User talk:Arctic.gnome/Archive 5

This is an archive of discussions from January to June, 2008. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on my main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary. 1 2 3 4 Archive 5 6 7 8 9 10

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates

Hey - I noticed you're the "director" so to speak of FTC. Just as a note, there are currently 2 candidates with unanimuous support that have both been around for over two weeks. Not sure how often we close them, but yeah... Cheers, — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 01:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool, look forward to it :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 21:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Arctic.gnome, Wikipedia:Featured_topic_candidates#Powderfinger_albums has unanimous support and has been listed for 16 days now. Would you mind having a look and seeing if it's appropriate to promote? Thanks! --rm 'w avu 04:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks heaps! :D Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for that! Much appreciated! --rm 'w avu 05:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Spotlight

Honourable mention in the spotlight in WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 1 - January 2008SriMesh | talk 02:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:CANADA talk page box on your user page

Can I change it to "class=NA" to remove it from the unassessed pile? Thanks again for all your hard work with WP:CANADA! Cheers, CP 19:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Tommy Douglas portrait.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Tommy Douglas portrait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Tommy Douglas portrait.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 00:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tommy Douglas portrait.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Tommy Douglas portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WinHunter ^(talk) 08:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Federal monarchy

I've nominated this for deletion if you're interested.--Gazzster (talk) 00:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Deprecation message

I remember that you had added some language the PPAP template indicating that it should be replaced, but I can't find anywhere listing that. Anyway, if you could add that language to Template:WikiProject Libya, indicating that it can be substituted with {{AfricaProject|Libya=yes}}, I would be very appreciative. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD

Congratulations!!!! List of Prime Ministers of Canada has been selected to be a February WP:LOTD. If you have any particular date preferences please contact me by January 24th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 17:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Québécois

Hello. Awhile back you assessed this article as being of high importance. I was wondering if you might reassess that in light of the fact that it was agreed (months ago, after protracted discussions to which I was a party) that the article would cover only the use of the word Québécois, and not the people themselves. The ethnic/cultural group is instead to be covered at French-speaking Quebecer, an article not likely to add much to the treatment at French Canadian. Joeldl (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Anyone working on the Solar System featured topic

Please come settle the current debate raging over there. Thank you. Serendi^podous 11:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Charlie jokes

Hello Arctic.gnome. If anybody wishes me to remove the Charles joke? I will do so. Not because I'm afraid of libel (I'd love the publicity), but because some editors (likely monarchist) would wish it removed (which I'd understand). GoodDay (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

PS: It almost seemed as though Soulscanner was claiming authorship; strange eh? GoodDay (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Assessment of KHMR

I think this article has reached Start-class status. Can you please raise it if you agree? Thanks. Billscottbob (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Billscottbob (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Harry Nixon.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Harry Nixon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Quebec

Hello Arctic Gnome. I'm not sure if Ramdrake & Soulscanner will ever compromise on the location of the Quebecois motion. GoodDay (talk) 22:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll go along with that. This logjam has got to be broken - no matter what happens to the location of the 'Quebecois motion'. GoodDay (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ramdrake and I have broken the logjam. Please comment on whether it is acceptable to you. If you can, spread the word. We need a strong consensus if this is going to hold. --soulscanner (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ipswich Town F.C. FTC

Hey! Just a quick note to ask what specific criteria you attach to promoting to FT (e.g. time limit) - the Ipswich Town F.C. featured topic candidacy has unanimous support, and has done now for ten days, so I was hoping for a promotion in the near future? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. No rush, I was just curious. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

A question

The new criteria doesn't specify whether it is 20% of articles rounded up or down. The Simpsons FTs have 26 articles, but we've been told that we need two more even though 20% of 26 is 5.2. So I was wondering if you could clarify this for me. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Why should it be rounded up? It seems that you should get a consensus on that first. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 01:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

IT just seems really unfair because the only topics affected by this are us, so why can't you cop us a break? Getting four episode FAs from a narrow group in 6 months will be extremely difficult, can you at least give us until the end of the year? -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 01:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

An FT question

The WWE Cruiserweight Championship is no longer an active championship and it's part of the Active WWE Championships FT. It should be removed from the FT, but what is the proper way to do it? -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 02:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The thing about that is that there are over a dozen others that aren't included because they are no longer active, and if we leave the Cruiserweight title, we'd have to work to include all of the others. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD

Congratulations! List of Canadian federal parliaments was selected as a List of the Day for April. Let me know if you have a strong preference for a date.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Canadian Prime Ministers timeline small

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian Prime Ministers timeline small requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Creating a WP:FT with Lists of billionaires

If I make List of billionaires (2006), List of billionaires (2007), and List of billionaires (2008) into WP:FLs, and either Lists of billionaires or Billionaire into either an WP:FL or an WP:FA, then would I be able to nominate them for a WP:FT? Or would the lists for the years before 2006 be required? The actual lists from Forbes go back a few decades at the least, I believe, but the lists on Wikipedia only start from 2004 to the present. If possible, I would like to focus on 2006–2008. Please let me know. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:FT of Nintendo video game consoles?

If I created a WP:FT for Nintendo video game consoles, would including Color TV Game, Nintendo Entertainment System, Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, Nintendo GameCube, and Wii be sufficient? The lead article would be Nintendo video game consoles as a separate article with a similar list to the one that exists now. Gary King (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Table of contents on WP:FT?

Could we add a table of contents to WP:FT? It'd be easier than scrolling through the page to see if a potential topic already exists. Gary King (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Canadian PM tenure dates

Hello Arctic-gnome. Though I can't produce sources at the momment. I do recall personally recall Mulroney, Campbell, Chretien and Martin all resigning on the same dates (mere 2 or 3 hrs before) their successors were sworn in. GoodDay (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

PS: With the exception of Macdonald in 1891, Thompson and (incumbent) Harper; every Canadian Prime Minister had resigned. GoodDay (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

List of UEFA club championship winning managers FTC

Hello Arctic gnome. Could you please withdraw the nomination (I'd do it myself but I wasn't sure if you recorded it in the fail log, and, if so, exactly how). Despite the consensus being in support of its promotion to FT, I'm not happy about it since the comments of Struway2 were added. Rest assured I'll be back but probably with at least one more FL (if I can!)... Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Black Loyalists

If you read Barry Cahill's piece the term Black Loyalist is inaccurate. David George makes no mention of being a "Black Loyalist" in his account. How then do you call him what he himself never referred to himself as. The only thing I know George referred to himself as was a negro. This is mentioned in his account of his life to brother John Rippon.

It is you who is disruptive

You purposefully ignore the facts and declare what you want to believe. Wikipedia will forever be seen as an unreliable encyclopedia if it has people who refuse to say the facts. I created the article on David George, I created the article on Cato Perkins,Harry Washington and Boston King. Boston King and David George never mentioned loyalty in their accounts or memoirs. Barry Cahill who is a senior archivist at the Nova Scotia archives has also said that none of these enslaved African Americans were Black Loyalists. Are you saying that because historians classify these blacks as loyalists they were loyalists? Or are you going to look at the individual cases and of historical African Americans who sought refuge in the British camp. Some Blacks were loyalists but so were some Native Americans. Create an article on Native American Loyalists because if you do not know there were many who actually supported the British. Do not tell open lies on the internet; the blacks who immigrated to Sierra Leone never called themselves blacks loyalist they called themselves the nova scotians or settlers. If you do not believe these facts then you can continue to put false information on Wikipedia. I will continue to edit and put out the facts. If I am blocked for this then so be it. I am currently planning to discontinue editing wikipedia anyway. It seems correcting false information on this encyclopedia it deemed "disruptive". This is why wikipedia will never be taken seriously or looked at as a respectable encyclopedia. But I suppose I am "disruptive" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiaddict8962 (talk • contribs)

Dear Arctic gnome

There is no denial that Black Loyalist is used in all academic texts. But does this mean the term in itself is correct? This is what Barry Cahill examines. This is the wrong place to argue over the term. Let me say without a doubt the term black loyalist will not be the term used within the next 5 to 10 years. African American refugees or African American fugitives will be. http://atlanticportal.hil.unb.ca/dev/acva/blackloyalists/en/context/articles/cahill.pdf

I am not predicting I am saying fact because I alongside professors I collaborate with are starting the campaign

Also please stop calling the Sierra Leone company blacks "black loyalists" the group who immigrated to sierra leone clearly called themselves the Nova Scotian settlers. Thank you --Wikiaddict6989 (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Seeking consensus around "Black Loyalist"

Thanks for taking up this issue. My Wikipedia strengths lie more in adding info and tweaking articles for readability than in helping other editors to use the system appropriately and invoking sanctions. I'm glad you are taking the steps you have outlined, to encourage Wikiaddict to seek consensus and to report disruption if need be. Let me know if I can help. BrainyBabe (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on the "Black Loyalist" issue.--Editor2020 (talk) 00:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Canadian PM infoboxes

As a consistancy buff? I'm discouraged. If I do the following: A) add/remove 'monarch' from all 22 articles; B) add/remove 'governor general' to the 22 articles or C) do both A & B'? I'll be reverted either way. GoodDay (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

In agreement; hopefully 'others' will take interest in this topic. Thus, we'd be able to break the stalemate. GoodDay (talk) 23:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Viable Featured Topics

Hi, if you have time, could you take a look at User:Gary King#Not_nominated and tell me which Featured Topics are viable and which have gaps? That'd be very helpful so I know if I'm wasting my time on some of them or not. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the suggestions you mentioned, but regarding Microsoft and Apple, the topic would be 'Founding of Microsoft/Apple' and not the whole company itself (which would then encompass all of their products, etc.) I personally understand the founding of a company to be the company's article itself, the History of the company, and the original founders. There isn't any company featured topics yet so there is no precedent set for that yet. Gary King (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm curious to know typically how long a WP:FTC must hang around before it passes? I'm asking because I'm just itching to see Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Star Wars episodes, my first WP:FTC, get passed, and as you can imagine, this particular one is very exciting! :) Gary King (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Silver Maple Leaf Award

Thanks for the award. It's nice to know my contributions are appreciated. Indefatigable (talk) 17:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Edits to some prime miniister page?

I did not make any of these edits...I am on a DSL connection at home and my guess is that the ips assigned by Bell are assigned randomly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.55.83 (talk) 15:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

On this day April 17

I disagree with your claim that all of those items are more notable than the Canadian constitutional patriation. At the same time as it formally made Canada independent from Britain, it gave the Canadian courts supremacy over the parliament, which had never been done before in any of the similar parliamentary democracies. An item like the 335 Year War is quirky and interesting, but the patriation has huge historical implications in the field of parliamentary law. This is probably the third most important event in Canadian history, and out of the 366x5 items in On This Day, Canada is surely entitled to at least three events. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 23:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Regardless, they are all notable and interesting. It's only for an hour or so, anyway. Feel free to post it back for next year, and replace another 20th century item (too many). (If it's earlier in the day, I'd suggest cycling of those events.) But, please note that when we put things on MainPage, we have to keep in mind:

1. Do not break the left-right balance on MainPage.
2. Do not use fairuse pictures.

You did both with this edit. --PFHLai (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, It didn't see the <!-- --> on the 1942 item. MainPage was balanced. --PFHLai (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

We can check before loading new DYK updates at Wikipedia:Main Page alternative (Next DYK) and Wikipedia:Main Page alternative (Tomorrow and Next DYK). There is none for just OTD or ITN yet. --PFHLai (talk) 23:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Featured topic article total

D'oh! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Mullbrow-2 appears to have vandalised the Gartocharn article after the last warning. PatGallacher (talk) 10:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

And I suspect Passisphysics is a sockpuppet. PatGallacher (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

UEFA managers

Hey Arctic, any reason why the current UEFA managers topic isn't being promoted? I guess you may be busy? It's unanimous support after 11 days... All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

FT image

Now that Wikipedia:Featured topics/Seasons of Degrassi: The Next Generation has been promoted, does it need a picture? It seems to be the odd one out right now as all the others have one. Are fair-use images okay to use, as it might be hard to come up with a free image for a TV Show. I'm no artist, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Degrassi is unfrequented so that's a dead end. There is one free image, Image:Degrassiautos.jpg. Would this be okay? -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 00:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

It has to be a free image, so that image of autographs might be our only choice for now. I think the best we could do is find out what school was used for exterior shots and take a photo of it. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

"Featured work" and "Awards" on your user page

For these boxes, you could use {{hidden}}; it duplicates the functionality and keeps it nice and clean in a template :) Gary King (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome

Your welcome and thank you for taking an interest. Just so you know, I know of the templates you're supposed to use, I just can't find them all the time. If you know how to quick access them please tell me how on my talk page. Skeletor 0 (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Help needed

I'm working on my first full-fledged featured topic and I've run into a big bummer. Can you guide me through the process of audit for New York State Route 9L, because this cannot reach GA in my opinion. If it is GA possible, is there a way to give it special privilages along with New York State Route 418 and New York State Route 912Q to avoid demotion? Thanks.^Mitch32^contribs 23:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The exemption for short articles is generally used for articles about things that are too new to have a long article now, but should have one in the future, such as an article about a movie that hasn't been released yet. I suspect that many editors will say that if there isn't enough information on this road to write a GA article, then its content should be merged into something else, such as a catch-all list of minor highways in the county. If you want to try asking for the exemption anyway, there is no formal process, for review before the FT nomination itself, but a peer review from its wikiproject would help.

Hmm, 9L's the biggest target to this. What's your opinion on the article out of sheer curiousity?^Mitch32^contribs 23:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Rock Steady

Thank you so much. I was waiting for it. Thanks so much. I wish Drew could see this. Thanks again. Indianescence (talk) 06:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Antonio Barrette.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Antonio Barrette.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 03:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:FT

Hey Artic.gnome, I got a question on FT. On WP:FT, How come some have the featured topic symbol beside the # of articles (like Christ Illusion) and some don't (like Carnivàle)? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD

List of Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada was selected as a WP:LOTD for one day in June and will be the LOTD during the month. Let me know before May 23rd if you have any date preferences.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

WM can followup

Hey there,

I'm just following up from the last WM Can meeting, we were wondering what the state of the union was with the Bylaws. Are the latest greatest posted on Meta, and are they ready for submission to WMF? Someone thought they might be, but you are the authority right now. Feel free to post back to me, or leave a note on m:talk:Wikimedia Canada. Thanks for your hard work! Historybuff 00:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Featured Topic Passed

Thank you for passing the ACC championship games topic; it's my first! JKBrooks85 (talk) 09:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

ACC championship games

Hi - The bot I run that updates WP:WBFTN expects the page name for the featured topic box added to WP:FT to be the same as the page name for the nomination added to WP:FTC. This wasn't the case for the ACC championship games FT (the page name of the box matched the header in the nomination file, not the page name). I fixed this by moving the nomination page (and updating the transclusion in the log file). Unlike featured articles (and featured lists) these page names aren't generally visible to readers since the pages are transcluded by WP:FT (articles and lists are linked by WP:FA and WP:FL respectively). I don't have any idea how often this might come up again, but in general I think it's probably good for the FT name (the header in the nom file), the name of the nom page (subpage of WP:FTC), and the topic page name (subpage of WP:FT) to all match. As far as you know, is this already supposed to be the case? Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

New categories at WP:FT

Sweet, I like the new categories at WP:FT. I don't know if you remember, but I initially brought this issue to you a few months ago, so it's nice to see that categories are similar to WP:FA now. Gary King (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada on Commons two cents requested

A preliminary Commons WikiProject Canada has been created. Please help adapt, modify and expand it, to coordinate and organize Canadian media on commons. It will provide a common area for media discussion, PD issues and naming on the commons WP talk page. Well, already the Commons WikiProject Canada has a This gallery has been requested for deletion deletion tag and discussion started because a wikiproject is not a gallery. Do you want to edit the intial Wikiproject start up or comment if it is needed on commons or not at the deletion discussion. Oh my goodness! SriMesh | talk 02:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Contribution claim request

Hi there!

I recently decided to create my account on Wikipedia. However, I have made contributions before when I wasn't registered, and I now want to claim those contributions. My account IP address and the IP address that I'm recorded as on the Revision history of List of Soul Reapers in Bleach as are exactly the same- is there a way you can have all of my contributions listed when I click the "My Contributions" page? I have contributed to both the "Senna" section and the "Baishin" section on the page List of Soul Reapers in Bleach. Thanks so much! Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 20:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

A Featured List contest

Greetings. FL directors Scorpion0422 and The Rambling Man have decided to run a contest for FL contributors. We are trying to get some interest in the process and get some FLs for the under-represented topics. If you would like to learn more about this contest, you can find such information here. If you are uninterested in it, then you could still help out by reviewing FLCs submitted by the entrants. Thanks for the time, Scorpion⁰⁴²² 18:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

FT query

I am trying to figure out if I am still too far away to request guidance, but I posted a new query on the FTC talk page that might be up your alley.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Your advice is still awaited.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Undeleted Commons:WikiProject Canada

Well after much controversy, the Commons:WikiProject Canada is back up again to see what can be made of it.SriMesh | talk 01:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

WM Canada

Just wondering if you got the by laws submitted, or if they are still under review. I'd be glad to assist if it's needed, as I have a bit of extra free time coming up. v:User:Historybuff 19:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Fête nationale du Québec article

I've put in a request to change Fête nationale du Québec to Saint Jean Baptiste Day. You may wish to join the discussion at the Talk Page--soulscanner (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)