Optakeover: Thank you for the kind words - that saga was definitely ... interesting to say the least.--Cahk (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Mena Holding

As my page have fast deletion I can support legal papers from govermential sites to approved my page & published again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedeehafez (talk • contribs) 13:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

@Deedeehafez: You're welcome to use the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process to attempt at the article again. However, government approval is not an indicator of notability for organizations to have an article on Wikipedia. As mentioned before, you may wish to consult the requirements before attempting at the publishing another article again.--Cahk (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

George Town, Penang

Herman Jaka is always reverting to his version of George Town, Penang, even though I tried to correct several false information on his part. I suggest you read thoroughly and compare the information I have against his. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buonkee (talk • contribs) 10:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

@Buonkee: The issue is not whether who's more 'right' than the other. You simply cannot revert more than 3 times within 24 hours, for which both of you have now violated.--Cahk (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Patricia Petersen edit war

Hello Cahk.

I note your current message on my talk page. Please note that I have tried to address this on both the article talk page and the user's talk page. They refuse to engage.

I feel my edits are more thoroughly researched and relevant. I ask that you compare the version I have done to the one the other use is reverting to. If there is anything you feel should change I am happy to hear it - but I feel I am not in the wrong here. SnapMcCrackle (talk) 10:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

@SnapMcCrackle: I see that you have requested assistance at 3RR, and I feel it would be best to leave it to an administrator to assist you. Having said that, the issue on hand is not whether your edit is more 'right' than the other, but the behavior itself.--Cahk (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Apologies - I am fairly new to editing and did a fair bit of research on this article so am a bit dismayed that it is being reverted and the other user won't engage with me about it. I will wait out the administrators and see what they say. Thank you for your help and guidance.SnapMcCrackle (talk) 10:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Regarding email tracking Page

Hey cahk,

Can i add the full list of email tracking software to make it informative and non-promotional.

@DhruvPPatel: Perhaps ... whether it is promotional or not will depend on the final result, of course.--Cahk (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Re: User:Emancipatrix studio

Re your message: Thanks for the note. It looks like they stopped after your revert. I wouldn't be surprised if they came back with another account though as that was their second. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Kathleen Garcia-Manjarres

Please wait at least 10 minutes before putting up BLP prod's like Kathleen Garcia-Manjarres, the article was only 1 minute old when you put it up! Wgolf (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@Wgolf: The use of BLPPROD alerts the creator the need for proper sources on the article via their talk page. Tagging alone may not be seen by the creator. There's no risk of deletion unless the article remains unsourced after 7 days. --Cahk (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I know, I've gotten the same notice also though that its never a good idea to tag a BLP prod too early though, the person might be still editing it. Which seem to be the case here. So don't be too hasty. Wgolf (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@Wgolf: I would have applied A7 if I was hasty ... the sources added are frankly, not reliable. --Cahk (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Please Stop the unverified editing

Some are just adding filthy information on this page to defame the movie and now totally spoiling the whole page. Please notice it soon and stop such editing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raees_%28film%29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous1833 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Response

Ironically you've warned me about the 3RR despite my edits not taking place in a 24 hour period, and advised me to discuss on the talk even though I already am, but you did not warn Gala19000 who's entire contribution list is nothing but edit wars. Please take a closer look, I am simply restoring sourced content the other user is removing. --Oatitonimly (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

@Oatitonimly: Your last edit of the 3 occurred just mere 20 minutes over the 24 hour mark. As such, I left a warning message on your talk page instead of reporting it to 3RR. --Cahk (talk) 23:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

A what of Gala19000's multiple violations of 3RR in the past 24 hours, despite having been given several warnings in the past?

Look at the page you warned me about, he has stacked three copies of the article on top of each other (in addition to removing sourced content), yet if I revert it again I'm for some reason the one in trouble. What to do? --Oatitonimly (talk) 23:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

@Oatitonimly: Gala19000's last 3rd revert occurred 31 hours from the first (and occurred after I posted the warning to you). I'll also be warning that user given both of you have now done 3 reverts. You can seek further guidance from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring if you wish, or Wikipedia:Requests for page protection to freeze the content of the page in the mean time.--Cahk (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Another article in the past 24 hours: [5][6][7][8]. His page is already full of warnings, a sanction is more appropriate. --Oatitonimly (talk) 23:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

@Oatitonimly: As I am not an administrator, I cannot do more than to report the user. However, I see you already done that step so no action on my part will be taken.--Cahk (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Bernd Kaina bio page

Hi, I think I added the references. all good now? thnx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulavinhais (talk • contribs) 16:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Paulavinhais: As long as one reliable source is cited, it's fine for the BLPPROD tag to be removed.--Cahk (talk) 18:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Contesting speedy deletion

Per WP:CSD anyone other than the article creator can contest speedy deletion by removing the tag with an edit summary explaining the reason. Please check such things before issuing invalid warning templates. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Reactions

Men, he saying bad words to me such as BULLSHIT and FUCKING, I almost shock what he's saying. Please Delete his account. Jesus doesn't want bad words.

@Ronald Galope Barniso: You need to consider your own action - you have made an explicit threat against another editor. That in itself can get you blocked indefinitely. See Wikipedia:Don't shoot yourself in the foot.--Cahk (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

you mean I'm wrong?? The other editor was right about bad words???

My head was shaking because of them. Bad words was part of the 7 deadly sins. I read that On Bible about Revelation 20. If you don't trust me, then he's right. I'll go to hell.

@Ronald Galope Barniso: You're missing the point. If you want to ask another editor for help, but you made an even more egregious action, you should first consider your action. I don't know what was the dispute between you and the other editor, but you are more than welcome to ask an administrator for help. I am simply cautioning you might be blocked from editing for making an explicit death threat.--Cahk (talk) 10:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	To Cahk, for this user's diligence and agility with reverting all of that vandalism made by the Cow Cleaner 5000 surge! Thanks for helping me out with all of that vandalism and cleanup! You made a big difference, and I really appreciate that! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Awww ... thanks! --Cahk (talk) 10:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

You deserve it, bud. Any time! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

re deletion: Creating User:CalderBenson/sandbox/Proton Freezer

You have deleted my draft of my first ever Wikipedia post. Apparently you found it too commercial or promotional. I understand that and would like to revise the draft so that it complies with the rules and passes your muster. I am confident that I can create an entry that provides valuable generic information about emerging new technology that is not promotional. Can you please assist by restoring my draft? I made edits to it that I have not saved elsewhere.

Thank you for your kind assistance.

Calder Benson

CalderBenson (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

@CalderBenson: While I have tagged the page, an administrator User:RHaworth deleted the page. You will need to speak with him/her about the issue.--Cahk (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gurmeet Singh001

Next time please use WP:SPI to open a case rather than trying to cobble it together on your own, which only caused me to have to figure out what was going on and fix it.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

@Bbb23: I realized it after I saved the page in the first instance.--Cahk (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for cleaning up the page on 'Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum'. I'm surprised such a controversial page doesn't have more destructive edits. Anyway thanks for reverting them back to their original self quickly. Danpi3141 (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Danpi3141: Thanks.--Cahk (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

NPP / AfC

Hi. Just a reminder that in just over a week at Wikimania there's going to be a cross-Wiki discussion about the systems of control of new pages. This is a round-table rather than a presentation or a lecture. On the agenda are reforms to the new article reviewing systems and ways to help new users better understand our content policies. If you are going to Italy and would like to take part, please check out the conference schedule, and I look forward to seeing you there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

For this. I think I had already opened the Afd dialog box whilst you were CSD tagging this BLP. Resultantly, the Afd nom went through. I did not speedy this BLP because of a claim of notability: "voted as one of the top Hindu blogs by Lotus Sculpture. It has also been listed as no. 1 blog under Philosophy category by blogtopsites." Thanks. Lourdes 07:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

@Xender Lourdes: No problem at all.--Cahk (talk) 08:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonnie Behar Brooks

Hi Cahk,

One of the authors of Bonnie Behar Brooks added some references to the article, and I've formatted them a bit. They're not particularly good sources, though, and they seem to underscore the fact that she's not notable IMHO. Would you like to change the reason of your PROD, or should we take it to AfD? --Slashme (talk) 13:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Slashme: Feel free to take it to AfD.--Cahk (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Done! --Slashme (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Budda Vengal Reddy

Hi Cahk

I have references and several pictures. I added some references. One of them is a PhD thesis by prof. Tangirala Venkata subbarao. I am in the process of obtaining the permission from the creator/copyright owner. I hope to get them soon.

This page is related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyyalawada_Narasimha_Reddy Both of them are born in the same village. One is a freedom fighter and other (this page is a philanthropist.

Thanks Kautilya1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kautilya1 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

I've removed the BLP tag as the person in question is not a living person, and therefore, do not require the tag.--Cahk (talk) 04:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

In Agreement: "Remove (School Assignment) 'Using Quizlet to Assess the Skill of Distinguish among Fact, Opinion, and Reasoned Judgment in a Text.'"

I just want to address agreement that I don't think this was an appropriate post for Wikipedia. It was the assignment of Professor Kathleen Huggard of Grand Canyon University.

What could I do? I knew from the test run the day before that the assigned page would be deleted. I made it, sent the all inclusive rough work including the Wikipedia address on to the professor to show that I had completed the assignment, and waited for the inevitable.

So please don't blame me.

Sincerely, Robert Prickett — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Prickett (talk • contribs) 16:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

@Robert Prickett: You can post it in your sandbox next time.--Cahk (talk) 17:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LRPS Flash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LRPS Flash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Help

Hi Cahk, why this is page is protected from creating Osama Chandio please unprotect this page. i will create this page on 2020 year thats my promise! i will never create this page Osama Chandio till 2020 thats my request to you! please do little for me. remove the log that you made on this page Osama Chandio or kindly tell me the expiration date of this log! Thank You Abdul Shakoor Chandio (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Abdul Shakoor Chandio: It has been protected because you and your sock accounts have tried to self-promote yourself for far too many times. There is no expiration date, and only administrator will be able to create the article in the future.--Cahk (talk) 07:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

there is no expiration date! so if i want to create article again on 2020 years so how request to admin to create my article will you send me direct link of requesting article for creation! Thank You Abdul Shakoor Chandio (talk) 07:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Abdul Shakoor Chandio: Exactly. There is no expiration date because it has been protected indefinitely. Please refrain from making further requests as you will only get banned again.--Cahk (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

tasted Beam15000 (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

My page was just a draft

Hi. My page titled "Those Video Game Moments" was marked for speedy deletion and/or violated a policy apparently. I'm new to Wikipedia and wanted to let you know that what I wrote was just a draft. It was not meant to be seen by anyone yet and I had no intention of actually submitting it for review yet. I didn't even click the submit/review button. All I did was click the save page button. If my page was actually submitted or if it was marked as spam/speedy deletion or something, can you please delete it? Again, what I wrote was unfinished work and wasn't meant to be seen by anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Those Video Game Moments (talk • contribs) 07:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@Those Video Game Moments: Wikipedia does not allow promotional contents be posted. You are correct the contents were in a sandbox. While sandbox are meant to be a draft space, "The addition of promotional material is not acceptable". Given your username, and the content written, I tagged it as WP:G11.--Cahk (talk) 07:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: But it's a DRAFT. The content that was written does not mean that that was actually what I was going to write in the finalized version. It was just ideas I was writing down; random thoughts. That's not fair to make a judgment on what was an unfinished draft. And something shouldn't be reviewed until it's actually finished. I was planning on writing the article objectively just like other Wiki pages out there. And it shouldn't matter who submits a article/page. If the content itself is written objectively and not using any marketing/promotional words or content, which I was going to do, then it shouldn't matter who writes what. Again, what I wrote was a draft. You're assuming what was written in a draft was going to be part of the final version of the article which is unfair. If I knew you or anyone could actually see what I wrote I never would've used the sandbox feature. I would've just written the article in a Word doc and then submitted everything in the sandbox once the article was actually finished. So now that my account has been marked for "speedy deletion", which I'm assuming you don't have any intention of removing, what does this mean now? Can I not create or edit any articles/pages now? Is my account in bad standing?

@Those Video Game Moments: Don't worry about the speedy deletion tag - it is not a punishment or negative mark, it is simply to let you know what another editor (i.e. me) thought about your writing. You can blank out my message on your talk page if you wish. --Cahk (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Ok. But can I still create an article/page? When I click on the sandbox link, all I see now is a blank screen with a "categories" link. Before there was a text editor I could use. Is the sandbox feature blocked for me now?

@Those Video Game Moments: Of course. You just have to select edit, and you should see the exact same screen as before. --Cahk (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Ah ok. The "edit source" link. Now I see the editor. The site's hard to navigate. Thanks for the speedy responses.

@Those Video Game Moments: You can head over to the Wikipedia:Teahouse or read Wikipedia:Your first article if you need further assistance.--Cahk (talk) 09:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Mercantile Communications

Hi Cahk. When it sounds as an About page, it probably is. :) — Sam Sailor 08:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor: Fair enough.--Cahk (talk) 08:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Toddler house deletion

Why is this deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0nerfusion (talk • contribs) 10:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@0nerfusion: See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toddler_House. --Cahk (talk) 10:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

why isn't other school not deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0nerfusion (talk • contribs) 11:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@0nerfusion: Because your article is considered to be a spam (i.e. promotional material). This is the 3rd time you created the article, without dealing with the underlying issues.--Cahk (talk) 18:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Frank Andre Guridy

I have added the neccesary references. Please remove the deletion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaeljacksonfan104 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Michaeljacksonfan104: Unlike a speedy deletion tag, you can remove the BLPPROD tag yourself once a reference is added.--Cahk (talk) 22:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

About my user name

Dear Cahk, after your advice I completed the form to change my user name as "oktar ITU PolReC" which starts with my surname. Thank you for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ITU PolReC (talk • contribs) 06:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

@Oktar ITU PolReC: You're welcome.--Cahk (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

I added the section United Kingdom. All the changes were very highly relevant. Check that the current page of wikipedia advertises his sex rape guides, and advertises Donald Trump which breaks Wikipedia Rules.

I added the section United Kingdom for Roosh V which is needed, considering that major politicians from UK have discussed Roosh V.

All the changes I made were very highly relevant. Check that the current page of wikipedia advertises his sex rape guides, and advertises Donald Trump which breaks Wikipedia Rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marychemo (talk • contribs) 08:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

@Marychemo: Person A supports person B doesn't make it advertising (assuming the source supports such statement). You'll find plenty of public personalities with such statements on their Wikipedia page. You are free to add well-sourced information to the article, but please don't remove sourced information simply because you disagree with the statements.--Cahk (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

About the "Pan-Orthodox Council" item

Dear Mr Cahk,

I was surprised when I found the "Criticism" header removed because a few time ago you removed it and after a few minutes you restored it. So, I thanked you because I thought that you understood me. So, I wonder why you've removed it again. Please, allow me to explain what it was happened: 1. As practitioner Orthodox I wanted to explain that for us the meeting was a big deviation from our religion, faith and Traditions. 2. I added to the initial article some important observations (30 august 2016). 3. An other author removed my content. I found this in 8 september. 4. I tried to restore the article at the 30 august state using copy/paste from my saved article, but all the references were lost. 5. So, I tried to make succesive (undo)s to recover the 30 august state. Unfortunately, at a moment the system did not allowed me to continue to undo. 6. I rebuild the article by editting manualy all my new references and in 9 septemper 2016 I published the article. 7. Some hours later, you deleted my contribution, but in short time you undo your action and I was able to enjoy that it was published. 8. Now, I found that you deleted again the article, even I made no important changes.

I am Professor, I know to write scientific articles and I studied and teached the Orthodoxy from about 20 years. I also published a lot of articles concerning the Ortodox religion (not in English).

I am open to suggestions.

I think you understand me and help me to improve the "Pan-Orthodox Council" article.

A good day,

Mirceati — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirceati (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

@Mirceati: Couple of items:

• 1. The edit you referenced to was done under an IP address.
• 2. When there is an unexplained removal, particularly the entire section that details the criticism of the organization, it is only fair to assume it is vandalism.
• 3. While I appreciate having some inside knowledge about the organization, the Wikipedia article must have various sources to back up the various claims. It is not enough to simply say you are a professor, and have knowledge to make various claims.
• 4. Finally, the article was never deleted. I can only assume you meant the contents at one point was reversed. --Cahk (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

ICCG

Hello Cahk,

ICCG is an IT Company and i wrote that Article just for Information Purpose. So if there is anything regarding Deleting the Article so i can explain but please no need to delete the Article

as of now, i have added few details and sooner i will add more details

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICCG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prikunj Sharma (talk • contribs) 08:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

@Prikunj Sharma: Once the speedy deletion tag is applied, it is up to an administrator to review the article and determine whether to delete the article, or to cancel the tag.--Cahk (talk) 08:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Mother Russia

Excuse me,"Cahk". but was the myth of Russian state sponsored doping not based on the testament of one man and did the hacker group fancy bears not expose the fact that US athletes had been taking performance enhancing drugs.

Thank You for taking the time to view this message. p.s sorry if I have appeared at all rude — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12345678901234567890abcdefg (talk • contribs) 19:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

@12345678901234567890abcdefg: Please see WP:CITE and WP:RELIABLE. Wikipedia requires statements to be reliably sourced, and cannot simply be a statement made by an editor. --Cahk (talk) 22:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page while I was away from Wikipedia and reporting the vandal, you were really helpful. Here is a barnstar! Thanks again! Class455 (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?

Hi Cahk! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a very active Twinkle user (top 25, actually!). The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle User. Include the following information:

• Username
• Email where we can reach you
• Your city or time zone
• Best time to talk to you
• Your primary use of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Could you please go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Localism camp for discussion, as User:Lmmnhn has very strong intention to "mislead readers" that "Localism camp" does not exist? (Actually he knew there is "Localist camp" or "Localist groups", but he did not move the "Localism camp" to one of those alternative names...) Thank you. UU (talk) 09:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

There is Graham Daw, who may be notable

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7896760/ Xx236 (talk) 10:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Neelam Ibrar Chattan

Hi Chak, I have taken the liberty to remove take {{db-person}} tag from Neelam Ibrar Chattan as it does not seem to meet the requirements under CSD#A7. The article appears to make a credible claim of significance or importance with regard to the individual. The page also contains some references which discuss the subject in depth. Therefore, I would recommend that you take this page through the AfD process, if you so desire, or assist the new editor with improving the article. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 19:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Question

Hello Sir,

I have a question regarding the Majestic Drama page. Why is it tagged for deletion when it follows similar formatting to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Chytist & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TODAY_(production_duo) but the pages are still up? Thank you for time. I just wanted to get a better understanding.

Sincerely, Macdo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macdo696 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

@Macdo696: To answer your question - firstly on the issue of using multiple accounts: You are not allowed to create multiple accounts/use IP address to circumvent Wikipedia rules. In particular, you have removed the speedy deletion tag so many times that both the IP address and the user account was blocked. By creating another account now, you have violated the rules on WP:EVASION. With respect to the speedy deletion tag, your article fails to pass Wikipedia:Notability (music). Further, asserting WP:WAX will not help your article survive the deletion review process.--Cahk (talk) 06:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I don't know how to use this wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.136.224.139 (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

It says you have reviewed do i undo your deletion now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolLandEnt (talk • contribs) 08:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

*Pow!* ...Ok, got that one. Pull! Ian.thomson (talk) 09:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Haunted Head

Hello. I hope you are well. I intended to start a draft of the page for Haunted Head, not actually submit the page to be reviewed as it was incomplete. Did I submit the page for review accidentally while in a sleep depraved state? I intended to continue to add to the draft as I amass references and content on the subject. How should I proceed? Thank you. 533N03V1L L00k4W47 (talk) 18:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)533N03V1L L00k4W47

@533N03V1L L00k4W47: Yes, the page was in the mainspace, and thus I tagged it for deletion. If you wish to retrieve the article, please leave a message on the administrator (User:Michig) who deleted the page for review.--Cahk (talk) 21:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Congradulations!

	Hall of fame induction notice
	You have been inducted in to the Spam Museum hall of anti-Spam! Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Haha ... Thanks!--Cahk (talk) 07:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Following Tom Bombadil

Thank you for your message. AoTB was 1st published in 1962, then RGEO in 1967. Father Xmas Letters not published until after Tolkien died. The dates of publication are in each book's article, and they correspond to the information in my editions. I do not make edits wantonly! Jungleboy63 (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jungleboy63: I see - I wonder if you meant to link the book, as opposed to the music? I reverted because the article did not appear to connect.--Cahk (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: The article I meant to link was The Road Goes Ever On. That article discusses the book as well as the music, although this is not clear from the introduction. A corresponding correction needs to be made to the Father Xmas Letters article (preceded by). Would you prefer to do the honours, or shall I? BTW should we ignore Smith of Wootton Major, 1st published 1967 but not connected to the Middle-earth legendarium? Cheers Jungleboy63 (talk) 09:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jungleboy63: Please feel free to move forward with the edit, as you are obviously more familiar with the subject matter than I am. --Cahk (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Cancelled Edition

Hello Cahk,

Many thanks for your message.

I am shocked to hear that the article was considered advertising. I added an important term that was missing from the main definition ("Transcreation"), and I used a reference from a webpage that had a good definition. The landing page I added did not have any sentences that suggest it's advertising, or any call to action to the users.

Many thanks and Kind regards,

Dangon81 (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Dangon81: There is already an article on Transcreation. While you are correct the specific URL is not an advertisement per se; viewed as a whole with the entire website though, the tone is promotional in nature.--Cahk (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I had not seen the separate article on Transcreation, otherwise I would have linked to it. I still think that a small subsection in the "Translation" article, linking to the more in-depth "Transcreation" one, would be useful. I have seen many references linking to blogs within "commercial" pages, so I didn't see any harm in linking to this site, especially since the article offers useful content.

Dangon81 (talk) 16:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

AIV

Please do not report users like User:SITS to AIV. That was their first edit to this project and it is too early to block for persistent spamming, (1) because it's not persistent and (2) it's not clear it is promotional rather than a newbie's attempt at an article. Please bear in mind WP:DBTN and attempt to educate new users before reporting them. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

@MSGJ: I originally tagged the page for CSD and left it at that. I reported the user after seeing the contest notice as the project coordinator for the institution in question is "only passing information to needy people." I took that to be promotion. --Cahk (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Cahk

Thank you for the heads up. I do not quite know what the use of a user page is, and what I must do when I create the page. Do I say something about myself or do I create it without any copy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardus Hartzenberg (talk • contribs) 12:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

@Hardus Hartzenberg: The autobiography notice is to alert you to avoid creating an article on yourself. A userpage can be descriptive about yourself, but do read WP:UP#NOT to see what you should not have on that page.--Cahk (talk) 16:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Cahk thank you for alerting me

Greetings Cahk thank you for alerting me of one of the basic rules of posting, I will ensure i read the guidelines before writing articles. Regards Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hepburnadam (talk • contribs) 23:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

NISCAIR WIKIPEDIA

I added another message to their talk page; their name seems to be that of an organization which is not permitted. It isn't a problem to have 'Wikipedia' in the name unless they are suggesting they have some authority or official role here that they don't have. Many organizations add 'wiki' or 'wikipedia' to their name because the person at the computer is typically assigned the task of editing Wikipedia. I apologize for stepping on your toes but I wanted to mention this to you. Best wishes to you 331dot (talk) 10:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@331dot: Thanks for letting me know. --Cahk (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Wide Bay

Regarding your message on my page, I wasn't trying to engage in an edit war, I was trying to list a promotion that operates in Queensland, the person who kept editing it out has some issue with a guy that is working the show, who has nothing more to do with Wide Bay, it seems this person is slandering the guy all over the Wikipedia pages and that was why Anthony said what he did and you guys blocked him. Anthony just wanted Wide Bay added to the feds list because it is a fed running in Queensland, and they have everything professional.

This person has an issue with someone and I have tried to peacefully take it away from Wikipedia so we can keep Wide Bay on the list, he's vandalising the list because of whatever issue he and whoever this guy is he has an issue with, he isn't apart of Wide Bay, Anthony Puleo owns the company. So I am wondering if you can revert it back to having Wide Bay there and ask this person to please stop vandalising it because of whatever personal agenda he has.

I joined Wikipedia to add any edits needed, and not get into some war with someone that needs to learn to stop posting things that could be untrue on here. Thanks. (Daveharding (talk) 06:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC))

@Daveharding: User Widebay101 was blocked because he made legal threats on Wikipedia. There are ways to resolve the issue, but making statement such as "I hope you have a good lawyer ... and hit you up for defermation" is an absolute no-no here. The list has been reverted, and the IP address has been temporarily blocked for engaging in an edit war.--Cahk (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Totally understand about that, had I been able to talk to him before that I would have told him not to threaten the action, I have been trying to work with whoever this other user was to try and resolve any issue, I have been told the other side of the story which seems to be that it was a case of business partners falling out and now ones taken up calling the other one names. Which would be fine if he kept Wide Bay out of it as we have not done anything wrong.

But thank you, I sincerely apologise for it all, I didn't want anything more than to try and resolve this privately but this person doesn't want to they just want to keep posting disgusting messages. (Daveharding (talk) 08:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC))

DJ Darren Chraplak deleted?

Why did you delete the DJ Darren Chraplak Wikipedia page!? All the information on there was true! So I demand that you bring it back!

Thank You😃 DJ Darren Chraplak (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

@DJ Darren Chraplak: I see that User:Ian.Thomson already responded on your talk page, so I will leave the issue with him.--Cahk (talk) 00:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Sterling Management

Hi Cahk I made two changes to the Sterling Management page and was in the process of opening a conversation with fellow editor Slash Me about these when you reverted the changes. One is a reference in the very first line of the page to a legal case related to nothing. Its only purpose seems to be that it states, after you read through 17 pages of deposition, that the company has multiple DBAs. This is not a newsworthy fact. Companies have multiple DBAs as well as domain names. It was never published as news by anyone, it means nothing.

Positive reference to company being on Inc 500 for two years, 1986 and 1989 I believe, was removed as being old, not newsworthy and "puffery." Negative reference to one client's bad experience from 1991 is left in as relevant and newsworthy? This is not NPOV!

If a negative statement by one client over God knows how many in 30 years, made 25 years ago, is relevant, certainly a positive from a reputable publication like Inc 500 cannot be written off as irrelevant. Really think this needs to be one way or another to be neutral.

So where does I go now to talk on this, to you or the editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeram (talk • contribs) 08:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

@Keeram: The reason I reverted your edit was because you've removed cited information from an article because it was "old". This is not a valid reason to remove cited information from an article. I had a quick scan through the talk page of the article, and note the various issues you raised had been addressed in the past, save the issue of puffery as indicated by another editor. I'd suggest you leave a message on the editor's talk page to begin a dialogue on how to move forward.--Cahk (talk) 10:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

I will make a short-reply and nothing else

This guy is a total maniac. If I'm not mistaken he is the same troll who used to write about how many Africans died, how many people were massacred. He is extremely offensive. He's been allowed to manipulate wikipedia all this time to fullfill his negative and hateful agenda.

I promise I'm not going to write anything nasty to him, I just want to make a very short reply. I just want him to know I replied and after this message I'm not going to wrote to him anymore.

He is also the type of guy who cherry pick sources from written google books and exaggerate his edits and it doesn't if the sources are reliable or unreliable. He will mis-interpret it to his willing direction. He properly used a new ip address again.

77.98.238.98 (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

How do I contact Polyenetian

Is there a way I can message him privately? Right now I simply just want to reply him so I can rebuke all of his garbage exaggerated claims. I want to teach him a lesson but I will not do it on wikipedia however I don't know how how else to contact him. Please show me a way.

(talk page watcher) 77.98.238.98 No there isn't. And that is a Good Thing: you would merely get blocked for making threats off wiki rather than on. Please: take a step back- walk away- on WP, when people insist on winning, they generally lose. Anon, be the bigger man person. I have difficulty with that sometimes, I know how you feel. But it aint worth it, no way. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

So I have no choice but still I don't know understand why we can allow users who have intention who's purpose is to manipulate wiki edits and fufill is own agenda. His focus is nothing more but death, massacres of other ethnic groups. For example you can see that in his talk page Polyenetian, he insist on editing massacre of about 40,000 Manchus by the Taiping rebels in nanjing despite reverting his edits multiple times he still continues. How do we stop people who plays by the rules but have such bad intention? 77.98.238.98 (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

I've just noticed you're having the ?same convo on Bishonen's page. Ffs mate. Apologies to Cahk for squatting his page though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

I just want to get to the point and wish people to answer my question. I'm serious and not interesting in chatting. My experience is if the first guy can't answer the second guy usually can. My question is was can you stop guys like Polynetian who play by the rules but have bad intention with his edits, he's being doing for a long time already. 77.98.238.98 (talk) 08:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Well: WP:ANI has been mentioned, no? File a new complaint at that board, present your case, backed by evidence in the form of diffs (like this), and wait for the rest of the community to examine all concerned parties' behaviour before coming to a conclusion and making recommendations for administrative action. Be mindful though, that, as I said, the behaviour and edits of everyone involved can be under the microscope there. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Here is his bad intentions edits again, I've only bold the parts that matters in his disclosure, the main point of his edits are again the massive number of deaths of other ethnics. He is already being discussed on the bottom of the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents so I hope you can stop this evil maniac wiki user.

His recent edits "The Thirty Years' War brought tremendous destruction to the Germany, more than 1/4 of the population and 1/2 of the male population in the German states were killed by the catastrophic war" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Germany&diff=prev&oldid=749152324

and many Armenians have a hateed Turkish people primarily due to the Armenian Genocide of 1915 and its denial by Turkey which killed an estimate of 1.5 million Armenians. ::::::https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Turkism&diff=prev&oldid=749125507 77.98.238.98 (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2016

@77.98.238.98: Given this matter is being discussed at ANI, I'll leave it to the administrators on that board to further iron out the matter. Please note I am not an administrator, and as such, I cannot "stop" him per your request.--Cahk (talk) 23:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Why tag USCF for deletion?

It is a needed page. Because you dont understand why doesnt mean it isnt. Usernine (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

@Usernine: There isn't such a thing as "needed" page on Wikipedia. I suggest you read WP:ORG and WP:NOTADVERTISING before proceeding again. Repeatedly creating a deleted page can cause the article to be SALTed.--Cahk (talk) 08:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

You want to suppress this page. People looking for information about USCF deserve information about it. That is not advertising that is doing the work of an encyclopedia. Usernine (talk) 08:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

You are friends with Jimfbleak who first deleted it due to his conflict of interest with it. He has called you over to delete it for him. Usernine (talk) 08:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Therefore you fall under the same conflict of interest. Please refrain from deleting or editing the page. Don't run this like a mafia. Usernine (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

@Usernine: Please don't make baseless accusations. I have no interest in or against the subject in question. Again, just because a club (or movement, as you called it) exists, it does not mean a Wikipedia article. You are treading dangerously to making personal attacks against me and another administrator. I suggest you to cease the behavior or you will be blocked. --Cahk (talk) 08:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

You may have picked up my pings, but just for completeness, there is background here, where I have also invited Usernine to go to WP:ANI, which he has attempted to do, but has posted in the wrong place. As a named co-conspirator, you may wish to comment if that ANI actually gets going. In the immortal words of Kenneth Williams, "Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me!" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Richard Pombo

Hello, I am interested in editing and updating the Richard Pombo page. I saw I needed to post here first, so want to play by the rules. :)

Thanks for your help. Rencoyote (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Page deleted because I used the wrong log in information - please help

Good Morning. I have had a message to say that i have written an autobiography and so therefore my page has been deleted. This is not the case, I have written a page about Charles and Patricia Lester, however I used their names as a username so that I would remember the login!

I would be very grateful if you could assist me to change my username so that I can publish this page.

I am new to Wikipedia so did not understand your rules. Sorry. Vikki Cartledge.CharlesPatriciaLester (talk) 09:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

I have also put this information into contested deletion.

Hoping you can help.

Vikki CartledgeCharlesPatriciaLester (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Association of Microfinance Institutions of Uganda Page

Hi. I found a message indicating that the above page needs to be deleted! Well the page was created borrowing ideas from other similar networks so if others do exist why do you propose ours to be deleted? Secondly you may point to the fact of references but it was still work in progress and i was still puting together these to be inserted. I would appreciate if you could point to me how best the article needs to be wriiten to change the percepation of a promotional page. I strongly believe it still qualifies for encyclopedic content. I will appreciate your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntalaka (talk • contribs) 13:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Ntalaka: Please speak with the administrator who deleted the page User:RHaworth as I can't see the deleted page. Based on my recollection, I believe mission, vision, etc were on the page which is considered to be promotional in nature, and disallowed on Wikipedia. --Cahk (talk) 17:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

why did you deleted my life history

why did you deleted history of an united Nations ambassador recorrect and undo deletion of my life history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr abhishekmayercholankrypton (talk • contribs) 08:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

@Dr abhishekmayercholankrypton: I've tagged your draft article as there's absolutely no source indicating you are an ambassador. --Cahk (talk) 08:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Why Did You Delete My Page

I saw that you had deleted the "Toby Miller (Snowboarder)" page and I was wondering why? Could you also include the source text from what I had posted? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptkindt (talk • contribs) 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

"Discussing" with accounts that have not edited.

Hi. I've come across several recent instances of you dropping username discussion templates on the pages of accounts that have no actual edits. This kind of short-circuits the usual process at WP:UAA. The discussion template is usually used for accounts that may have a problematic username, but who are making positive edits. It is not really for blatant violations, and we usually wait before taking any action on an account that has no edits, except in the most extreme cases. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: I have been told different mechanisms of reporting/warning over the past year that I am getting rather confused. --Cahk (talk) 08:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

This has always been a bit of an issue at UAA I'm afraid. Frankly, the best solution is to keep doing the needed work of making reports, and leave responding to reports to admins. There's some discussion of the various other things non-admins can do to help at WT:UAA#Clerking. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

NPR

Hi. Thank you for reviewing new pages. When you rightly identify a page that needs to be speedy deleted, please be sure to strictly use only the pre-defined criteria - there is no catch all. Tagging with multiple criteria is also possible. For more information please see the tutorial CSD section. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Twinkle does not have a combination option for G11 and G3-Hoax, only G3-vandalism was available with G11. --Cahk (talk) 10:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

There are no pre-defined combinations. If you must use Twinkle, you'll find that it has a check box for tagging with multiple criteria, then you select the ones you wish to use. In Page Curation, which is much easier to use, you just select all the relevant criteria. For more information please see the tutorial CSD section. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Are you referring to a specific tag? I'm not a new NPP ... --Cahk (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

The section on the tutorial I linked to explains best. There is no catch all. Not using a recognised criterion upsets the stats, and I believe a few other things. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

IP hopping

14.139.183.220 is not the original account. Original account is User:TRUEV140, who is IP hopping for edit warring. Although I initiated discussion in his talk page (TRUEV140) and in the article talk, he is not willing to participate, rather more interested in reverting. Deliberate edit war. While in semi protection he uses his original auto-confirmed user account, and when protection removed, he uses IP hopping. Each time he reverts, I restores to the last best revision, thus unfortunately I am also involved in this edit war.--Essex-1799 (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Essex-1799: I suggest you report the behavior to WP:ANI. Edit-Waring, even in good faith, can get you blocked. --Cahk (talk) 09:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

how do I update user name?

Hi Cahk,

With reference to your email on 21/11/2016 related to change of username "Activeintelligence" could you please help me with updating user name in the profile. Currently I do not see any option that allows me to update the user name.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Activeintelligence (talk • contribs) 09:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Activeintelligence: You can head over to Special:GlobalRenameRequest to change your username. --Cahk (talk) 09:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

User:TheSpotKeene/sandbox/Spot Keene Developer of former Keene Middle School Keene, NH

I just don't know what i did wrong and i changed the article around after i looked at you thought was copied and i just think that its something of note worthy in the city of Keene, New Hampshire to have this old property being developed into something the city needs and going to benefit from forever for everyone for arts, music, theater, culinary, new housing, college internships, employment and revenue for the city. could some one try and help me and look at the changes I made and see if its okay or maybe advice? I worked on it all night because I really think its important and should come up and be able to be relevant to our city. Please help. Thank youTheSpotKeene (talk) 09:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@TheSpotKeene: Please don't remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. An administrator will review the article, and your comments before deciding on the next course of action. Continuing to remove the tag will eventually result in your account being blocked from editing. The chief problem of the article - it's significantly copied from a LinkedIn profile. Secondly, the tone of the page is promotional. Thirdly, it appears you are closely related to the subject matter in question, and as such, you are required to declare any conflict of interest. I urge you to read the links I provided above, before proceeding in publishing your article in the mainspace as it will likely encounter the same situation again. --Cahk (talk) 10:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

User:TheSpotKeene

Sorry I didn't understand why Linkedin would be there sorry again and i won't touch it. I will try to figure out how I can write better. Everything I worked on tonight was in good faith for everyone to have knowledge about and know it will be for everyone with so much to offer. Was just trying to do something importantTheSpotKeene (talk) 10:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please help me to delet.

The english informations of this artist on the internet is not too much. So please help me to delet "Meng Yan (artist)" and "Meng Yan (disambiguation)" those two pages.

My apology — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhd7890 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mhd7890: Sources do not have to be in English to be accepted. If you still want to delete the pages, leave a message here again and I will tag it for deletion.--Cahk (talk) 19:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks sir. My last struggle: I have connected with this artist and let his personal informations on blog turn in En as he can. If it is worked, please keep those two pages; not, please "Boom" them as plan.

My apology again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhd7890 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mhd7890: An administrator will review the BLPPROD tag in a week time, and can decide if enough sources has been provided.--Cahk (talk) 08:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cahk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

You are cordially invited to a sockpuppet investigation discussion

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shivam268 --Mr. Vernon (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mr. Vernon: Materialscientist theorized it's likely a group of students editing on homework/assignment?--Cahk (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Possibly, but they never acknowledged it (I've asked several times, so have others), bans have been handed out and they are still at it. So more action probably needs to be taken. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 09:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mr. Vernon: Agreed.--Cahk (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Suggestion related to Beijing News page

Hello

Thanks for reviewing the Beijing news page.

Could you please see this suggestion that I have left on the Beijing News Talk page

Notthebestusername (talk) 10:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Notthebestusername: Please go ahead and merge information. Thanks for the notifications.--Cahk (talk) 10:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Cahk Can you please Kindly Stop User "Levamigao", He always does Consistent destructive Violation of Author in the Page List of countries by Military Strength Index , Thank you!. LuigiPortaro29 10:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuigiPortaro29 (talk • contribs)

@LuigiPortaro29: I am not an administrator. You may wish to post a message at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to get one of the administrator to look into the situation.--Cahk (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

My edits

Why are you changing my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luciferlux (talk • contribs) 09:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

@Luciferlux: Your edits were reverted because the passages you added had no references. See WP:RELIABLE. Further, There's no explanation how "Witchcraft & Satanic Supplies" has anything to do with the passage you added, which constitute promotion. See WP:NOTPROMOTION.--Cahk (talk) 10:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Cahk, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Cahk,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 814 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Thanks

Hi there,

Thanks for your message, however, I am new to wiki and just tried my first publication, The person I created the page about, why should it be deleted and what can I do to not let it be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniakshah (talk • contribs) 09:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

@Daniakshah: There are a couple of issues with your article: Firstly, there are no sources. While you have made citations, none of them refer to the subject in question. This does not meet the criteria for Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Secondly, "quickly rose through the ranks within his company becoming one of the youngest Sales Representatives." The tone is not appropriate for a encyclopedia, borderling promotional. Thirdly, you have not indicated why this person is notable. You may wish to review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.--Cahk (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I really appreciate all the help. Good that you took it down, I will read these links and if there are any more suggested reads please let me know as I am new to wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniakshah (talk • contribs) 09:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

VFA

Sorry I did it to make my sick uncle smile.. It's cool that you took it down I screen shots it and made his day 10x better..Vfa National page (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Stop redirdcting to pornographic images

My edits to that redirect page whose name I cannot type on this talk page due to automated filters, were soley to reduce the number of pages on Wikipedia which redirect to pornography. If someone with the proper privileges to edit Anal sex removes the shock pic at the top of the page (where you see it without needing to scroll, and were not expecting to see porn), I will not have a problem with the redirect anymore. Anti-ho (talk) 09:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Citation

I would gladly add a citation. But what if it was off my own experiences? Do I just say like "B123rad blah blah blah?" I don't know what I do. B123rad (talk) 08:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@B123rad: Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability.--Cahk (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Citation

Ok, so I pretty much cannot post this? Is that right? B123rad (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@B123rad: If it's something you made up, then no.--Cahk (talk) 08:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Citation

But what if it is real, just not too well known or only off experience? B123rad (talk) 08:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@B123rad: Not well known is one thing, one off is likely not encyclopedic. --Cahk (talk) 08:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

So you are pretty much saying I can't? At all? B123rad (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@B123rad: You can try, but will likely be reverted/undo by another editor. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, see WP:NOTPROMOTION.--Cahk (talk) 08:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

PROD removed, AfD started

The PROD on Autobiography of a stray dog was removed, so I started an AfD. It is located here if you wish to comment on it. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Revert

Why you got to be so rude? I was trying to help.--Polinka123 (talk) 08:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)--Polinka123 (talk) 08:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)--Polinka123 (talk) 08:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)--Polinka123 (talk) 08:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Polinka123: See WP:NOTADVOCATE and WP:NOTBATTLE. Your edit was clearly not constructive, and constitute an attack.--Cahk (talk) 08:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Gridsum

Thank you for your information. Sorry for the multiple accounts.I will give a brief explanation here. All the accounts are belonged to me, and only managed by me, without the manipulation from others. The accounts Gridsum and Gridcomputing are suspected to be connected with the article I created. So I changed to another account. Sorry for that. As for the account sunny_day_123, I forget the password. Sorry again. this is my first time to edit Wikipedia. I just try to make edit test, not having bad intentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny wang 123 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your help again. Sorry for my revision on Gridsum holding Inc.. I just wanna to make edit test. Please help me with the article of Gridsum Holding Inc. I would like to have more suggestions from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny wang 123 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@Sunny wang 123: Feel free to visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you have any questions.--Cahk (talk) 08:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing HR News, Cahk.

Unfortunately PamD has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Appears to be COI!

To reply, leave a comment on PamD's talk page.

Potential customer

I redirected this to consumer per WP:CHEAP and WP:BITE. It's a natural redirect, in my personal opinion, because college and high school students will search us for synonyms. Take it to WP:AfD if you feel that must do so. Bearian (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Cahk,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Quick on the draw

It is my feeling that most people would agree that:

There is nothing absolutely 'wrong' with slapping prods on pages that fit the criteria,

but that the timeline here shows how *extreme* the ambitions to do so can be.

Is only 13 minutes really warranted when the editor is literally typing as fast as they can while looking up information, that they supplied only 6 minutes later? That is, is 20 minutes just too slow for Wikipedia? (Editors with 48 total edits only 19 this year are not likely to know about sandboxes.) Everyone acknowledges that Wikipedia can be 'hostile' to new editors, and this timeline seems to typify that, though very likely to have been unintentionally so.

Is this something you can review with the NPP project? Perhaps they need to qualify a listed new page by how long since it was last edited? (And yes I know how d*mn fast Google is to index things - maybe that is something for the foundation to pick up with Google (wait a bit on new possibly prejudicial pages)) It just bothers me that editors can easily get the impression that WP is hostile, and yet circumstances can easily lend that impression, yes? Shenme (talk) 08:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Shenme: I actually see quite the opposite of you - the PROD tag encourages new editor to source their edits properly for a "full" review. Given the extreme backlog on NPP, the reminder to source either draws the attention of the author to add, or to other NPP to move on to other pages. It is my understanding new pages are no longer indexed by Google, unless they have been patrolled by a new page patroller. --Cahk (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

That would be very very good news if Google has reasonable restrictions on new page indexing. (I hadn't checked lately and was very disheartened in the past to see examples of "FIggle Whort was here!" appearing immediately in Google.)

But as for motivation, can you see where, as in the timeline above, that same motivational note - quite in the midst of actively working on the article - could also appear to be harassment? That was the reason for my mentioning the need for notations on whatever list y'all are working from of how long since last edit. If an editor is _actively_ trying their best to do what we all want, that note instead could sure look like "type faster you sluggard! Why aren't you better prepared! How dare you come to WP without perfect copy! Newbie! Hmmmph!" Shenme (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Shenme: I understand where you come from - to be honest, I used to tag even faster than I do now. There are a few divergent thoughts on this issue that I have read in the past. The question is how to determine what "active" editing means - what if I go "offline" for 15 minutes to do more research, vs. staying on the article edit page but not doing anything ... would the system count the latter as "active" but the former as not?--Cahk (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Came upon another example that bothered me. And blathered on and on about it. Again, I think a little more 'queueing' of concerns is needed. There ought'ta be a nice way to give a new (and slow) user a chance to work the article up to snuff. Do you think that was one of better places to 'blather'? (Sorry to keep bothering you) Shenme (talk) 07:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@Shenme: I unfortunately don't know the answer - I think with the major backlog on new page patrol, it is not really possible to queue (as if there isn't enough of a queue already ...) --Cahk (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion on my amazing page about a local hero (Chandler Norton)?

Who are you to determine the importance of an individual? Chandler Norton is a diamond emerging from the disgusting scummy rough that is Roseburg, Oregon. Go delete real spam like the keyboard warrior you are. Your services are appreciated but please be careful in the future not to abuse your power.

@Lose McFool: You should read Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance, then Wikipedia:Notability (people). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - not everyone on the planet will be article-worthy. --Cahk (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: Read it. He qualifies.

@Lose McFool: Your article subject does not remotely meet the notability test. In any event, an administrator will review my tag and determine whether the article will be kept, or deleted.--Cahk (talk) 09:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Cahk: "An athlete is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." He falls under this because he professionally plays League of Legends and has won significant honor and has received coverage for doing so.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lose_McFool (talk • contribs)

@Lose McFool: What part of "received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" did you not understand? All of it? Apparently being good at a game you like does not mean he's a professional athlete, and just because you like him (oh who am I kidding, you're him) does not make you notable. You should seriously drop it before you convince me that you're not here to build an encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Lose McFool: Did you actually read what you copied and pasted? Sport refers to an actual sport, not a computer game "sport". Further, there is no coverage of the subject whatsoever. Please stop your nonsense.--Cahk (talk) 09:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

eSports are sports. I am not Chandler Norton, I am Lose McFool. This isn't nonsense you arrogant prick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lose McFool (talk • contribs) 09:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Lose McFool: Right ... You clearly did not read what @Ian.thomson: wrote on your talk page.--Cahk (talk) 09:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ian.thomson: Professional athletes are athletes that receive payment for their performance. Chandler receives payment for his performance via ad revenue.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lose McFool (talk • contribs)

@Lose McFool: Ad revenue on a Youtube channel he set up perhaps? It's not just professional athletes that are covered, it's specifically professional athletes that have received notable awards. You also haven't provided a single damn source. Now drop it. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• I've blocked OP. I noticed that he used his IP address on the talk page for the article, and decided to check out the other edits he made while logged out. All vandalism, blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Reply on edits

Hi Cank,

The page for Jill Thayer was submitted by Chris Janus. When it was declined due to insufficient references, I contributed the citations and content edits. Should I have the original author do this?

Thank you, JillJillthayer (talk) 09:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Jillthayer: It's okay to add citations. However, assuming you are the subject of the article, be aware of Wikipedia's autobiography policies.--Cahk (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Cahk. Jill75.141.164.141 (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello Cahk: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 16:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

On Tevin Coleman page

I am sorry I am new thanks for the sandbox experimental page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnybones24 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~

Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!

Hello, Cahk! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia!
Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 12:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Deletion of Junior Roberti

Hello, this is about the deletion of Junior Roberti page.

We have added more reference there and also disagree about the teams not being in major leagues. Junior Roberti managed team in the English National Futsal Super League what is the highest level in the country.

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proberti007 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)