November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Sterling Management. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Scientology Front Account

edit

This is clearly an account used by the Church of Scientology to clean up articles negative to the Church. See this user's edits of Sterling Management and e.RepublicKentuckyJoe4513 (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I have no connection to the Church of Scientology. I am familiar with both Sterling and e.Republic as I have PERSONALLY researched Hubbard Management. The garbage that is posted about both of these companies is ridiculous. You are using Wikipedia to take digs at a religion rather than for its purpose, which is to impart valuable and impartial information. I have edited with reputable sources per the Wikipedia guidelines. Your insinuation here is way off the mark, as are some of your posts. Keeram (talk) 02:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply