Article accuracy edit

I have changed the kanji to reflect actuall Japanese language usage found on google and deleted the unneeded "ruby" text. The last term, I should note, was completely wrong. (Possible, yes, but unused, and therefore, wrong.) I have also taken out the "wikitionary" links, for the moment. It made editing it all confusing, and I'm not really sure how "standard" that is anyway. Someone who knows better than I do, please put it back if needed. To me, it seems sort of unneccesary for the average user, anyone interested in finding out the Japanese terms should be able to find it themselves easily enough.

I personally question some of the info here, but I really can't say because I know so little on the topic. Liashi 11:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

doubt about credibility of this article from the point of view of Japanese edit

Hello, I’m Japanese wikipedian. Recently this article was translated to Japanese, and I (and a few Japanese wikipedians) had doubt about the subject of this article. We don't know Odori-ebi, and there are NO Japanese sources refer to "踊り海老(odori-ebi)". Other English site we searched says that Odori-ebi is a raw shrimp sushi, not using sake, it dosen't match this article. Therefore, I wonder this source (and this article) is accurate or not. Please tell us credibility of the source about Odori-ebi. I apologies my poor English. Capsellanaut (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply