Adishesha
Welcome edit
|
Proposed deletion of Annai Velankanni edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Annai Velankanni, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds 21:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Thirumal Perumai.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Thirumal Perumai.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Saraswathi Sabatham edit
I have nominated Saraswathi Sabatham, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saraswathi Sabatham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VG ☎ 09:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC) VG ☎ 09:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Thirumal Perumai edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thirumal Perumai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Waterden (talk) 15:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of K.R.Vijaya edit
A tag has been placed on K.R.Vijaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 18:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ashokasundari edit
A tag has been placed on Ashokasundari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ashokasundari edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ashokasundari, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
December 2008 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Karpagam, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Geoff T C 17:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Karpagam constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord2 17:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Gary Damer edit
A tag has been placed on Gary Damer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Elfriede Geiringer edit
A tag has been placed on Elfriede Geiringer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Yossiea (talk) 18:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles. Thanks... ttonyb1 (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Swami Murugesu edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Swami Murugesu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Swami Murugesu seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Swami Murugesu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Swami Murugesu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 19:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Swami Murugesu constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 19:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Ben Kerfoot edit
A tag has been placed on Ben Kerfoot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Future Planning edit
A tag has been placed on Future Planning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 19:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ann Beach edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ann Beach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Actress who appears to have a number of small roles, but little of importance. Gsearch and gnews search not coming up with independent, reliable sources that show notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Ann Beach edit
I have nominated Ann Beach, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Beach. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009 edit
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Swami Murugesu. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- Mentifisto 16:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Swami Murugesu. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 19:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jemma McKenzie-Brown, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of James Cartwright (actor) edit
A tag has been placed on James Cartwright (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Spacevezon (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Kristal Lau edit
A tag has been placed on Kristal Lau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Spacevezon (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Spacevezon (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to The Story of Tracy Beaker (TV series). Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Imogen Brown edit
A tag has been placed on Imogen Brown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Sid Beadle edit
A tag has been placed on Sid Beadle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jay Haher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Marilyn Le Conte edit
A tag has been placed on Marilyn Le Conte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Chloe Hibbert-Waters edit
A tag has been placed on Chloe Hibbert-Waters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Stop~! edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. The Rolling Camel (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
New articles edit
Hi. I noted you've created some new articles, which is great. There are some basic things I wanted to let you know about to help in doing that. There is a list of various person related infoboxes at Category:People infobox templates that should prove helpful. The image "replace this image" is no longer used. For filmographies, there is a currently approved format at WP:ACTOR#Filmography. Please note that filmographies should start with the earliest appearances and end with the latest. Note at Kristian Kiehling how multiple appearances in one year are formatted (using rowspan="3" or whatever), while "rowspan=1" is never used. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Editing Etiquette edit
Hello, Please can i ask that in the interest of courtesy and for ease of understanding when making edits like you have done to Fantasy Ride can you provide an WP:edit summary. this helps other editors identify what changes have been made to articles. I know myself that sometimes i forget to do so, but it does make things easier for other users if you can provide a brief summary of the additions/deletions or changes you have made to an article. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC))
Unsourced edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Rachel Petladwala. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Blocked extended edit
- Adishesha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 86.11.108.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mizmif". The reason given for Mizmif's block is: "Vandalism: persistent abuse, adding incorrect information to articles".
- Blocking administrator: Rodhullandemu (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of two weeks for violating the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy which prohibits the misuse of multiple accounts. Should you be caught abusing the community trust of the Wikipedia in such a manner again you may find yourself permanently banned from this website. -- Netsnipe ► 13:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ain't No Party: The Ultimate Collection of S Club 7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Trevor Marron (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dangerous (Cascada song) edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dangerous (Cascada song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No source that this will be the next single and even if it will, there is not anything else to write about it for the time being. Consider recreating when it is closer to its release date and notable.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Dreams We Have As Children, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Dreams We Have As Children (Live for Teenage Cancer Trust). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Boys and Girls (Pixie Lott song), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lyricsreg.com/lyrics/pixie+lott/Boys+and+Girls. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Ain't No Party: The Ultimate Collection of S Club 7 edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ain't No Party: The Ultimate Collection of S Club 7, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ain't No Party: The Ultimate Collection of S Club 7. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. »—Mikay—talk—contribs→ 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Superwoman (Shontelle song) edit
The article Superwoman (Shontelle song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- completely unsourced and unconfirmed
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mister sparky (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Singles Collection (Britney Spears album) edit
A tag has been placed on The Singles Collection (Britney Spears album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Europe22 (talk) 19:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated The Singles Collection (Britney Spears album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Singles Collection (Britney Spears album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wolfer68 (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Genie Us! edit
The article Genie Us! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BOOK, cannot find any 3rd party references that talk about this work or that establish its notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RP459 (talk) 17:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sundown (S Club 8 album). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Jumping Into Rivers edit
I have nominated Jumping Into Rivers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumping Into Rivers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Roots edit
A tag has been placed on Alex Roots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Adishesha. I hope you will continue to work on the article. I have added some sources on the talk page that might be of help to you. Best wishes, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alex Roots edit
The article Alex Roots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability. No article, actually.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Dangerous (Cascada song) edit
I have nominated Dangerous (Cascada song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous (Cascada song) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Victão Lopes I hear you... 15:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Don't Stop Looking edit
The article Don't Stop Looking has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Totally unsourced article on a future non-notable debut single.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes I hear you... 20:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Usage of "under construction" and "inuse" templates edit
Please, consider not using the templates {{under construction}} and {{inuse}} inappropriately. You should only place the first one when you know you will still be improving the article in the next few days, and the second one should only be placed when the article is being significantly edited within those exact minutes. If you place them but don't make edits, editors who could make valuable edits to the page may feel disencouraged, and articles that are candidates for deletion may have their deletion delayed with no necessity. Thank you, Victão Lopes I hear you... 20:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Removing CSD tags edit
Do not remove CSD tags from articles that you have created. Doing so repeatedly is considered vandalism, and will result in you being blocked. If you have any reason to believe that the discussions at WP:Articles for deletion/JLS (album) and WP:Articles for deletion/JLS (Album) do not apply, use the {{hangon}} tag on the article page, and explain why on the talk page.—Kww(talk) 20:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Untitled Fourth Album (Avril Lavigne album) edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, Untitled Fourth Album (Avril Lavigne album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Fourth Album (Avril Lavigne album). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wolfer68 (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Pop Princesses 2 edit
I have nominated Pop Princesses 2, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Princesses 2. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Just letting you know that Pop Princesses 3 has also been bundled into this deletion discussion. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of TBA (Jade Ewen album) edit
I have nominated TBA (Jade Ewen album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBA (Jade Ewen album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hi. You would save yourself a lot of trouble creating articles that quickly get deleted if you would read WP:MUSIC, particularly the section "Albums, singles and songs", where it says:
Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources. Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release. For example, a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article, and even then only if there is some verifiable information about it. (See also TenPoundHammer's Law.)
- Articles like Untitled Fourth Album (Avril Lavigne album) and TBA (Jade Ewen album) are always going to get deleted, because Wikipedia is not a fan-rumour site but an encyclopedia that deals in verifiable facts. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009 edit
Articles for deletion nomination of TBA (Third M.I.A album) edit
I have nominated TBA (Third M.I.A album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBA (Third M.I.A album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JohnCD (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of TBA (Shontelle album) edit
The article TBA (Shontelle album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- par WP:CRYSTAL
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 11:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of TBA (Shontelle album) edit
I have nominated TBA (Shontelle album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBA (Shontelle album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
The article Bubbel G has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- While they have a notable manager, this newly-formed and newly-signed act falls well short of the WP:MUSIC notability bar.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 01:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Singles edit
Your edits to the singles of S Club 7 have been undone. There is a difference between a single being included on a Greatest Hits album and being released as a single from a Greatest Hits album. None of those singles were released as singles from their Greatest Hits album. Please do not add that album back to the single template or on any other artist's page. Thank You. ---Shadow (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Broken Heels edit
Hi User, You seem to have a problem with understanding wikipedia rules. According to WP:NSONGS a song is not considered notable unless it has recieved extensive indepent coverage and or has charted/recieved awards. Additionally because the release date is unspecified according to WP:Crystal the page is in breach of the rules. Finally there is nowhere near enough detail to warrant a full page for the song. I recommend you revert your won edits and redirect the page. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC))
Undoing of re-vert edit
Have you bothered to read WP:NSONGS and WP:Crystal. The general concenus is that once a song has a single cover, and or is available to purchase. It should NOT have its own independent article. The only exception to this rule is if the song has charted once announced as a single. This has not and you have failed to respond to my earlier message. This could warrant WP:disruptive editing for which you can be banned from editing. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC))
Edit Summaries edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
Speedy deletion nomination of PopLife Records edit
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on PopLife Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wolfer68 (talk) 03:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fiona Dunbar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/d/fiona-dunbar. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of S Club 3 Tour, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: S Club 3 Tour 2008-2009. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010 edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give S Club 3 Tour 2008-2009 a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Saffron Coomber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Subject does not meet notability guidelines for entertainers; see WP:ENT. Please take a look and add more if Coomber meets these guidelines.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ErikHaugen (talk) 01:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've nominated it to be deleted; see here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron Coomber Please join the discussion if you think some good sources can be added, etc, or if you think I'm way off here. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk) 15:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Trinity Stone edit
I have nominated Trinity Stone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Stone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jclemens (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Je Suis Une Dolly edit
I have nominated Je Suis Une Dolly, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Je Suis Une Dolly. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
The article TBA (Diana Vickers album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced album with name not known yet per WP:CRYSTAL. Main article Diana Vickers only mentions this using her Twitter as a reference.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 16:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Daniel Evans (singer) edit
Hello, just to let you know this article has been nominated for deletion using WP:PROD. I wouldn't normally nominate an article for deletion when it is so new, even by the longer process of WP:PROD but as I am familiar with the singer in question, I know he clearly doesn't meet the guidelines. The best option would be the redirect there previously, which could perhaps be expanded if you felt it needed more info, and this could be turned into a proper article when/if he meets the notability guidelines. Please remove the prod and give your reasons on the article's Talk page if you've looked at the guidelines and have spotted a way in which he meets them. Best wishes, Boleyn2 (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
February 2010 edit
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Dannii Minogue worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rose Gupta edit
A tag has been placed on Rose Gupta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadManCF (talk) 22:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Once (Diana Vickers song) edit
I have nominated Once (Diana Vickers song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Once (Diana Vickers song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GregJackP (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pyromania (song) edit
A tag has been placed on Pyromania (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hairhorn (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Little Darlings (novel) edit
I have nominated Little Darlings (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Darlings (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frank | talk 16:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Missing You edit
The page was redirected as there is NOT enough information to create a detailed article. Please do not recreate until the song charts or until there is sufficient detail as explained at WP:NSONGS --Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs edit
Hello Adishesha! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 3 of the articles that you created are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Simone James - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Darragh Mortell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jonathan Bailey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
August 2010 edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Tiffany Dean a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Frickative 22:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
September 2010 edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Courcelles 04:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- This is twice now. Do not do this again. Courcelles 04:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Nicola Morgan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 15:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Article creations edit
Hi, forgive me for pointing this out, but you appear to have a long history of deleted creations. This is quite unusual at Wikipedia, and if there is anything I can do to explain our policies, and what you should do to avoid your new articles being proposed for deletion, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page.--Kudpung (talk) 11:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article The X Factor (UK series 7), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors 16:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Helium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Sweat (Until the Morning) for deletion edit
A discussion has begun about whether the article Sweat (Until the Morning), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweat (Until the Morning) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Treyc Cohen edit
Please can you stop recreating the article on Treyc Cohen and instead expand the existing list entry about her. She is not notable outside of The X Factor. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors 19:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Asking you again not to recreate article, thank you. She is not notable outside of The X Factor. AnemoneProjectors 22:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked nicely, now please stop or I'll start treating your edits as vandalism and you could end up being blocked. AnemoneProjectors 12:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Simone James has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced BLP. No indication on Google News/Books of substantive (let alone significant) coverage.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 09:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Pollyanna (2003 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article does not establish notability and is nothing more than a plot summary.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan Vesey (talk) 22:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
August 2011 edit
Your addition to Sugartown has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Maccy69 (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Theo Stevenson edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Theo Stevenson. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Incubator/Theo_Stevenson
A deleation discussion recenlty incubated this article and someone has created it again.]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Incubator/Theo_Stevenson
A deleation discussion recenlty incubated this article and someone has created it again.]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Incubator/Theo_Stevenson
A deleation discussion recenlty incubated this article and someone has created it again.|the article's talk page]].
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ruth-2013 (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 4 O'Clock Club, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Sadie J. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Emily Glenister has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28 edit
Hi. When you recently edited Turn Me On (Turn Me Out), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Around the World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19 edit
Hi. When you recently edited Bad Education (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Horne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for And the Mountains Echoed edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, And the Mountains Echoed , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Church of Obesity edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Church of Obesity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
David Witts edit
Hi, if you have an issue with a redirect that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, please take it to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion rather than blank the page as you did with David Witts. Thanks! -- KTC (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 3 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rae Earl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
August 2013 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asin may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | 2005 || ''[[Ghajini (2005 film)]]|Ghajini]]'' || Kalpana || Tamil || Filmfare Award for Best Actress - Tamil
- | 2008 || ''[[Ghajini (2008 film)]]|Ghajini]]'' || Kalpana Shetty || [[Hindi]] || [[Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut]]<br/>Nominated-
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abhay Deol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Producer and Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chandan Roy Sanyal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013 edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Amy Jackson does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! -- L o g X 20:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Nargis Fakhri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Abraham, Thriller and Imtiaz Ali
- Dhanush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Producer
- Jiah Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Model
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jiah Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank You! edit
Thanks so much for the barnstar, mate! :) AB01 (talk) 03:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Minor barnstar |
| For all those small, but important contributions that you make to articles...keep it up! :) AB01 (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 1 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tena Desae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sara Banerji edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sara Banerji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Priya Anand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 19 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saurabh Shukla, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Moksha (film) and Nayak (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sabrina Mahfouz edit
Hello Adishesha,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sabrina Mahfouz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divya Dutta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Model and Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divya Dutta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fatima Sana Shaikh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dangal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Adishesha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Emily Glenister for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Glenister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Glenister until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi (Talk to me! ) 20:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Adishesha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Dead Gorgeous for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dead Gorgeous is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Gorgeous until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Adishesha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Adishesha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Teardrops on My Guitar (2nd UK Single Only) listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teardrops on My Guitar (2nd UK Single Only). Since you had some involvement with the Teardrops on My Guitar (2nd UK Single Only) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of No Easy Way edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on No Easy Way requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Launchballer 15:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of PopLife Records for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PopLife Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Simone James for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone James until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Fred Zepelin (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)