Lose McFool

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 09:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

I noticed that you used your IP address at Talk:Chandler Norton, and upon investigating those IP addresses edits, I saw that all other edits were vandalism. This block applies to you as a person, not just to this account. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lose McFool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wow, right as I'm about to prove you wrong and provide sources you block me? Abuse of power much? Every edit I have made is accurate and productive to this encyclopedia. Lose McFool (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that your edits are still visible on your contributions page and this page's history section, and deletion of messages is seen as acknowledgement of those messages. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• Sending me messages on Facebook is not going to get you unblocked. In fact, it's going to make it highly unlikely that any other admin will unblock you since you admitted to sockpuppetry in those messages. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lose McFool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I never have caused any damage to the encyclopedia, and I never disrupted anything. I wouldn't do either in the future. Present me with any edit my account made, not my public IP address, and I will provide adequate sources for every edit. If this is regarding my IP address edits, I claim collateral damage. Lose McFool (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block is sound as you clearly are not here to edit constructively. In order to prevent further wasting of Admin time reviewing your claims of innocence, I'm revoking talk page access. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lose McFool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17107 was submitted on Dec 13, 2016 00:15:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)