User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 6

Re: Pitlane start

I'm actually unsure about that myself. I've started a new section at WT:F1 to get more views on this rather than being bold and change it. Your views are welcome at the link. Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for increasing my deleted pages count tagging all of those orphan Talk pages. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Airblue destinations and Pakistan International Airlines destinations vandalism

Please keep a check on these two as they are being vandalised with table format layout, the editor has been warned but hes continuing doing that.inspector 17:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspector123 (talk • contribs)

Hi, Inspector123, yes, i will. But few things, first don't use your IP to edit, you already have account, so use this account just simply to avoid SOCK. And don't hit UNDO four times, simply if that is the latest edit, you can revert to earlier version (see WP:REVERT). Any help, please contact me. --Aleenf1 17:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, will do.inspector 18:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspector123 (talk • contribs)

Talk:MCM/70

Hi. I deleted this page after you tagged it for CSD as a test page, but it looks like the article MCM/70 is a real article, and that the talk page isn't just an odd sub-page of Talk:MCM. It looks like a reasonable request, actually, so I've restored it. The / in the title is screwing things up, I think - but I don't know how to work around that. I'll ping the VPT and see if they know. Just an FYI, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Team descriptions

Thanks a lot for giving CBS the idea of "Southern Belles" for a team relationship, when the teams were first released. It would have been "Best Friends" but your changing it to "Southern Belles" (not a relationship) ruined it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.102.61 (talk) 23:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

flags in airline destinations lists

People are useless adding flags to these lists making them look confusing and messed up please keep a check on this so far I have found Air India, Air India Regional, Nepal Airlines, Indian Airlines, Alitalia, Turkish Airlines, Aero Mexico, Aeromexico Connect, Mexicana and Click Mexicana there may be more.203.81.232.64 (talk) 14:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, so much, i have to do it slowly later on. So, i know, flagicons is prohibited in Airlines Project, so if you wish to correct, please add "remove flags based on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide#Flag icons]]" in edit summary. Good luck. --Aleenf1 09:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Some has re-added flags to Turkish Airlines destinations despite you removing them and adding notice.116.71.44.175 (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm already leave the note to that user, i will continue to observe for that, so don't worry. --Aleenf1 08:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Fars Qeshm Air article name correction

The airlines actual name as per their website is Qeshm Fars Air, please change to the correct name, Thank you.116.71.44.175 (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, you might be wrong too, i found this page[1], which is the best reference, is Fars Air Qeshm, i will move it. --Aleenf1 08:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Rosiana and Resiana

Hello, Aleenf. I'm revising the articles on Indonesian badminton players and I'm wondering if you can help me. Would you know if Rosiana Tendean and Resiana Zelin (whose name is sometimes listed as Rosiana Zelin) are different people? Could they possibly be the same person (a married name)? If you can help me I'd appreciate it. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Good work, Aleenf. Your research tells me that they are definitely two different ladies. It also gives me dates of birth for the article. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Amazing Race Asia 3. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

I'm sorry that I have to do this, but there is such a rule as a 3RR violation, so I have to mete this out on you as well. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Furthermore, I currently can't help you out on the what comprises the tasks on TARA3. I haven't seen the latest episode because the cable service at where I took my vacation doesn't carry AXN. I'm back home now, so I may help you on that later when I see the episode. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

2008 Brazilian Grand Prix

If Massa wins the title, yes. If Hamilton wins, I probably won't want to visit that page for a few hours at least. D.M.N. (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe. :P Only kidding. D.M.N. (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

No.

Aleen, you are not annoying. Part of editing is bad editors thinking you are annoying. You are easly one of TAR's most valuable contributors, and I really don't want to see you go. Sam ^Blab 13:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

You don't realize it, but you are one of the few people who actually watch over and update the TAR and TAR ASIA articles. Who will do it while you are gone? Sam ^Blab 13:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Iraqi Airways destinations

Some oen has uselessly created seprate article and that too in table format, when destinations are already listed in main article in collapsible table style which is more suited since only few places are served.inspector 19:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspector123 (talk • contribs)

Response to "Some comments..."

Please get this right. Some of the comments you read were NOT by me. Look carefully. The comment about Wiki not suitable for you was written by the unregistered guy. Do realize that there were 2 main sub-sections in the discussion page. The one on top was by that guy. I had no participation in that. The one below was mine. I even signed off everytime I posted. So please don't blame me. And I never did say you were childish. Please read carefully. I said THE FIGHTING over this was childish, not you. BUT, you have to admit that some of your faults in this conflict were that:t

1) you refused to give in to another person's opinion who might be right (and honestly, I felt he/she was right as well) and kept on reverting edits rather than start a discussion, and hence causing PAGE-PROTECTION.

2) you kept on saying that people were attacking you when there wasn't any attacking to begin with!

3) you DID try to to play up sympathy and/or threaten to leave helping TAR pages just to get what you want and for people to agree with you.

I'm just trying to clarify the definition of "task" and also try to let you see that sometimes, you should consider what others are thinking as well. Yes, you are more experienced but spare a thought for the rest who also want to contribute. There is no intention to hurt anyone's feelings and the term "childish", I feel is not a strong enough term for an insult, nor was it meant to be as it wasn't even directed at you in the first place.

And FYI, no one is chasing you away. PLEASE stay and help on the TAR articles. The only thing is I hope you can show more compassion when you want to revert NON-VANDALISM edits.

Thanks. DanielTAR (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

FURTHER REPLY. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.

---

FIRST OF ALL GET THIS RIGHT... I DID NOT TYPE THIS:

If you really think something like "everyone think(s) he is not wrong" and giving up everything after meeting an opposite view, then Wikipedia is not really the best place for you as you are refusing to accept the fact that consensus is a foundation that builds up Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a community that are being shared by more than one person.

It will never be you lose, and everyone wins after you have decided to give up putting efforts. Everyone will lose coz I am thinking that your continuous efforts at the part of reverting vandalism and constructive editings must be thanked by a lot of users here. They can observe it without doubts. But the rule is there, we are less easily to remove things here than adding things. If the consensus turns out to be on your side, in my view, the other side shouldn't be considered a "lose" because at least the people involved have put their effort to figure out a consensus and they have tried to be their role in the community.

I DID NOT WRITE THE ABOVE. IT WAS NOT ME. IT WAS ANOTHER PERSON. STOP BLAMING ME FOR THIS.

Let me just quickly address the issues over here:

1) I cannot interfere with your conversations? It's on the TARA3 DISCUSSION page, open to everyone. If you wanna have a personal/private conversation, USE THE PERSON'S TALK PAGE. As far as I'm concerned, your discussion was about TAR. And I have every right to interfere and voice my opinion. AND... the ONLY part I commented was under YOUR SUB-SECTION asking what is the definition of a task. I said what I said and that's it.

2) It is not wrong to have page protection but it is wrong if it's over a personal feud over you and that other guy, that is prohibiting me from editing it CONSTRUCTIVELY. And I asked for the removal of protection because several people, including me, have already FORMALLY defined what an Additional Task was. 3) The discussion only got personal because of the actions you took. Don't deny it but you were the one who first started the "everyone doesn't appreciate me and I'm gonna leave. you go handle all the TAR issues yourself" in the first place. Who the fuck asked you to leave anyway? If you can't accept constructive criticism, then fine, leave. But don't try to make people feel guilty because it's disgusting.

I tried to make it right and explain the situation thoroughly. But either you can't understand what I wrote or you just blatantly want to stir up trouble. I don't have time for this. I have my O Levels right now and can't be bothered to deal with this. Stay to contribute on TAR wiki pages if you want. If you don't want to, then bye.

DanielTAR (talk) 07:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Help wanted for Pakistan International Airlines destinations

Hi Afleen, an editor is repeatedly removing PIA terminated destinations list despite my having added references including old route maps, I dont know why he is only targetting this airline and not others whose lists dont have any references. Inspector123 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, first, i can't help you on this, Here it is mention that future terminated destinations (of course with ref) can be listed, while not mention that terminated destinations should be listed. The editor is already point you to discuss in project, clearly it is consensus. Second, please sign your name with four tildes ~~~~, so you easier me to archiving by bot. Thanks!

TARA Map

Hi. I hope you can direct me as to where to get a blank template used for the Amazing Race World Map. Thanks a lot.LordBelly06 (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Aleenf

Thanks for the compliment and for the work that you do on badminton topics. Best Regards! Badmintonhist (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Aleenf1, thanks for the notice on the BWF's hesitation about separating the runnings of the Thomas and Uber Cups. I've modified the wording in the article on the Thomas Cup. Badmintonhist (talk) 14:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Where you are...

Hi Aleenf1! I'm now living abroad my country and I don't have too much time for the Wikipedia at the moment. I hope I can come back some time. See you!! MontanNito (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

2000 Singapore Open

Greetings Aleenf1. Here's a puzzle for you. The list of winners for the 2000 Singapore Open seems to be about a decade off. Players such as China's Huang Hua and Li Yongbo and Tian Bingyi were no longer playing internationally then. Bambang Suprianto was a doubles specialist by that time. Perhaps you could investigate who actually won in 2000, and what year, if any, the set of players now listed for 2000 actually won. Maybe 1989? Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your effort, anyway. I'm going to go ahead and delete those results and replace them with "results not available." Unless 2000 was a special "old timers" tournament those winners don't make sense. One other question, and you may already know the answer to this one. Are Joko Suprianto and Bambang Suprianto brothers? Same last name. Born in the same city a couple of years apart. If you already know or can find out I'd appreciate it. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for trying anyway, Aleenf1. It's no big deal. I was curious and would have put it in their articles if I knew it as a fact. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I must be a shared IP address

I never made that edit. This IP address must be shared... if i'm blocked i won't be able to log on to my user name... --121.216.206.26 (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Recent removal of link

a spam link to www.anontalk.com was recently removed from your page, you might be inclined to check it out - do not, it is a trojan site that will attempt to hijack your browser. Regards --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it - they only turned it *into* that once they realised that the spam links were being reverted - it's a group that has targeted wikipedia for years. If you just got the normal talk page, it's nothing to worry about. I'm just trying to catch people who might not have tried it before they "switched" the site. --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion for the Old Image

Then I should delete that old image, but how? Please reply to my talk page. Kampfgruppe (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Tagging for Image:Batangas City's Official Flag

It's done and I think it's okay. Thanks for your assistance Aleenf1. Kampfgruppe (talk) 12:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Lee Chong Wei

Hello Aleenf1. I'm currently working on the articles on (mainland) Chinese players, but I'll take a look at Lee Chong Wei's article. However, I may want to change other things about it besides the grammar, so don't feel insulted if I try to change some things that you don't want changed. I find that too many of the articles on current players contain personal and "trivial" kinds of information, as if an encyclopedia article is no different from a blog or an on-line forum. Also, sometimes there is too much information, while at other times there isn't enough. I think the articles should concisely summarize the highlights of a player's career and (if it can be done accurately) briefly describe his [her] playing styles and strengths, and that's about all. Badmintonhist (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Christmas Greetings, Aleenf1! For what it is worth, I would give you the following advice: Because players play hundreds of matches and (if they they are among the very best for a substantial period of time) dozens of finals, I wouldn't get into the habit of including the scores of their matches. If the score has an unusual story behind it (such as the match between Lee Chong Wei and Lin Dan at the 2006 Malaysia Open) that's different. I think that the biography articles should summarize a player's career, rather than give a running account of each tournament that he or she plays in. Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Hockey clubs

I saw few articles about hockey clubs in Malaysia were created (Maybank HC). This article are unsourced and have all false information. can you have a look and consider the deletion propose by an IP user. Real Madrid 09:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Nakambala Leopards F.C.

I actually move the article to article space, where it belongs. In fact, as a member of Zambian Premier League, I think it's notable enough to stay as an article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm do my job only, it is depend to the judgment. Sorry. --Aleenf1 10:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

No problems. Just something interesting to note. I agree it was a little odd until I look more into it. I doubt you're that aware of new Zambian soccer teams. =) -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

IP always use talk page to create article, i'm tagged CSD to gain admin sight. I hope you understand. --Aleenf1 10:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Perfectly. Keep up the good work. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! --Aleenf1 10:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned talk pages

Just out of curiosity, how do you find them? —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 06:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging all of those. I think this is the second or perhaps third time I have deleted a large group of pages you have tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

When I think about it, you really deserve a barnstar for the job you have done...

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		For your all of your work tagging orphaned talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I will keep my good work! :) --Aleenf1 07:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice work. But please remember that not all those pages are deletable. Talk:Turn Your Lights Down Low for example was a valid article created by an IP and could just be moved to Turn Your Lights Down Low instead. Regards SoWhy 14:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! All i do just tagged, the judgment is handover to administrator. --Aleenf1 14:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

casinomeister

hi, i see you flagged the discussion i started on the casinomeister page to be deleted? just thought it defeats the object if the page is deleted before anyone has the chance to reply to me. 90.215.234.18 (talk) 17:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Kov 93

hello, please make a map with, Country representation in 2009 Giro d'Italia. please. like for examples, File:2008 Tour de France representation.png. sorry, my English not better, but I learn the language. Kov 93 (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done As you wish, feel free to contact if have any mistake. --Aleenf1 13:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Kov 93

Thank you, you are the best. hello Köszi, te vagy a legjobb. (in hungarian language) 14:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

deleting talk pages

Hi, thanks for spotting all these dubious pages. In many cases G8 does not apply as they are not a talk page, but an article in talk space put in by an anonymous user. If you see something that could make an article, could you move it to the correct name? Also for the attack pages or test ones there are other codes to use for these! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi Aleenf1, thanks for all your tagging work. It's always a judgment call, but I'd say in maybe 1 out of 10 orphaned talk pages you tag, there is content on the page that needs to be transferred to the article creator's talk page before the article should be tagged for deletion. (Watchlisting) - Dank (push to talk) 13:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Badminton Super Series

Hi Aleenf1, thanks for leading the Wikiproject Badminton. The Super Series came to Singapore where I live, so I got a bit caught up editing and looking at all the Super Series pages. I found these pages informative. but as always, there is room for improvement. I'm actually looking at the Tennis pages for inspiration, mainly the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 page as a guide to the BWF Super Series page, and the various Grand Slam tennis pages as guide to the various tournament page of the Super Series. And I have a few suggestion:

1. Include the results of all the tournaments, showing just the winners, from 2007. This serves two purposes. One is to allow readers to find the winners info more easily. Also currently the page does not have any link to the various editions, so the inclusion could also serve as a link.
2. Create a infobox for the Super Series with all the years of the Series in it
3. For tournaments, list the winners and runners-up, as well as score of the final, for ease of reading.

I'm also trying to test and see how my suggestions will look, without affecting the current pages. Any idea how can I go about doing it? Thanks for your attentions, and do help me to see whether there are any suggestions from the others in the Wikiproject group. I believe that with collective effort, we can makes things better. And do contact me to feedback me on my suggestions. Many Thanks. Frankie goh (talk) 05:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Aleenf1, thanks for your reply. I think we can replace the Super Series Ranking section with the results, like you did for the Grand Prix and Grand Prix Gold event. I will do some testing now, and will keep the group inform if I think I have any good ideas. Thank you!Frankie goh (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Help control an editor

Can you please help control an editor whos harassing some other people at this site, can you send a private message, I will give you details through that.inspector 19:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspector123 (talk • contribs)

Field Hockey updates

Hi Aleenf1, Thanks for your message. I am also busy at the moment so will do as much as I can to keep the hockey pages up to date. Best regards, Goldfinger820 (talk) 17:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Badminton Oceania logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Badminton Oceania logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Re. Comments on 'my' talk page

Thanks for your observations. The changes to which you refer were made by the previous user of this IP address, which is assigned dynamically by our ISP. Clearly they were mindless vandals & your comments were very forgiving regarding their actions - I would not have given them such grace ;) Anyhow, I can assure you no such activities shall be undertaken whilst this IP is under my care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.101.148 (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

File:2006 Valencia Motogp.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2006 Valencia Motogp.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

File:ThomasCup.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ThomasCup.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 14:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The Amazing Race Asia host.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Amazing Race Asia host.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:The Amazing Race Asia host.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Amazing Race Asia host.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Infobox Hockey

I got your user from infobox hockey. Didn't know who else to ask this question. I wanted to suggest that shouldn't there be a page for World Cup hockey team squads just like there is for Olympic hockey men's team sqauds? If yes then template needs to have a link. I'd appreciate your comment in this regard. —  Hamza  ^{[ talk ]} 04:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Wb

Hello. You have a new message at Armbrust's talk page. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Why am I blocked from editing?

Hi Afleen, how are you? I dont know why I have been blocked, can you please find out, I cant edit unsigned or signed in, all I have been doing is updating airline destinations lists to new format as in Dragonair destinations, maybe some editors dont like that, by the way some one is vandalising Air India destinations article, please check it, thanks.inspector (talk) 15:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Good to hear from you Afleen, I seem to be having problem with my account, when I log in and go to edit any article the top right corner shows I am not logged in, but when I go to talk page like right now or view history etc. it is showing me I am logged in, whats happening?inspector (talk) 21:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

offensive note at PIA disimbiguation section

Afleen some unregistered editor has left an offensive note at PIA main page, related to my udoing his irrelevant additions, please consider appropriate action, thanks.inspector (talk) 04:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Go

Hi Aleen, I really enjoyed our Go (game)s today. Sorry, but I had to go (no pun intended!).

You played very well, and were picking up the rules excellently, I thought.

Hopefully we can play again soon. In the meantime, some links for you!

Click on: Go Clubs & Players in Malaysia - note that Go is called wei-qi or wei-chi in China, and I think maybe Malaysia too. (It's called Baduk in Korea, and Igo in Japan, but Go throughout America & Europe).

Every Go club I have ever attended - throughout the world - has always been _delighted_ to meet new players & introduce them to the game, & help them improve - a very friendly crowd always.

Click on: Rules_of_Go

"Though 19 × 19 boards are standard, go can be played on another size board. Particularly common sizes for quick games are 9 × 9 and 13 × 13.

Beginners might prefer to play on a 9 × 9 board to start. The nature of the game remains similar enough to make this worthwhile, yet the games are shorter. For beginners, playing longer games is less important than playing a greater number of games."

Click on: Rules_of_Go#Komi

That should keep you busy until we can play again. Tomorrow, same time (approx.)? Oh - and there are better internet Go servers for Go than Yahoo, where lots of players are on-line, wanting games.

I'll try to catch you in en-help as usual. All the best, take care, T9. --Trafford09 (talk) 14:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

IRC? --Trafford09 (talk) 13:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Easy Go-playing game called Igowin

Just had a thought. If you were bored & had 5 mins, you could download an easy-to-play-against Go game called 'Igowin'.

I know lots of people who've downloaded it - from here.

It's recommended by a very trusted website

• http://www.britgo.org/gopcres/gopcres1.html#igowin

It says "It is free copyrighted software. You may give it away or sell it."

It only plays you on a 9x9 board, but it's very good, and gives you what it thinks is the fairest number of handicap stones.

At first, it assumes your grade is 25-kyu (a beginner), so it gives you 5 stones.

Then, as it sees you improve (when you beat it, which you will on your first game - trust me!),

it gives you a new rank (say 24-kyu), & reduces the number of handicap stones it gives you.

I wonder what rank you can get it to give you!

Have a go if you've got 5 minutes - it's free & fun. You'll enjoy it. Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

IRC? Trafford09 (talk) 09:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)